Prostatic NeoplasmsSMARTNCT03961321
Stereotactic MR-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer
An observational study of Prostatic Neoplasms, run by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Rationale: This prospective study investigates the outcomes of daily online stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) in patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- stereotactic mr guided adaptive radiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 104 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 25 Aug 2016to 17 Apr 2019
- How long will I take part?
- 1 Year
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with localized prostate cancer with a clinical stage T1-3b, with a maximal volume of 90 cc on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and no suspicious lymph nodes observed on either a diagnostic MRI or CT scan and no signs of distant metastases on radiological staging are eligible. All patients will be discussed in the multidisciplinary board (MDO) with an urologist, medical oncologist, radiologist, pathologist and a radiation oncologist, all specialized in the treatment of prostate cancer. If the MDO treatment advise comprises external beam radiotherapy, patient eligibility for the study will be assessed, and the treating radiation oncologist will discuss the study with the patient and family.
Who may be able to join
- Age of 18 years or older
- WHO performance score 0-2
- Biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- Gleason ≥ 6
- Prostate volume ≤ 90 cc on TRUS
- T-stage: cT1c-T3b (on MRI and/or endorectal ultrasound)
Show all 13Show fewer
- All patients should be able to undergo MRI scans
- No evidence of lymph node or distant metastases on radiological staging
- The multidisciplinary team advised external beam radiotherapy treatment
- IPSS (International Prostate Symptoms Score) ≤19
- Previous TURP is allowed provided there is at least 8 weeks interval with radiotherapy
- The administration of concomitant hormonal therapy is allowed
- Ability to provide written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Previous irradiation in the pelvic region
- Contra-indications for MRI
- As no safety data for 0.35 Tesla MRI scanners are available on electronic devices such as pacemakers or implanted defibrillators, deep brain stimulators, cochlear implants, this constitutes an absolute contraindication for this study, even for devices that have been considered safe for MRI scans with higher magnetic field strengths.
- Patients who have a metallic foreign body in their eye, or who have an aneurysm clip in their brain, cannot have an MRI scan since the magnetic field may dislodge the metal
- Patients with severe claustrophobia may not be able to tolerate an MRI scan
- Patients with a hip prosthesis will not be eligible for the MRI scan
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: SMART (Stereotactic MR-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy) for Localized Prostate Cancer; a Phase II Study
Rationale: This prospective study investigates the outcomes of daily online stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) in patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0). Visualization of the prostate, rectum and bladder prior to and during radiation delivery can be used to deliver "gated" treatment (beam-on only when the prostate is in the predetermined position) using small uncertainty margins. The novel MRIdian treatment delivery system (ViewRay, USA), which will be used for this study, allows for the immediate generation of an optimal radiotherapy plan based on the current anatomy of the prostate and surrounding normal organs prior to each fraction. These major advances will (i.e. dosimetrically) allow for an optimisation of normal tissue radiation doses, which should theoretically decrease toxicity to surrounding organs such as the rectum or bladder. Another advantage of this approach is that online MR-based prostate imaging does not rely on implanted gold markers, avoiding an invasive procedure to insert such markers. If proven feasible, this approach could set a new standard of care for patients with localized prostate cancer.
The main goal of this phase II study of SMART for prostate cancer is to evaluate the early and early-delayed toxicity, i.e. within the first year after treatment. An established 5-fraction hypofractionated radiation scheme will be used in this trial.
Read more
Main outcome parameters will include gastro-intestinal, genitourinary and sexual symptoms, which will be monitored at fixed time points using CTCAE criteria. In addition, patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated using EORTC-QOL questionnaires.
Objective: To investigate the early and early-delayed toxicity profile of SMART in patients with localized prostate cancer.
Study design:phase II observational study Study population: 100 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0).
Study intervention: Study patients will be treated with an online MR-guided hypofractionated course of radiotherapy in 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy per fraction delivered on the prostate with a simultaneous integrated sparing of the urethra with a dose of 32.5 Gy in 5 fractions Main study parameters: Early and early-delayed toxicity (CTCAE v. 4.0); (IPSS) and Qol C30 PR25. Secondary endpoint will be the offline evaluation of the dosimetric benefit of SMART by comparing cumulative doses to organs at risk.
