Lumbar Disc Disease6MWT-DDDNCT03977961
The Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) as a Measure of Functional Impairment in Lumbar Degenerate Disc Disease.
An observational study of Lumbar Disc Disease and Lumbar Spine Degeneration, run by Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The study determines the reliability and validity of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lumbar Disc Disease, Lumbar Spine Degeneration, Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 1 May 2019to 1 May 2020
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: All patients presenting to the neurosurgical department of the Kantonsspital St. Gallen (KSSG) with a diagnosed DDD fulfilling the inclusion criteria and scheduled for surgery will be considered for this study.
Who may be able to join
- Patient scheduled for spine surgery with one of the following diagnosis (1) lumbar disc herniation (LDH), (2) lumbar spinal stenosis lumbar (LSS) or lumbar DDD with or without instability requiring lumbar fusion (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, or extreme lateral interbody fusion)
- Male and Female subjects ≥ 18 years
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Inability to walk (extreme pain or severe neurological deficits)
- Severe Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD) corresponding to ≥ Gold III
- Severe heart failure corresponding to ≥ New York Heart Association (NYHA) III
- Lung cancer and diffuse parenchymal lung disease
- Other medical reasons interfering with the patient's ability to walk and perform the 6MWT (e.g., osteoarthritis disease of the lower extremities, Parkinson's disease, heart failure, hip or knee prosthesis etc.)
- Unavailability for follow up and/or inability to complete assessment (planning to move, no smartphone, etc.).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Kantonsspital St. Gallen / Department of Neurosurgery
Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, 9000
About this study
The study determines the reliability and validity of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD).
Read the detailed description
The purposes of the study is to assess the ability of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) as a reliable and standardized objective outcome assessment and its relation to already established subjective patient reported outcome measures in patients suffering from lumbar degenerative disc disease. We want to use an existing smartphone-application that uses global positioning system (GPS) coordinates to measure walking distance. Applying self- measurement of the 6MWT before and after a therapeutic intervention, we determine objective functional impairment (OFI) in patients. The results of this study add to the understanding of achievable objective outcomes after therapeutic interventions applied to patients with DDD and examines patients acceptance for smartphone based self-measurement.
Primary Objectives The primary objective is to determine the reliability and validity of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD)
Secondary objectives are
- to correlate objective functional impairment (OFI) with already established patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) in the sense of cross-validation.
- To correlate OFI, as determined by the 6MWT with OFI that is determined by another objective test, the TUG test
- to then analyze the change in OFI in patients before and after surgical intervention
- to determine whether patients prefer the objective (6MWT) or subjective (PROMs) repeated assessment of their functional condition.
- Medical subject headings
- Intervertebral disc disease, Spinal Stenosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DDD Patients | All patients presenting to the neurosurgical department of the Kantonsspital St. Gallen (KSSG) with a diagnosed DDD fulfilling the inclusion criteria and scheduled for surgery will be considered for this study. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Raw walking distance
Raw walking distance (in m), as measured with the 6MWT, between the baseline- (before surgery) and follow-up assessment
Measured: 4-12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (11)
TTFS
Difference in Time to First Symptoms (TTFS; in sec) as measured by the 6MWT, between the baseline- and follow-up assessment
Measured: 4-12 weeks
DTFS
Difference in Distance to First Symptoms (DTFS, in m), as measured by the 6MWT, between the baseline- and follow-up assessment
Measured: 4-12 weeks
Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ)
Difference in PROM, as measured by the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ average score, range 0 (best) - 4,5 (worst), between the baseline- and follow-up assessment.
Measured: 4-12 weeks
Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)
Difference in health-related quality of life (hrQoL), as measured by the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI average score, range 0 (best) - 10 (worst)), between the baseline- and follow-up assessment
Measured: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/ZCQ baseline
Correlation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the ZCQ score at baseline
Measured: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/ZCQ follow-up
Correlation of TTFS in the 6MWT with the ZCQ score at follow-up
Measured: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/COMI baseline
Correlation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the COMI score at baseline
Measured: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/COMI follow-up
Correlation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the COMI score at follow-up
Measured: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/TUG baseline
Correlation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the Timed up go Test (TUG) at baseline
Measured: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/TUG follow-up
Correlation of TTFS/DTFS in the 6MWT with the TUG at follow-up
Measured: 4-12 weeks
Test-retest reliability of the 6MWT
Test-retest reliability of the 6MWT in patients with lumbar degenerate disc disease, tested two consecutive times with the 6MWT App (within 3 days) before as well as after surgery.
