Colorectal CancerDEPLRNCT03981679
Circulating-free DNA Assessment as a Tool to Predict Colorectal Cancer in Subjects With a Positive Fecal Immunoassay.
A study testing Biological collection in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Colorectal cancer (CRC): is one of the most frequent cancers, with almost 42152 new cases estimated in France for 2012. There are 3 levels of risk of developing CRC: moderate, high or very high. At each level of risk, appropriate follow-up recommendations are made. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Biological collection
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 278 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 5 Jun 2018to 17 Jan 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ at 18 years old,
- Patient with a positive immunological screening test,
- Patient requiring a colonoscopy
- Patient having given his informed, written and express consent.
Who cannot join
- Patient not affiliated to a social security scheme,
- Subject under tutelage, curatorship or safeguard of justice,
- Patient in an emergency situation,
- Acute or chronic inflammatory disease,
- Patient having made an intense effort 3 days before sampling.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
ICM - Institut régional du Cancer Montpellier
Montpellier, Occ, 34298
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Non-randomized, Open-label and Multi-center Study With the Establishment of a Clinical-biological Database.
Colorectal cancer (CRC): is one of the most frequent cancers, with almost 42152 new cases estimated in France for 2012. There are 3 levels of risk of developing CRC: moderate, high or very high. At each level of risk, appropriate follow-up recommendations are made. Immunological tests for fecal occult blood tests have emerged in recent years and have rapidly become established as benchmark tests in Europe and then in France (OC Sensor test) as part of mass screening. In the case of a positive immunological test, a diagnostic colonoscopy must be systematically organized in order to characterize the possible recto-colic cause of the digestive bleeding thus observed.
Measurement of the DNA present in the circulating blood (circulating DNA or cfDNA): allowed a significant advance in the personalized management of cancers, as a non-invasive test capable of producing diagnostic, prognostic, theranostic, and of therapeutic follow-up type.
The aim of the work is to measure the cfDNA concentration in subjects undergoing colonoscopy because of a positive immunological fecal test.
Read the detailed description
Colorectal cancer (CRC): is one of the most frequent cancers, with almost 42152 new cases estimated in France for 2012. The incidence is thus 30 new cases per year per 100 000 inhabitants in France. It is also a significant cause of death, with 10 deaths per year per 100,000 inhabitants. More than 8 patients out of 10 are cured by surgery alone in case of discovery of an early form with a tumor extension limited to the colonic wall and absence of proximal lymph node invasion. Since most of the invasive cancers are preceded by a benign precancerous lesion called adenoma, it is well understood that the detection of these adenomas (and in particular those at high risk of cancerization: adenomas greater than 10 mm or adenomas in severe dysplasia), followed by their endoscopic excision (polypectomy via colonoscopy) can prevent the development of invasive CRC and ultimately improve the survival of the population thus detected. It is precisely the possibility of intervening on this sequence adenomacancer during an asymptomatic phase of the disease that is the basis of the offer of screening for CRC. CRC screening: There are 3 levels of risk of developing CRC: moderate, high or very high. At each level of risk, appropriate follow-up recommendations are made.considered moderate risk of developing CRC, subjects older than 50 years. These patients at risk are also the most numerous. They are the ones who are involved in screening for occult blood in the stool. Two methods of screening were recommended for moderate-risk subjects, left-sided recto-sigmoidoscopy and repeated occult blood tests in the faeces by the Gaiac method. The latter method has rapidly became in Europe a reference method for screening CRC for reasons of cost and access to care. However, it appears to be a method which is not very appreciated by patients (manipulation of several stool samples) and which is not very sensitive, and which may also interact with hemoglobin of animal origin. These disadvantages have led to an interest in other methods of screening occult blood in stools, such as immunological methods. Immunological tests for fecal occult blood tests have emerged in recent years and have rapidly become established as benchmark tests in Europe and then in France (OC Sensor test) as part of mass screening. Briefly, 2 Dutch randomized studies showed that the OC Sensor immunoassay had better screening performance and acceptability than the Gaiac test. Overall, the different studies have shown that immunological tests lead to more CRCs and more advanced neoplasia than the Gaiac test. According to the studies, the positivity rate ranged from 3% to 6% for immunoassays, the positive predictive value of advanced neoplasia was about 45% with OC Sensor, and that of invasive cancer was 7%. Thus, the OC Sensor fecal immunoassay is the reference screening test, as part of the organized screening of subjects at moderate risk of CRC. In the case of a positive immunological test, a diagnostic colonoscopy must be systematically organized in order to characterize the possible recto-colic cause of the digestive bleeding thus observed. The colonoscopy identifies the lesion and the biopsies then performed accurately identify the advanced nature (adenoma> 10 mm or adenoma in severe dysplasia or invasive cancer) or not of the neoplasia. Colonoscopy is a perfectly controlled medical procedure performed under anesthesia.
