Lung DiseasesNCT03960736
Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block or Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Following Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery
A study testing ESP block (Group A) and TEA group (Group B) in people with Lung Diseases, run by Medipol University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has recently been evaluated as the standard surgical procedure for lung surgery. Although VATS is less painful than thoracotomy, patients may feel severe pain during the first hours at postoperative period. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Diseases
- What is being tested?
- ESP block (Group A) and TEA group (Group B)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2019to 25 Jan 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
- Scheduled for lVATS under general anesthesia
Who cannot join
- Bleeding diathesis
- Receiving anticoagulant treatment
- Known local anesthetics and opioid allergy
- Infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Patients who do not accept the procedure
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
Istanbul, Bagcilar, 34070
About this study
Official title: COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK AND THORACIC EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR POSTOPERATİVE ANALGESIA MANAGEMENT FOLLOWING VIDEO ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY
Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has recently been evaluated as the standard surgical procedure for lung surgery. Although VATS is less painful than thoracotomy, patients may feel severe pain during the first hours at postoperative period. Analgesia management is very important for these patients in postoperative period since insufficient analgesia can cause pulmonary complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia and increased oxygen consumption. The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane (ESP) block is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. ESP block provides thoracic analgesia at T5 level and abdominal analgesia at T7-9 level. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle (12). Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. In the literature, there is not still any randomized study evaluating ESP block efficiency for postoperative analgesia management after VATS. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided continuous ESP block and TEA for postoperative analgesia management after VATS.
Read the detailed description
Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has recently been evaluated as the standard surgical procedure for lung surgery. The advantages of VATS procedures compared with open thoracotomy are rapid recovery, short hospital stay and low complication risk. Although VATS is less painful than thoracotomy, patients may feel severe pain during the first hours at postoperative period. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) which is the gold standard analgesic technique after thoracotomy, is generally used for analgesia management after VATS. However, since the surgical technique and trauma between open surgery and VATS are different, the question of what should be the gold standard for analgesia management after VATS is a topic of discussion. Especially due to the difficult administration and adverse effect profile of TEA, the opinion of minimally invasive surgical procedures, requiring less invasive analgesic techniques is supported. Analgesia management is very important for these patients in postoperative period since insufficient analgesia can cause pulmonary complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia and increased oxygen consumption.
The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane (ESP) block is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. ESP block provides thoracic analgesia at T5 level and abdominal analgesia at T7-9 level. The ESP block contains a local anesthetic injection into the deep fascia of erector spinae. This area is away from the pleural and neurological structures and thus minimizes the risk of complications due to injury. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle. Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. Cadaveric studies have shown that the injection spreads to the ventral and dorsal roots of the spinal nerves and creates sensory blockade in both posterior and anterolateral thorax. In the literature, it has been reported that ESP block provides effective analgesia after open heart surgery, breast surgery and ventral hernia repair in randomized controlled studies about ESP block efficiency for postoperative analgesia management. In some case series and case reports it has been reported that ESP block provides effective analgesia after thoracotomy and VATS. Furthermore, it has been reported that it provides effective analgesia in chronic and persistant pain syndromes of thorax.
The aim of this study is to compare US-guided continuous ESP block and TEA for postoperative analgesia management after VATS. The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting), complications due to blocks (pneumothorax, hematoma), and the time period and number of attempt for blocks.
- Conditions
- Lung Diseases
- Being tested
- ESP block (Group A), TEA group (Group B)
- Keywords
- Video assisted thoracic surgery, Postoperative pain management, Erector spina plane block, Thoracic epidural analgesia
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ESP block (Group A)Other
US probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the T5 transvers process. From superior to inferior, three muscles will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process; trapezius (upper), rhomboideus major (middle), erector spinae (lower). The block needle will be inserted cranio caudal direction and then for correction of the needle 5 ml saline will be injected deep into the erector spina muscle fascia. Following confirmation of the correct position 20G catheter will be inserted 5 cm in caudal direction. 20 ml %0.25 bupivacaine will be administered for block.
TEA group (Group B)Other
Local infiltration with 2% of lidocaine under the skin, in T4/T5 intervertebral space will be administered. An 18 G Tuohy needle will be inserted at T4/T5 intervertebral space to identify epidural space using the loss of resistance technique. 20G catheter will be inserted 3-4 cm in caudal direction in the epidural space. Bolus dose of 0.125% bupivacaine 10 ml will be administered through the catheter after the negative aspiration for blood or cerebrospinal fluid
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group ESPB = Erector spinae plane block group | Active comparator | ESP block (Group ESP) will be performed in the preoperative block room.A continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at the rate of 4 ml/h infusion dose, 6 ml bolus dose and 30 min lockout time will be performed till 48 h postoperative period. Receives: Other: ESP block (Group A) |
| Group TEA = Thoracic epidural analgesia group | Active comparator | TEA will be performed in the preoperative block room.A continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at the rate of 4 ml/h infusion dose, 6 ml bolus dose and 30 min lockout time will be performed till 48 h postoperative period. Receives: Other: TEA group (Group B) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative pain scores
Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the VAS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt). The VAS scores at rest and during cough will be recorded at postoperative 0, 2, 4, 8, 16,and 24 hours.