Read the detailed description
Rationale: This prospective study investigates the outcomes of daily online stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) in patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0). Visualization of the prostate, rectum and bladder prior to and during radiation delivery can be used to deliver "gated" treatment (beam-on only when the prostate is in the predetermined position) using small uncertainty margins. The novel MRIdian treatment delivery system (ViewRay, USA), which will be used for this study, allows for the immediate generation of an optimal radiotherapy plan based on the current anatomy of the prostate and surrounding normal organs prior to each fraction. These major advances will (i.e. dosimetrically) allow for an optimisation of normal tissue radiation doses, which should theoretically decrease toxicity to surrounding organs such as the rectum or bladder. Another advantage of this approach is that online MR-based prostate imaging does not rely on implanted gold markers, avoiding an invasive procedure to insert such markers. If proven feasible, this approach could set a new standard of care for patients with localized prostate cancer.
The main goal of this phase II study of SMART for prostate cancer is to evaluate the early and early-delayed toxicity, i.e. within the first year after treatment. An established 5-fraction hypofractionated radiation scheme will be used in this trial. At VUmc, experience with this scheme has been obtained as a result of participation in a recently concluded multicenter randomized phase II trial [METc NL4181402912; 20012/398]. Main outcome parameters will include gastro-intestinal- (GI), genitourinary- (GU) and sexual symptoms, which will be monitored at fixed time points using CTCAE criteria. In addition, patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated using EORTC-QOL questionnaires.
Objective: To investigate the early and early-delayed toxicity profile of SMART in patients with localized prostate cancer.
Study design: A phase II observational study Study population: 100 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0).
Study intervention: Study patients will be treated with an online MR-guided hypofractionated course of radiotherapy in 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy per fraction delivered on the prostate with a simultaneous integrated sparing (SIS) of the urethra with a dose of 32.5 Gy in 5 fractions (6.5 Gy per fraction). This stereotactic radiation scheme was also used in [METc NL4181402912; 20012/398].
Main study parameters: Early and early-delayed toxicity (CTCAE v. 4.0); prostate specific symptom score (IPSS) and Qol (EORTC-QoL C30 \& QLQ Prostate Cancer module (QLQ-PR25)). Secondary endpoint will be the offline evaluation of the dosimetric benefit of SMART by comparing cumulative doses to organs at risk.
Nature, extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: This novel SMART approach could set a new standard of care for patients with localized prostate cancer by limiting radiation doses to surrounding normal organs and thereby potentially radiation-induced toxicity. Also, implantation of gold markers would become unnecessary using MR-guided "gated" radiotherapy. Disadvantages for patients include the need to be positioned within the MRI bore during radiation delivery, and a prolonged time per treatment fraction (estimated at 30 minutes per fraction), which has to be weighed against the use of a total of only five fractions. As the radiation fractionation scheme that is used in this study has been evaluated in prior trials, no further patient-related risks are anticipated.
- Conditions
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Being tested
- stereotactic mr guided adaptive radiotherapy
- Keywords
- SMART, Prostate cancer, SBRT, MRgRT, Toxicity
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
stereotactic mr guided adaptive radiotherapyRadiation
Study patients will be treated with an online MR-guided hypofractionated course of radiotherapy in 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy per fraction delivered on the prostate with a simultaneous integrated sparing (SIS) of the urethra with a dose of 32.5 Gy in 5 fractions (6.5 Gy per fraction).
