AzTrials
AzTrials

Influenza, HumanPhase 4NCT03982069

Immunologic Response to FluMist vs. Flucelvax

A Phase 4 study testing FluMist live attenuated influenza vaccine and Flucelvax inactivated influenza vaccine in people with Influenza, Human and Immune Response, run by Richard Zimmerman MD at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate immunologic response to different types of influenza vaccine among children/adolescents/young adults 4-21 years of age. This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT), that will assess immune response in about 440 participants (about 220 per vaccine arm) pre- and post-vaccination… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 21 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Influenza, Human, Immune Response
What is being tested?
FluMist live attenuated influenza vaccine and Flucelvax inactivated influenza vaccine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
465 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
20 Sep 2019to 9 Dec 2020
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 21 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • aged 4-21 years;
  • has prior vaccination history available (which can be determined based either on medical record review or through state registry review);
  • plans to receive the current seasonal influenza vaccination at one of the recruiting sites

Who cannot join

  • unable or unwilling to completed required study activities, including informed consent, randomization to vaccine, and bloodwork;
  • has already received influenza vaccine for the current season;
  • has a known immunocompromising condition or is on an immunosuppressing medication (e.g., high dose steroids >10 days);
  • is known to be pregnant;
  • has a history of severe allergy to eggs or to influenza vaccine or any of its components

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • General Academic Pediatrics

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • University of Pittsburgh Department of Family Medicine

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Immunological Response to Influenza Vaccination in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: A RCT of FluMist vs. Flucelvax

The purpose of this study is to evaluate immunologic response to different types of influenza vaccine among children/adolescents/young adults 4-21 years of age. This is a randomized controlled trial (RCT), that will assess immune response in about 440 participants (about 220 per vaccine arm) pre- and post-vaccination to FluMist (live attenuated influenza vaccine given by nasal administration) and Flucelvax (egg-free cell-culture inactivated influenza vaccine).

Read the detailed description

This is a non-blinded, randomized controlled trial analyzing influenza vaccine immunogenicity response in children/adolescents/young adults aged 4-21 years given one of two FDA approved and licensed influenza vaccines: FluMist (live attenuated influenza vaccine by nasal administration) and Flucelvax (egg-free cell-culture inactivated influenza vaccine). This study will enroll about 440 healthy participants, about 220 per vaccine arm. Participants will be randomized in blocks of 4 using a 1:1 allocation to receive either FluMist or Flucelvax. Blood work will be conducted on all participants at baseline prior to vaccine receipt and post-vaccination at Day 7 (range 6-9 days) and Day 28 (range 21-35 days). The primary objective of the study is to determine pre- and post-serologic responses to each vaccine type.

Being tested
FluMist live attenuated influenza vaccine, Flucelvax inactivated influenza vaccine
Medical subject headings
Influenza, Human

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • FluMist live attenuated influenza vaccineBiological

    Participants randomized to this study influenza vaccine arm will receive FluMist live attenuated influenza vaccine at baseline after the baseline blood draw is complete.

  • Flucelvax inactivated influenza vaccineBiological

    Participants randomized to this study influenza vaccine arm will receive Flucelvax cell-culture inactivated influenza vaccine at baseline after the baseline blood draw is complete.

Study groups in NCT03982069
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FluMist live attenuated influenza vaccineActive comparatorParticipants receiving live attenuated FluMist influenza vaccine will receive 0.2 mL given intranasally
Receives: Biological: FluMist live attenuated influenza vaccine
Flucelvax inactivated influenza vaccineActive comparatorParticipants receiving inactivated Flucelvax influenza vaccine will receive 0.5 mL given intramuscularly
Receives: Biological: Flucelvax inactivated influenza vaccine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Participants With Seroconversion Response In 2019

    Rows in data tables represent different influenza antigens measured in 2019. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay was conducted to assess immunologic outcome. Seroconversion is defined as a 4-fold or higher rise in HI titer post-vaccination given a pre-vaccination HI titer of >=10 and a final HI titer of >=40.

    Measured: Post-vaccination (at Day 28 timepoint)

  2. Number of Participants With Seroconversion Response In 2020

    Rows in data tables represent different influenza antigens measured in 2020. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay was conducted to assess immunologic outcome. Seroconversion is defined as a 4-fold or higher rise in HI titer post-vaccination given a pre-vaccination HI titer of >=10 and a final HI titer of >=40.

    Measured: Post-vaccination (at Day 28 timepoint)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Number of Participants With Seroprotection Response in 2019

    Rows in data tables represent different influenza antigens measured in 2019. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay was conducted to assess immunologic outcome. Seroprotection is defined as a HI titer >= 1:110 at either time point.

    Measured: Pre-vaccination (at Day 0 timepoint) and post-vaccination (at Day 28 timepoint)

  2. Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at Each Time Point 2019

    Rows in data tables represent different influenza antigens measured in 2019. Hemagglutination inhibition assay was conducted to assess immunologic outcome. GMTs is defined as the anti-log of the mean of the log2 HI titers

    Measured: Pre-vaccination (at Day 0 timepoint) and post-vaccination (at Day 28 timepoint)

  3. Number of Participants With Seroprotection Response in 2020

    Rows in data tables represent different influenza antigens measured in 2020. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay was conducted to assess immunologic outcome. Seroprotection is defined as a HI titer >= 1:110 at either time point.

    Measured: Pre-vaccination (at Day 0 timepoint) and post-vaccination (at Day 28 timepoint)

  4. Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at Each Time Point 2020

    Rows in data tables represent different influenza antigens measured in 2020. Hemagglutination inhibition assay will be conducted to assess immunologic outcome. GMTs is defined as the anti-log of the mean of the log2 HI titers

    Measured: Pre-vaccination (at Day 0 timepoint) and post-vaccination (at Day 28 timepoint)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jun 2019
  2. Study start20 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion9 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion9 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
465 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03982069
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY19040242
Other IDs
1U01|P001035-01
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
6 Jun 2019
Last updated
14 Oct 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the primary article, after deidentification, will be placed at the site mentioned below.

Publications

  • Williams KV, Li ZN, Zhai B, Alcorn JF, Nowalk MP, Levine MZ, Kim SS, Flannery B, Moehling Geffel K, Merranko AJ, Collins M, Susick M, Clarke KS, Zimmerman RK, Martin JM. A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Immunogenicity to Cell-Based Versus Live-Attenuated Influenza Vaccines in Children. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2023 Jun 30;12(6):342-352. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piad033.

    PubMed 37232430

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing FluMist live attenuated influenza vaccine and Flucelvax inactivated influenza vaccine in people with Influenza, Human and Immune Response, run by Richard Zimmerman MD at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Oct 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Participants With Seroconversion Response In 2019 (time frame: Post-vaccination (at Day 28 timepoint)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03982069, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in