Mandibular DislocationNCT03994692
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction Using Autogenous Inlay (Sandwich) Eminoplasty Versus Patient Specific Poly Ether-ether Ketone (PEEK) Onlay Implant
A study testing PEEK eminoplasty and autogenous onlay grafting eminoplasty in people with Mandibular Dislocation, run by Cairo University.
Trial summary
Aim of the study: The aim is minimize morbidity in treatment of TMJ dislocation. Hypothesis: Alternate hypothesis that treatment tmj dislocation with PEEK eminoplasty will be more efficient than using autogenous inlay technique PICO: Problem (P): patients with un pleasant painful dislocated tmj Intervention (I)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 to 35 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Mandibular Dislocation
- What is being tested?
- PEEK eminoplasty and autogenous onlay grafting eminoplasty
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 7 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 20 Jun 2019to 20 Mar 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 to 35 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- - Patient with recurrent dislocation with maximum inter incisal opening over 55mm
- Long-standing dislocation of the TMJ involving both fixation for more than 3 weeks and the failure of manual reduction
- Failure of conservative strategies such as orientation to self-limit jaw movement and the use of a chin-cap or bandage
- Both sexes
- Age between 18 and 48 years.
- Highly motivated patients.
Who cannot join
- Post-menopausal females with osteoporosis
- Patient with uncontrolled systemic disease
- pregnancy
- psychological disorders, drug or alcohol dependency
- Known allergies or sensitivities to dental materials, including PEEK, Titanium or general anesthetic agents
- Inability to return for follow up visits.
- Refusal of participation from the patient
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction Using Autogenous Inlay (Sandwich) Eminoplasty Versus Patient Specific Poly Ether-ether Ketone (PEEK) Onlay Implant in Treatment of Chronic Condylar Dislocation A Randomized Control Trial
Aim of the study:
The aim is minimize morbidity in treatment of TMJ dislocation. Hypothesis: Alternate hypothesis that treatment tmj dislocation with PEEK eminoplasty will be more efficient than using autogenous inlay technique
PICO:
Problem (P): patients with un pleasant painful dislocated tmj Intervention (I): eminoplasty with patient specific poly ether-ether ketone (PEEK) onlay implant Control Group (C): autogenous inlay (sandwich) eminoplasty Outcome (O): patient Satisfaction, dislocation treatment (normal range of mouth opening), less morbidity.
Read the detailed description
Aim of the study:
The aim is minimize morbidity in treatment of TMJ dislocation. Hypothesis: Alternate hypothesis that treatment tmj dislocation with PEEK eminoplasty will be more efficient than using autogenous inlay technique
PICO:
Problem (P): patients with un pleasant painful dislocated tmj Intervention (I): eminoplasty with patient specific poly ether-ether ketone (PEEK) onlay implant Control Group (C): autogenous inlay (sandwich) eminoplasty Outcome (O): patient Satisfaction, dislocation treatment (normal range of mouth opening), less morbidity.
- Trial design: Type: Parallel, two arm, randomized clinical trial. Allocation ratio: 1:1 Superiority framework
III. Methods A) Participants, interventions \& outcomes 9. Study settings: Diagnosis in outpatient clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery at the faculty of dentistry, Cairo University, Urban area, Cairo Governorate, Egypt.
The surgery will be in O.R rooms or in the outpatient clinic of the same faculty.
- Interventions
Control Group:
Patient preparation The operation can be performed under general anesthesia. mental nerve blocks will be given and infiltration for hemostasis.
After allowing adequate time for vasoconstrictor effects to take place, the incision is initiated in a layered approach through the labial mucosa and is continued through the mentalis muscles and periosteum.
Exposure of the symphyseal bone is undertaken using periosteal elevators and the mental nerves are visualized bilaterally.
The roots of the incisors and canines should be localized and bone cuts should be made at least 5 mm inferior to the root apices.
The roots of canines can impede the operation and limit the size of graft. Similarly, the surgeon should stay at least 5 mm away from the inferior border of the symphysis and the mental foramina.
Bone cuts can be made with a bur or reciprocating saw under copious saline irrigation. When the desired bone cuts have been completed, thin straight or curved osteotomes are then used to deliver the graft Hemostasis can be achieved using resorbable hemostatic agents or fibrin glue. Long-lasting local anesthetic, e.g. bupivacaine, can be applied to the area to achieve longer analgesia.
