AzTrials
AzTrials

Alzheimer DiseaseMAPdPNCT03991624

Lack of Decision-making in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease : Functions Involved and the Daily Consequences

A study testing cognitive assessment, Inhibition evaluation and Assessment of mental flexibility in people with Alzheimer Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 4 sites in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Early in its development, Alzheimer's disease causes not only brain damage affecting different regions of the brain, such as the entorhinal cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex, and the prefrontal lobe, but also a cognitive deficit affecting several functions, such as episodic memory, executive functions, or working… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Alzheimer Disease
What is being tested?
cognitive assessment, Inhibition evaluation and Assessment of mental flexibility
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
4 sitesFrance
Study dates
27 Sep 2019to 21 Apr 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Mini-Mental State Examination > 23
  • stable treatment for at least two months
  • mother tongue : French
  • general cognitive level in the standard on the following tests : Mini-Mental State Examination and Fast Front End Efficiency Battery
  • mother tongue : French

Who cannot join

  • game addiction
  • uncorrected visual and hearing disorders
  • other neurological or psychiatric history
  • inability to communicate
  • delusional or psychotic state
  • game addiction
  • psychiatric or neurological disorders
  • anxiety and depression symptomatology

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

France4 sites
  • Laboratoire d'Etude des Mécanismes Cognitifs

    Bron, 69676

  • Hôpital Lariboisière- Fernand Widal

    Paris, 75010

  • CHU de Saint Etienne

    Saint-Etienne, 42055

  • CMRR - Hôpital Charpennes

    Villeurbanne, 69100

Other trials in France

About this study

Early in its development, Alzheimer's disease causes not only brain damage affecting different regions of the brain, such as the entorhinal cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex, and the prefrontal lobe, but also a cognitive deficit affecting several functions, such as episodic memory, executive functions, or working memory. Although these different areas and functions are involved in the decision-making process, few studies have focused their research on this subject in the context of Alzheimer's disease. However, a 2008 study showed an early decline in decision-making skills in the disease, but did not link this deficit to cognitive impairment. In addition, decision-making is generally assessed using a test called the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), which, despite its many advantages, does not have established ecological validity.

In the context of pathology, however, it seems essential to evaluate decision-making in relation to daily life, especially since a deficit in this process would have considerable repercussions on quality of life.

In this study, the investigators seek to better define the disorder by decision-making in early Alzheimer's disease, to understand the links between them with the deficit of other cognitive functions, and to highlight the the consequences that this decline has on patients' daily lives.

Being tested
cognitive assessment, Inhibition evaluation, Assessment of mental flexibility, Evaluation of the update, working memory
Keywords
decision making, Iowa Gambling Task
Medical subject headings
Alzheimer Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cognitive assessmentDiagnostic test

    • MMSE : Mini-Mental State Examination
    • 5 words of Dubois
    • Direct Assessment of Functional Status
    • Trail Making Test
    • BREF : Fast Front End Efficiency Battery
    • short battery of praxies
    • Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease
  • Inhibition evaluationOther

    • Stroop Victoria : This test consists of 3 sheets of 24 items, organized in 6 lines of 4 (points, neutral words or names of colours), from which the subject must identify the ink of the stimuli as quickly and precisely as possible.
    • Stop Signal task on the computer to give a response to the presentation of a target stimulus (Go signal) (e.g. pressing a button when a red circle appears on the screen, but doing nothing when a blue triangle appears), and prevent this response when the stimulus is followed or preceded by a beep (stop signal) (e.g. the appearance of a red circle is immediately preceded or followed by a beep, the subject should not press the button).
  • Assessment of mental flexibilityOther

    • a letter-number pair task. The subject sees 4 blocks of 48 letter-number pairs appear successively on a screen. When the pair appears at the top, the subject must make a parity judgment but when the pair appears at the bottom, the subject must make a consonant / vowel judgment.
    • a category change task, which consists in classifying a word according to one category or another according to a visual clue that appears. The task consists of 4 blocks of 48 stimuli.
  • Evaluation of the updateOther

