AzTrials
AzTrials

Neuromuscular BlockadeNCT03987607

Comparison of Two Monitors That Measure Neuromuscular Function During Surgeries

An observational study of Neuromuscular Blockade, run by Tamas Vegh, MD at 1 site in Hungary.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Anesthesiologists are often required to give certain drugs, called muscle relaxants to the patients for surgery. These drugs make the people weak for the procedure to make the work of the surgeon easier and prevent unexpected movements. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Neuromuscular Blockade
What is being tested?
neuromuscular blockade monitoring
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteHungary
Study dates
17 Jun 2019to 18 Dec 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients of the University of Debrecen Clinical Center who are scheduled for elective surgery

Who may be able to join

  • elective surgery requiring neuromuscular blockade
  • written informed consent
  • American Society of Anesthesiology physical status I-III

Who cannot join

  • neuromuscular disease in patient history,
  • patient taking any medication that affects neuromuscular transmission,
  • open wound or sores at the site of electrode placement,
  • expected difficult airway,
  • pregnancy or breastfeeding state,
  • implanted pacemaker

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hungary1 site
  • University of Debrecen, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

    Debrecen, 4032

Other trials in Hungary

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Electromyography-based TetraGraph and Acceleromyography-based TOF-Watch SX Neuromuscular Monitors Under Clinical Conditions

Anesthesiologists are often required to give certain drugs, called muscle relaxants to the patients for surgery. These drugs make the people weak for the procedure to make the work of the surgeon easier and prevent unexpected movements. The effect of these drugs must be terminated by the end of the procedures to ensure that the patients can breathe normally. Over the years several monitors have been developed to monitor the effect of these drugs. The monitors use different principles to measure muscle function. Some monitors are integrated into anesthesia machines while others are battery-operated, portable devices. The aim of the present study is two compare monitors using different technologies. Both monitors stimulate a peripheral nerve at the wrist that makes the thumb twitch. The older device (TOF-Watch SX) measures the acceleration of thumb movement, the new device (TetraGraph) measures the electrical activity of the muscle that moves the thumb. The two devices will be connected so that with one simulation both types of signals can be recorded and analyzed. The monitors will be used during the surgeries as described by the manufacturer. The study will not influence the surgical procedure or the anesthetic of the patients. The aim of the study is to collect data on how the two monitors correlate, since they measure neuromuscular function by different technologies (acceleromyography and electromyography).

Read the detailed description

The aim of this single center, one-arm, observational, prospective, non-inferiority study is to compare neuromuscular data obtained with two neuromuscular monitors. The two monitors are the electromyography-based TetraGraph neuromuscular monitor and the acceleromyography-based TOF-WATCH SX device.

The study will enroll 50 patients undergoing elective surgeries that require muscle relaxation. Patients will be only enrolled after written informed consent is obtained. Exclusion criteria include: neuromuscular disease in patient history, patient taking any medication that affects neuromuscular transmission, open wound or sores at the site of electrode placement, expected difficult airway, pregnancy or breastfeeding state, or implanted pacemaker.

The study will be conducted using one of the patient's arms. Both neuromuscular monitors will be applied on the same arm. The monitors will be connected by optical cable link to synchronize nerve stimulation and data recording. The aim of this setting is to obtain both acceleromyography and electromyography signals of the adductor pollicis muscle in response to ulnar nerve stimulation. This setting ensures identical stimulation conditions for the two monitors. Only the TOF-Watch SX will be used for nerve stimulation while the TOF-Watch will collect acceleromyography data of the thumb and TetraGraph will collect the electromyography data of the adductor pollicis muscle.

The ulnar nerve will be stimulated via single use electrocardiography electrodes used by TOF-Watch SX. The piezoelectric probe of TOF-Watch SX will be applied on the thumb via hand adapter, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The stimulating electrodes of TetraGraph will be isolated, since the device will not deliver electrical stimulation, only register the compound muscle action potentials of the adductor pollicis muscle evoked by TOF-Watch SX stimulation. The sensing electrodes of TetraGraph will be applied above the thenar and the interphalangeal joint of the thumb.

The TetraGraph monitor used for the study has a modified software compared to the commercially available monitors. This study device is used only for the current study.

Also, the cable of the TOF-Watch SX monitor has been modified to connect to the TetraGraph monitor for synchronization . The results of the responses analyzed by the TetraGraph device will not be used for clinical care decisions.

