Balance DeficitsBATPNCT03994770
An Engineering-Based Balance Assessment and Training Platform
A study testing Balanced Reach Assessment and Training Protocol in people with Balance Deficits and Stroke, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This is a proposal to develop a Balanced Reach Training Protocol (BRTP) to evaluate and train dynamic standing balance. The BRTP is based upon the Balanced Reach Test (BRT) that the investigators previously developed and validated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Balance Deficits, Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Balanced Reach Assessment and Training Protocol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 7 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Nov 2021to 12 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18-40 years old and in good health; 60 years and older
- For Ages 60 or older-stroke with persistent motor function deficit.
- For ages 18-40-experienced no falls in the past year. Fall is defined as a fall that occurs under conditions that an able body individual would not fall.
- Able to perform the balanced reach task without assistive devices for 90 seconds
- Able to perform a sit-to-stand with minimal assistance and walk 10 meters without human assistance
- Adequate language and neurocognitive function to give adequate informed consent \& to participate in testing and training
- Vision adequate to see a 1 inch diameter black disk against a white background at 3 feet
- Able to tolerate the use of Virtual Reality eyewear for ~10 minutes
Who cannot join
- Clinical history of:
- Any health condition that the study team deems would preclude safe completion of the BATP
- For ages 18-40-History of a stroke, orthopedic deficits, or sensorimotor deficits
- Body Mass Index (BMI) >40
- Excessive daily alcohol consumption (>3 oz. liquor; >12 oz. wine; or >36 oz. beer) or illicit drug abuse
- For ages 60 and older-Dementia based on Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score of less than 23 for more than 9th grade education.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Neurological disease other than stroke, such as Parkinson's disease. Vestibular disorders sufficient to preclude safe completion of the BATP or MMBI
- Poorly controlled hypertension (>190/105) on at least two separate occasions
- Poorly controlled type 1 or 2 diabetes (HbA1c >10)
- Recent hospitalization for severe disease or surgery (<3 months)
- Congestive heart failure or valvular dysfunction symptomatic with ordinary activities (NYHA II)
- Self-reported Pregnancy
- Symptomatic orthostatic hypotension
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
About this study
This is a proposal to develop a Balanced Reach Training Protocol (BRTP) to evaluate and train dynamic standing balance. The BRTP is based upon the Balanced Reach Test (BRT) that the investigators previously developed and validated. In the BRT subjects stand and point to a target disk moving unpredictably across a large projection screen in front of them without stepping. Body movements undertaken to track the disk are integral to many daily activities and represent an important class of "expected" balance disturbances that can precipitate falls. The BRTP employs engineering and psychophysical methods, and exploits advances in real time computing in a novel and innovative way to more effectively evaluate and train balance function. The BRTP presents a challenging reaching/tracking task that subjects perform at their limit of balance. The BRTP is an objective, quantitative test that can evaluate balance function without floor or ceiling effects, and train balance across the spectrum of aging, disease, and injury.
Read the detailed description
This study comprises two Specific Aims: SA-1) Development of a Balance Assessment and Training Platform (BATP) based upon the existing BRT; and SA-2) Evaluation of the BATP Assessment Module's test-retest reliability and the Training Module's motor learning effect.
Methods related to Specific Aim 1 SA-1.1: Develop a BATP based on the BRT that incorporates real-time computing and an Adaptive Staircase Algorithm to establish subjects' Limit of Balance. Modify the BRT's experimental control algorithm and hardware setup such that data from our extant measurement systems are continuously streamed to a Real Time Computing Workstation and read by the experimental control algorithm, enabling it to monitor foot movement and compute key performance measures on an ongoing basis. These measures will include Root Mean Square tracking Error (RMSE) and Root Mean Squared Deviation (RMSD) between the ground plane projection of Center of Mass (CoM) and the center of the Base of Support (BoS). Incorporate an Adaptive Staircase Algorithm into the real time experimental control algorithm to establish the target positions corresponding to Limit of Balance, based on foot movement (i.e., stepping).
SA-1.2: Replace the projection screen with Virtual Reality eyewear. The experimental control algorithm will be further modified to display a virtual sphere in the virtual reality eyewear. The virtual reality eyewear will provide a direct view of the actual physical environment but also show the sphere following the trajectory specified by the Adaptive Staircase Algorithm, or the assessment or training modules. When the subject's tracking fingertip contacts the center of the target sphere it will provide visual feedback by changing color.
