AzTrials
AzTrials

Cerebral PalsyNCT03986333

Validation of the French Version of the Drooling Impact Scale in a Pediatric Cerebral Palsy Population

An observational study of Cerebral Palsy and Drooling, run by Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues Croix Rouge Française at 6 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to present the French translation of the Drooling Impact Scale (DIS-F) and to explore its validity, reliability and responsiveness to change in a group of children with Cerebral Palsy (CP) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Cerebral Palsy, Drooling
How many people
55 participants
Where
6 sitesFrance
Study dates
Jan 2015to Dec 2018
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: Fifty-five children were included, 33 in the stable group and 22 in the intervention group.

Who may be able to join

  • Cerebral palsy
  • Hypersialorrhea
  • No change in content and frequency of speech therapy for three months following baseline
  • At least 1 out of 2 parents must have a clear understanding of french language
  • Oral consent

Who cannot join

  • No clear understanding of french language

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

France6 sites
  • Centre d'Education Motrice Jean-Marie Arnion - Odynéo

    Dommartin, 69380

  • Centre d'Education Motrice Henry Gormand

    Écully, 69130

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôpital Nord

    La Tronche, 38700

  • Croix rouge française Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues

    Lyon, 69005

  • AP-HM Hôpital de la Timone

    Marseille, 13385

  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nîmes

    Nîmes, 30029

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Validity, Reliability and Responsiveness to Change of the French Version of the Drooling Impact Scale in a Pediatric Cerebral Palsy Population.

The aim of this study is to present the French translation of the Drooling Impact Scale (DIS-F) and to explore its validity, reliability and responsiveness to change in a group of children with Cerebral Palsy (CP)

Read the detailed description

Drooling in children with CP is likely underestimated and under treated. It is an over-handicap for these children, because it causes many complications and may lead to a decline in self-esteem and to social isolation, altering the quality of life for patients and families. The therapeutic arsenal for the management of drooling includes rehabilitation techniques, oral drug treatments, local treatments or surgical treatments whose effectiveness is variable. In order to evaluate the efficacy of these therapies, standardized and valid assessment tools must be used. The Drooling Impact Scale (DIS) developed by Dr. Sue Reid's team in Melbourne in 2008, shows good validity and sensitivity to change, especially after botulinum toxin injection. It is commonly used in English-speaking studies, but no validation in French is available yet.

The aim of this study is to present the French translation of the Drooling Impact Scale (DIS-F) and to explore its validity, reliability and responsiveness to change in a group of children with CP.

Medical subject headings
Cerebral Palsy, Sialorrhea

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT03986333
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlChildren whose drooling was expected to remain relatively stable over 1 month
InterventionChildren receiving a treatment to reduce their drooling

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Drooling Impact Scale

    The severity of drooling is assessed from the parents perception, by the Drooling Impact Scale. This scale consists of a set of ten items exploring the impact of drooling on daily life activities and relationships, each measured on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 representing the lowest impact of drooling, 10 the highest).

    Measured: Control group : baseline and 1 month later. Intervention group : baseline and 1 month after treatment

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Internal consistency

    Internal consistency was assessed by calculating the Cronbach's alpha coefficient from scores obtained at inclusion. A correlation coefficient of at least 0.7 was defined as indicative of adequate inter-relatedness of items. The Pearson correlation matrix was used to define the linear relationships between items.

    Measured: All groups : at inclusion

  2. Test-retest reliability

    The Lin concordance correlation coefficient was used to compute the level of agreement between the two assessments. In addition, the Bland-Altman limits-of-agreement method for assessing test-retest reliability was used as a complementary approach.

    Measured: Control group : baseline and 1 month later

  3. Responsiveness to change

    An estimate of the responsiveness or sensitivity to change of the measure was obtained using four statistical methods : effect size, standardized response mean,Guyatt responsiveness statistics, unpaired t-test (Wilcoxon test).

    Measured: Intervention group : baseline and 1 month after treatment.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jun 2019
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2017
  4. Study completionDec 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
55 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03986333
Sponsor's protocol ID
DROOLING
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
13 May 2019
Last updated
14 Jun 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cerebral Palsy and Drooling, run by Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues Croix Rouge Française at 6 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Drooling Impact Scale (time frame: Control group : baseline and 1 month later. Intervention group : baseline and 1 month after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jun 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in