Breast Cancer PatientsMRINCT03969524
Functional MRI in Predicting Response to Chemotherapy
An observational study of Breast Cancer Patients, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Address the accuracy of functional MRI techniques to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy given to local advanced breast cancer patients with correlation with pathology thus allowing early chemotherapy regimen modification to increase number of patients achieving pathological complete response or save patients… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer Patients
- What is being tested?
- MRI
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 15 Jun 2019to 30 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Selection of patients diagnosed with of biopsy proven breast cancer (BIRAD VI ) :
Who may be able to join
- patient in different age groups with local advanced breast cancer who are eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast conservative surgery and in need for clip placement for tumor localization
Who cannot join
- Patient with breast cancer who are not eligible for NAC (pregnant patients, multicentric breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer).
- Patients who have received any prior chemotherapy, radiation therapy or tamoxifen therapy for their current breast cancer
- Patients with any general contraindication to MRI as presence of any paramagnetic substance as pacemakers, or those with claustrophobia.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
AssiutU
Asyut, 711111
Heba AS sabet, MSc, 01000870587, bobaez1989@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Superadded Value of Functional MRI Techniques in Evaluation of Malignant Breast Cancers Following Clips Guided Neoadjuvant Chemotherapeutic Series
- Address the accuracy of functional MRI techniques to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy given to local advanced breast cancer patients with correlation with pathology thus allowing early chemotherapy regimen modification to increase number of patients achieving pathological complete response or save patients from toxic effects of ineffective chemotherapy.
Read the detailed description
patient selection:
Selection of patients diagnosed with of biopsy proven breast cancer (BIRAD VI ) :
- Inclusion criteria: patient in different age groups with local advanced breast cancer who are eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast conservative surgery and in need for clip placement for tumor localization
Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common cancer in the world and by far the most frequent cancer among women. In Egypt the incidence rate of breast cancer is 29.9/100,000 population in the age group of 30-34 years with the highest population among young women. (1).
Management of breast cancer depends upon its stage. Early stages (stage I) with small sized breast masses undergo breast conservative surgery (BCS) while locally advanced breast masses (stage II and III) may require Preoperative administration of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to decrease the tumor burden allowing for BCS instead of mastectomy with no significant difference in disease-free survival for patients receiving breast conservation in comparison to mastectomy.(2, 3)
Patients who achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR; defined as no residual tumor or a minimal residual tumor on histologic analysis) post NAC demonstrate significantly longer disease-free and overall survival rates(4).
Predicting whether a patient will respond or not to the given chemotherapy would allow an early change in chemotherapy regime or early resort to surgery saving patients from potential toxic effects of chemotherapy and provide a greater chance of achieving a pCR.(5, 6)
Imaging is more accurate than clinical examination in monitoring response to therapy. Different imaging modalities including Digital mammography, ultrasound and MRI have been incorporated in predicting tumoral response to NAC however the MRI has the upper hand due to its higher sensitivity.(3)
Assessing tumoral response to chemotherapy based on observing the regression in the tumor size is widely accepted(7). However, changes in tumor microvasculature, cell density can predate tumoral size change therefore the use of Functional MRI techniques as diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), MR spectroscopy (MRS) or Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE) can be used to quantify these early histopathological changes in the tumor.(8)
DCE MRI was reported by multiple studies as the optimal imaging tool to determine disease response, with an accuracy of approximately 91% however there is no established cutoff of enhancement determining partial versus complete response.In three recent studies, the routine use of DWI allowed early differentiation between responders and non-responders by at least a 20% increase in apparent diffusion coefficient, thereby allowing for tailoring of chemotherapy. Also it was reported that the addition of DWI to DCE MRI resulted in improved diagnostic performance in predicting residual disease after chemotherapy.(3) 80% to 90% of patients receiving NAC have a significant response rate of the primary tumor to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, this significant response complicates the surgical excision because it is difficult to verify accurate localization of the site of the previous tumor. Therefore the use of a radiopaque marker placed in the tumor bed before administrating chemotherapy has been reported as a safe and inexpensive technique that allows later on for wire guided localization of the tumor bed before surgical resection (9).