SA-1.3: Develop the BATP's Assessment and Training modules. The Assessment Module consists of measuring the subject's Limit of Balance, computing the manifold bounding target motion, and the target's motion within the manifold; as just described. The harnessed subject then tracks the disk for 90 sec. After a 2 1/2 minute rest the process is repeated a second time. Tracking and resting durations can be varied to optimize measurement quality and accommodate individual subject needs and capabilities.
The Training Module operates in a loop that presents an operator-specified number of training bouts. One training bout consists of measuring Limit of Balance, computing the manifold and target motion, presenting the tracking target for five minutes, and pausing for a 2 1/2 minute rest period before signaling the operator to begin the next bout. Tracking and resting durations can be varied to optimize training efficacy and accommodate individual subject needs and capabilities. For this proposal a training session will consist of five bouts and last approximately 60 minutes. As in the Assessment Module, subjects will be harnessed while performing the tracking task to guard against falling.
The Assessment and Training modules both collect the same data (All data will be saved for offline, post-test analyses: a) The values of r and corresponding to each Limit of Balance, and Limit of Balance; b) The motion (position vs. time) of the target sphere; c) The motion of each of 13 body segments, as well as the tip of the tracking finger [these data will be used to compute tracking error (RMSE), balance stability (RMSD), and to inform the Adaptive Staircase Algorithm when stepping occurs]; d) Ground reaction forces and moments for each foot.
Methods related to Specific Aim 2 SA-2.1: Evaluate the Assessment Module's test-retest reliability and compare subject performance in it to that in established clinical measures of balance, reach, and Fear of Falling. Twenty stroke (STR) adults will undergo two tests with the Assessment Module 48 hours apart. Clinical measures will be administered before each test. Test-retest reliability will be evaluated
SA-2.2: Evaluate the Training Module's motor learning effect of three one-hour training sessions over one week. Ten subjects randomly selected from those that participated in SA-2.1 will undergo three one-hour training sessions for one week. The SA-2.1 test-retest data will also serve here as double baseline data to establish before-training balance performance. Subjects will be evaluated using the clinical measures at the beginning and immediately after training. Motor learning will be assessed using data from the baseline assessments, the clinical measures, and from the Training Module taken from the last 90 sec of the last training bout of each training session.
- Conditions
- Balance Deficits, Stroke
- Being tested
- Balanced Reach Assessment and Training Protocol
- Keywords
- Balance
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Balanced Reach Assessment and Training ProtocolDiagnostic test
Three one-hour training sessions for one week in the Balanced Reach Training Protocol
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| STR | Other | Older people who have suffered a stroke Receives: Diagnostic Test: Balanced Reach Assessment and Training Protocol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Root Mean Squared Deviation between Center of Mass and Center of Base of Support (RMSD)
Measure of Balance Capability. Root Mean Squared Deviation (RMSD) records the root mean squared distance between the ground plane projection of whole-body Center of Mass and the center of the Base of Support during performance of the balanced reach task, in centimeters. It ranges from zero to the distance from the center of the Base of Support to the boundary of the Base of Support. Larger deviations indicate better performance than smaller deviations.
Measured: Assess change between base line (just prior to training) and last 90 seconds of last training session at end of 1 week
Secondary outcomes (2)
Multi-Directional Reach Test
Measures ability to lean and reach. Multi-Directional Reach Test records the distance in centimeters that one can reach in the forward, backward, rightward, and leftward directions; by bending at the waist and reaching with arm extended in each associated direction. Larger distances indicate better performance than smaller distances.
Measured: Assess change between base line (just prior to training) and within 24 hours of the end of training (1 week)
Falls Efficacy Scale
Assesses fear of falling. The Falls Efficacy Scale is a self-report questionnaire providing information on level of concern about falls for a range of activities of daily living. The questionnaire contains 16 items scored on a four-point scale (1 = not at all concerned to 4 = very concerned). The overall score is the sum of the 16 scores that are provided and ranges from 1to 64. Overall scores between 16-19 indicate low fear of falling; 20-27 indicates moderate fear of falling; and 28-64 indicates high fear of falling. Lower scores are better than higher scores.