Neuromuscular monitoring will be started after the induction of anesthesia before the administration of neuromuscular blocking agent and terminated at the extubation of the patient. After calibration, the TOF-Watch will be left to stimulate automatically every 15 sec. Neuromuscular monitoring will be performed during surgery according to clinical standards, it will be stopped before extubation to avoid patient discomfort associated with neurostimulation.

During deep neuromuscular block the examiner will deliver post tetanic count stimulation every 5 min.

TOF-Watch SX data will be stored on a laptop computer using the devices software. TetraGraph is using a built-in SD card for data collection.

Beside acceleromyography and electromyography train-of-four ratios, train-of-four counts and post tetanic counts the following data will be recorded in a clinical research form:

  • date of surgery, type of surgery,
  • patient identification number, patient's sex, weight, height, BMI, dominant hand side,
  • time of anesthesia induction, drugs used to induce anesthesia
  • time of starting neuromuscular monitoring
  • time of muscle relaxant administration, type and dose of muscle relaxant
  • time of tracheal intubation and extubation,
  • time of beginning and end of surgery
  • time of reversal agent administration, type and dose of reversal agent
  • use of surgical devices

To avoid uncertainty, only the data of TOF-Watch SX will be provided to the anesthesiology team for clinical use. TetraGraph data will be kept blinded from healthcare providers. All clinical decisions will be made according to TOF-Watch SX measurements, as per current clinical care. If any doubt arises regarding the reliability of the data delivered by TOF-Watch SX, the anesthesia workstations' built-in NMT modules (Infinity Trident NMT Smartpod, Draeger, Lübeck, Germany) will be used to guide clinical care.

Propofol target control infusion with bispectral index monitoring will be used to provide anesthesia. The administration of muscle relaxants, reversal agents and time of intubation and extubation will be at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist as per usual clinical routine.

All patients will be monitored postoperatively for one day to detect any unexpected adverse events.

Statistical analysis:

Data will be analyzed offline after the completion of the study. Based on a priori sample size calculation, 50 patients will be enrolled in the study. Paired T-test and Bland-Altman analysis will be performed to examine the agreement between the two devices.

Being tested
neuromuscular blockade monitoring
Keywords
neuromuscular monitoring, acceleromyography, electromyography

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • neuromuscular blockade monitoringDevice

    Neuromuscular blockade monitoring via two different types of monitoring devices

Study groups in NCT03987607
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients scheduled for elective surgeryPatients scheduled for elective surgery requiring neuromuscular blockade
Receives: Device: neuromuscular blockade monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived TOF ratios in the recovery range of 0.8-1.0

    Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived TOF ratios in the recovery range of 0.8-1.0

    Measured: Prior to extubation

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. o Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived TOF ratios in the recovery range of 0.6-0.79

    • Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived TOF ratios in the recovery range of 0.6-0.79

    Measured: During surgery

  2. o Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived TOF ratios in the recovery range of 0.4-0.59

    • Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived TOF ratios in the recovery range of 0.4-0.59

    Measured: During surgery

  3. o Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived TOF ratios in the recovery range of 0.2-0.39

    • Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived TOF ratios in the recovery range of 0.2-0.39

    Measured: During surgery

  4. o Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived TOF counts

    • Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived TOF counts

    Measured: During surgery

  5. o Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived PTC counts

    • Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived PTC counts

    Measured: During surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jun 2019
  2. Study start17 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion18 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion18 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03987607
Sponsor's protocol ID
AITT2017/3
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
12 Jun 2019
Last updated
2 Jan 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Liang SS, Stewart PA, Phillips S. An ipsilateral comparison of acceleromyography and electromyography during recovery from nondepolarizing neuromuscular block under general anesthesia in humans. Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):373-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182937fc4. Epub 2013 Jul 2.

    PubMed 23821356
  • Kopman AF, Chin W, Cyriac J. Acceleromyography vs. electromyography: an ipsilateral comparison of the indirectly evoked neuromuscular response to train-of-four stimulation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Mar;49(3):316-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00643.x.

    PubMed 15752395
  • Naguib M, Brull SJ, Johnson KB. Conceptual and technical insights into the basis of neuromuscular monitoring. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72 Suppl 1:16-37. doi: 10.1111/anae.13738.

    PubMed 28044330

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Neuromuscular Blockade, run by Tamas Vegh, MD at 1 site in Hungary.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hungary. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Agreement between acceleromyography and electromyography derived TOF ratios in the recovery range of 0.8-1.0 (time frame: Prior to extubation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03987607, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jan 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in