AzTrials
AzTrials

NAFLDNCT03980912

Validation of the LiverFASt Test and the Associated Fibrosis Staging Scores Compared to Liver Tissue Pathology Via Liver Biopsy

An observational study of NAFLD and NASH, run by Fibronostics USA, Inc at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is to assess the diagnostic performance of the LiverFASt Test for assessing fibrosis staging scores compared to the assessment of liver tissue pathology from liver biopsy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
NAFLD, NASH
What is being tested?
LiverFASt
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Sep 2019to 1 Nov 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study will include approximately 200 men and women residing in the United States, who are between the ages of 18-80 years. Participants will be liver patients who have undergone liver biopsy within the three months prior to enrollment or are scheduled to undergo a medically indicated liver biopsy.

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18 to 80 years old, inclusive
  • Male or Female
  • Liver patients who are scheduled to undergo, or have recently undergone, a medically indicated liver biopsy. Patients with a prior biopsy may be included under the following conditions:
  • The biopsy was performed within the 3 months prior to enrollment
  • A full report is available, including degree of Fibrosis, Activity and Steatosis or residual liver tissue is available for additional review.
  • Have a full component of biomarkers available for analysis from a blood sample obtained within 3 months of the date of the biopsy. Participants without a full component of biomarkers may be included if an additional sample for analysis of the missing biomarkers can be obtained within 3 months of the date of the biopsy.
  • Required biomarkers include: α2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, total bilirubin, y-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), triglycerides, cholesterol, and fasting glucose, collected within 3 months
  • Willing and able to allow access to requested data and who were informed and signed the consent form

Who cannot join

  • Known psychiatric conditions
  • Patients who may be uncooperative with the sample collection procedures
  • Severe coagulopathy or infection of the hepatic bed
  • Extrahepatic biliary obstruction
  • Severe cardiovascular disease and/or renal failure
  • Malignancy, except for resolved basal-cell carcinoma
  • Previous liver transplant
  • Suffering with a terminal illness or any other conditions or diseases that the investigator considers inappropriate for study participation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • ObvioHealth

    Orlando, Florida, 32817

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Clinical Diagnostic Validation of the LiverFASt Test and the Associated Fibrosis Staging Scores for Activity/Inflammation and Steatosis as Compared to Liver Tissue Pathology Via Liver Biopsy

This study is to assess the diagnostic performance of the LiverFASt Test for assessing fibrosis staging scores compared to the assessment of liver tissue pathology from liver biopsy.

Read the detailed description

Chronic liver diseases (CLDs), such as chronic viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic fatty liver diseases (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally and usually develops over many years. The prevalence of NAFLD has increased in recent years (15% in 2005 to 25% in 2010). As, approximately 20% of NAFLD cases develop NASH, the associated increase in NASH during the same period is to be expected (33% in 2005 to 59.1% in 2010).

The risk of liver-related mortality increases exponentially with increase in fibrosis stage. As the progression from NAFLD to NASH is associated with progressive liver fibrosis, the prognosis for NASH is worse than it is for NAFLD, and results in an increased risk of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and death from liver related causes. As a result, staging of liver fibrosis is essential in determining the prognosis and optimal treatment for patients with NASH. Furthermore, evaluation of fibrosis in NAFLD patients can help refine treatment options designed to prevent the progression to NASH. Currently, liver biopsy is the gold standard for staging liver fibrosis. However, liver biopsy is invasive, expensive and prone to sampling error. Developing, safe and easily accessible noninvasive modalities to accurately evaluate fibrosis stage of NAFLD and NASH is of utmost importance in clinical practice. The use of non-invasive biomarkers of liver fibrosis are needed in the general population setting.

LiverFASt is a non-invasive diagnostic and staging tool, which has been developed as an alternative to liver biopsy. It is a reliable, and reproducible tool which provides grading or staging of the three elementary features of NASH: steatosis, inflammatory activity and fibrosis. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of LiverFASt as a non-invasive biopsy-proven assessment of fatty liver disease.

