AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteotomyProtectedHTONCT04000672

Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) Referencing Osteotomy Technological Transfer - a Randomized Control Trial (RCT)

A study testing 3D printed patient specific metal jigs (PSI jig) and HTO with navigation in people with Osteotomy and Randomized Controlled Trial, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a surgery performed to treat knee osteoarthritis in young patients.Recently with our department advance of technology, the investigators performed computed tomography for the patient's lower limb and 3D reconstruct the image. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Osteotomy, Randomized Controlled Trial
What is being tested?
3D printed patient specific metal jigs (PSI jig) and HTO with navigation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
1 Jul 2019to 6 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • symptomatic patient with medial compartment knee OA
  • medial compartment OA was grade 3 or milder according to Kellgren-Lawrence classification

Who cannot join

  • lateral compartment OA
  • symptomatic patellofemoral compartment OA,
  • inflammatory arthritis,
  • significant loss of knee joint range in flexion (less than 100°) or in extension (less than - 10°),
  • ligamentous instability,
  • obesity with a body mass index greater than 30,
  • significant psychological disorder
  • inability to communicate in Chinese or English language

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hong Kong1 site
  • Prince of Wales Hospital & Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital

    Shatin

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: Patient Specific Instrumentation (PSI) Referencing Osteotomy Technological Transfer and Education - a PSI High Tibial Osteotomy, Double-blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial - the PROTECTED HTO (High Tibial Osteotomy) Trial

Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a surgery performed to treat knee osteoarthritis in young patients.Recently with our department advance of technology, the investigators performed computed tomography for the patient's lower limb and 3D reconstruct the image. Based on the 3D image, the investigators planned our planned osteotomy cut on computer software Materialize 3 and the investigators then 3D printed a metal jig that has a slot to produce the osteotomy and also protected the neurovascular bundles. Therefore these metal jigs are specific to each patients. The investigators have performed a few cases of HTO under this extra metal jig protection and guidance and noted it has improved accuracy and safety clinically. However, whether it has scientific significance difference in accuracy is not known.

Read the detailed description

Medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy is a surgery performed to treat knee osteoarthritis in young patients. Currently the investigators perform high tibial osteotomy under the guidance of computer navigation to achieve the required alignment. During conventional high tibial osteotomy the bone cut is done by free hand cutting, there are risks of cutting into the posterior proximal tibia compartment and transect the neurovascular bundles which is a surgical disaster and may then lead to loss of limb. And the accuracy of free hand cutting is limited by experience of surgeons. In our conventional high tibial osteotomy transection of neurovascular bundles has never happened given our meticulous surgical technique but the investigators believe an extra protection is always beneficial to our patients. Recently with our department advance of technology, the investigators performed computed tomography for the patient's lower limb and 3D reconstruct the image. Based on the 3D image, the investigators planned our planned osteotomy cut on computer software Materialize 3 and the investigators then 3D printed a metal jig that has a slot to produce the osteotomy and also protected the neurovascular bundles. Therefore these metal jigs are specific to each patients. The investigators have performed a few cases of HTO under this extra metal jig protection and guidance and noted it has improved accuracy and safety clinically. However, whether it has scientific significance difference in accuracy is not known.

Being tested
3D printed patient specific metal jigs (PSI jig), HTO with navigation
Keywords
Patient Specific Instrumentation, Randomized controlled trial, High Tibial Osteotomy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 3D printed patient specific metal jigs (PSI jig)Procedure or surgery

    PSI jig is created based on the pre-operative CT image. Standard medial open wedge osteotomy described previously is performed. Incision is made in the midway between posteromedial border of the tibia and medial aspect of the tibial tuberosity. Sartorius fascia is cut and retracted medially to expose the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Then the PSI jig is positioned onto the tibia. Due to the jig patient specific design (individually based on each patient's CT image), it can fit closely to the proximal tibia. The slot opening on the PSI jig corresponds to 4 cm below the medial joint line and the slot design allow the sawblade cut direction toward the safe zone of the lateral cortex under fluoroscopy. The PSI Jig is removed after the bone cut completed and would not retain in patient's body.

  • HTO with navigationProcedure or surgery

    In brief, an incision is made in the midway between posteromedial border of the tibia and medial aspect of the tibial tuberosity. Sartorius fascia is cut and retracted medially to expose the medial collateral ligament (MCL). Two to three K-wires are placed 4 cm below the medial joint line toward the safe zone (an area between the tip of the fibular head and the remnant of fibular head epiphysis line) of the lateral cortex under fluoroscopy and osteotomy is done below and parallel to the k-wires using an oscillating saw leaving the lateral 10 mm intact.

