AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck CancerMARTHANCT03972072

MRI - Guided Adaptive RadioTHerapy for Reducing XerostomiA in Head and Neck Cancer (MARTHA-trial)

A study testing Pre-defined MR-linac based IGRT and plan adaptation protocol and salivary flow measurements in people with Head and Neck Cancer and Xerostomia Due to Radiotherapy, run by Panagiotis Balermpas at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Radiotherapy is the main treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Many advances regarding tumor control and patient survival have been made over the past decades. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Pre-defined MR-linac based IGRT and plan adaptation protocol and salivary flow measurements
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
49 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
15 Oct 2019to 24 Jul 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity oro- or hypopharynx or larynx, Stages II-IVB, requiring definitive or postoperative bilateral neck irradiation
  • Age ≥ 18 years, no upper age limit
  • ECOG-Performance score < 2
  • The trial is open to both genders
  • History/physical examination within 30 days prior to registration by head and neck surgeon and Radiation Oncologist
  • FDG-PET-CT-scan within 30 days prior to registration

Who cannot join

  • Not adequately controlled hepatitis or HIV disease (HIV-viral load detectable)
  • Second non-controlled malignancy other than basalioma or cervical/genital/anal in situ neoplasia during the last 2 years before enrollment
  • Bilirubin > 2,0 mg/dl, SGOT, SGPT, AP, Gamma-GT >3x norm, GFR < 30 ml/min
  • leucocytes <3,5 x 10^9/l or platelets < 100 x 10^9/l or neutrophiles < 1,5 x 10^9/l
  • Other severe comorbidities or psychic disorders (e.g. myocardial infraction within 6 months prior to registration, permanent cardiac arrhythmia, COPD Gold IV, hepatitis B/C, schizophrenia, ongoing alcohol abuse etc.)
  • Lactating and pregnant women
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Previous radiotherapy of the neck
  • Contraindications for MRI (e.g. pacemaker/ICD, tattoos, cochlear or other not MR-compatible implants)
  • Pre-existing salivary gland disease (e.g. Sjorgen's-syndrome) or xerostomia-inducing medication (e.g. anticholinergic medication like tricyclic antidepressant)
  • Claustrophobia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Zurich University Hospital

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: MARTHA-trial: MRI - Guided Adaptive RadioTHerapy for Reducing XerostomiA in Head and Neck Cancer Including Longitudinal Evaluation of the Patient's Immune Profile Under Radiotherapy

Radiotherapy is the main treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Many advances regarding tumor control and patient survival have been made over the past decades. However, treatment-induced toxicity remains a crucial problem, leading to reduced quality of life and permanent impairment for many survivors. Xerostomia is up to this day the leading cause of late toxicity for these patients. Toxicity has been reduced by implementation of modern image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), but the low soft-tissue contrast of routine x-ray image guidance does not allow exact planning adaptation and daily imaging is associated with high radiation exposure. Furthermore, despite the routinely use of IMRT, rates of clinically relevant xerostomia (i.e. grade 2 or worse) are still common and reported in approximately 38%. Recently developed hybrid machines (MRidian®-CE approval since 2016), consisting of a linear accelerator and an integrated low-field MRI, could allow a) better visualization of tumor and organs at risk, such as parotid glands during patient positioning and daily treatment, b) daily imaging without additional radiation exposure, c) narrowest established safety margins for the treatment volumes, and finally d) repetitive adaptation of target volumes according to changes in patient weight and tumor anatomy during the radiotherapy course. These procedures would facilitate a high-precision treatment and help reduce dose exposure of critical structures.