Early liver disease detection allows patients treatment options for a healthier and productive life. Once liver disease progresses to cirrhosis or cancer, treatment options are limited and expensive. Reducing the almost $2Billion dollar liver disease economic burden to the United States, requires a breakthrough technology, which brings diagnosis to the patient.

Current liver disease diagnosis devices are dependent on fixed facilities, which utilize ultrasound, CT scan, MRI or biopsy sampling with pathology analysis. The dependency on fixed facility diagnostic procedures introduces barriers to patients receiving early detection. While it is known that early detection, wellness and cost effectiveness mitigate these realities, and many trends today in diagnostics are pushing greater early access to the patients, providers limit screening and detection to patients for which the procedure meets the cost-benefit in the ever-evolving value-based healthcare system. Additionally, requiring patients to travel to radiology or laboratory facilities introduces adherence issues.

Fibronostics breaks through the burden to serve patients. By empowering their providers with diagnostic tools within the clinic, the ability to ensure screening and diagnostic adherence is eliminated, and the ease for early detection profoundly shifts the $2B economic burden. For example, the Veterans Health Affairs estimates that 50,000 veterans a year are undiagnosed for Hep C.

Fibronostics diagnostic tool fits into a backpack, which allows a broader reach to underserved patients, and supports the Veterans Health Affairs Mobile Health Provider Program, which is designed to equip VA health care providers with technologies to deliver health care to Veterans homes. To date there is no liver diagnostic device which can serve the broad United States population and shift the growing economic burden.

Conditions
NAFLD, NASH
Being tested
LiverFASt
Keywords
LiverFASt, Fibrosis, Steatosis, Activity, Liver Biopsy, Algorithm, LiverFASt select, Liver Disease
Medical subject headings
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Fibrosis, Fatty Liver, Motor Activity, Liver Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LiverFAStDiagnostic test

    LiverFASt™ is a blood based diagnostic test utilizing a patented algorithm to determine presence and the progression of liver disease. The test is non-invasive, simple, and less expensive than liver biopsy or liver imaging.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NAFLD

    Diagnostic performance of the LiverFASt Test for NAFLD resulting from liver biopsy based on percent diagnostic agreement using the thresholds of clinical significance outlined below.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NAFLD

    Diagnostic performance of the LiverFASt Test for NAFLD resulting from liver biopsy based on percent diagnostic specificity using the thresholds of clinical significance outlined below.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NAFLD

    Diagnostic performance of the LiverFASt Test for NAFLD resulting from liver biopsy based on percent diagnostic sensitivity using the thresholds of clinical significance outlined below.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NAFLD

    Diagnostic performance of the LiverFASt Test for NAFLD resulting from liver biopsy based on percent diagnostic accuracy using the thresholds of clinical significance outlined below.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NASH

    Diagnostic Performance of LiverFASt Test in NASH compared to histopathology

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NASH

    Performance of the test in determining the degree of Fibrosis, Activity and Steatosis compared to histopathology resulting from liver biopsy using percent composite score agreement

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NASH

    Performance of the test in determining the degree of Fibrosis, Activity and Steatosis compared to histopathology resulting from liver biopsy using diagnostic stage-specific percent agreement.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NASH

    Performance of the test in determining the degree of Fibrosis, Activity and Steatosis compared to histopathology resulting from liver biopsy using deviation in individual composite score

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NASH

    Performance of the test in determining the degree of Fibrosis, Activity and Steatosis compared to histopathology resulting from liver biopsy using sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for a stage score basis

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jun 2019
  2. Study start1 Sep 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Sep 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Nov 2020 (estimated)

Why it stopped: created a new protocol with a new study design

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03980912
Sponsor's protocol ID
OBVIO-FIB-001
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
4 Jun 2019
Last updated
3 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of NAFLD and NASH, run by Fibronostics USA, Inc at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic Performance of the LiverFASt test for NAFLD (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in