AzTrials
AzTrials

Reconstructive SurgeryNCT04002713

Comparison of Choosing Free ALT or Free PMT for Reconstruction With Head and Neck Cancer

An observational study of Reconstructive Surgery and Head and Neck Cancer, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was designed to compare the outcome of the anteromedial thigh (AMT) and anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps in head and neck cancer reconstruction. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Reconstructive Surgery, Head and Neck Cancer
What is being tested?
ALT flap reconstruction and AMT flap reconstruction
How many people
1,590 participants
Where
1 siteTaiwan
Study dates
20 Mar 2019to 3 Jun 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: A retrospective study was performed on adult trauma patients from the registered free flap database and electric medical records of Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, a 2,686-bed medical center in Southern Taiwan.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who underwent ALT or AMT free flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer surgery between March 1, 2008 and February 28, 2017.

Who cannot join

  • Patients whose data were missing will be excluded.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Taiwan1 site
  • Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

    Kaohsiung City, 83301

Other trials in Taiwan

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Outcome of Choosing Free Anterolateral Thigh or Free Posterolateral Thigh Flap for Reconstruction in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

This study was designed to compare the outcome of the anteromedial thigh (AMT) and anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps in head and neck cancer reconstruction.

Read the detailed description

To compare the results of the AMT and ALT flaps, this study aimed to compare their outcomes in head and neck cancer reconstruction under the condition of attenuating baseline patient and operative characteristics with the selection of propensity score-matched patient cohorts.

Being tested
ALT flap reconstruction, AMT flap reconstruction
Keywords
Anterolateral thigh (ALT), anteromedial thigh (AMT), free flap reconstruction, microsurgery, head and neck cancer, outcomes
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ALT flap reconstructionOther

    Patients who underwent ALT free flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer surgery.

  • AMT flap reconstructionOther

    Patients who underwent AMT free flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer surgery.

Study groups in NCT04002713
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ALT&AMT free flap reconstructionPatients who underwent ALT or AMT free flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer surgery between March 1, 2008 and February 28, 2017
Receives: Other: ALT flap reconstruction; Other: AMT flap reconstruction

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. survival or failure

    The primary free flap outcome was determined as its survival or failure.

    Measured: up to 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Complications

    The second outcome was the associated complications (fistula, hematoma, partial necrosis, and wound infection).

    Measured: up to 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2019
  2. Study start20 Mar 2019
  3. Primary completion2 May 2019
  4. Study completion3 Jun 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
1,590 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04002713
Sponsor's protocol ID
201900308B0
Status last verified
Jun 2019
First submitted
27 Jun 2019
Last updated
1 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Reconstructive Surgery and Head and Neck Cancer, run by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

survival or failure (time frame: up to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in