It can, however, exceptionally cause bleeding, perforation of the colon, severe abdominal pain, especially when the endoscopic act is associated with an interventional act such as biopsy or polypectomy. The practice of colonoscopy is yearly responsible for 3 accidents on 1000 colonoscopies performed, leading to 1 surgery on 1000 colonoscopy, and unfortunately to 1 death every 10 000 colonoscopies. Because the colonoscopy is performed under anesthesia, this forces the patient to absent himself from work for one day, to call on a third party to return home. Finally, although colonoscopy is the most sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of adenomas and CRCs, its diagnostic performance is not absolute: complete colon exploration is only possible in 95 % Of cases. Colonoscopy is missing in particular 5% of adenomas of more than 1 cm and 4% of colon cancers of the right colon. Colonoscopy also has a cost. Thus, any non-invasive test capable of making a diagnosis of invasive cancer or discarding the same cancer diagnosis after a positive immunological fecal screening test would be able to reduce the use of diagnostic colonoscopy and thus the risks and Associated constraints. Measurement of the DNA present in the circulating blood (circulating DNA or cfDNA): allowed a significant advance in the personalized management of cancers, as a non-invasive test capable of producing diagnostic, prognostic, theranostic, and of therapeutic follow-up type. The teams of the IRCM of Montpellier have developed a test called IntPlex®, capable of allowing the multiparametric analysis of this cfDNA.
This innovative technology has been patented and validated technically and clinically on large cohorts of patients with different types of cancer and for several types of genetic mutations. Briefly, this Intplex® technology enables the simultaneous determination of five cfDNA measurement and characterization parameters: total cfDNA concentration, fragmentation, point mutation detection, mutant cfDNA concentration and mutational load.
Plasma cfDNA concentrations in patients with CRC are significantly higher than in healthy individuals. These concentrations decrease progressively in patients in remission while they increase in the patients evolutionary or in recurrence. This measure also proves to be an excellent tool to discriminate patients with metastatic CRC from those with more pejorative prognosis. The aim of the work is to measure the cfDNA concentration in subjects undergoing colonoscopy because of a positive immunological fecal test.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Being tested
- Biological collection
- Keywords
- colonoscopy, CRC screening, cfDNA, Intplex, colorectal cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Biological collectionOther
The biological collection will also include samples of blood samples collected before colonoscopy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Biological collection | Experimental | For all the patients include in the study :
- Blood samples collected before the colonoscopy In parallel to this biological collection, standardized clinical data will be entered into a database Receives: Other: Biological collection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
AUC
Area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the total cfDNA concentration.
Measured: Until the study completion of 2 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
cfDNA threshold
Optimal threshold of CfDNA (according to Youden Index)
Measured: Until the study completion of 2 years
Intplex parameters
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of the test Intplex
Measured: Until the study completion of 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2019
- Study start5 Jun 2018
- Primary completion17 Jan 2020
- Study completion17 Jan 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 278 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- ADENIS Antoine, MD, Study chair, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03981679
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PROICM 2017-02 DEP
- Acronym
- DEPLR
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 7 Jun 2019
- Last updated
- 4 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, Risio M, Sciallero S, Zappa M, Andreoni B, Arrigoni A, Bisanti L, Casella C, Crosta C, Falcini F, Ferrero F, Giacomin A, Giuliani O, Santarelli A, Visioli CB, Zanetti R, Atkin WS, Senore C; SCORE Working Group. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial--SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Sep 7;103(17):1310-22. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr284. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
PubMed 21852264Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, Church T, Laiyemo AO, Bresalier R, Andriole GL, Buys SS, Crawford ED, Fouad MN, Isaacs C, Johnson CC, Reding DJ, O'Brien B, Carrick DM, Wright P, Riley TL, Purdue MP, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS, Miller AB, Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Berg CD; PLCO Project Team. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2345-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114635. Epub 2012 May 21.
PubMed 22612596Minozzi S, Armaroli P, Segnan N. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Principles of evidence assessment and methods for reaching recommendations. Endoscopy. 2012 Sep;44 Suppl 3:SE9-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309781. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
PubMed 23012125US Preventive Services Task Force; Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Davidson KW, Epling JW Jr, Garcia FAR, Gillman MW, Harper DM, Kemper AR, Krist AH, Kurth AE, Landefeld CS, Mangione CM, Owens DK, Phillips WR, Phipps MG, Pignone MP, Siu AL. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
PubMed 27304597Mouliere F, El Messaoudi S, Pang D, Dritschilo A, Thierry AR. Multi-marker analysis of circulating cell-free DNA toward personalized medicine for colorectal cancer. Mol Oncol. 2014 Jul;8(5):927-41. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
PubMed 24698732
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Non-randomized, Open-label and Multi-center Study With the Establishment of a Clinical-biological Database.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03981679
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DEPLR / PROICM 2017-02 DEP
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer
- Keywords
- colonoscopy, CRC screening, cfDNA, Intplex, colorectal cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 278 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'AurelleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 17 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 Jan 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Colorectal cancer (CRC): is one of the most frequent cancers, with almost 42152 new cases estimated in France for 2012. There are 3 levels of risk of developing CRC: moderate, high or very high. At each level of risk, appropriate follow-up recommendations are made. Immunological tests for fecal occult blood tests have emerged in recent years and have rapidly become established as benchmark tests in Europe and then in France (OC Sensor test) as part of mass screening. In the case of a positive immunological test, a diagnostic colonoscopy must be systematically organized in order to characterize the possible recto-colic cause of the digestive bleeding thus observed.