The wound closure is done in two layers with a resorbable suture for the muscle layer and fast-resorbing suture for the mucosa.
Flexible skin tape can be used on the chin for 3-5 days to reduce swelling and prevent wound dehiscence.
Layered Endural approach to TMJ making wedge in eminence by mallet \& chisel (green stick fracture), then wedging piece of chin graft to increase the height of the eminence creating an obstacle to treat dislocation by manipulation of patient mandible intra operative.
- Functional mandibular movements were reproduced to confirm absence of subluxation and checked for interference and any required adjustments made.
- A multilayer closure of the incisions will be accomplished using Vicryl sutures (88).
Intervention group ; CT scan will be done with the following criteria;
bony window for facial bones, axial cuts, minimal slice thickness, minimal intervals between the cuts, guantry tilt equals zero and finally DICOM files on CD .then, Using cad cam software (mimics 15) , the virtual design and surgery will be done.
Patient Preparation;
- All surgeries will be performed under general anaesthesia (naso-endotracheal intubation)
- Then the entire periarticular region and overlying skin will be infiltrated by 2% lidocaine (20 ml lidocaine + adrenalin 1%) via a 25 gauge needle as an additional anaesthesia.
- Benzyl penicillin 2 MIU in combination with dicloxacillin 1 g will be administered intravenously as prophylactic antibiotics.
- A line is drawn between the lateral eyebrow and tragus. The articular fossa and condylar head is located 10 mm anterior to the tragus and 2-5 mm below this line.
- The temporofacial branch has relatively a constant course and vector being on a line located 0.5 cm below the tragus of the ear, in the direction of the eyebrow and passing 1.5 cm above the lateral eyebrow. Just anterior to the condylar head where the articular eminence will be identified by palpation and marked.
The TMJ will be exposed using the endural incision line and the articular eminence will be identified
- To locate the articular eminence precisely, tissue must be exposed layer by layer until the articular eminence is located. Then, a tunnel will be formed using blunt dissection so that the front wall of the articular capsule can be exposed completely.(89-90-91 )
- The patient specific PEEK eminence will be inserted and secured with two to three pre-planed screws .
- Functional mandibular movements were reproduced to confirm absence of subluxation and checked for interference and any required adjustments made.
- A multilayer closure of the incisions will be accomplished using Vicryl sutures.
For both groups masseter muscle scarification through intra oral approach will be done with post-operative intermaxillary fixation using ivy loops
Post-operative instructions:
According to Oral Maxillo-fac Surg Clin North Am (Quinn PD, 2000):
The following postoperative protocol will be used for patients of both groups:
- Broad-spectrum antibiotics (penicillin V 1 g, or clindamycin 600 mg) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) will be prescribed for 1 week.
- The patients will be told to stay on a soft diet for 5 days and encouraged to resume a normal diet as soon as possible.
- Physiotherapy will start on postoperative day 1, and patients will be encouraged to increase the exercise program as soon as possible.
- Patients will be advised to continue physiotherapy for at least 1 year and possibly longer.
- Cone Beam CT (CBCT) imaging will be performed at the first follow-up visit in order to visualize the position of the patient specific titanium eminence, as well as the position of the retention screws and their relationships to the surrounding vital structures following surgery.
Visit: (every month till 4 month after operation) For group I: Regular follow up with measuring maximum inter incisal distance with a caliper , check normal mandibular movement \& other problems like pain ,discomfort \& swelling For group II: Regular follow up with measuring maximum inter incisal distance with a caliper , check normal mandibular movement \& other problems like pain ,discomfort \& swelling
- Conditions
- Mandibular Dislocation
- Being tested
- PEEK eminoplasty, autogenous onlay grafting eminoplasty
- Keywords
- PEEK eminoplasty ,autogenous inlay (sandwich) eminoplasty
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PEEK eminoplastyDevice
Also called poly ether - ether ketone
making obstacle at eminence using patient specefic PEEK device
autogenous onlay grafting eminoplastyProcedure or surgery
Also called grafting eminoplasty
making obstacle at eminence using chin graft
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK eminoplasty | Experimental | CT scan with bony window for facial bones and DICOM files on CD .then, Using cad cam software (mimics 15) , the virtual design and surgery will be done.
under general anathesia The TMJ will be exposed using the endural incision line and the articular eminence will be identified then blunt dissection so that the front wall of the articular capsule can be exposed completely.
