AzTrials
AzTrials

Myeloma MultiplePhase 2DART4MMNCT03992170

Study of Daratumumab in Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients in >VGPR/MRD-positive

A Phase 2 study testing Daratumumab in people with Myeloma Multiple, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aim of this study is to evaluate Daratumumab effect on MRD-positive patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) who achieved >VGPR after any therapy (ASCT, VMP, Rev-Dex). Daratumumab 16 mg/kg administered at weekly intervals for 8 weeks, then every 2 weeks for an additional 16 weeks, will be given to 50 MM patients who… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Myeloma Multiple
What is being tested?
Daratumumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
31 Dec 2018to 31 Dec 2022
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
  • >VGPR/MRD-positive by NGF measured by 2-tubes optimized 8-color antibody panel, (OneFlow PCST e PCD BD Biosciences)
  • Patients should be at enrollment at least 12 weeks from any therapy for myeloma after diagnosis or at any subsequent relapse
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0, 1, or 2
  • Laboratory values and electrocardiogram within protocol-defined parameters at screening
  • All previous MM therapy, including radiation, cytostatic therapy and surgery, must have been terminated at least 4 weeks prior to treatment in this study, without corticosteroid therapy.
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Laboratory test results within these ranges:
  • Absolute neutrophil count 1.0 x 109/L
  • Platelet count 75 x 109/L
  • Creatinine clearance > 30 ml/h)
  • Total bilirubin 1.5 mg/Dl
  • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST; SGOT) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT; SGPT) 2 x ULN
  • Disease free of prior malignancies for 5 years with exception of curatively treated basal cell, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma "in situ" of the cervix or breast
  • Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 6 months after study treatment
  • Patients must sign on an Informed Consent Form No study treatment or any other procedure within the framework of the trial (except for screening) will be performed in any patient prior to receipt of written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Received Daratumumab or other anti-CD38 therapies previously
  • Nonsecretory multiple myeloma
  • Previously received an allogenic stem cell transplant or has received an autologous stem cell transplantation within 12 weeks
  • Known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, persistent asthma, or a history of asthma within 5 years
  • Absence of the Informed Consent Form signed by the patient
  • Pregnant or breast feeding females
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Use of any other experimental drug or therapy within 28 days of baseline.
  • Known hypersensitivity to the study drugs
  • Known positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or infectious hepatitis, type A, B or C.
  • Plasma cell leukemia, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, POEMS syndrome (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal protein, and skin changes), or amyloidosis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Cristiana Cafarelli, Letters contact

0039 0577586718

cristianacafarelli21@gmail.com

Francesca Di Martino, Pharmacy contact

0039 0577586798

francesca.dimartino29@gmail.com

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese

    Siena, 53100

    Cristiana Cafarelli, Letters, 0039 0577586718, cristianacafarelli21@gmail.com

    Francesca Di Martino, Pharmacy, 0039 0577586798, francesca.dimartino29@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: A Pilot Study on the Efficacy of Daratumumab in Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients in >VGPR/MRD-positive by Next Generation Flow

Aim of this study is to evaluate Daratumumab effect on MRD-positive patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) who achieved >VGPR after any therapy (ASCT, VMP, Rev-Dex). Daratumumab 16 mg/kg administered at weekly intervals for 8 weeks, then every 2 weeks for an additional 16 weeks, will be given to 50 MM patients who achieved a >VGPR defined by monoclonal component disappearance in serum or urine, immunofixation positive/negative and MRD-positivity (by NGF). Free light chain (FLC) and CT/PET will be evaluated at time 0. NGF will be done on marrow aspirate at time 0, at 2 months and every 6 months for 2 years. If patients will be still MRD positive after 6 months of therapy , treatment will be continued up to 2 years. If MRD negative by NGF, the patients can stop the treatment.

