Multiple MyelomaPhase 3IFM2017_03NCT03993912
Compare Lenalidomide and Subcutaneous Daratumumab vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Frail Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Ineligible for High Dose Therapy
A Phase 3 study testing Daratumumab SC in combination with Lenalidomide, Lenalidomide PO (25mg) and Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by University Hospital, Lille at 23 sites in France.
Trial summary
This is a Phase 3, randomized (study drug assigned by chance), open-label (participants and researchers are aware about the treatment, participants are receiving), active-controlled (study in which the experimental treatment or procedure is compared to a standard treatment or procedure), parallel-group (each group of… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Daratumumab SC in combination with Lenalidomide, Lenalidomide PO (25mg) and Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 294 participants
- Where
- 23 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 17 Oct 2019to 28 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject must be at least 65 years of age.
- Subject must have documented multiple myeloma satisfying the CRAB criteria and measurable disease.
- Newly diagnosed and not considered candidate for high-dose chemotherapy with SCT.
- Subject must have a Frailty Score ≥ 2
- Subject must have within 5 days prior to first drug intake (C1D1) pretreatment clinical laboratory values meeting the following criteria during the Screening Phase:
- hemoglobin ≥7.5 g/dL
Show all 16Show fewer
- absolute neutrophil count ≥1.0 x 109/L
- platelet count ≥70 x 109/L
- aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤2.5 x ULN
- total bilirubin ≤2.0 x ULN
- creatinine clearance≥30mL/min
- Measurable ISS with β2-microglobulin and albumin values for randomization
- A man who is sexually active with a woman of childbearing potential must agree to use a latex or synthetic condom, even if they had a successful vasectomy. All men must also not donate sperm during the study, for 4 weeks after the last dose of lenalidomide, and for 4 months after the last dose of daratumumab. Women participating in this study must be postmenopausal.
- Each subject must sign an informed consent form (ICF) indicating that he or she understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to participate in the study. Subject must be willing and able to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in this protocol, as referenced in the ICF.
- Subjects affiliated with an appropriate social security system.
Who cannot join
- Subject has a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, or smoldering multiple myeloma.
- Subject has a diagnosis of Waldenström's disease, or other conditions in which IgM M-protein is present in the absence of a clonal plasma cell infiltration with lytic bone lesions.
- Subject has prior or current systemic therapy or SCT for multiple myeloma
- Subject has a history of malignancy (other than multiple myeloma) within 5 years before the date of randomization
- Subject has had radiation therapy within 14 days of randomization.
- Subject has had plasmapheresis within 28 days of randomization.
Show all 24Show fewer
- Subject is exhibiting clinical signs of meningeal involvement of multiple myeloma.
- Subject has known chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (defined as a forced expiratory volume [FEV] in 1 second <60% of predicted normal), persistent asthma, or a history of asthma within the last 2 years (intermittent asthma is allowed).
- Subject is known to be seropositive for history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
- Seropositive for hepatitis B.
- (Known to be) seropositive for hepatitis C
- Subject has any concurrent medical or psychiatric condition or disease that is likely to interfere with the study procedures or results, or that in the opinion of the investigator, would constitute a hazard for participating in this study.
- Subject has clinically significant cardiac disease, including:
- myocardial infarction within 1 year before randomization, or an unstable or uncontrolled disease/condition related to or affecting cardiac function
- uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia or clinically significant ECG abnormalities
- screening 12-lead ECG showing a baseline QT interval as corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) >470 msec
- Subject has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to corticosteroids, monoclonal antibodies or human proteins, or their excipients
- Subject has plasma cell leukemia or POEMS syndrome
- Subject is known or suspected of not being able to comply with the study protocol. Subject has any condition for which, in the opinion of the investigator, participation would not be in the best interest of the subject or that could prevent, limit, or confound the protocol-specified assessments.
- Subject has had major surgery within 2 weeks before randomization or has not fully recovered from surgery.
- Subject has received an investigational drug (including investigational vaccines) or used an invasive investigational medical device within 4 weeks before randomization or is currently enrolled in an interventional investigational study.
- Refusal to consent or protected by legal regime ( guardianship, trusteeship)
- Subject has contraindications to required prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism
- Incidence of gastrointestinal disease that may significantly alter the absorption of oral drugs.
Trial locations and contacts
23 sites in 1 country.