In a report on patients who underwent clip placement and preoperative chemotherapy indicated that preoperative wire localization of the tumor bed would have been impossible in 35.7% of patients and difficult in 21.4% of patients without the aid of the clip. Dash et al. concluded that the clip placement was valuable in 57% of patients at the time of preoperative needle localization(10). Edeiken and colleagues reported a similar experience with ultrasound-guided implantation of metallic markers. The markers reportedly were the only remaining evidence of the original tumor site in (47%) of patients.
In a study conducted in M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas in 2007 aiming to determine whether patients with breast cancer who received breast-conservation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had improved outcomes if radiopaque clips were placed to mark the primary tumor. The study concluded that the omission of tumor bed clips was associated with a hazard ratio of 3.69 for increased local recurrence compared with patients who did have radiopaque clip placement (P =.083;95% confidence interval , 0.84-16.16).(9)
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Patients
- Being tested
- MRI
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MRIDevice
Patients will undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline (T0) (before NAC) and after the 2nd cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(T2). Histopathological examination (gold standard) of the surgical specimen will be done for each patient and Compared to the results of MRI.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
correlations coefficient between functional techniques of MRI breast and histology
by appropriate statistical test
Measured: 3 years
changes in the different functional technique's parameters according to the type of response.
by appropriate statistical test
Measured: 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 May 2019
- Study start15 Jun 2019
- Primary completion15 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast Cancer PatientsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assiut UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Heba Sabet, Assiut University
- Investigators
- Osama HA El-Sayed, Professor, Study director, Assiut University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03969524
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MRI in response assesment
- Acronym
- MRI
- Status last verified
- Dec 2020
- First submitted
- 28 May 2019
- Last updated
- 29 Dec 2020
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Rieber A, Brambs HJ, Gabelmann A, Heilmann V, Kreienberg R, Kuhn T. Breast MRI for monitoring response of primary breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2002 Jul;12(7):1711-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-001-1233-x. Epub 2002 Feb 14.
PubMed 12111062Taourel P, Pages E, Millet I, Bourgier C, Rouanet P, Jacot W, Crochet P, Azria D. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer management in the context of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018 Dec;132:51-65. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
PubMed 30447927
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Dec 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Superadded Value of Functional MRI Techniques in Evaluation of Malignant Breast Cancers Following Clips Guided Neoadjuvant Chemotherapeutic Series
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03969524
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MRI / MRI in response assesment
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Patients
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assiut UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jun 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 May 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
- Address the accuracy of functional MRI techniques to predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy given to local advanced breast cancer patients with correlation with pathology thus allowing early chemotherapy regimen modification to increase number of patients achieving pathological complete response or save patients from toxic effects of ineffective chemotherapy.
Detailed description
patient selection:
Selection of patients diagnosed with of biopsy proven breast cancer (BIRAD VI ) :
- Inclusion criteria: patient in different age groups with local advanced breast cancer who are eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast conservative surgery and in need for clip placement for tumor localization
Breast cancer (BC) is the second most common cancer in the world and by far the most frequent cancer among women. In Egypt the incidence rate of breast cancer is 29.9/100,000 population in the age group of 30-34 years with the highest population among young women. (1).
Management of breast cancer depends upon its stage. Early stages (stage I) with small sized breast masses undergo breast conservative surgery (BCS) while locally advanced breast masses (stage II and III) may require Preoperative administration of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to decrease the tumor burden allowing for BCS instead of mastectomy with no significant difference in disease-free survival for patients receiving breast conservation in comparison to mastectomy.(2, 3)
Patients who achieve a pathologic complete response (pCR; defined as no residual tumor or a minimal residual tumor on histologic analysis) post NAC demonstrate significantly longer disease-free and overall survival rates(4).