    • an update span task for which letters appear on a screen sequentially, and subjects must memorize the last three, without knowing the length of the list. The task will consist of 3 tests of training and then 20 tests. After three errors consecutive, the task ends.
    • an n-back task that consists of a sequential presentation of letters, during which the subject must indicate when the stimulus. The task consists of 3 levels, with n = 1, n= 2 or n = 3. For level 1 (with n = 1), the subject must press a button when the same letter appears twice in a row on the screen. This task consists of 75 letters.
  • working memoryOther

    • the empan baba task, which mainly involves maintaining information, and which consists in retaining a series of letters, appearing sequentially on a screen, and whose latency time between two word presentations is required for a secondary task: the repetition of baba syllables.
    • the task of reading operations which consists in recalling operations series of letters whose presentation is interspersed with the reading aloud of simple operations and of their results.
    • the ongoing operational task of recalling a list of letters, the presentation of which is interspersed with operations that are simple to read aloud and to to solve head-on.
  • episodic memoryOther

    • A recognition task with a Remember/Know paradigm
Study groups in NCT03991624
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Alzheimer's patients (lack of executive functions)OtherNot described
Receives: Diagnostic Test: cognitive assessment; Other: Inhibition evaluation; Other: Assessment of mental flexibility; Other: Evaluation of the update
control (lack of executive functions)OtherNot described
Receives: Diagnostic Test: cognitive assessment; Other: Inhibition evaluation; Other: Assessment of mental flexibility; Other: Evaluation of the update
Alzheimer's patients (lack of working memory)OtherNot described
Receives: Diagnostic Test: cognitive assessment; Other: working memory
control (lack of working memory)OtherNot described
Receives: Diagnostic Test: cognitive assessment; Other: working memory
Alzheimer's patients (lack of episodic memory)OtherNot described
Receives: Diagnostic Test: cognitive assessment; Other: episodic memory
control (lack of episodic memory)OtherNot described
Receives: Diagnostic Test: cognitive assessment; Other: episodic memory

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Score obtained (the number of correct answers) by participants in tasks evaluating decision-making

    measured with two decision-making tasks : Iowa Gambling Task and one experimental task

    Measured: day 14

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Score obtained in task evaluating executive functions

    measured with Stroop Victoria

    Measured: day 14

  2. Score obtained in task evaluating executive functions

    measured with Stop Signal on computer

    Measured: day 14

  3. Score obtained in task evaluating executive functions

    measured with a letter-number pair task

    Measured: day 14

  4. Score obtained in task evaluating executive functions

    measured with a category change task.

    Measured: day 14

  5. Score obtained in task evaluating executive functions

    measured with an update span task and a n-back task.

    Measured: day 14

  6. Score obtained in task evaluating working memory

    measured with the task of empan baba.

    Measured: day 14

  7. Score obtained in task evaluating working memory

    measured with the task of reading operations.

    Measured: day 14

  8. Score obtained in task evaluating working memory

    measured with the continuous operation task.

    Measured: day 14

  9. Scores obtained in tasks evaluating episodic memory

    measured with a recognition task with a Remember/Know paradigm

    Measured: day 14

  10. Scores obtained from the quality of life questionnaire.

    measured with Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease : it is composed of 13 items (ex: physical health, memory, relationship with friends...). the patient must rate according to 4 possibilities: bad, fairly good, good or excellent. There is one copy to be completed by the patient and another by the caregiver.

    Measured: day 14

  11. Scores obtained from autonomy questionnaire.

    measured with Direct Assessment of Functional Status : assessment of several areas of daily life (spatial and temporal orientation, communication skills, driving, financial management, shopping ability, behaviour food and hygiene). It consists of 7 subscales, allowing each competency to be assessed independently.

    Measured: day 14

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Jun 2019
  2. Study start27 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2021
  4. Study completion21 Apr 2021

Why it stopped: Challenges in inclusion

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03991624
Sponsor's protocol ID
18CH237
Other IDs
2019-A00174-53
Acronym
MAPdP
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
25 Feb 2019
Last updated
8 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing cognitive assessment, Inhibition evaluation and Assessment of mental flexibility in people with Alzheimer Disease, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne at 4 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Challenges in inclusion). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Score obtained (the number of correct answers) by participants in tasks evaluating decision-making (time frame: day 14). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in