23 sites in 1 country
France23 sites
Chru Jean Minjoz
Besançon
Ch Blois Simone Veil
Blois
Ch Fleyriat
Bourg-en-Bresse
Chru Brest Site Hopital Morvan
Brest
Chu de Caen Normandie
Caen
Hopital Prive Sevigne - Cesson
Cesson-Sévigné
Chu Dijon Bourgogne
Dijon
Chu de Grenoble
Grenoble
Gpe Hospitalier La Rochelle-Re-Aunis
La Rochelle
Ch Chartres Louis Pasteur-Le Coudray
Le Coudray
Hôpital Claude Huriez, CHU
Lille
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille
Chi Mont de Marsan Et Pays Des Sources
Mont-de-Marsan
Chu Montpellier
Montpellier
Chu de Nantes Site Hotel Dieu Hme
Nantes
Chu de Nice Hopital de L'Archet
Nice
Centre Hospitalier de Perigueux
Périgueux
Hopital Haut-Leveque - Chu
Pessac, 33604
Chru Rennes Site Pontchaillou
Rennes
Centre Hospitalier de Saint Quentin
Saint-Quentin
Centre Hospitalier Saint-Malo
St-Malo
Oncopole Chu Toulouse
Toulouse
Chu de Tours
Tours
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Study Comparing Lenalidomide and Subcutaneous Daratumumab (R-Dara SC) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Frail Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Ineligible for High Dose Therapy
This is a Phase 3, randomized (study drug assigned by chance), open-label (participants and researchers are aware about the treatment, participants are receiving), active-controlled (study in which the experimental treatment or procedure is compared to a standard treatment or procedure), parallel-group (each group of participants will be treated at the same time), and multicenter (when more than one hospital team work on a medical research study) study in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (a blood cancer of plasma cells) and who are not candidates for high dose chemotherapy (treatment of disease, usually cancer, by chemical agents) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The primary hypothesis of this study is that subcutaneous Daratumumab in combination with Lenalidomide will prolong progression-free survival and likely induce less toxicity as compared with Lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in elderly frail subjects with newly diagnosed Multiple myeloma who are ineligible for high dose chemotherapy and ASCT
Read the detailed description
The primary hypothesis of this study is that subcutaneous Daratumumab in combination with Lenalidomide will prolong progression-free survival and likely induce less toxicity as compared with Lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in elderly frail subjects with newly diagnosed Multiple myeloma who are ineligible for high dose chemotherapy and ASCT
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Daratumumab SC in combination with Lenalidomide, Lenalidomide PO (25mg), Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression
- Keywords
- Newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma, Frail elderly patients, Dexamethasone-sparing regimen, Daratumumab, Toxicity
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Daratumumab SC in combination with LenalidomideDrug
Daratumumab SC 1800 mg
- once every week for 8 weeks
- then once every other week for 16 weeks
- thereafter once every 4 weeks, until progression
Lenalidomide PO (25mg)Drug
Lenalidomide PO (25mg): days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle, until progression
Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progressionDrug
Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1: Experimental group | Experimental | Daratumumab SC 1800 mg
* once every week for 8 weeks
* then once every other week for 16 weeks
* thereafter once every 4 weeks, until progression Lenalidomide PO (25mg): days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle, until progression Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of a 28-day cycle, for the first 2 cycles, then discontinued Receives: Drug: Daratumumab SC in combination with Lenalidomide; Drug: Lenalidomide PO (25mg); Drug: Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression |
| Arm 2: Control group | Sham comparator | Lenalidomide PO (25mg): days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle, until progression Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression Receives: Drug: Lenalidomide PO (25mg); Drug: Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Comparison of the efficacy of Daratumumab SC injection when combined with Lenalidomide (R-Dara SC) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd): PFS
The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of Daratumumab SC injection when combined with Lenalidomide (R-Dara SC) to that of Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd), in terms of PFS in frail subjects with newly diagnosed myeloma who are not candidates for high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Secondary outcomes (14)
Time-to-treatment failure
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Time-to-next treatment
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
PFS2 time
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Overall survival (OS) time
Overall survival (OS) time,
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Complete remission (CR)
Percentage of participants with CR, as defined by the IMWG criteria, will be reported.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Very good partial response (VGPR) or better.
VGPR or better, defined as VGPR or CR according to the IMWG criteria during or after the study treatment at the time of data cutoff.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Overall response (CR + VGPR + partial response [PR]).
