AzTrials
AzTrials

Breast CancerCOHECNCT03981731

Management of Perioperative Anxiety by the Cardiac Coherence Technique Coupled With a Hypnosis Session

A study testing Cardiac coherence in people with Breast Cancer and Gynecologic Cancer, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

the investigator proposes to use the cardiac coherence technique coupled with a hypnosis session to improve post-operative recovery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Breast Cancer, Gynecologic Cancer
What is being tested?
Cardiac coherence
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
53 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
14 Feb 2020to 14 Jan 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Surgery for breast or gynaecological cancer requiring scheduled hospitalization for up to 3 days
  • Signing of informed consent before any specific procedure in the study
  • Patient affiliated to a social security system

Who cannot join

  • Patients undergoing outpatient surgery for their cancer will not be included
  • Natural bradycardia (50 beats per minute)
  • Patient taking β-blockers, digoxin, flecaine, isoptin, cordarone, diltiazem
  • Cardiac arrhythmias
  • Severe heart failure with ventricular ejection fraction < 40%
  • Uncontrolled chronic pain
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Patients whose medical or psychological conditions do not allow them to complete the study or sign the consent
  • Patient does not understand the French language
  • Deaf and/or dumb patient
  • Adult patient under guardianship or curatorship

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Institut régional du cancer de Montpellier

    Montpellier, Hérault, 34298

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Management of Perioperative Anxiety by the Fixed Rate Guided Breathing Technique (Cardiac Coherence) Coupled With a Hypnosis Session, as Part of the Improved Pre-habilitation After Surgery

the investigator proposes to use the cardiac coherence technique coupled with a hypnosis session to improve post-operative recovery.

Read the detailed description

The perioperative period is recognized as an anxiety-provoking period for patients. If for some patients, this anxiety is more or less manageable, for others, it is the major concern with regard to their intervention, fearing not to wake up, to remain in a coma. Consideration of this aspect is very important for patients who require surgery. It is also a concern for caregivers involved in the care of these patients, including anesthesiologists, surgeons and operating room staff.

For many years, pharmacological premedication, including benzodiazepines, has been the gold standard in the treatment of preoperative anxiety.

This systematic prescription is controversial in populations most exposed to side effects such as the elderly, patients with heart or respiratory diseases.

Surgery also seems to influence the impact of premedication. For example, abdominal surgery and breast surgery are associated with a higher risk of agitation upon awakening.

Mental preparation, based on simple explanations by the anaesthetist, is not enough to reduce patients' anxiety.

A recent study evaluated the perioperative experience of patients receiving or not receiving premedication. It shows that benzodiazepines are associated with cognitive impairment and delayed extubation in the elderly. In addition, it seems to have little effect on patient anxiety when compared to a placebo.

In this context of anxiety, an emotional regulation tool appears particularly relevant. Cardiac coherence" (CC) is a particular state of cardiac variability. This state is correlated with many physiological and psychological variables. It is possible to promote this state through different techniques. One of its practices, "fixed frequency guided breathing", seems relevant both in its principles and in its simplicity of implementation.

This specific respiratory mode permits to rebalance the sympathetic - parasympathetic balance of the autonomic nervous system and reveals a state of calm vigilance. This simple, well-coded respiratory psychophysiological practice is widely used in many applications, such as for the most caricatural ones, the management of difficult situations where stress is a central element such as decision-making among fighter pilots on mission, in national education to improve academic learning (especially among anxious students) and also more generally in stress and anxiety management.

This technique induces a refocusing of emotions by regulating the SNA and therefore a better regulation of the hormones involved in the emotional cascade.

This practice has several advantages:

  • it is psychophysiological (psychocorporeal) and widely described in the scientific literature in several indications
  • it is completely free of charge and immediately accessible to the patient, regardless of time and place
  • it can be used at other anxiety-inducing times (e.g., imaging or biopsy tests)
  • it allows total patient autonomy, offering self-management of anxiety and independence from the presence of a third party
  • it can approach a hypnotic model by focusing and absorbing what it can induce on breathing, and thus share some of its benefits
  • It does not have any adverse effects. The major difficulty of this technique is the adherence and regularity of the practice. The optimal effect is dependent on regular training.

To improve this adherence, an audio tape will be put online, read in a hypnotic tone, which will aim to explain respiratory physiology, the benefits of oxygenation on cells and metabolism; this will have the effect of understanding the interest and utility of this exercise and will contribute to induce a feeling of relaxation and well-being.

This study will be a study of feasibility about a program based on the cardiac coherence technique in a context of perioperative anxiety.

Being tested
Cardiac coherence
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cardiac coherenceOther

    An initiation session to cardiac coherence will take place between D-10 and D-7 before the operation (during the anaesthesia consultation) in order to obtain a breathing rate of 6 cycles/min via a free application (Respirelax) with listening to an audio tape.

    3 cardiac coherence sessions per day of 5 min (before meals) during the 7 days preceding the operation.

    • The anaesthetic induction will be done with a session of cardiac coherence associated with listening to the audio tape.
Study groups in NCT03981731
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cardiac coherenceExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Cardiac coherence

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of patients who have enrolled in the pre-habilitation program

    A patient will be considered to have optimally adhered to the program if she performs at least 2/3 of the proposed cardiac coherence sessions (that represents 67% of the total number of sessions), that is, at least 14 sessions over the 7 days preceding the surgery.

    Measured: 7 days

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. The preoperative anxiety score by using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS)

    The anxiety scale consists of six items, each of which could be scored from 1 to 5 with the end poles "not at all" (1) and "extremely" (5). The score of the anxiety scale is the sum of these four questions, with a scoring range from 6 to 30.