Read the detailed description

Daratumumab in clinical trials and study rationale Daratumumab is an immunoglobulin G1 kappa (IgG1κ) human mAb against CD 38 antigen, produced in a mammalian cell line (CHO) using recombinant DNA technology. (see Investigational Brochure, IB) Daratumumab has been explored as a single agent in relapsed and refractory patients (GEN501,NCT00574288. In the dose-expansion phase 30 patients received 8 mg/kg and 42 patients 16 mg/kg once weekly (8 doses), twice monthly (8 doses) then monthly up to 24 months. Patients had received a median number of 4 to 5 lines of therapy with 54% of patients refractory to bortezomib and 72% to lenalidomide. Low grade infusion-related reactions were initially observed in up to 75% of patients but were considerably attenuated by the delivery in a large infusion volume. Thirty five percent of patients receiving a dose of 16 mg/kg responded, with 15% of complete or very good partial responses. These encouraging results were confirmed in the multicenter phase 2 study SIRIUS (NCT01985126). In this study, 106 heavily pretreated myeloma patients received daratumumab monotherapy (16 mg/kg). Patients had received a median of 5 prior therapies and the majority of them were refractory to bortezomib, lenalidomide and pomalidomide. Partial response was achieved by 29.2% of patients and the median duration of response was 7.4 months.

A pooled analysis of the patients of the GEN 501 and the SIRIUS trials who had received daratumumab monotherapy at the dose of 16 mg/kg (n=148) showed an overall response rate of 31.1% and a median PFS and OS of 4 and 20 months, respectively. Patients achieving only stable disease or minimal response reached a promising median overall survival of 18.5 months, which is unexpected in this population of very advanced myeloma patients. The quality of response was correlated with the expression intensity of CD38 by neoplastic plasmocytes. Daratumumab was granted accelerated approval in 2015 by the FDA to treat patients with multiple myeloma who had received at least three prior treatments. Daratumumab is also being studied in combination with many other agents including lenalidomide, bortezomib, carfilzomib or pomalidomide. The phase 3 randomized trial CASTOR recently confirmed a strong advantage of the addition of daratumumab to bortezomib/dexamethasone, in 498 relapsed myeloma patients (NCT02136134). The triplet combination was associated with a significantly better response rate, including 82.9% of PR or better and 19.2% of CR or better. The 1-year rate of progression free survival was 60.7% in the daratumumab group versus 26.9% in the control arm. The updated results of this trial have confirmed this strong PFS benefit for the patients in the daratumumab arm, especially for the patients in first relapse (12-months PFS : 77.3% vs 24.7%, p<10-4). Daratumumab also clearly improved the median PFS of patients with high-risk cytogenetic. In this relapse setting, the POLLUX trial also demonstrated a strong advantage of the addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in terms of both response rate and PFS (NCT02076009) . In this trial, patients in the daratumumab group reached an overall response rate of 93% (including 43% CR) and had a 63% reduction in the risk of progression. The updated results of this trial confirmed this significant PFS advantage even in lenalidomide-naïve patients and in patients with high-risk cytogenetic. Minimal Residual disease (MRD) assessed by NGS analysis in patients included in CASTOR and POLLUX trials revealed an unprecedently observed rate of patients with MRD negative disease. Indeed, 32% (vs 9%) and 18% (vs 4%) of patients reached a 10-4 MRD negative in the daratumumab (versus control) arms of POLLUX and CASTOR, respectively. In particular the rate of MRD negativity (10-5) has increased continuosly after month 6 in patients receiving Daratumumab monotherapy in the CASTOR trial. (36) The addition of daratumumab is currently being assessed in the context of previously untreated myeloma patients. The phase 3 randomized study Cassiopeia is currently evaluating the role of daratumumab in combination with VTD in induction, and its role as maintenance after high-dose therapy (NCT02541383). In patients not eligible for transplant, the phase 3 randomized trial MAIA is evaluating the addition of daratumumab to lenalidomide-dexamethasone (NCT02252172). In the ALCYONE trial (Dara-VMP vs VMP) in patients inelegible to transplant MRD negativity (10-5) has increased continuosly after cycle 10 with daratumumab monotherapy.(37) The potential benefit of daratumumab has also been recently evaluated in high-risk smoldering myeloma patients in the phase 3 randomized CENTAURUS (NCT02316106). Daratumumab monotherapy can increase response and in particular MRD negativity, which correlates with PFS and OS. To the investigator's knowledge the use of daratumumab in multiple myeloma patients with suboptimal response (in particular with a >VGPR/MRD+) has not yet been explored. To achieve a better response can ameliorate patient outcome and survival.

