AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaNCT03981224

The Value of Post-radiation Detectable Plasma EBV DNA in High-risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients

An observational study of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Taichung Veterans General Hospital.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

An additional blood test at 2-3 months after RT is a valuable biomarker in predicting treatment outcome for NPC patients. Patients with persistently detectable EBV DNA during re-staging survey 2-3 months after RT should strengthen adjuvant therapy due to very high subsequent relapse rate and poor survivals. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
How many people
706 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
2 May 2012to 1 May 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: locally advanced NPC patients who finished curative RT with or without chemotherapy

Who may be able to join

  • histologically-proven nasopharyngeal carcinoma without distant metastasis (M0) at initial presentation
  • NPC patients who finished curative RT with or without chemotherapy

Who cannot join

  • initial present M1 disease
  • Secondary primary cancer diagnosed within 5 years
  • performance status (WHO scale) less than 2

About this study

Official title: Additional Blood Test Enhances Diagnostic Sensitivity of Relapse Detection and Predicts Survivals in High-risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients With Post-radiation Detectable Plasma EBV DNA

An additional blood test at 2-3 months after RT is a valuable biomarker in predicting treatment outcome for NPC patients. Patients with persistently detectable EBV DNA during re-staging survey 2-3 months after RT should strengthen adjuvant therapy due to very high subsequent relapse rate and poor survivals.

Read the detailed description

One week post-radiation therapy (RT) blood test showing persistently detectable EBV DNA is a very poor prognostic factor for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. We hypothesize that additional EBV DNA confirmation test could enhance diagnostic sensitivity of relapse detection and predict survivals.

We screened 706 newly diagnosed NPC patients who finished curative RT with or without chemotherapy from March 2001 to December 2012. Additional EBV DNA blood test was performed at re-staging survey 2-3 months after RT. The association between treatment outcome (tumor relapse and patients' survival) and this additional blood test along with various clinical parameters were analyzed.

Keywords
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Radiotherapy, Epstein-Barr virus
Medical subject headings
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Epstein-Barr Virus Infections

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03981224
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
plasma EBV DNA detectablethe NPC patient received curative treatment and post-treatment plasma EBV DNA was detectable.
plasma EBV DNA undetectablethe NPC patient received curative treatment and post-treatment plasma EBV DNA was undetectable.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. relapse-free survival (RFS)

    From the end of treatment to clinical or pathological proven disease relapse

    Measured: 5 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Overall survival (OS)

    Overall survival was calculated from the day of enrollment until death or the last follow-up visit

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jun 2019
  2. Study start2 May 2012
  3. Primary completion1 May 2013
  4. Study completion1 May 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
706 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03981224
Sponsor's protocol ID
CE12117-1
Status last verified
Jun 2019
First submitted
6 Jun 2019
Last updated
10 Jun 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by Taichung Veterans General Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

relapse-free survival (RFS) (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in