Overall response, defined as CR or VGPR or PR, according to the IMWG criteria
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Occurrence of grade 3 or more side effects.
Collecting all AE (grade 3 or more)
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Safety and tolerability of Daratumumab SC when administered in combination with Revlimid: NCI-CTCAE V5.0.
Evaluation of safety data by type, frequency, severity, relation to study drug, according to NCI-CTCAE V5.0.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Evaluation of quality of life based on MY20 questionnaires
Treatment effects on patient reported outcomes and heath economic/resource utilization.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Evaluation of quality of life based on EORTC C30 questionnaires
Treatment effects on patient reported outcomes and heath economic/resource utilization.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Evaluation of quality of life based on EQ-5D questionnaires
Treatment effects on patient reported outcomes and heath economic/resource utilization.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate at 12 months.
Proportion of participants assessed as MRD negative
Measured: after 12 months of treatment
Event Free Survival
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2019
- Study start17 Oct 2019
- Primary completion28 Aug 2026
- Study completion28 Aug 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, LilleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 294 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Lille
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Thierry Facon, MD,PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Lille
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03993912
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2018_16
- Other IDs
- 2018-003535-30, 2018
- Acronym
- IFM2017_03
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 27 May 2019
- Last updated
- 23 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Manier S, Lambert J, Hulin C, Macro M, Laribi K, Araujo C, Pica GM, Touzeau C, Godmer P, Slama B, Karlin L, Orsini Piocelle F, Dib M, Sanhes L, Morel P, El Yamani A, Tiab M, Tabrizi R, Richez V, Garderet L, Royer B, Bareau B, Mariette C, Fleck E, Robu D, Calmettes C, Rigaudeau S, Demarquette H, Frenzel L, Decaux O, Mohty M, Arnulf B, Bigot N, Perrot A, Corre J, Mary JY, Avet-Loiseau H, Moreau P, Leleu X, Facon T. Safety and efficacy of a dexamethasone-sparing regimen with daratumumab and lenalidomide in patients with frailty and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (IFM2017-03): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2025 Oct;26(10):1323-1333. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00280-3.
PubMed 41038184
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Study Comparing Lenalidomide and Subcutaneous Daratumumab (R-Dara SC) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd) in Frail Subjects With Previously Untreated Multiple Myeloma Who Are Ineligible for High Dose Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03993912
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IFM2017_03 / 2018_16
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Keywords
- Newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma, Frail elderly patients, Dexamethasone-sparing regimen, Daratumumab, Toxicity
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 294 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, LilleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 17 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Aug 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Aug 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a Phase 3, randomized (study drug assigned by chance), open-label (participants and researchers are aware about the treatment, participants are receiving), active-controlled (study in which the experimental treatment or procedure is compared to a standard treatment or procedure), parallel-group (each group of participants will be treated at the same time), and multicenter (when more than one hospital team work on a medical research study) study in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (a blood cancer of plasma cells) and who are not candidates for high dose chemotherapy (treatment of disease, usually cancer, by chemical agents) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). The primary hypothesis of this study is that subcutaneous Daratumumab in combination with Lenalidomide will prolong progression-free survival and likely induce less toxicity as compared with Lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in elderly frail subjects with newly diagnosed Multiple myeloma who are ineligible for high dose chemotherapy and ASCT
Detailed description
The primary hypothesis of this study is that subcutaneous Daratumumab in combination with Lenalidomide will prolong progression-free survival and likely induce less toxicity as compared with Lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in elderly frail subjects with newly diagnosed Multiple myeloma who are ineligible for high dose chemotherapy and ASCT
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1: Experimental group | Experimental | Drug: Daratumumab SC in combination with Lenalidomide, Drug: Lenalidomide PO (25mg), Drug: Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progressionDaratumumab SC 1800 mg * once every week for 8 weeks * then once every other week for 16 weeks * thereafter once every 4 weeks, until progression Lenalidomide PO (25mg): days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle, until progression Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of a 28-day cycle, for the first 2 cycles, then discontinued |
| Arm 2: Control group | Sham comparator | Drug: Lenalidomide PO (25mg), Drug: Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progressionLenalidomide PO (25mg): days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle, until progression Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Subject must be at least 65 years of age.
- Subject must have documented multiple myeloma satisfying the CRAB criteria and measurable disease.