Measured: 6 weeks to 1 day before surgery as well as 4-12 weeks after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jun 2019
- Study start1 May 2019
- Primary completion1 May 2020
- Study completion1 May 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lumbar Disc DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- PD Dr. med. Martin Stienen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich, PD Dr. med. Oliver Gautschi, Neuro- und Wirbelsäulen Zentrum Zentral-schweiz, Luzern
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nicolai Maldaner, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
- Investigators
- Nicolai Maldaner, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Neurosurgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03977961
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 6MWT DDD - 1.0
- Acronym
- 6MWT-DDD
- Status last verified
- Jul 2022
- First submitted
- 31 May 2019
- Last updated
- 26 Jul 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ziga M, Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM, Regli L, Bozinov O, Weyerbrock A, Ratliff JK, Stienen MN, Maldaner N. Objective outcome measures may demonstrate continued change in functional recovery in patients with ceiling effects of subjective patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders. Spine J. 2023 Sep;23(9):1314-1322. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 13.
PubMed 37182704Zeitlberger AM, Sosnova M, Ziga M, Gautschi OP, Regli L, Bozinov O, Weyerbrock A, Stienen MN, Maldaner N. Distance to first symptoms measured by the 6-min walking test differentiates between treatment success and failure in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders. Eur Spine J. 2022 Mar;31(3):596-603. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07103-9. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
PubMed 35015137Zeitlberger AM, Sosnova M, Ziga M, Regli L, Bozinov O, Weyerbrock A, Stienen MN, Maldaner N. Assessment of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Smartphone-based 6-minute Walking Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Sep 15;46(18):E959-E965. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003991.
PubMed 34042414Maldaner N, Sosnova M, Ziga M, Zeitlberger AM, Bozinov O, Gautschi OP, Weyerbrock A, Regli L, Stienen MN. External Validation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Timed-up-and-go Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Feb 15;47(4):337-342. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004128.
PubMed 34033596Maldaner N, Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM, Ziga M, Gautschi OP, Regli L, Bozinov O, Weyerbrock A, Stienen MN. Responsiveness of the self-measured 6-minute walking test and the Timed Up and Go test in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 May 7;35(1):52-59. doi: 10.3171/2020.11.SPINE201621. Epub 2021 May 7.
PubMed 33974372
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Jul 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Six-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) as a Measure of Functional Impairment in Lumbar Degenerate Disc Disease.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03977961
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 6MWT-DDD / 6MWT DDD - 1.0
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cantonal Hospital of St. GallenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- PD Dr. med. Martin Stienen, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsspital Zürich, PD Dr. med. Oliver Gautschi, Neuro- und Wirbelsäulen Zentrum Zentral-schweiz, Luzern
- Study start
- 1 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 May 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study determines the reliability and validity of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD).
Detailed description
The purposes of the study is to assess the ability of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) as a reliable and standardized objective outcome assessment and its relation to already established subjective patient reported outcome measures in patients suffering from lumbar degenerative disc disease. We want to use an existing smartphone-application that uses global positioning system (GPS) coordinates to measure walking distance. Applying self- measurement of the 6MWT before and after a therapeutic intervention, we determine objective functional impairment (OFI) in patients. The results of this study add to the understanding of achievable objective outcomes after therapeutic interventions applied to patients with DDD and examines patients acceptance for smartphone based self-measurement.
Primary Objectives The primary objective is to determine the reliability and validity of the 6-Minute Walking Test (6MWT) in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD)
Secondary objectives are
- to correlate objective functional impairment (OFI) with already established patient-rated outcome measures (PROMs) in the sense of cross-validation.