DATA COLLECTION All patient-related data are recorded in a pseudonomized way. Each patient is unequivocally identified by a trial subject number, attributed at recruitment into the study. The investigator has to keep a patient identification log, including the full name and address of the subject and eventually additional relevant personal data such as hospital record number, home physician etc. In addition, patients who were screened in order to be entered into the study, but who could not be recruited for whatever reason (informed consent not given, not fulfilling selection criteria etc.) are recorded in a "patient reject log". All the data retrieved during the conduct of the study are entered into the appropriate case record forms (CRF) by the investigator or another person authorized by the investigator (co-investigator). The CRFs are provided by the study secretariat and are explained to the investigator by the study monitor.

SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION The main objective of the trial is to assess, whether the experimental regimen shows a promising activity profile in treatment of MM minimal residual disease. The primary endpoint is the response rate. Multiple myeloma patients achieving CR and MRD negativity after autotransplant are around 60% and 20% of the total, respectively. MM patients that achieve an MRD negative status after VMP (velcade , melphalan prednisone) are not known. Since CR achievement after VMP is 30%, MRD negativity is probably < 5% of the patients. Statistical analysis will be provided on 50 patients, assuming the power to show an increase in MRD negativity from 20% to at least 50% of the patients treated. In summary, the trial design is based on the following assumptions: The activity of the experimental therapy would be rated as insufficient, if the actual response rate was only 20% or lower. On the other hand, the regimen would be considered to be a promising candidate for further development (e.g. in a phase III trial), if the true ORR amounted to 50% or more. To show effectiveness of daratumumab to give a negative MRD; only descriptive statistics will be performed AE RECORDING All adverse events and special reporting situations, whether serious or non-serious, will be reported from the time a signed and dated ICF is obtained until completion of the subject's last study-related procedure, which may include contact for follow-up of safety. Serious adverse events, including those spontaneously reported to the investigator within 30 days after the last dose of study drug, must be reported using the Serious Adverse Event Form. The sponsor will evaluate any safety information that is spontaneously reported by an investigator beyond the time frame specified in the protocol.

Being tested
Daratumumab
Keywords
Myeloma Multiple, Daratumumab
Medical subject headings
Multiple Myeloma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DaratumumabDrug

    Also called Darzalex

    Daratumumab is a human monoclonal antibody (mAb) IgG1 that binds to the highly expressed CD38 protein on the surface of multiple myeloma cells and, at various levels, also in other types of cells and tissues. The CD38 protein has multiple functions, such as receptor-mediated adhesion, signal transduction activity and enzymatic activity.

Study groups in NCT03992170
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single ArmExperimentalPatients will receive Daratumumab (16 mg/Kg day) every week for 8 weeks intravenous (8 infusions) and then every 2 weeks for 16 weeks intravenous (8 more infusions). If MRD positive by NGF, the patients will receive Daratumumab every 4 weeks for 80 weeks intravenous; if MRD negative by NGF, the patients can stop the treatment.
Receives: Drug: Daratumumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Responde Rate (ORR)

    The fraction of patients who experience a Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) negativity per IMWG 2016 criteria

    Measured: every 6 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Progression free survival (PFS)

    PFS determined using the Kaplan-Meier method, considering those who progress or die without progression as failures, and censoring those who do not