* The patient specific PEEK eminence will be inserted and secured with two to three pre-planed screws .
* Functional mandibular movements were reproduced to confirm absence of subluxation and then closure Receives: Device: PEEK eminoplasty |
| autogenous onlay grafting eminoplasty | Active comparator | under general anesthesia , chin graft was taken Layered Endural approach to TMJ making wedge in eminence by mallet \& chisel (green stick fracture), then wedging piece of chin graft to increase the height of the eminence creating an obstacle to treat dislocation by manipulation of patient mandible intra operative.
- Functional mandibular movements were reproduced to confirm absence of subluxation then closure Receives: Procedure: autogenous onlay grafting eminoplasty |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient satisfaction: Question
Questioning the patient about if there is any dislocation or any limitation to mandibular movement
Measured: up to 4 month after operation
Secondary outcomes (3)
Maximal Incisal Opening
measured with Caliper
Measured: follow up for 4 month
Intra operative time
measured with time calculation
Measured: during operation
Post operative pain: VAS
measured with visual analogue scale
Measured: follow up for 2 weeks up to 4 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2019
- Study start20 Jun 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion20 Jul 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion20 Mar 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mandibular DislocationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- * randomized control trial * trials will be carried out in hospital of oral \& maxillofacial department at faculty of oral and dental medicine of Cairo university * equal randomization participants with equal probabilities for intervention * positive controlled , both groups receiving treatment * parallel group study , each group of patient receive single treatment simultaneously
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- El-Galaa Military Medical Complex
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, mustafa gamal abdel kawy, El-Galaa Military Medical Complex
- Investigators
- mohamed mounir, Phd, Study director, faculty of oral and dental medecine cairo university
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03994692
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- omfs 3-3-3
- Status last verified
- Jun 2019
- First submitted
- 19 Jun 2019
- Last updated
- 21 Jun 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
1-Mayer L. Recurrent dislocation of the jaw. J Bone Joint Surg1933;15:22Y25 2- Van der Kwast WA. Surgical management of bilateral habitual luxation of the mandible. Int J Oral Surg 1978;7:329Y332 3- Gosserez M, Dautrey J. Osteoplastic bearing for the treatment of temporomandibular luxations. In: Oral Surgery Transactions of 2nd Congress of Int Assoc Oral Surg Copenhagen. 1967:261Y264 4- Lindemann A. Die chirurgische behandlung der erkrankungen des kiefergelenkes. Z Stoma 1925;23:395Y 406 5- Iizuka T, HNdaka H, Murakami K, et al. Chronic recurrent anterior luxation of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 17:170Y172
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jun 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction Using Autogenous Inlay (Sandwich) Eminoplasty Versus Patient Specific Poly Ether-ether Ketone (PEEK) Onlay Implant in Treatment of Chronic Condylar Dislocation A Randomized Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03994692
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- omfs 3-3-3
- Conditions
- Mandibular Dislocation
- Keywords
- PEEK eminoplasty ,autogenous inlay (sandwich) eminoplasty
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- El-Galaa Military Medical Complex
- Study start
- 20 Jun 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 20 Jul 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 20 Mar 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim of the study:
The aim is minimize morbidity in treatment of TMJ dislocation. Hypothesis: Alternate hypothesis that treatment tmj dislocation with PEEK eminoplasty will be more efficient than using autogenous inlay technique
PICO:
Problem (P): patients with un pleasant painful dislocated tmj Intervention (I): eminoplasty with patient specific poly ether-ether ketone (PEEK) onlay implant Control Group (C): autogenous inlay (sandwich) eminoplasty Outcome (O): patient Satisfaction, dislocation treatment (normal range of mouth opening), less morbidity.
Detailed description
Aim of the study:
The aim is minimize morbidity in treatment of TMJ dislocation. Hypothesis: Alternate hypothesis that treatment tmj dislocation with PEEK eminoplasty will be more efficient than using autogenous inlay technique
PICO:
Problem (P): patients with un pleasant painful dislocated tmj Intervention (I): eminoplasty with patient specific poly ether-ether ketone (PEEK) onlay implant Control Group (C): autogenous inlay (sandwich) eminoplasty Outcome (O): patient Satisfaction, dislocation treatment (normal range of mouth opening), less morbidity.