Measurement of the DNA present in the circulating blood (circulating DNA or cfDNA): allowed a significant advance in the personalized management of cancers, as a non-invasive test capable of producing diagnostic, prognostic, theranostic, and of therapeutic follow-up type.
The aim of the work is to measure the cfDNA concentration in subjects undergoing colonoscopy because of a positive immunological fecal test.
Detailed description
Colorectal cancer (CRC): is one of the most frequent cancers, with almost 42152 new cases estimated in France for 2012. The incidence is thus 30 new cases per year per 100 000 inhabitants in France. It is also a significant cause of death, with 10 deaths per year per 100,000 inhabitants. More than 8 patients out of 10 are cured by surgery alone in case of discovery of an early form with a tumor extension limited to the colonic wall and absence of proximal lymph node invasion. Since most of the invasive cancers are preceded by a benign precancerous lesion called adenoma, it is well understood that the detection of these adenomas (and in particular those at high risk of cancerization: adenomas greater than 10 mm or adenomas in severe dysplasia), followed by their endoscopic excision (polypectomy via colonoscopy) can prevent the development of invasive CRC and ultimately improve the survival of the population thus detected. It is precisely the possibility of intervening on this sequence adenomacancer during an asymptomatic phase of the disease that is the basis of the offer of screening for CRC. CRC screening: There are 3 levels of risk of developing CRC: moderate, high or very high. At each level of risk, appropriate follow-up recommendations are made.considered moderate risk of developing CRC, subjects older than 50 years. These patients at risk are also the most numerous. They are the ones who are involved in screening for occult blood in the stool. Two methods of screening were recommended for moderate-risk subjects, left-sided recto-sigmoidoscopy and repeated occult blood tests in the faeces by the Gaiac method. The latter method has rapidly became in Europe a reference method for screening CRC for reasons of cost and access to care. However, it appears to be a method which is not very appreciated by patients (manipulation of several stool samples) and which is not very sensitive, and which may also interact with hemoglobin of animal origin. These disadvantages have led to an interest in other methods of screening occult blood in stools, such as immunological methods. Immunological tests for fecal occult blood tests have emerged in recent years and have rapidly become established as benchmark tests in Europe and then in France (OC Sensor test) as part of mass screening. Briefly, 2 Dutch randomized studies showed that the OC Sensor immunoassay had better screening performance and acceptability than the Gaiac test. Overall, the different studies have shown that immunological tests lead to more CRCs and more advanced neoplasia than the Gaiac test. According to the studies, the positivity rate ranged from 3% to 6% for immunoassays, the positive predictive value of advanced neoplasia was about 45% with OC Sensor, and that of invasive cancer was 7%. Thus, the OC Sensor fecal immunoassay is the reference screening test, as part of the organized screening of subjects at moderate risk of CRC. In the case of a positive immunological test, a diagnostic colonoscopy must be systematically organized in order to characterize the possible recto-colic cause of the digestive bleeding thus observed. The colonoscopy identifies the lesion and the biopsies then performed accurately identify the advanced nature (adenoma> 10 mm or adenoma in severe dysplasia or invasive cancer) or not of the neoplasia. Colonoscopy is a perfectly controlled medical procedure performed under anesthesia.
It can, however, exceptionally cause bleeding, perforation of the colon, severe abdominal pain, especially when the endoscopic act is associated with an interventional act such as biopsy or polypectomy. The practice of colonoscopy is yearly responsible for 3 accidents on 1000 colonoscopies performed, leading to 1 surgery on 1000 colonoscopy, and unfortunately to 1 death every 10 000 colonoscopies. Because the colonoscopy is performed under anesthesia, this forces the patient to absent himself from work for one day, to call on a third party to return home. Finally, although colonoscopy is the most sensitive and specific test for the diagnosis of adenomas and CRCs, its diagnostic performance is not absolute: complete colon exploration is only possible in 95 % Of cases. Colonoscopy is missing in particular 5% of adenomas of more than 1 cm and 4% of colon cancers of the right colon. Colonoscopy also has a cost. Thus, any non-invasive test capable of making a diagnosis of invasive cancer or discarding the same cancer diagnosis after a positive immunological fecal screening test would be able to reduce the use of diagnostic colonoscopy and thus the risks and Associated constraints. Measurement of the DNA present in the circulating blood (circulating DNA or cfDNA): allowed a significant advance in the personalized management of cancers, as a non-invasive test capable of producing diagnostic, prognostic, theranostic, and of therapeutic follow-up type. The teams of the IRCM of Montpellier have developed a test called IntPlex®, capable of allowing the multiparametric analysis of this cfDNA.