Being tested
Pre-defined MR-linac based IGRT and plan adaptation protocol, salivary flow measurements
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pre-defined MR-linac based IGRT and plan adaptation protocolOther

    daily MR-imaging/MR guided radiotherapy once weekly offline plan adaptation to a total of 6

  • salivary flow measurementsDiagnostic test

    baseline, 6 month-, 12 month- and 24 month-follow up salivary flow measurements and LENT-SOMA subjective/objective evaluation of xerostomia

Study groups in NCT03972072
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single Intervention ArmExperimentaldaily imaging for MR-IGRT once weekly offline plan adaptation subjective/objective LENT-SOMA xerostomia-evaluation including flow measurements at baseline, 6 month-, 12 month- and 24 month-follow up EORTC-QoL questionnaires at baseline, 6 month-, 12 month- and 24 month-follow up
Receives: Other: Pre-defined MR-linac based IGRT and plan adaptation protocol; Diagnostic Test: salivary flow measurements

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of patients with xerostomia of grade 2 or worse

    will be evaluated by the LENT-SOMA (Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA)) side-effect scale: SOM (1)-(4) (higher score represents higher grade xerostomia), A: objective flow measurement (1) 76-95%, (2) 51-75%, (3) 26-50%, (4) 0-25%

    Measured: 12 month-follow up

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Percentage of patients with xerostomia of grade 2 or worse

    will be evaluated by the LENT-SOMA (Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA)) side-effect scale: SOM (1)-(4) (higher score represents higher grade xerostomia), A: objective flow measurement (1) 76-95%, (2) 51-75%, (3) 26-50%, (4) 0-25%

    Measured: 6- and 24-months follow up

  2. Locoregional control rate as defined from treatment start to histologically confirmed tumor progression, persistence or last follow up

    as defined from treatment start to histologically confirmed tumor progression, persistence or last follow up

    Measured: 2-years

  3. Overall survival

    as defined from treatment start to death from any cause or last follow up

    Measured: 2-years

  4. Description of Quality of life - scoring 6 months after treatment, assessed according to the general EORTC-quality of life "core" questionnaire QLQ C30 (overall quality of life for cancer patients)

    Questionnaire consists of 30 questions with a maximal score of 100. Absolute scores after linear transformation will be reported as descriptive statistics The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

    A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

    See also: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf

    Measured: 6 months after treatment

  5. Description of Head-Neck cancer related symptoms 6 months after treatment, assessed according to the specific EORT-head and neck quality of life supplementary questionnaire HN35

    total scoring of an additional 35 questions with a similar approach to that of the core questionnaire will be reported as descriptive statistics

    Measured: 6 months after treatment

  6. Description of Quality of life - scoring 12 months after treatment, assessed according to the general EORTC-quality of life "core" questionnaire QLQ C30 (overall quality of life for cancer patients)

    Questionnaire consists of 30 questions with a maximal score of 100. Absolute scores after linear transformation will be reported as descriptive statistics The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

    A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

    See also: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf

    Measured: 12 months after treatment

  7. Description of Head-Neck related symptoms 12 months after treatment, assessed according to the specific EORT-head and neck quality of life supplementary questionnaire HN35

    total scoring of an additional 35 questions with a similar approach to that of the core questionnaire will be reported as descriptive statistics

    Measured: 12 months after treatment

  8. Description of Quality of life - scoring 24 months after treatment, assessed according to the general EORTC-quality of life "core" questionnaire QLQ C30 (overall quality of life for cancer patients)

    Questionnaire consists of 30 questions with a maximal score of 100. Absolute scores after linear transformation will be reported as descriptive statistics The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.

    A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

    See also: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf

    Measured: 24 months after treatment

  9. Description of Head-Neck related symptoms 24 months after treatment, assessed according to the specific EORT-head and neck quality of life supplementary questionnaire HN35

    total scoring of an additional 35 questions with a similar approach to that of the core questionnaire will be reported as descriptive statistics

    Measured: 24 months after treatment

  10. Toxicity rates

    evaluated by the CTCAE v5-questionnaires

    Measured: weekly during radiotherapy and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jun 2019
  2. Study start15 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion21 May 2025
  4. Study completion24 Jul 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
49 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03972072
Sponsor's protocol ID
HN01_2019
Acronym
MARTHA
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
23 May 2019
Last updated
3 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pre-defined MR-linac based IGRT and plan adaptation protocol and salivary flow measurements in people with Head and Neck Cancer and Xerostomia Due to Radiotherapy, run by Panagiotis Balermpas at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of patients with xerostomia of grade 2 or worse (time frame: 12 month-follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in