- Trial design: Type: Parallel, two arm, randomized clinical trial. Allocation ratio: 1:1 Superiority framework
III. Methods A) Participants, interventions \& outcomes 9. Study settings: Diagnosis in outpatient clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery at the faculty of dentistry, Cairo University, Urban area, Cairo Governorate, Egypt.
The surgery will be in O.R rooms or in the outpatient clinic of the same faculty.
- Interventions
Control Group:
Patient preparation The operation can be performed under general anesthesia. mental nerve blocks will be given and infiltration for hemostasis.
After allowing adequate time for vasoconstrictor effects to take place, the incision is initiated in a layered approach through the labial mucosa and is continued through the mentalis muscles and periosteum.
Exposure of the symphyseal bone is undertaken using periosteal elevators and the mental nerves are visualized bilaterally.
The roots of the incisors and canines should be localized and bone cuts should be made at least 5 mm inferior to the root apices.
The roots of canines can impede the operation and limit the size of graft. Similarly, the surgeon should stay at least 5 mm away from the inferior border of the symphysis and the mental foramina.
Bone cuts can be made with a bur or reciprocating saw under copious saline irrigation. When the desired bone cuts have been completed, thin straight or curved osteotomes are then used to deliver the graft Hemostasis can be achieved using resorbable hemostatic agents or fibrin glue. Long-lasting local anesthetic, e.g. bupivacaine, can be applied to the area to achieve longer analgesia.
The wound closure is done in two layers with a resorbable suture for the muscle layer and fast-resorbing suture for the mucosa.
Flexible skin tape can be used on the chin for 3-5 days to reduce swelling and prevent wound dehiscence.
Layered Endural approach to TMJ making wedge in eminence by mallet \& chisel (green stick fracture), then wedging piece of chin graft to increase the height of the eminence creating an obstacle to treat dislocation by manipulation of patient mandible intra operative.
- Functional mandibular movements were reproduced to confirm absence of subluxation and checked for interference and any required adjustments made.
- A multilayer closure of the incisions will be accomplished using Vicryl sutures (88).
Intervention group ; CT scan will be done with the following criteria;
bony window for facial bones, axial cuts, minimal slice thickness, minimal intervals between the cuts, guantry tilt equals zero and finally DICOM files on CD .then, Using cad cam software (mimics 15) , the virtual design and surgery will be done.
Patient Preparation;
- All surgeries will be performed under general anaesthesia (naso-endotracheal intubation)
- Then the entire periarticular region and overlying skin will be infiltrated by 2% lidocaine (20 ml lidocaine + adrenalin 1%) via a 25 gauge needle as an additional anaesthesia.
- Benzyl penicillin 2 MIU in combination with dicloxacillin 1 g will be administered intravenously as prophylactic antibiotics.
- A line is drawn between the lateral eyebrow and tragus. The articular fossa and condylar head is located 10 mm anterior to the tragus and 2-5 mm below this line.
- The temporofacial branch has relatively a constant course and vector being on a line located 0.5 cm below the tragus of the ear, in the direction of the eyebrow and passing 1.5 cm above the lateral eyebrow. Just anterior to the condylar head where the articular eminence will be identified by palpation and marked.
The TMJ will be exposed using the endural incision line and the articular eminence will be identified
- To locate the articular eminence precisely, tissue must be exposed layer by layer until the articular eminence is located. Then, a tunnel will be formed using blunt dissection so that the front wall of the articular capsule can be exposed completely.(89-90-91 )
- The patient specific PEEK eminence will be inserted and secured with two to three pre-planed screws .
- Functional mandibular movements were reproduced to confirm absence of subluxation and checked for interference and any required adjustments made.
- A multilayer closure of the incisions will be accomplished using Vicryl sutures.
For both groups masseter muscle scarification through intra oral approach will be done with post-operative intermaxillary fixation using ivy loops
Post-operative instructions:
According to Oral Maxillo-fac Surg Clin North Am (Quinn PD, 2000):
The following postoperative protocol will be used for patients of both groups:
- Broad-spectrum antibiotics (penicillin V 1 g, or clindamycin 600 mg) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) will be prescribed for 1 week.
- The patients will be told to stay on a soft diet for 5 days and encouraged to resume a normal diet as soon as possible.
- Physiotherapy will start on postoperative day 1, and patients will be encouraged to increase the exercise program as soon as possible.