Measured: Assess change between base line (just prior to training) and within 24 hours of the end of training (1 week)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jun 2019
- Study start15 Nov 2021
- Primary completion12 Dec 2023
- Study completion12 Dec 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Balance DeficitsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by VA Office of Research and DevelopmentThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Once the BATP is developed 20 stroke subjects will be recruited and the BATP's Assessment Module will be administered in order to verify its operation. After this is complete 10 stroke subjects will be randomly selected from this group and will undergo three one-hour training sessions over the course of one week to assess the operation of the BATP's Training Module.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and Development
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Joseph E. Barton, MD PhD, Principal investigator, Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03994770
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A3020-P
- Other IDs
- I21RX003020
- Acronym
- BATP
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2019
- Last updated
- 22 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Engineering-Based Balance Assessment and Training Platform
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT03994770
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BATP / A3020-P
- Conditions
- Balance Deficits, Stroke
- Keywords
- Balance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 7 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- VA Office of Research and DevelopmentUS federal agency
- Study start
- 15 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 12 Dec 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a proposal to develop a Balanced Reach Training Protocol (BRTP) to evaluate and train dynamic standing balance. The BRTP is based upon the Balanced Reach Test (BRT) that the investigators previously developed and validated. In the BRT subjects stand and point to a target disk moving unpredictably across a large projection screen in front of them without stepping. Body movements undertaken to track the disk are integral to many daily activities and represent an important class of "expected" balance disturbances that can precipitate falls. The BRTP employs engineering and psychophysical methods, and exploits advances in real time computing in a novel and innovative way to more effectively evaluate and train balance function. The BRTP presents a challenging reaching/tracking task that subjects perform at their limit of balance. The BRTP is an objective, quantitative test that can evaluate balance function without floor or ceiling effects, and train balance across the spectrum of aging, disease, and injury.
Detailed description
This study comprises two Specific Aims: SA-1) Development of a Balance Assessment and Training Platform (BATP) based upon the existing BRT; and SA-2) Evaluation of the BATP Assessment Module's test-retest reliability and the Training Module's motor learning effect.
Methods related to Specific Aim 1 SA-1.1: Develop a BATP based on the BRT that incorporates real-time computing and an Adaptive Staircase Algorithm to establish subjects' Limit of Balance. Modify the BRT's experimental control algorithm and hardware setup such that data from our extant measurement systems are continuously streamed to a Real Time Computing Workstation and read by the experimental control algorithm, enabling it to monitor foot movement and compute key performance measures on an ongoing basis. These measures will include Root Mean Square tracking Error (RMSE) and Root Mean Squared Deviation (RMSD) between the ground plane projection of Center of Mass (CoM) and the center of the Base of Support (BoS). Incorporate an Adaptive Staircase Algorithm into the real time experimental control algorithm to establish the target positions corresponding to Limit of Balance, based on foot movement (i.e., stepping).
SA-1.2: Replace the projection screen with Virtual Reality eyewear. The experimental control algorithm will be further modified to display a virtual sphere in the virtual reality eyewear. The virtual reality eyewear will provide a direct view of the actual physical environment but also show the sphere following the trajectory specified by the Adaptive Staircase Algorithm, or the assessment or training modules. When the subject's tracking fingertip contacts the center of the target sphere it will provide visual feedback by changing color.
SA-1.3: Develop the BATP's Assessment and Training modules. The Assessment Module consists of measuring the subject's Limit of Balance, computing the manifold bounding target motion, and the target's motion within the manifold; as just described. The harnessed subject then tracks the disk for 90 sec. After a 2 1/2 minute rest the process is repeated a second time. Tracking and resting durations can be varied to optimize measurement quality and accommodate individual subject needs and capabilities.
The Training Module operates in a loop that presents an operator-specified number of training bouts. One training bout consists of measuring Limit of Balance, computing the manifold and target motion, presenting the tracking target for five minutes, and pausing for a 2 1/2 minute rest period before signaling the operator to begin the next bout. Tracking and resting durations can be varied to optimize training efficacy and accommodate individual subject needs and capabilities. For this proposal a training session will consist of five bouts and last approximately 60 minutes. As in the Assessment Module, subjects will be harnessed while performing the tracking task to guard against falling.
The Assessment and Training modules both collect the same data (All data will be saved for offline, post-test analyses: a) The values of r and corresponding to each Limit of Balance, and Limit of Balance; b) The motion (position vs. time) of the target sphere; c) The motion of each of 13 body segments, as well as the tip of the tracking finger [these data will be used to compute tracking error (RMSE), balance stability (RMSD), and to inform the Adaptive Staircase Algorithm when stepping occurs]; d) Ground reaction forces and moments for each foot.
