AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast Cancer PatientsMRINCT03969524

Functional MRI in Predicting Response to Chemotherapy

An observational study of Breast Cancer Patients, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Address the accuracy of functional MRI techniques to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy given to local advanced breast cancer patients with correlation with pathology thus allowing early chemotherapy regimen modification to increase number of patients achieving pathological complete response or save patients… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer Patients
What is being tested?
MRI
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
15 Jun 2019to 30 Dec 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Selection of patients diagnosed with of biopsy proven breast cancer (BIRAD VI ) :

Who may be able to join

  • patient in different age groups with local advanced breast cancer who are eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast conservative surgery and in need for clip placement for tumor localization

Who cannot join

  • Patient with breast cancer who are not eligible for NAC (pregnant patients, multicentric breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer).
  • Patients who have received any prior chemotherapy, radiation therapy or tamoxifen therapy for their current breast cancer
  • Patients with any general contraindication to MRI as presence of any paramagnetic substance as pacemakers, or those with claustrophobia.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Heba AS Sabet, Msc contact

01000870587

bobaez1989@gmail.com

Marwa MS Mohamed, MD contact

01025260404

marwasamy2014@gmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • AssiutU

    Asyut, 711111

    Heba AS sabet, MSc, 01000870587, bobaez1989@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Superadded Value of Functional MRI Techniques in Evaluation of Malignant Breast Cancers Following Clips Guided Neoadjuvant Chemotherapeutic Series

  • Address the accuracy of functional MRI techniques to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy given to local advanced breast cancer patients with correlation with pathology thus allowing early chemotherapy regimen modification to increase number of patients achieving pathological complete response or save patients from toxic effects of ineffective chemotherapy.
Read the detailed description

patient selection:

Selection of patients diagnosed with of biopsy proven breast cancer (BIRAD VI ) :

  • Inclusion criteria: patient in different age groups with local advanced breast cancer who are eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast conservative surgery and in need for clip placement for tumor localization

Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common cancer in the world and by far the most frequent cancer among women. In Egypt the incidence rate of breast cancer is 29.9/100,000 population in the age group of 30-34 years with the highest population among young women. (1).

Management of breast cancer depends upon its stage. Early stages (stage I) with small sized breast masses undergo breast conservative surgery (BCS) while locally advanced breast masses (stage II and III) may require Preoperative administration of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to decrease the tumor burden allowing for BCS instead of mastectomy with no significant difference in disease-free survival for patients receiving breast conservation in comparison to mastectomy.(2, 3)

Patients who achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR; defined as no residual tumor or a minimal residual tumor on histologic analysis) post NAC demonstrate significantly longer disease-free and overall survival rates(4).

Predicting whether a patient will respond or not to the given chemotherapy would allow an early change in chemotherapy regime or early resort to surgery saving patients from potential toxic effects of chemotherapy and provide a greater chance of achieving a pCR.(5, 6)

Imaging is more accurate than clinical examination in monitoring response to therapy. Different imaging modalities including Digital mammography, ultrasound and MRI have been incorporated in predicting tumoral response to NAC however the MRI has the upper hand due to its higher sensitivity.(3)

Assessing tumoral response to chemotherapy based on observing the regression in the tumor size is widely accepted(7). However, changes in tumor microvasculature, cell density can predate tumoral size change therefore the use of Functional MRI techniques as diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), MR spectroscopy (MRS) or Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE) can be used to quantify these early histopathological changes in the tumor.(8)

DCE MRI was reported by multiple studies as the optimal imaging tool to determine disease response, with an accuracy of approximately 91% however there is no established cutoff of enhancement determining partial versus complete response.In three recent studies, the routine use of DWI allowed early differentiation between responders and non-responders by at least a 20% increase in apparent diffusion coefficient, thereby allowing for tailoring of chemotherapy. Also it was reported that the addition of DWI to DCE MRI resulted in improved diagnostic performance in predicting residual disease after chemotherapy.(3) 80% to 90% of patients receiving NAC have a significant response rate of the primary tumor to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, this significant response complicates the surgical excision because it is difficult to verify accurate localization of the site of the previous tumor. Therefore the use of a radiopaque marker placed in the tumor bed before administrating chemotherapy has been reported as a safe and inexpensive technique that allows later on for wire guided localization of the tumor bed before surgical resection (9).

In a report on patients who underwent clip placement and preoperative chemotherapy indicated that preoperative wire localization of the tumor bed would have been impossible in 35.7% of patients and difficult in 21.4% of patients without the aid of the clip. Dash et al. concluded that the clip placement was valuable in 57% of patients at the time of preoperative needle localization(10). Edeiken and colleagues reported a similar experience with ultrasound-guided implantation of metallic markers. The markers reportedly were the only remaining evidence of the original tumor site in (47%) of patients.

In a study conducted in M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas in 2007 aiming to determine whether patients with breast cancer who received breast-conservation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had improved outcomes if radiopaque clips were placed to mark the primary tumor. The study concluded that the omission of tumor bed clips was associated with a hazard ratio of 3.69 for increased local recurrence compared with patients who did have radiopaque clip placement (P =.083;95% confidence interval , 0.84-16.16).(9)

Being tested
MRI

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MRIDevice

    Patients will undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline (T0) (before NAC) and after the 2nd cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(T2). Histopathological examination (gold standard) of the surgical specimen will be done for each patient and Compared to the results of MRI.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. correlations coefficient between functional techniques of MRI breast and histology

    by appropriate statistical test

    Measured: 3 years

  2. changes in the different functional technique's parameters according to the type of response.

    by appropriate statistical test

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 May 2019
  2. Study start15 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion15 Jun 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03969524
Sponsor's protocol ID
MRI in response assesment
Acronym
MRI
Status last verified
Dec 2020
First submitted
28 May 2019
Last updated
29 Dec 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Rieber A, Brambs HJ, Gabelmann A, Heilmann V, Kreienberg R, Kuhn T. Breast MRI for monitoring response of primary breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2002 Jul;12(7):1711-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-001-1233-x. Epub 2002 Feb 14.

    PubMed 12111062
  • Taourel P, Pages E, Millet I, Bourgier C, Rouanet P, Jacot W, Crochet P, Azria D. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer management in the context of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018 Dec;132:51-65. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

    PubMed 30447927

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Breast Cancer Patients, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Heba AS Sabet, Msc (01000870587, bobaez1989@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

correlations coefficient between functional techniques of MRI breast and histology (time frame: 3 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03969524, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in