- Patients will be advised to continue physiotherapy for at least 1 year and possibly longer.
- Cone Beam CT (CBCT) imaging will be performed at the first follow-up visit in order to visualize the position of the patient specific titanium eminence, as well as the position of the retention screws and their relationships to the surrounding vital structures following surgery.
Visit: (every month till 4 month after operation) For group I: Regular follow up with measuring maximum inter incisal distance with a caliper , check normal mandibular movement \& other problems like pain ,discomfort \& swelling For group II: Regular follow up with measuring maximum inter incisal distance with a caliper , check normal mandibular movement \& other problems like pain ,discomfort \& swelling
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- * randomized control trial * trials will be carried out in hospital of oral \& maxillofacial department at faculty of oral and dental medicine of Cairo university * equal randomization participants with equal probabilities for intervention * positive controlled , both groups receiving treatment * parallel group study , each group of patient receive single treatment simultaneously
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK eminoplasty | Experimental | Device: PEEK eminoplastyCT scan with bony window for facial bones and DICOM files on CD .then, Using cad cam software (mimics 15) , the virtual design and surgery will be done. under general anathesia The TMJ will be exposed using the endural incision line and the articular eminence will be identified then blunt dissection so that the front wall of the articular capsule can be exposed completely. * The patient specific PEEK eminence will be inserted and secured with two to three pre-planed screws . * Functional mandibular movements were reproduced to confirm absence of subluxation and then closure |
| autogenous onlay grafting eminoplasty | Active comparator | Procedure: autogenous onlay grafting eminoplastyunder general anesthesia , chin graft was taken Layered Endural approach to TMJ making wedge in eminence by mallet \& chisel (green stick fracture), then wedging piece of chin graft to increase the height of the eminence creating an obstacle to treat dislocation by manipulation of patient mandible intra operative. - Functional mandibular movements were reproduced to confirm absence of subluxation then closure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- - Patient with recurrent dislocation with maximum inter incisal opening over 55mm
- Long-standing dislocation of the TMJ involving both fixation for more than 3 weeks and the failure of manual reduction
- Failure of conservative strategies such as orientation to self-limit jaw movement and the use of a chin-cap or bandage
- Both sexes
- Age between 18 and 48 years.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Post-menopausal females with osteoporosis
- Patient with uncontrolled systemic disease
- pregnancy
- psychological disorders, drug or alcohol dependency
- Known allergies or sensitivities to dental materials, including PEEK, Titanium or general anesthetic agents
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK eminoplastyAlso: poly ether - ether ketonemaking obstacle at eminence using patient specefic PEEK device | Device | PEEK eminoplasty |
| autogenous onlay grafting eminoplastyAlso: grafting eminoplastymaking obstacle at eminence using chin graft | Procedure or surgery | autogenous onlay grafting eminoplasty |
Primary outcome
Patient satisfaction: Question
Time frame: up to 4 month after operation
Questioning the patient about if there is any dislocation or any limitation to mandibular movement
3 secondary outcomes
Maximal Incisal Opening
Time frame: follow up for 4 month
Intra operative time
Time frame: during operation
Post operative pain: VAS
Time frame: follow up for 2 weeks up to 4 month
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jun 2019.
- Background1-Mayer L. Recurrent dislocation of the jaw. J Bone Joint Surg1933;15:22Y25 2- Van der Kwast WA. Surgical management of bilateral habitual luxation of the mandible. Int J Oral Surg 1978;7:329Y332 3- Gosserez M, Dautrey J. Osteoplastic bearing for the treatment of temporomandibular luxations. In: Oral Surgery Transactions of 2nd Congress of Int Assoc Oral Surg Copenhagen. 1967:261Y264 4- Lindemann A. Die chirurgische behandlung der erkrankungen des kiefergelenkes. Z Stoma 1925;23:395Y 406 5- Iizuka T, HNdaka H, Murakami K, et al. Chronic recurrent anterior luxation of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 17:170Y172
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
mohamed mounir, Phd study director
faculty of oral and dental medecine cairo university
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PEEK eminoplasty and autogenous onlay grafting eminoplasty in people with Mandibular Dislocation, run by Cairo University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact mustafa gamal abdel kawy, B.D.S (01004519806, mustafa.gamal@dentistry.cu.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient satisfaction: Question (time frame: up to 4 month after operation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT03994692, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2019.