Methods related to Specific Aim 2 SA-2.1: Evaluate the Assessment Module's test-retest reliability and compare subject performance in it to that in established clinical measures of balance, reach, and Fear of Falling. Twenty stroke (STR) adults will undergo two tests with the Assessment Module 48 hours apart. Clinical measures will be administered before each test. Test-retest reliability will be evaluated
SA-2.2: Evaluate the Training Module's motor learning effect of three one-hour training sessions over one week. Ten subjects randomly selected from those that participated in SA-2.1 will undergo three one-hour training sessions for one week. The SA-2.1 test-retest data will also serve here as double baseline data to establish before-training balance performance. Subjects will be evaluated using the clinical measures at the beginning and immediately after training. Motor learning will be assessed using data from the baseline assessments, the clinical measures, and from the Training Module taken from the last 90 sec of the last training bout of each training session.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Once the BATP is developed 20 stroke subjects will be recruited and the BATP's Assessment Module will be administered in order to verify its operation. After this is complete 10 stroke subjects will be randomly selected from this group and will undergo three one-hour training sessions over the course of one week to assess the operation of the BATP's Training Module.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| STR | Other | Diagnostic Test: Balanced Reach Assessment and Training ProtocolOlder people who have suffered a stroke |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- 18-40 years old and in good health; 60 years and older
- For Ages 60 or older-stroke with persistent motor function deficit.
- For ages 18-40-experienced no falls in the past year. Fall is defined as a fall that occurs under conditions that an able body individual would not fall.
- Able to perform the balanced reach task without assistive devices for 90 seconds
- Able to perform a sit-to-stand with minimal assistance and walk 10 meters without human assistance
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Any health condition that the study team deems would preclude safe completion of the BATP
- For ages 18-40-History of a stroke, orthopedic deficits, or sensorimotor deficits
- Body Mass Index (BMI) >40
- Excessive daily alcohol consumption (>3 oz. liquor; >12 oz. wine; or >36 oz. beer) or illicit drug abuse
- For ages 60 and older-Dementia based on Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) score of less than 23 for more than 9th grade education.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Balanced Reach Assessment and Training ProtocolThree one-hour training sessions for one week in the Balanced Reach Training Protocol | Diagnostic test | STR |
Primary outcome
Root Mean Squared Deviation between Center of Mass and Center of Base of Support (RMSD)
Time frame: Assess change between base line (just prior to training) and last 90 seconds of last training session at end of 1 week
Measure of Balance Capability. Root Mean Squared Deviation (RMSD) records the root mean squared distance between the ground plane projection of whole-body Center of Mass and the center of the Base of Support during performance of the balanced reach task, in centimeters. It ranges from zero to the distance from the center of the Base of Support to the boundary of the Base of Support. Larger deviations indicate better performance than smaller deviations.
2 secondary outcomes
Multi-Directional Reach Test
Time frame: Assess change between base line (just prior to training) and within 24 hours of the end of training (1 week)
Falls Efficacy Scale
Time frame: Assess change between base line (just prior to training) and within 24 hours of the end of training (1 week)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jan 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Balance Deficits
Recruiting
Neuromodulation-Enhanced Use of RObotic BALANCE Training to Improve Balance Function in Individuals With Stroke
Stroke, Stroke (CVA) or Transient Ischemic Attack
Recruiting
Lifestyle Intervention to Improve Muscle Function in Older Adults
Body Composition, Physical Function
Recruiting
Brain Stimulation for Foot-sole Sensation in Older Adults With Foot-sole Somatosensory Deficits
Somatosensory Function, Balance Control
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Examining the Effects of Theta Burst TMS on Brain Connectivity and Balance Ability in Older Adults With Balance Problems
Aging, Balance Deficits
Recruiting
Vibratory Stimulation to Improve Balance Recovery
Fall, Fall Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joseph E. Barton, MD PhD principal investigator
Baltimore VA Medical Center VA Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, MD
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Balanced Reach Assessment and Training Protocol in people with Balance Deficits and Stroke, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Root Mean Squared Deviation between Center of Mass and Center of Base of Support (RMSD) (time frame: Assess change between base line (just prior to training) and last 90 seconds of last training session at end of 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2026.