PainNCT03975660
Evaluation of Objective Pain Measurement Device
A study testing Pain Measurement Device in people with Pain and Analgesia, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will attempt to objectively measure pain with an experimental device. The investigators will apply the device to measure patients "pain" due to uterine contractions during routine clinical care to correlate patients verbal pain ratings and analgesia requirements to that measured by the device. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Analgesia, Labor Pain
- What is being tested?
- Pain Measurement Device
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2019to 31 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 45 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-50
- ASA 1 or 3 +/-E
- Patient requesting epidural labor analgesia
- Good toco tracing (clearly showing contractions at least every 5 minutes)
- Pain score greater than or equal to 3 out of 10 with contractions
Who cannot join
- History of chronic pain
- History of chronic opioid use
- BMI > 45
- Allergy to sensor adhesive material, local anesthetic or opioids
- Contraindication to neuraxial block
- Patient on magnesium infusion
- Inability to give informed consent or understand English
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
This study will attempt to objectively measure pain with an experimental device. The investigators will apply the device to measure patients "pain" due to uterine contractions during routine clinical care to correlate patients verbal pain ratings and analgesia requirements to that measured by the device. A brain oxygenation device, Edwards Foresight, will be used to concurrently to monitor brain oxygenation and hemodynamics, so the relationship between the CereVu ROPA device objective measure of pain and brain oxygenation/hemodynamic changes and patient-reported pain can be determined.
Read the detailed description
Despite all the progress in our understanding of the basic mechanisms of pain, the gold standard for measuring pain is still a subjective verbal numeric rating scale rating (0-10) obtained from the individual reporting pain. This method is not objective and cannot be used in all patient populations. This study will attempt to objectively measure pain in laboring mothers with a pain measurement device. The investigators aim to 1) see if the pain measurement device (CereVu ROPA) is capable of reflecting different levels of pain ratings in patients in labor having uterine contractions and then changes in pain after receiving different neuraxial techniques for labor pain and to 2) additionally determine the relationship between the CereVu ROPA device, brain oxygenation/hemodynamic changes and patient-reported pain scores.
- Conditions
- Pain, Analgesia, Labor Pain
- Being tested
- Pain Measurement Device
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Agnosia, Labor Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pain Measurement DeviceDevice
When participants request labor analgesia, the sensors of the pain measurement device (ROPA System [CereVu Medical, Inc. San Francisco, CA] and Edwards Foresight device) will be applied to the forehead and connected to the device. Data recording is then started.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Device Calibration and Validation | Experimental | Patients requesting epidural labor analgesia will have pain levels monitored during labor. Receives: Device: Pain Measurement Device |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Average Self-report Pain Score
Average patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain)
Measured: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Correlation of Average Device Pain Score to Average Self-report Pain Score
Pearson correlation
Measured: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Correlation Between Pain Score and Brain Oxygenation
Pearson correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and brain oxygenation (0-100%). This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.
Measured: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Correlation Between Pain Score and Noninvasive Blood Pressure
Pearson correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and hemodynamic parameter noninvasive blood pressure. This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.
Measured: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Correlation Between Pain Score and Heart Rate
Pearson correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and hemodynamic parameter heart rate. This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.
Measured: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Correlation Between Pain Score and Pulse Oximetry
Correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and hemodynamic parameter pulse oximetry (Sp02). This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.
Measured: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Secondary outcomes (13)
Time to Reach Pain Score 2 or Less Out of 10
Pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain)
Measured: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Time Taken for Pain Device Score to be Below Validated Value
Validated value is from the validated reading recorded by the sensor in the pilot study
Measured: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Patient Reported Pain Scores After Block
Pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain). Pain scores were obtained at random intervals and the scores were summed and averaged to create the reported score. Patients stopped rating pain once the level dropped to zero.
Measured: Up to approximately 45 minutes after the block placement
Device Recorded Pain Scores After Block
Device pain score validated measure (range: 0 to 10, higher scores correspond to more pain). Pain scores were obtained at random intervals and the scores were summed and averaged to create the reported score. Device recording was discontinued when pain level dropped to zero.
Measured: Up to approximately 45 minutes after the block placement
Dermatomal Level at 45 Minutes After Block Placement as a Measure of Sensory Blockade Level
Measured: 45 minutes
Count of Participants With Block Failures
Measured: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Count of Participants With Maternal Side Effects
Monitored maternal side effects will include nausea, pruritis, hypotension
Measured: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Count of Participants With Fetal Side Effects
Monitored fetal side effects include fetal decelerations early/variable/late
Measured: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Count of Participants Needing Physician Intervention
Measured: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Time From Epidural to Delivery
Measured: from epidural to delivery (average approximately 9 hours)
Count of Participants With Normal Vaginal Delivery
Measured: from epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
Count of Participants With Assisted Vaginal Delivery
Measured: from epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
Count of Participants With Cesarean Delivery
Measured: from epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jun 2019
- Study start1 Nov 2019
- Primary completion31 Oct 2023
- Study completion31 Oct 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Stanford UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brendan Carvalho, Stanford University
- Investigators
- Brendan Carvalho, MBBCh, FRCA, Principal investigator, Stanford University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03975660
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 51101
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Jun 2019
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Objective Pain Measurement Device
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03975660
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 51101
- Conditions
- Pain, Analgesia, Labor Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Stanford UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 8 Jun 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will attempt to objectively measure pain with an experimental device. The investigators will apply the device to measure patients "pain" due to uterine contractions during routine clinical care to correlate patients verbal pain ratings and analgesia requirements to that measured by the device. A brain oxygenation device, Edwards Foresight, will be used to concurrently to monitor brain oxygenation and hemodynamics, so the relationship between the CereVu ROPA device objective measure of pain and brain oxygenation/hemodynamic changes and patient-reported pain can be determined.