Predicting whether a patient will respond or not to the given chemotherapy would allow an early change in chemotherapy regime or early resort to surgery saving patients from potential toxic effects of chemotherapy and provide a greater chance of achieving a pCR.(5, 6)
Imaging is more accurate than clinical examination in monitoring response to therapy. Different imaging modalities including Digital mammography, ultrasound and MRI have been incorporated in predicting tumoral response to NAC however the MRI has the upper hand due to its higher sensitivity.(3)
Assessing tumoral response to chemotherapy based on observing the regression in the tumor size is widely accepted(7). However, changes in tumor microvasculature, cell density can predate tumoral size change therefore the use of Functional MRI techniques as diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), MR spectroscopy (MRS) or Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE) can be used to quantify these early histopathological changes in the tumor.(8)
DCE MRI was reported by multiple studies as the optimal imaging tool to determine disease response, with an accuracy of approximately 91% however there is no established cutoff of enhancement determining partial versus complete response.In three recent studies, the routine use of DWI allowed early differentiation between responders and non-responders by at least a 20% increase in apparent diffusion coefficient, thereby allowing for tailoring of chemotherapy. Also it was reported that the addition of DWI to DCE MRI resulted in improved diagnostic performance in predicting residual disease after chemotherapy.(3) 80% to 90% of patients receiving NAC have a significant response rate of the primary tumor to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, this significant response complicates the surgical excision because it is difficult to verify accurate localization of the site of the previous tumor. Therefore the use of a radiopaque marker placed in the tumor bed before administrating chemotherapy has been reported as a safe and inexpensive technique that allows later on for wire guided localization of the tumor bed before surgical resection (9).
In a report on patients who underwent clip placement and preoperative chemotherapy indicated that preoperative wire localization of the tumor bed would have been impossible in 35.7% of patients and difficult in 21.4% of patients without the aid of the clip. Dash et al. concluded that the clip placement was valuable in 57% of patients at the time of preoperative needle localization(10). Edeiken and colleagues reported a similar experience with ultrasound-guided implantation of metallic markers. The markers reportedly were the only remaining evidence of the original tumor site in (47%) of patients.
In a study conducted in M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas in 2007 aiming to determine whether patients with breast cancer who received breast-conservation therapy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy had improved outcomes if radiopaque clips were placed to mark the primary tumor. The study concluded that the omission of tumor bed clips was associated with a hazard ratio of 3.69 for increased local recurrence compared with patients who did have radiopaque clip placement (P =.083;95% confidence interval , 0.84-16.16).(9)
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Selection of patients diagnosed with of biopsy proven breast cancer (BIRAD VI ) :
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- patient in different age groups with local advanced breast cancer who are eligible for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast conservative surgery and in need for clip placement for tumor localization
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient with breast cancer who are not eligible for NAC (pregnant patients, multicentric breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer).
- Patients who have received any prior chemotherapy, radiation therapy or tamoxifen therapy for their current breast cancer
- Patients with any general contraindication to MRI as presence of any paramagnetic substance as pacemakers, or those with claustrophobia.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MRIPatients will undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at baseline (T0) (before NAC) and after the 2nd cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy(T2). Histopathological examination (gold standard) of the surgical specimen will be done for each patient and Compared to the results of MRI. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
correlations coefficient between functional techniques of MRI breast and histology
Time frame: 3 years
by appropriate statistical test
changes in the different functional technique's parameters according to the type of response.
Time frame: 3 years
by appropriate statistical test
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Dec 2020.
- Background: PubMed 12111062Rieber A, Brambs HJ, Gabelmann A, Heilmann V, Kreienberg R, Kuhn T. Breast MRI for monitoring response of primary breast cancer to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2002 Jul;12(7):1711-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-001-1233-x. Epub 2002 Feb 14.
- Background: PubMed 30447927Taourel P, Pages E, Millet I, Bourgier C, Rouanet P, Jacot W, Crochet P, Azria D. Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer management in the context of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2018 Dec;132:51-65. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2018.09.012. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
Related trials for Breast Cancer Patients
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Effects of GDC-4198 in Combination With Letrozole, Fulvestrant, or Giredestrant in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negatve Breast Cancer
Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
An Overview of Vaccination Coverage Among Patients Receiving Treatment for Breast Cancer at the ICO: Identifying Factors Associated With Vaccination Uptake and Improved Prevention
Breast Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Inavolisib in Participants With Endocrine-resistant, PIK3CA-mutated, Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-negative Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Recruiting
INtegrating Systematic PatIent-Reported Evaluations in Multi-Disciplinary Tumor Boards: The INSPIRE Study
Breast Cancer, Corpus Uteri Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of an Individualized Vaccine to Durvalumab and Tremelimumab and Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Invasive Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Osama HA El-Sayed, Professor study director
Assiut University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Breast Cancer Patients, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Dec 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Heba AS Sabet, Msc (01000870587, bobaez1989@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
correlations coefficient between functional techniques of MRI breast and histology (time frame: 3 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03969524, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Dec 2020.