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Early gastrointestinal toxicity
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
Measured: determined at 3 months
Late gastrointestinal toxicity
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
Measured: determined at 12 months
Early genitourinary toxicity
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
Measured: determined at 3 months
Late genitourinary toxicity
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
Measured: determined at 12 months
Early quality of life (QoL)
EORTC QoL core questionnaire (QLQ-C30)
Measured: determined at 3 months
Early prostate specific quality of life (QoL)
EORTC QLQ-PR25
Measured: determined at 3 months
Late quality of life (QoL)
EORTC QoL core questionnaire (QLQ-C30)
Measured: determined at 12 months
Late prostate specific quality of life (QoL)
EORTC QLQ-PR25
Measured: determined at 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 May 2019
- Study start25 Aug 2016
- Primary completion17 Apr 2019
- Study completion17 Apr 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostatic NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 1 Year
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anna Bruynzeel, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
- Investigators
- Anna Bruynzeel, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03961321
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL5728902916
- Acronym
- SMART
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 15 May 2019
- Last updated
- 23 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tetar SU, Bruynzeel AME, Oei SS, Senan S, Fraikin T, Slotman BJ, Moorselaar RJAV, Lagerwaard FJ. Magnetic Resonance-guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Final Results on Patient-reported Outcomes of a Prospective Phase 2 Study. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;4(4):628-634. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
PubMed 32536573
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- SMART (Stereotactic MR-guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy) for Localized Prostate Cancer; a Phase II Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03961321
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SMART / NL5728902916
- Conditions
- Prostatic Neoplasms
- Keywords
- SMART, Prostate cancer, SBRT, MRgRT, Toxicity
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 104 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Aug 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Apr 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale: This prospective study investigates the outcomes of daily online stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) in patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0). Visualization of the prostate, rectum and bladder prior to and during radiation delivery can be used to deliver "gated" treatment (beam-on only when the prostate is in the predetermined position) using small uncertainty margins. The novel MRIdian treatment delivery system (ViewRay, USA), which will be used for this study, allows for the immediate generation of an optimal radiotherapy plan based on the current anatomy of the prostate and surrounding normal organs prior to each fraction. These major advances will (i.e. dosimetrically) allow for an optimisation of normal tissue radiation doses, which should theoretically decrease toxicity to surrounding organs such as the rectum or bladder. Another advantage of this approach is that online MR-based prostate imaging does not rely on implanted gold markers, avoiding an invasive procedure to insert such markers. If proven feasible, this approach could set a new standard of care for patients with localized prostate cancer.
The main goal of this phase II study of SMART for prostate cancer is to evaluate the early and early-delayed toxicity, i.e. within the first year after treatment. An established 5-fraction hypofractionated radiation scheme will be used in this trial.
Main outcome parameters will include gastro-intestinal, genitourinary and sexual symptoms, which will be monitored at fixed time points using CTCAE criteria. In addition, patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated using EORTC-QOL questionnaires.
Objective: To investigate the early and early-delayed toxicity profile of SMART in patients with localized prostate cancer.
Study design:phase II observational study Study population: 100 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0).
Study intervention: Study patients will be treated with an online MR-guided hypofractionated course of radiotherapy in 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy per fraction delivered on the prostate with a simultaneous integrated sparing of the urethra with a dose of 32.5 Gy in 5 fractions Main study parameters: Early and early-delayed toxicity (CTCAE v. 4.0); (IPSS) and Qol C30 PR25. Secondary endpoint will be the offline evaluation of the dosimetric benefit of SMART by comparing cumulative doses to organs at risk.
Detailed description
Rationale: This prospective study investigates the outcomes of daily online stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) in patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0). Visualization of the prostate, rectum and bladder prior to and during radiation delivery can be used to deliver "gated" treatment (beam-on only when the prostate is in the predetermined position) using small uncertainty margins. The novel MRIdian treatment delivery system (ViewRay, USA), which will be used for this study, allows for the immediate generation of an optimal radiotherapy plan based on the current anatomy of the prostate and surrounding normal organs prior to each fraction. These major advances will (i.e. dosimetrically) allow for an optimisation of normal tissue radiation doses, which should theoretically decrease toxicity to surrounding organs such as the rectum or bladder. Another advantage of this approach is that online MR-based prostate imaging does not rely on implanted gold markers, avoiding an invasive procedure to insert such markers. If proven feasible, this approach could set a new standard of care for patients with localized prostate cancer.
The main goal of this phase II study of SMART for prostate cancer is to evaluate the early and early-delayed toxicity, i.e. within the first year after treatment. An established 5-fraction hypofractionated radiation scheme will be used in this trial. At VUmc, experience with this scheme has been obtained as a result of participation in a recently concluded multicenter randomized phase II trial [METc NL4181402912; 20012/398]. Main outcome parameters will include gastro-intestinal- (GI), genitourinary- (GU) and sexual symptoms, which will be monitored at fixed time points using CTCAE criteria. In addition, patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated using EORTC-QOL questionnaires.