- Newly diagnosed and not considered candidate for high-dose chemotherapy with SCT.
- Subject must have a Frailty Score ≥ 2
- Subject must have within 5 days prior to first drug intake (C1D1) pretreatment clinical laboratory values meeting the following criteria during the Screening Phase:
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Subject has a diagnosis of primary amyloidosis, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, or smoldering multiple myeloma.
- Subject has a diagnosis of Waldenström's disease, or other conditions in which IgM M-protein is present in the absence of a clonal plasma cell infiltration with lytic bone lesions.
- Subject has prior or current systemic therapy or SCT for multiple myeloma
- Subject has a history of malignancy (other than multiple myeloma) within 5 years before the date of randomization
- Subject has had radiation therapy within 14 days of randomization.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Daratumumab SC in combination with LenalidomideDaratumumab SC 1800 mg * once every week for 8 weeks * then once every other week for 16 weeks * thereafter once every 4 weeks, until progression | Drug | Arm 1: Experimental group |
| Lenalidomide PO (25mg)Lenalidomide PO (25mg): days 1 through 21 of each 28-day cycle, until progression | Drug | Arm 1: Experimental group, Arm 2: Control group |
| Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progressionDexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression | Drug | Arm 1: Experimental group, Arm 2: Control group |
Primary outcome
Comparison of the efficacy of Daratumumab SC injection when combined with Lenalidomide (R-Dara SC) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd): PFS
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of Daratumumab SC injection when combined with Lenalidomide (R-Dara SC) to that of Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd), in terms of PFS in frail subjects with newly diagnosed myeloma who are not candidates for high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant.
14 secondary outcomes
Time-to-treatment failure
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Time-to-next treatment
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
PFS2 time
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Overall survival (OS) time
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Complete remission (CR)
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Very good partial response (VGPR) or better.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Overall response (CR + VGPR + partial response [PR]).
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Occurrence of grade 3 or more side effects.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Safety and tolerability of Daratumumab SC when administered in combination with Revlimid: NCI-CTCAE V5.0.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Evaluation of quality of life based on MY20 questionnaires
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Evaluation of quality of life based on EORTC C30 questionnaires
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Evaluation of quality of life based on EQ-5D questionnaires
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate at 12 months.
Time frame: after 12 months of treatment
Event Free Survival
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Sep 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 41038184Manier S, Lambert J, Hulin C, Macro M, Laribi K, Araujo C, Pica GM, Touzeau C, Godmer P, Slama B, Karlin L, Orsini Piocelle F, Dib M, Sanhes L, Morel P, El Yamani A, Tiab M, Tabrizi R, Richez V, Garderet L, Royer B, Bareau B, Mariette C, Fleck E, Robu D, Calmettes C, Rigaudeau S, Demarquette H, Frenzel L, Decaux O, Mohty M, Arnulf B, Bigot N, Perrot A, Corre J, Mary JY, Avet-Loiseau H, Moreau P, Leleu X, Facon T. Safety and efficacy of a dexamethasone-sparing regimen with daratumumab and lenalidomide in patients with frailty and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (IFM2017-03): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2025 Oct;26(10):1323-1333. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(25)00280-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Examine the Effects of Novel Therapy Linvoseltamab in Combination With Other Cancer Treatments for Adult Participants With Multiple Myeloma That is Resistant to Current Standard of Care Treatments
Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 2
Cevostamab in Combination With Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone After BCMA- Targeting CAR T-Cell Therapy in Participants With Previously Treated Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Multiple Treatments in Participants With Multiple Myeloma
Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Trial to Study if REGN17372 in Combination With Linvoseltamab is Tolerable for Adult Participants With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingObservational study
Biospecimen Procurement for Center for Immuno-Oncology Immunotherapy Protocols
Multiple Myeloma, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Thierry Facon, MD,PhD principal investigator
University Hospital, Lille
23 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Daratumumab SC in combination with Lenalidomide, Lenalidomide PO (25mg) and Dexamethasone PO (20mg): days 1, 8, 15, 22 of each 28-day cycle, until progression in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by University Hospital, Lille at 23 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 23 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Comparison of the efficacy of Daratumumab SC injection when combined with Lenalidomide (R-Dara SC) vs Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone (Rd): PFS (time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of toxicity or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 84months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03993912, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Sep 2026.