    Measured: 7 days

  2. Patient's satisfaction with perioperative period by using "Evaluation of the Vecu of General Anesthesia" questionnaire (EVAN-G)

    The validated EVAN-G questionnaire includes 26 questions whose results are grouped together to define 6 "dimensions": Attention Focus, Information, Privacy, Pain, Discomfort and Wait Times. From these scores, an overall satisfaction score is calculated (average of all scores). For each of the scores: the higher the score, the higher the satisfaction. For each dimension, scores were reduced on a scale from 0 to 100. The higher the score, the higher the perceived quality of the experience. The total score was the sum of the scores of the six dimensions reduced to 100.

    Measured: 48 hours

  3. Measurement of the Postoperative Quality of Recovery (QoR)

    The quality of postoperative functional recovery will be assessed by the QoR-15 questionnaire, which assesses five dimensions of recovery (physical comfort ; emotional state ; physical independence ; physiological support ; and pain). Each item was rated on a ten-point Likert scale: none of the time, some of the time, usually, most of the time, and all the time. The total score on the QoR-15 ranges from 0 (poorest quality of recovery) to 150 (best quality of recovery).

    Measured: 10 days

  4. Measurement of anxiety level by using a visual analogue scale

    It's a visual scale from 0 (no anxiety) to 100 (highest anxiety)

    Measured: 7 days

  5. Measurement of wake-up quality by using a visual analogue scale

    It's a visual scale from 0 (best wake-up) to 100 (worst wake-up)

    Measured: 1 day

  6. Measurement of post-operative pain by using a visual analogue scale

    It's a visual scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (highest pain)

    Measured: 1 day

  7. Measurement of post-operative fatigue by using a visual analogue scale

    It's a visual scale from 0 (no fatigue) to 100 (highest fatigue)

    Measured: 1 day

  8. Measurement of comfort and satisfaction with care by using a visual analogue scale

    It's a visual scale from 0 (ideal care) to 100 worst care)

    Measured: 1 day

  9. Number of patients taking anesthetic drugs at induction of anaesthesia

    Measured: 1 day

  10. Number of patients taking anesthetic drugs during the post-interventional monitoring

    Measured: 1 day

  11. Number of patients taking morphine in recovery room

    Measured: 1 day

  12. Number of patients taking setrons (nausea and vomiting medication)

    Measured: 1 day

  13. Rate of patients that consider continuing the program of cardiac coherence

    Measured: 1 day

  14. Rate of patients willing to recommend the technique

    Measured: 1 day

  15. Number of days of hospitalization

    Measured: 1 month

  16. Number of patients taking morphine in peroperative

    Measured: 1 day

  17. Measurement of pain at inclusion by using a visual analogue scale

    It's a visual scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (highest pain)

    Measured: 1 day

  18. The recruitment rate (proportion of patients consenting to participate in the study among eligible patients at the screening) and reasons for refusal.

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jun 2019
  2. Study start14 Feb 2020
  3. Primary completion14 Jan 2022
  4. Study completion14 Jan 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
53 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03981731
Sponsor's protocol ID
PROICM 2019-06 COH
Acronym
COHEC
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
7 Jun 2019
Last updated
5 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All data will be available after publication of the results in peer-reviewed revues, and in national and international meetings. It includes all disidentified participants' data, the study protocol, the statistical analysis plan, the clinical study report and the analytic code. The corresponding author will provide data and datasets generated and/or analyzed during the study upon reasonable request.

Publications

  • Pekcan M, Celebioglu B, Demir B, Saricaoglu F, Hascelik G, Yukselen MA, Basgul E, Aypar U. The effect of premedication on preoperative anxiety. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;18(2):421-33.

    PubMed 16438017
  • Van den Bosch JE, Moons KG, Bonsel GJ, Kalkman CJ. Does measurement of preoperative anxiety have added value for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting? Anesth Analg. 2005 May;100(5):1525-1532. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000149325.20542.D4.

    PubMed 15845719
  • Munoz HR, Dagnino JA, Rufs JA, Bugedo GJ. Benzodiazepine premedication causes hypoxemia during spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients. Reg Anesth. 1992 May-Jun;17(3):139-42.

    PubMed 1606095
  • Agelink MW, Majewski TB, Andrich J, Mueck-Weymann M. Short-term effects of intravenous benzodiazepines on autonomic neurocardiac regulation in humans: a comparison between midazolam, diazepam, and lorazepam. Crit Care Med. 2002 May;30(5):997-1006. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200205000-00008.

    PubMed 12006794
  • Lepouse C, Lautner CA, Liu L, Gomis P, Leon A. Emergence delirium in adults in the post-anaesthesia care unit. Br J Anaesth. 2006 Jun;96(6):747-53. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael094. Epub 2006 May 2.

    PubMed 16670111
  • McCraty R, Atkinson M, Tiller WA, Rein G, Watkins AD. The effects of emotions on short-term power spectrum analysis of heart rate variability. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Nov 15;76(14):1089-93. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80309-9.

    PubMed 7484873
  • Amraoui J, Leclerc G, Jarlier M, Diaz J, Guler R, Demoly C, Verin C, Rey Dit Guzer S, Chalbos P, Moussion A, Taoum C, Neron M, Philibert L. Cardiac coherence and medical hypnosis: a feasibility study of a new combined approach for managing preoperative anxiety in patients with breast or gynaecological cancer. BJA Open. 2024 Sep 24;12:100309. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100309. eCollection 2024 Dec.

    PubMed 39381542

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cardiac coherence in people with Breast Cancer and Gynecologic Cancer, run by Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of patients who have enrolled in the pre-habilitation program (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03981731, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in