This innovative technology has been patented and validated technically and clinically on large cohorts of patients with different types of cancer and for several types of genetic mutations. Briefly, this Intplex® technology enables the simultaneous determination of five cfDNA measurement and characterization parameters: total cfDNA concentration, fragmentation, point mutation detection, mutant cfDNA concentration and mutational load.
Plasma cfDNA concentrations in patients with CRC are significantly higher than in healthy individuals. These concentrations decrease progressively in patients in remission while they increase in the patients evolutionary or in recurrence. This measure also proves to be an excellent tool to discriminate patients with metastatic CRC from those with more pejorative prognosis. The aim of the work is to measure the cfDNA concentration in subjects undergoing colonoscopy because of a positive immunological fecal test.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Biological collection | Experimental | Other: Biological collectionFor all the patients include in the study : - Blood samples collected before the colonoscopy In parallel to this biological collection, standardized clinical data will be entered into a database |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age ≥ at 18 years old,
- Patient with a positive immunological screening test,
- Patient requiring a colonoscopy
- Patient having given his informed, written and express consent.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patient not affiliated to a social security scheme,
- Subject under tutelage, curatorship or safeguard of justice,
- Patient in an emergency situation,
- Acute or chronic inflammatory disease,
- Patient having made an intense effort 3 days before sampling.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Biological collectionThe biological collection will also include samples of blood samples collected before colonoscopy | Other | Biological collection |
Primary outcome
AUC
Time frame: Until the study completion of 2 years
Area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the total cfDNA concentration.
2 secondary outcomes
cfDNA threshold
Time frame: Until the study completion of 2 years
Intplex parameters
Time frame: Until the study completion of 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Aug 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 21852264Segnan N, Armaroli P, Bonelli L, Risio M, Sciallero S, Zappa M, Andreoni B, Arrigoni A, Bisanti L, Casella C, Crosta C, Falcini F, Ferrero F, Giacomin A, Giuliani O, Santarelli A, Visioli CB, Zanetti R, Atkin WS, Senore C; SCORE Working Group. Once-only sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: follow-up findings of the Italian Randomized Controlled Trial--SCORE. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Sep 7;103(17):1310-22. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr284. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 22612596Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, Weissfeld JL, Yokochi LA, Church T, Laiyemo AO, Bresalier R, Andriole GL, Buys SS, Crawford ED, Fouad MN, Isaacs C, Johnson CC, Reding DJ, O'Brien B, Carrick DM, Wright P, Riley TL, Purdue MP, Izmirlian G, Kramer BS, Miller AB, Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Berg CD; PLCO Project Team. Colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jun 21;366(25):2345-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1114635. Epub 2012 May 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 23012125Minozzi S, Armaroli P, Segnan N. European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition--Principles of evidence assessment and methods for reaching recommendations. Endoscopy. 2012 Sep;44 Suppl 3:SE9-14. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1309781. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 27304597US Preventive Services Task Force; Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, Davidson KW, Epling JW Jr, Garcia FAR, Gillman MW, Harper DM, Kemper AR, Krist AH, Kurth AE, Landefeld CS, Mangione CM, Owens DK, Phillips WR, Phipps MG, Pignone MP, Siu AL. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.
- Results publication: PubMed 24698732Mouliere F, El Messaoudi S, Pang D, Dritschilo A, Thierry AR. Multi-marker analysis of circulating cell-free DNA toward personalized medicine for colorectal cancer. Mol Oncol. 2014 Jul;8(5):927-41. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.02.005. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of RAS(ON) Inhibitors in Combination With Ivonescimab in Patients With Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, Metastatic Solid Tumors
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Regorafenib With Low-dose Chemotherapies and Aspirin Followed by Standard Chemotherapies in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
cfDNA Assay Prospective Observational Validation for Early Cancer Detection and Minimal Residual Disease
Brain Cancer, Breast Cancer
Recruiting
Distance-Based Exercise to Preserve Function and Prevent Disability
Localized Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Anal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
ADENIS Antoine, MD study chair
Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Biological collection in people with Colorectal Cancer, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
AUC (time frame: Until the study completion of 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03981679, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Aug 2020.