Diabetes MellitusNCT03988140
Apico-coronal Position of the Implant in Edentulous Diabetics With Implant-retained Overdentures
A study testing Dental Implant Placement and subsequent prosthetic reabilithation in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Dental Implants, run by Paulista University.
Trial summary
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a recognized factor affecting implant complication rates, including peri-implantitis and peri-implant bone loss, and the apico-coronal position of implants seems interfere on the conditions of peri-implant tissues. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 59 to 77 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus, Dental Implants
- What is being tested?
- Dental Implant Placement and subsequent prosthetic reabilithation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2014to 29 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 59 to 77 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The inclusion criteria included: patients aged between 50 and 80 years old, 2) totally edentulous in the mandible with previous mandibular dentures for at least 6 months and indicated for rehabilitation with overdenture, 3) patients with diabetes had to have had T2DM, diagnosed by a physician, for at least the past 5 years. Such individuals were either under a dietary regimen and/or were using oral hypoglycaemic agents (metformin or glybenclamin).
Who cannot join
- Exclusion criteria were: 1) pregnancy, 2) lactation, 3) current smoking or ex-smokers, 4) other systemic conditions that could affect bone metabolism (e.g., immunologic disorders), 5) use of anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive and anti-resorptive medications, 6) patients that required bone grafts before or concomitantly with implant surgery and 7) a history of previous regenerative procedures in the area designated for implant therapy. Patients with major complications of DM (i.e., cardiovascular and peripheral vascular diseases [ulcers, gangrene, and amputation], neuropathy, and nephropathy) were also excluded.
About this study
Official title: Could the Apico-coronal Position of the Implant Influence the Peri-implant Parameters in Mandibular Edentulous Type 2 Diabetics Rehabilitated With Implant-retained Overdentures? A Split-mouth RCT With 24-months Follow up.
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a recognized factor affecting implant complication rates, including peri-implantitis and peri-implant bone loss, and the apico-coronal position of implants seems interfere on the conditions of peri-implant tissues. However, the influence of the vertical implant position in type 2 diabetics (T2DM) is unclear. This split-mouth randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of implants of machined-collar placed at crestal level or supracrestally in T2DM rehabilitated with implant-retained overdentures on the clinical, tomographic and immunoinflammatory peri-implant outcomes after implant loading.
Read the detailed description
Considering the outcomes achieved with implants with machined-collar inserted supracrestally, it would be relevant to investigate whether this therapeutic strategy could be considered as a more effective approach in the rehabilitation with dental implants of individuals with type 2 DM, since these patients may be more disposed to peri-implant changes, both from the point of view of marginal bone remodeling as related to local variations in immunoinflammatory response. Thus, the propose of this split-mouth randomized controlled trial was to compare the impact of crestal level or supracrestally implant platform in T2DM rehabilitated with implant-retained overdentures on the clinical, tomographic and immunoinflammatory peri-implant outcomes after implant loading.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Dental Implants
- Being tested
- Dental Implant Placement and subsequent prosthetic reabilithation
- Keywords
- dental prosthesis, biological markers, dental implants
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dental Implant Placement and subsequent prosthetic reabilithationDevice
Surgeries to dental implant placement were performed. All patients received 3.5 mm diameter dental implants - surface blasted with TiO2 particles and machined collar of 1mm - in the interforaminal region of the mandible. The surgical sequence followed the protocol described by the implant company.A two stages protocol was used and the prostheses were placed at 4 months.The prosthetic retention system used in rehabilitation with overdentures was the O'ring and the capture of this component was done directly in the patient's mouth. After 7 and 14 days, the patients returned to occlusal adjustments and verification of prosthetic adaptation. The prostheses were made entirely of acrylic resin without metallic reinforcement and the antagonist of the patients were total edentulous and rehabilitated with muco-supported prostheses.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Implant placed at supra crestal level (SL) | Experimental | Implants were placed at supra crestal level (SL) Receives: Device: Dental Implant Placement and subsequent prosthetic reabilithation |
| Implant placed at crestal level (CL). | Other | Implants were placed at crestal level (CL) Receives: Device: Dental Implant Placement and subsequent prosthetic reabilithation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline Peri-implant Probing Depth (PPD) at 24 months.
distance from the bottom of the peri-implant pocket (PPD) to the mucosal margin (MM) measured by a calibrated examiner in millimeter using a Periodontal probing
Measured: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Mucosal Margin (MM)
distance from the implant platform to the peri-implant margin (CL group) and distance from the machined collar maintained supracrestally to the peri-implant margin (SL group) measured by a calibrated examiner in millimeter using a Periodontal probing
Measured: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
calculated by adding PPD and MM measured by a calibrated examiner in millimeter using a Periodontal probing
Measured: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Modified Bleeding on Probing
dichotomous index of bleeding during probing around implants measured by a calibrated examiner using a Periodontal probing. Data were presented as percentage.
Measured: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Modified Plaque Index
dichotomous modified plaque index along the mucosal margin around implants measured by a calibrated examiner using a Periodontal probing. Data were presented as percentage.
Measured: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Crest Height Bone Marginal Peri-implant
linear measurement in millimeter obtained by a parallel line to the implant surface from the implant platform to bone crestal (mesial, distal, buccal and lingually) in the sagittal and coronal slices each 2 mm using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans
Measured: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Markers on peri-implant crevicular fluid
The levels of Imunoinflammatory mediators: interferon (IFN)-gama, interleukin (IL)-10, IL-17, IL-33, IL-21, IL-4, IL-23, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α in the peri-implant crevicular fluid were determined using human plex and the multiplexing instrument. The mean concentration of each biomarker was calculated and expressed as pg/ml.