Objective: To investigate the early and early-delayed toxicity profile of SMART in patients with localized prostate cancer.
Study design: A phase II observational study Study population: 100 consecutive patients with localized prostate cancer (cT1c-T3bN0M0).
Study intervention: Study patients will be treated with an online MR-guided hypofractionated course of radiotherapy in 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy per fraction delivered on the prostate with a simultaneous integrated sparing (SIS) of the urethra with a dose of 32.5 Gy in 5 fractions (6.5 Gy per fraction). This stereotactic radiation scheme was also used in [METc NL4181402912; 20012/398].
Main study parameters: Early and early-delayed toxicity (CTCAE v. 4.0); prostate specific symptom score (IPSS) and Qol (EORTC-QoL C30 \& QLQ Prostate Cancer module (QLQ-PR25)). Secondary endpoint will be the offline evaluation of the dosimetric benefit of SMART by comparing cumulative doses to organs at risk.
Nature, extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: This novel SMART approach could set a new standard of care for patients with localized prostate cancer by limiting radiation doses to surrounding normal organs and thereby potentially radiation-induced toxicity. Also, implantation of gold markers would become unnecessary using MR-guided "gated" radiotherapy. Disadvantages for patients include the need to be positioned within the MRI bore during radiation delivery, and a prolonged time per treatment fraction (estimated at 30 minutes per fraction), which has to be weighed against the use of a total of only five fractions. As the radiation fractionation scheme that is used in this study has been evaluated in prior trials, no further patient-related risks are anticipated.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 1 Year
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with localized prostate cancer with a clinical stage T1-3b, with a maximal volume of 90 cc on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and no suspicious lymph nodes observed on either a diagnostic MRI or CT scan and no signs of distant metastases on radiological staging are eligible. All patients will be discussed in the multidisciplinary board (MDO) with an urologist, medical oncologist, radiologist, pathologist and a radiation oncologist, all specialized in the treatment of prostate cancer. If the MDO treatment advise comprises external beam radiotherapy, patient eligibility for the study will be assessed, and the treating radiation oncologist will discuss the study with the patient and family.
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Age of 18 years or older
- WHO performance score 0-2
- Biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate
- Gleason ≥ 6
- Prostate volume ≤ 90 cc on TRUS
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Previous irradiation in the pelvic region
- Contra-indications for MRI
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| stereotactic mr guided adaptive radiotherapyStudy patients will be treated with an online MR-guided hypofractionated course of radiotherapy in 5 fractions of 7.25 Gy per fraction delivered on the prostate with a simultaneous integrated sparing (SIS) of the urethra with a dose of 32.5 Gy in 5 fractions (6.5 Gy per fraction). | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Early gastrointestinal toxicity
Time frame: determined at 3 months
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
Late gastrointestinal toxicity
Time frame: determined at 12 months
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
Early genitourinary toxicity
Time frame: determined at 3 months
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
Late genitourinary toxicity
Time frame: determined at 12 months
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v4.0)
Early quality of life (QoL)
Time frame: determined at 3 months
EORTC QoL core questionnaire (QLQ-C30)
Early prostate specific quality of life (QoL)
Time frame: determined at 3 months
EORTC QLQ-PR25
Late quality of life (QoL)
Time frame: determined at 12 months
EORTC QoL core questionnaire (QLQ-C30)
Late prostate specific quality of life (QoL)
Time frame: determined at 12 months
EORTC QLQ-PR25
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 May 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32536573Tetar SU, Bruynzeel AME, Oei SS, Senan S, Fraikin T, Slotman BJ, Moorselaar RJAV, Lagerwaard FJ. Magnetic Resonance-guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Final Results on Patient-reported Outcomes of a Prospective Phase 2 Study. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;4(4):628-634. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prostatic Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anna Bruynzeel, MD, PhD principal investigator
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Prostatic Neoplasms, run by Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Early gastrointestinal toxicity (time frame: determined at 3 months). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03961321, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2019.