Measured: Postoperative 24 hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
Rescue analgesia need
Postoperative rescue analgesia need will be evaluated at postoperative 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours.
Measured: Postoperative 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 May 2019
- Study start1 Jul 2019
- Primary completion20 Jan 2021
- Study completion25 Jan 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medipol UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Sixty patients aged 18-65 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II and scheduled for VATS under general anesthesia will be included in the study. Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis, receiving anticoagulant treatment, known local anesthetics and opioid allergy, infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture, pregnancy or lactation, and patients who do not accept the procedure will be excluded from the study. Randomization will be achieved using a randomizing computer program. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups (Group A = ESP group, Group B = TEA group) including 25 patients each, before entering the operating room.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medipol University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Bahadir Ciftci, Medipol University
- Investigators
- Bahadir Ciftci, Asist.Prof, Principal investigator, Medipol University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03960736
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Medipol Mega Hospital Complex
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 21 May 2019
- Last updated
- 1 Feb 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared
Publications
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PubMed 27501016Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Rescue Analgesia in Thoracotomy After Epidural Failure: A Case Report. A A Case Rep. 2017 May 15;8(10):254-256. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000478.
PubMed 28252539Nagaraja PS, Ragavendran S, Singh NG, Asai O, Bhavya G, Manjunath N, Rajesh K. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia with bilateral erector spinae plane block for perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018 Jul-Sep;21(3):323-327. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_16_18.
PubMed 30052229Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH, Kilic CT. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Nov;50:65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
PubMed 29980005
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Feb 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- COMPARISON OF CONTINUOUS ERECTOR SPINAE PLANE BLOCK AND THORACIC EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR POSTOPERATİVE ANALGESIA MANAGEMENT FOLLOWING VIDEO ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03960736
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Medipol Mega Hospital Complex
- Conditions
- Lung Diseases
- Keywords
- Video assisted thoracic surgery, Postoperative pain management, Erector spina plane block, Thoracic epidural analgesia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medipol UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Jan 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has recently been evaluated as the standard surgical procedure for lung surgery. Although VATS is less painful than thoracotomy, patients may feel severe pain during the first hours at postoperative period. Analgesia management is very important for these patients in postoperative period since insufficient analgesia can cause pulmonary complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia and increased oxygen consumption. The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane (ESP) block is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. ESP block provides thoracic analgesia at T5 level and abdominal analgesia at T7-9 level. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle (12). Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. In the literature, there is not still any randomized study evaluating ESP block efficiency for postoperative analgesia management after VATS. The aim of this study is to compare US-guided continuous ESP block and TEA for postoperative analgesia management after VATS.
Detailed description
Video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has recently been evaluated as the standard surgical procedure for lung surgery. The advantages of VATS procedures compared with open thoracotomy are rapid recovery, short hospital stay and low complication risk. Although VATS is less painful than thoracotomy, patients may feel severe pain during the first hours at postoperative period. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) which is the gold standard analgesic technique after thoracotomy, is generally used for analgesia management after VATS. However, since the surgical technique and trauma between open surgery and VATS are different, the question of what should be the gold standard for analgesia management after VATS is a topic of discussion. Especially due to the difficult administration and adverse effect profile of TEA, the opinion of minimally invasive surgical procedures, requiring less invasive analgesic techniques is supported. Analgesia management is very important for these patients in postoperative period since insufficient analgesia can cause pulmonary complications such as atelectasis, pneumonia and increased oxygen consumption.
The ultrasound (US) guided erector spina plane (ESP) block is a novel interfacial plan block defined by Forero et al. at 2016. ESP block provides thoracic analgesia at T5 level and abdominal analgesia at T7-9 level. The ESP block contains a local anesthetic injection into the deep fascia of erector spinae. This area is away from the pleural and neurological structures and thus minimizes the risk of complications due to injury. Visualization of sonoanatomy with US is easy, and the spread of local anesthesic agents can be easily seen under the erector spinae muscle. Thus, analgesia occurs in several dermatomes with cephalad-caudad way. Cadaveric studies have shown that the injection spreads to the ventral and dorsal roots of the spinal nerves and creates sensory blockade in both posterior and anterolateral thorax. In the literature, it has been reported that ESP block provides effective analgesia after open heart surgery, breast surgery and ventral hernia repair in randomized controlled studies about ESP block efficiency for postoperative analgesia management. In some case series and case reports it has been reported that ESP block provides effective analgesia after thoracotomy and VATS. Furthermore, it has been reported that it provides effective analgesia in chronic and persistant pain syndromes of thorax.