Study groups in NCT04000672
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HTO with navigationActive comparatorHigh Tibial Osteotomy is offered to patients with symptomatic medial compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA)
Receives: Procedure: HTO with navigation
HTO with navigation + PSI jigExperimental3D printed patient specific metal jigs (PSI jig) are created based on the pre-operative CT image. After that, calibrated osteotome is used to achieve the desired correction with the use of navigation for overall lower limb alignment, which is the same as the "Active Comparator" group.
Receives: Procedure: 3D printed patient specific metal jigs (PSI jig); Procedure: HTO with navigation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Knee Society knee score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    Measured: 1 week before surgery

  2. Knee Society knee score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    Measured: 6 months post-op

  3. Knee Society knee score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    Measured: 1 year post-op

  4. Knee Society knee score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    Measured: 2 year post-op

  5. Knee Society function score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    Measured: 1 week before surgery

  6. Knee Society function score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    Measured: 6 months post-op

  7. Knee Society function score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    Measured: 1 year post-op

  8. Knee Society function score

    Clinical and functional scores, on a 100-point scale; Knee Society score (KSS) has a "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Both sections are scored from 0 to 100 with lower scores being indicative of worse knee conditions and higher scores being indicative of better knee conditions. "Excellent" for score 80-100, "Good" for score 70-79, "Fair" for score 60-69, "Poor" for score below 60.

    Measured: 2 year post-op

  9. Oxford Knee Score

    Clinical and functional scores

    Measured: 1 week before surgery

  10. Oxford Knee Score

    Clinical and functional scores

    Measured: 6 months post-op

  11. Oxford Knee Score

    Clinical and functional scores

    Measured: 1 year post-op

  12. Oxford Knee Score

    Clinical and functional scores

    Measured: 2 year post-op

  13. Range of motion

    Evaluated using a manual goniometer

    Measured: 1 week before surgery

  14. Range of motion

    Evaluated using a manual goniometer

    Measured: 1 week before discharge

  15. Range of motion

    Evaluated using a manual goniometer

    Measured: 3 months post-op

  16. Range of motion

    Evaluated using a manual goniometer

    Measured: 6 months post-op

  17. Range of motion

    Evaluated using a manual goniometer

    Measured: 1 year post-op

  18. Range of motion

    Evaluated using a manual goniometer

    Measured: 2 year post-op

  19. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score

    The VAS is a psychometric response scale and a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS pain ranges 0-10, with 10 representing the most pain.

    Measured: 1 week before surgery

  20. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score

    The VAS is a psychometric response scale and a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS pain ranges 0-10, with 10 representing the most pain.

    Measured: 1 week before discharge

  21. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score

    The VAS is a psychometric response scale and a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS pain ranges 0-10, with 10 representing the most pain.

    Measured: 3 months post-op

  22. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score

    The VAS is a psychometric response scale and a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS pain ranges 0-10, with 10 representing the most pain.

    Measured: 6 months post-op

  23. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score

    The VAS is a psychometric response scale and a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS pain ranges 0-10, with 10 representing the most pain.

    Measured: 1 year post-op

  24. Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score

    The VAS is a psychometric response scale and a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured. The VAS pain ranges 0-10, with 10 representing the most pain.

    Measured: 2 year post-op

  25. Measurement of knee displacement

    Measure the displacement (in cm) between femoral head and tibial head on a secured computer using CT scan images and scanogram images

    Measured: 1 week before surgery

  26. Measurement of knee displacement

    Measure the displacement (in cm) between femoral head and tibial head on a secured computer using CT scan images and scanogram images

    Measured: 1 year after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jun 2019
  2. Study start1 Jul 2019
  3. Primary completion6 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion6 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Control group: High tibial osteotomy with navigation Intervention group: High tibial osteotomy with navigation and PSI jig
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04000672
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019.050
Acronym
ProtectedHTO
Status last verified
Dec 2023
First submitted
22 Jun 2019
Last updated
7 Dec 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Data and resources will be shared with other eligible investigators through academically established means. The protocol and datasets used and/or analysed in this study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Publications

  • Lau LCM, Chui ECS, Fan JCH, Man GCW, Hung YW, Ho KKW, Chung KY, Wan SYC, Chau JWW, Yung PSH, Bhandari M. Patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) Referencing High Tibial Osteotomy Technological Transfer and Education: protocol for a double-blind, randomised controlled trial (PROTECTED HTO Trial). BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e041129. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041129.

    PubMed 33550239

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 3D printed patient specific metal jigs (PSI jig) and HTO with navigation in people with Osteotomy and Randomized Controlled Trial, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Dec 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Knee Society knee score (time frame: 1 week before surgery). The study lists 26 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04000672, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Dec 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in