Measured: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jun 2019
- Study start1 Nov 2014
- Primary completion12 Sep 2018
- Study completion29 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- This study was designed as a prospective, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Paulista University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Fernanda Vieira Ribeiro, Paulista University
- Investigators
- Alexandre Conte, Study chair, Paulista U
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03988140
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- apico-coronal position
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 30 May 2019
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017; 128:40-50. GBD 2016 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet, 390: 1260-1344. Kapur KK, Garrett NR, Hamada MO, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part I: Methodology and clinical outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79: 555-569.
Conte A, Ghiraldini B, Denofrio PHF, Marcello-Machado RM, Correa MG, Pimentel SP, Casati MZ, Pecorari VGA, Cirano FR. Supracrestal implant placement improves peri-implant health in T2DM patients: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2025 Oct;161:106002. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106002. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
PubMed 40716558
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Could the Apico-coronal Position of the Implant Influence the Peri-implant Parameters in Mandibular Edentulous Type 2 Diabetics Rehabilitated With Implant-retained Overdentures? A Split-mouth RCT With 24-months Follow up.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03988140
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- apico-coronal position
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Dental Implants
- Keywords
- dental prosthesis, biological markers, dental implants
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Paulista UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a recognized factor affecting implant complication rates, including peri-implantitis and peri-implant bone loss, and the apico-coronal position of implants seems interfere on the conditions of peri-implant tissues. However, the influence of the vertical implant position in type 2 diabetics (T2DM) is unclear. This split-mouth randomized controlled trial evaluated the impact of implants of machined-collar placed at crestal level or supracrestally in T2DM rehabilitated with implant-retained overdentures on the clinical, tomographic and immunoinflammatory peri-implant outcomes after implant loading.
Detailed description
Considering the outcomes achieved with implants with machined-collar inserted supracrestally, it would be relevant to investigate whether this therapeutic strategy could be considered as a more effective approach in the rehabilitation with dental implants of individuals with type 2 DM, since these patients may be more disposed to peri-implant changes, both from the point of view of marginal bone remodeling as related to local variations in immunoinflammatory response. Thus, the propose of this split-mouth randomized controlled trial was to compare the impact of crestal level or supracrestally implant platform in T2DM rehabilitated with implant-retained overdentures on the clinical, tomographic and immunoinflammatory peri-implant outcomes after implant loading.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study was designed as a prospective, split-mouth, randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Implant placed at supra crestal level (SL) | Experimental | Device: Dental Implant Placement and subsequent prosthetic reabilithationImplants were placed at supra crestal level (SL) |
| Implant placed at crestal level (CL). | Other | Device: Dental Implant Placement and subsequent prosthetic reabilithationImplants were placed at crestal level (CL) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 59 to 77 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- The inclusion criteria included: patients aged between 50 and 80 years old, 2) totally edentulous in the mandible with previous mandibular dentures for at least 6 months and indicated for rehabilitation with overdenture, 3) patients with diabetes had to have had T2DM, diagnosed by a physician, for at least the past 5 years. Such individuals were either under a dietary regimen and/or were using oral hypoglycaemic agents (metformin or glybenclamin).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Exclusion criteria were: 1) pregnancy, 2) lactation, 3) current smoking or ex-smokers, 4) other systemic conditions that could affect bone metabolism (e.g., immunologic disorders), 5) use of anti-inflammatory, immunosuppressive and anti-resorptive medications, 6) patients that required bone grafts before or concomitantly with implant surgery and 7) a history of previous regenerative procedures in the area designated for implant therapy. Patients with major complications of DM (i.e., cardiovascular and peripheral vascular diseases [ulcers, gangrene, and amputation], neuropathy, and nephropathy) were also excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dental Implant Placement and subsequent prosthetic reabilithationSurgeries to dental implant placement were performed. All patients received 3.5 mm diameter dental implants - surface blasted with TiO2 particles and machined collar of 1mm - in the interforaminal region of the mandible. The surgical sequence followed the protocol described by the implant company.A two stages protocol was used and the prostheses were placed at 4 months.The prosthetic retention system used in rehabilitation with overdentures was the O'ring and the capture of this component was done directly in the patient's mouth. After 7 and 14 days, the patients returned to occlusal adjustments and verification of prosthetic adaptation. The prostheses were made entirely of acrylic resin without metallic reinforcement and the antagonist of the patients were total edentulous and rehabilitated with muco-supported prostheses. | Device | Implant placed at crestal level (CL)., Implant placed at supra crestal level (SL) |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline Peri-implant Probing Depth (PPD) at 24 months.
Time frame: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
distance from the bottom of the peri-implant pocket (PPD) to the mucosal margin (MM) measured by a calibrated examiner in millimeter using a Periodontal probing
6 secondary outcomes
Mucosal Margin (MM)
Time frame: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Clinical attachment level (CAL)
Time frame: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Modified Bleeding on Probing
Time frame: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Modified Plaque Index
Time frame: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Crest Height Bone Marginal Peri-implant
Time frame: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Markers on peri-implant crevicular fluid
Time frame: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jun 2019.
- BackgroundOgurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017; 128:40-50. GBD 2016 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet, 390: 1260-1344. Kapur KK, Garrett NR, Hamada MO, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part I: Methodology and clinical outcomes. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79: 555-569.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40716558Conte A, Ghiraldini B, Denofrio PHF, Marcello-Machado RM, Correa MG, Pimentel SP, Casati MZ, Pecorari VGA, Cirano FR. Supracrestal implant placement improves peri-implant health in T2DM patients: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2025 Oct;161:106002. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.106002. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alexandre Conte study chair
Paulista U
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Dental Implant Placement and subsequent prosthetic reabilithation in people with Diabetes Mellitus and Dental Implants, run by Paulista University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline Peri-implant Probing Depth (PPD) at 24 months. (time frame: (baseline) and at 6, 12 and 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03988140, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2019.