    Measured: every 6 months

  2. Complete Remission Rate (CR)

    The fraction of patient who experience a sCR using the study treatment

    Measured: every 6 months

  3. Duration of Response (DoR)

    The fraction of patients who continues to respond to treatment without Myeloma progression

    Measured: every 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jun 2019
  2. Study start31 Dec 2018
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2022 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Patients will receive Daratumumab (16 mg/Kg day) every week for 8 weeks intravenous (8 infusions) and then every 2 weeks for 16 weeks intravenous (8 more infusions). If MRD positive by NGF, the patients will receive Daratumumab every 4 weeks for 80 weeks intravenous; if MRD negative by NGF, the patients can stop the treatment.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT03992170
Sponsor's protocol ID
DART4MM
Acronym
DART4MM
Status last verified
Jun 2019
First submitted
3 Jun 2019
Last updated
20 Jun 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV. Multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008 Mar 15;111(6):2962-72. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-078022.

    PubMed 18332230
  • Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Recent major improvement in long-term survival of younger patients with multiple myeloma. Blood. 2008 Mar 1;111(5):2521-6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-08-104984. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

    PubMed 17901246
  • Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Zeldenrust SR, Dingli D, Russell SJ, Lust JA, Greipp PR, Kyle RA, Gertz MA. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2008 Mar 1;111(5):2516-20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116129. Epub 2007 Nov 1.

    PubMed 17975015
  • Gozzetti A, Cerase A, Lotti F, Rossi D, Palumbo A, Petrucci MT, Patriarca F, Nozzoli C, Cavo M, Offidani M, Floridia M, Berretta S, Vallone R, Musto P, Lauria F; GIMEMA (Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche dell'Adulto) Myeloma Working Party; Marchini E, Fabbri A, Oliva S, Zamagni E, Sapienza FG, Ballanti S, Mele G, Galli M, Pirrotta MT, Di Raimondo F. Extramedullary intracranial localization of multiple myeloma and treatment with novel agents: a retrospective survey of 50 patients. Cancer. 2012 Mar 15;118(6):1574-84. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26447. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

    PubMed 21932386
  • Ocio EM, Richardson PG, Rajkumar SV, Palumbo A, Mateos MV, Orlowski R, Kumar S, Usmani S, Roodman D, Niesvizky R, Einsele H, Anderson KC, Dimopoulos MA, Avet-Loiseau H, Mellqvist UH, Turesson I, Merlini G, Schots R, McCarthy P, Bergsagel L, Chim CS, Lahuerta JJ, Shah J, Reiman A, Mikhael J, Zweegman S, Lonial S, Comenzo R, Chng WJ, Moreau P, Sonneveld P, Ludwig H, Durie BG, Miguel JF. New drugs and novel mechanisms of action in multiple myeloma in 2013: a report from the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG). Leukemia. 2014 Mar;28(3):525-42. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.350. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

    PubMed 24253022
  • Fonseca R, Blood E, Rue M, Harrington D, Oken MM, Kyle RA, Dewald GW, Van Ness B, Van Wier SA, Henderson KJ, Bailey RJ, Greipp PR. Clinical and biologic implications of recurrent genomic aberrations in myeloma. Blood. 2003 Jun 1;101(11):4569-75. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3017. Epub 2003 Feb 6.

    PubMed 12576322
  • Gozzetti A, Le Beau MM. Fluorescence in situ hybridization: uses and limitations. Semin Hematol. 2000 Oct;37(4):320-33. doi: 10.1016/s0037-1963(00)90013-1.

    PubMed 11071355
  • Stewart AK, Richardson PG, San-Miguel JF. How I treat multiple myeloma in younger patients. Blood. 2009 Dec 24;114(27):5436-43. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-204651. Epub 2009 Oct 27.

    PubMed 19861683
  • Moreau P, Avet-Loiseau H, Harousseau JL, Attal M. Current trends in autologous stem-cell transplantation for myeloma in the era of novel therapies. J Clin Oncol. 2011 May 10;29(14):1898-906. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.32.5878. Epub 2011 Apr 11.