Detailed description
Despite all the progress in our understanding of the basic mechanisms of pain, the gold standard for measuring pain is still a subjective verbal numeric rating scale rating (0-10) obtained from the individual reporting pain. This method is not objective and cannot be used in all patient populations. This study will attempt to objectively measure pain in laboring mothers with a pain measurement device. The investigators aim to 1) see if the pain measurement device (CereVu ROPA) is capable of reflecting different levels of pain ratings in patients in labor having uterine contractions and then changes in pain after receiving different neuraxial techniques for labor pain and to 2) additionally determine the relationship between the CereVu ROPA device, brain oxygenation/hemodynamic changes and patient-reported pain scores.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Device Calibration and Validation | Experimental | Device: Pain Measurement DevicePatients requesting epidural labor analgesia will have pain levels monitored during labor. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 45 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 18-50
- ASA 1 or 3 +/-E
- Patient requesting epidural labor analgesia
- Good toco tracing (clearly showing contractions at least every 5 minutes)
- Pain score greater than or equal to 3 out of 10 with contractions
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- History of chronic pain
- History of chronic opioid use
- BMI > 45
- Allergy to sensor adhesive material, local anesthetic or opioids
- Contraindication to neuraxial block
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pain Measurement DeviceWhen participants request labor analgesia, the sensors of the pain measurement device (ROPA System [CereVu Medical, Inc. San Francisco, CA] and Edwards Foresight device) will be applied to the forehead and connected to the device. Data recording is then started. | Device | Device Calibration and Validation |
Primary outcome
Average Self-report Pain Score
Time frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Average patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain)
Correlation of Average Device Pain Score to Average Self-report Pain Score
Time frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Pearson correlation
Correlation Between Pain Score and Brain Oxygenation
Time frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Pearson correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and brain oxygenation (0-100%). This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.
Correlation Between Pain Score and Noninvasive Blood Pressure
Time frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Pearson correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and hemodynamic parameter noninvasive blood pressure. This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.
Correlation Between Pain Score and Heart Rate
Time frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Pearson correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and hemodynamic parameter heart rate. This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.
Correlation Between Pain Score and Pulse Oximetry
Time frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural
Correlation between patient self-reported pain score on 0 to 10 scale (higher scores correspond to more pain) and hemodynamic parameter pulse oximetry (Sp02). This outcome will be assessed in part 2 only.
13 secondary outcomes
Time to Reach Pain Score 2 or Less Out of 10
Time frame: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Time Taken for Pain Device Score to be Below Validated Value
Time frame: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Patient Reported Pain Scores After Block
Time frame: Up to approximately 45 minutes after the block placement
Device Recorded Pain Scores After Block
Time frame: Up to approximately 45 minutes after the block placement
Dermatomal Level at 45 Minutes After Block Placement as a Measure of Sensory Blockade Level
Time frame: 45 minutes
Count of Participants With Block Failures
Time frame: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Count of Participants With Maternal Side Effects
Time frame: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Count of Participants With Fetal Side Effects
Time frame: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Count of Participants Needing Physician Intervention
Time frame: within 45 minutes after the block placement
Time From Epidural to Delivery
Time frame: from epidural to delivery (average approximately 9 hours)
Count of Participants With Normal Vaginal Delivery
Time frame: from epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
Count of Participants With Assisted Vaginal Delivery
Time frame: from epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
Count of Participants With Cesarean Delivery
Time frame: from epidural to delivery (expected average: 24 hours)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Digital Use, 24-Hour Movement Behaviors, and Myofascial Release in University Students With Neck Pain
Forward Head Posture, Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain
Recruiting
Effects of Virtual Reality Exergames Versus Spinal Manipulation in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Chronic Nonspecific Low-back Pain, CNSLBP
Recruiting
Dietary Intervention for Migraine Relief
Migraine
RecruitingPhase 4
Anrikefon-based Patient-controlled Intravenous Analgesia Following Laparoscopic Surgery
Laparoscopic Surgery, Visceral Pain, Postoperative
Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Focal Adenomyosis
Adenomyosis, Adenomyoma of Uterus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brendan Carvalho, MBBCh, FRCA principal investigator
Stanford University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pain Measurement Device in people with Pain and Analgesia, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Jun 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Average Self-report Pain Score (time frame: During labor up to 2 hours after epidural). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2025.