The aim of this study is to compare US-guided continuous ESP block and TEA for postoperative analgesia management after VATS. The primary aim is to compare perioperative and postoperative opioid consumption and the secondary aim is to evaluate postoperative pain scores (VAS), adverse effects related with opioids (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting), complications due to blocks (pneumothorax, hematoma), and the time period and number of attempt for blocks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Sixty patients aged 18-65 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II and scheduled for VATS under general anesthesia will be included in the study. Patients with a history of bleeding diathesis, receiving anticoagulant treatment, known local anesthetics and opioid allergy, infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture, pregnancy or lactation, and patients who do not accept the procedure will be excluded from the study. Randomization will be achieved using a randomizing computer program. Patients will be randomly divided into two groups (Group A = ESP group, Group B = TEA group) including 25 patients each, before entering the operating room.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group ESPB = Erector spinae plane block group | Active comparator | Other: ESP block (Group A)ESP block (Group ESP) will be performed in the preoperative block room.A continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at the rate of 4 ml/h infusion dose, 6 ml bolus dose and 30 min lockout time will be performed till 48 h postoperative period. |
| Group TEA = Thoracic epidural analgesia group | Active comparator | Other: TEA group (Group B)TEA will be performed in the preoperative block room.A continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine at the rate of 4 ml/h infusion dose, 6 ml bolus dose and 30 min lockout time will be performed till 48 h postoperative period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
- Scheduled for lVATS under general anesthesia
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Bleeding diathesis
- Receiving anticoagulant treatment
- Known local anesthetics and opioid allergy
- Infection of the skin at the site of the needle puncture
- Pregnancy or lactation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ESP block (Group A)US probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the T5 transvers process. From superior to inferior, three muscles will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process; trapezius (upper), rhomboideus major (middle), erector spinae (lower). The block needle will be inserted cranio caudal direction and then for correction of the needle 5 ml saline will be injected deep into the erector spina muscle fascia. Following confirmation of the correct position 20G catheter will be inserted 5 cm in caudal direction. 20 ml %0.25 bupivacaine will be administered for block. | Other | Group ESPB = Erector spinae plane block group |
| TEA group (Group B)Local infiltration with 2% of lidocaine under the skin, in T4/T5 intervertebral space will be administered. An 18 G Tuohy needle will be inserted at T4/T5 intervertebral space to identify epidural space using the loss of resistance technique. 20G catheter will be inserted 3-4 cm in caudal direction in the epidural space. Bolus dose of 0.125% bupivacaine 10 ml will be administered through the catheter after the negative aspiration for blood or cerebrospinal fluid | Other | Group TEA = Thoracic epidural analgesia group |
Primary outcome
Postoperative pain scores
Time frame: Postoperative 24 hours
Postoperative pain assessment will be performed using the VAS score (0 = no pain, 10 = the most severe pain felt). The VAS scores at rest and during cough will be recorded at postoperative 0, 2, 4, 8, 16,and 24 hours.
1 secondary outcome
Rescue analgesia need
Time frame: Postoperative 0, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 24 hours.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Feb 2021.
- Background: PubMed 27501016Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
- Background: PubMed 28252539Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Rescue Analgesia in Thoracotomy After Epidural Failure: A Case Report. A A Case Rep. 2017 May 15;8(10):254-256. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000478.
- Background: PubMed 30052229Nagaraja PS, Ragavendran S, Singh NG, Asai O, Bhavya G, Manjunath N, Rajesh K. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia with bilateral erector spinae plane block for perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018 Jul-Sep;21(3):323-327. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_16_18.
- Background: PubMed 29980005Gurkan Y, Aksu C, Kus A, Yorukoglu UH, Kilic CT. Ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block reduces postoperative opioid consumption following breast surgery: A randomized controlled study. J Clin Anesth. 2018 Nov;50:65-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.06.033. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared
Related trials for Lung Diseases
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Bahadir Ciftci, Asist.Prof principal investigator
Medipol University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ESP block (Group A) and TEA group (Group B) in people with Lung Diseases, run by Medipol University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative pain scores (time frame: Postoperative 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03960736, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Feb 2021.