    PubMed 21482979
  • Harousseau JL, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H, Marit G, Caillot D, Mohty M, Lenain P, Hulin C, Facon T, Casassus P, Michallet M, Maisonneuve H, Benboubker L, Maloisel F, Petillon MO, Webb I, Mathiot C, Moreau P. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as induction treatment prior to autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005-01 phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 20;28(30):4621-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.9158. Epub 2010 Sep 7.

    PubMed 20823406
  • Cavo M, Tacchetti P, Patriarca F, Petrucci MT, Pantani L, Galli M, Di Raimondo F, Crippa C, Zamagni E, Palumbo A, Offidani M, Corradini P, Narni F, Spadano A, Pescosta N, Deliliers GL, Ledda A, Cellini C, Caravita T, Tosi P, Baccarani M; GIMEMA Italian Myeloma Network. Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet. 2010 Dec 18;376(9758):2075-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61424-9. Epub 2010 Dec 9.

    PubMed 21146205
  • Rosinol L, Oriol A, Teruel AI, Hernandez D, Lopez-Jimenez J, de la Rubia J, Granell M, Besalduch J, Palomera L, Gonzalez Y, Etxebeste MA, Diaz-Mediavilla J, Hernandez MT, de Arriba F, Gutierrez NC, Martin-Ramos ML, Cibeira MT, Mateos MV, Martinez J, Alegre A, Lahuerta JJ, San Miguel J, Blade J; Programa para el Estudio y la Terapeutica de las Hemopatias Malignas/Grupo Espanol de Mieloma (PETHEMA/GEM) group. Superiority of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (VTD) as induction pretransplantation therapy in multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 3 PETHEMA/GEM study. Blood. 2012 Aug 23;120(8):1589-96. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-408922. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

    PubMed 22791289
  • Sonneveld P, Schmidt-Wolf IG, van der Holt B, El Jarari L, Bertsch U, Salwender H, Zweegman S, Vellenga E, Broyl A, Blau IW, Weisel KC, Wittebol S, Bos GM, Stevens-Kroef M, Scheid C, Pfreundschuh M, Hose D, Jauch A, van der Velde H, Raymakers R, Schaafsma MR, Kersten MJ, van Marwijk-Kooy M, Duehrsen U, Lindemann W, Wijermans PW, Lokhorst HM, Goldschmidt HM. Bortezomib induction and maintenance treatment in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the randomized phase III HOVON-65/ GMMG-HD4 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Aug 20;30(24):2946-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.6820. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

    PubMed 22802322
  • Richardson PG, Weller E, Lonial S, Jakubowiak AJ, Jagannath S, Raje NS, Avigan DE, Xie W, Ghobrial IM, Schlossman RL, Mazumder A, Munshi NC, Vesole DH, Joyce R, Kaufman JL, Doss D, Warren DL, Lunde LE, Kaster S, Delaney C, Hideshima T, Mitsiades CS, Knight R, Esseltine DL, Anderson KC. Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone combination therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Blood. 2010 Aug 5;116(5):679-86. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-268862. Epub 2010 Apr 12.

    PubMed 20385792
  • Kumar S, Flinn I, Richardson PG, Hari P, Callander N, Noga SJ, Stewart AK, Turturro F, Rifkin R, Wolf J, Estevam J, Mulligan G, Shi H, Webb IJ, Rajkumar SV. Randomized, multicenter, phase 2 study (EVOLUTION) of combinations of bortezomib, dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, and lenalidomide in previously untreated multiple myeloma. Blood. 2012 May 10;119(19):4375-82. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-395749. Epub 2012 Mar 15.

    PubMed 22422823

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Daratumumab in people with Myeloma Multiple, run by Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Cristiana Cafarelli, Letters (0039 0577586718, cristianacafarelli21@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Responde Rate (ORR) (time frame: every 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03992170, which also lists 35 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jun 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in