- To correlate OFI, as determined by the 6MWT with OFI that is determined by another objective test, the TUG test
- to then analyze the change in OFI in patients before and after surgical intervention
- to determine whether patients prefer the objective (6MWT) or subjective (PROMs) repeated assessment of their functional condition.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DDD Patients | – | –All patients presenting to the neurosurgical department of the Kantonsspital St. Gallen (KSSG) with a diagnosed DDD fulfilling the inclusion criteria and scheduled for surgery will be considered for this study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- All patients presenting to the neurosurgical department of the Kantonsspital St. Gallen (KSSG) with a diagnosed DDD fulfilling the inclusion criteria and scheduled for surgery will be considered for this study.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient scheduled for spine surgery with one of the following diagnosis (1) lumbar disc herniation (LDH), (2) lumbar spinal stenosis lumbar (LSS) or lumbar DDD with or without instability requiring lumbar fusion (transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, or extreme lateral interbody fusion)
- Male and Female subjects ≥ 18 years
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Inability to walk (extreme pain or severe neurological deficits)
- Severe Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (COPD) corresponding to ≥ Gold III
- Severe heart failure corresponding to ≥ New York Heart Association (NYHA) III
- Lung cancer and diffuse parenchymal lung disease
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Raw walking distance
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Raw walking distance (in m), as measured with the 6MWT, between the baseline- (before surgery) and follow-up assessment
11 secondary outcomes
TTFS
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
DTFS
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ)
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI)
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/ZCQ baseline
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/ZCQ follow-up
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/COMI baseline
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/COMI follow-up
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/TUG baseline
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
TTFS/TUG follow-up
Time frame: 4-12 weeks
Test-retest reliability of the 6MWT
Time frame: 6 weeks to 1 day before surgery as well as 4-12 weeks after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Jul 2022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37182704Ziga M, Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM, Regli L, Bozinov O, Weyerbrock A, Ratliff JK, Stienen MN, Maldaner N. Objective outcome measures may demonstrate continued change in functional recovery in patients with ceiling effects of subjective patient-reported outcome measures after surgery for lumbar degenerative disorders. Spine J. 2023 Sep;23(9):1314-1322. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.05.002. Epub 2023 May 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35015137Zeitlberger AM, Sosnova M, Ziga M, Gautschi OP, Regli L, Bozinov O, Weyerbrock A, Stienen MN, Maldaner N. Distance to first symptoms measured by the 6-min walking test differentiates between treatment success and failure in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders. Eur Spine J. 2022 Mar;31(3):596-603. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07103-9. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34042414Zeitlberger AM, Sosnova M, Ziga M, Regli L, Bozinov O, Weyerbrock A, Stienen MN, Maldaner N. Assessment of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Smartphone-based 6-minute Walking Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Sep 15;46(18):E959-E965. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003991.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34033596Maldaner N, Sosnova M, Ziga M, Zeitlberger AM, Bozinov O, Gautschi OP, Weyerbrock A, Regli L, Stienen MN. External Validation of the Minimum Clinically Important Difference in the Timed-up-and-go Test After Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Feb 15;47(4):337-342. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004128.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33974372Maldaner N, Sosnova M, Zeitlberger AM, Ziga M, Gautschi OP, Regli L, Bozinov O, Weyerbrock A, Stienen MN. Responsiveness of the self-measured 6-minute walking test and the Timed Up and Go test in patients with degenerative lumbar disorders. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 May 7;35(1):52-59. doi: 10.3171/2020.11.SPINE201621. Epub 2021 May 7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lumbar Disc Disease
Active, not recruiting
Post Marketing Study of MagnetOs Easypack Putty Standalone Compared to Demineralized Bone Matrix or Fibers Mixed With Autograft in Patients Undergoing Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion
Degenerative Disc Disease, Spine Fusion
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Relationship Between Disability, Flexibility, Back Muscles, and Thoracolumbar Fascia in Patients With Lumbar Disc Degeneration
Intervertebral Disc Degeneration
Not yet recruiting
Cortical Surface Functional Changes After Lever Positioning Manipulation for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Spinal Mobilization With and Without Clinical Pilates in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniationc Herniation
Disc Herniation
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Intradiscal Ozone/Oxygen Injection for Treatment of Contained Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nicolai Maldaner, MD principal investigator
Department of Neurosurgery
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Lumbar Disc Disease and Lumbar Spine Degeneration, run by Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Raw walking distance (time frame: 4-12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03977961, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Jul 2022.