Exercise TrainingGIVENCT04004598
Golf for Veterans Study
A study testing golf training in people with Exercise Training, run by University of Southern California at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Aging is associated with physiological declines that could impair the ability to perform activities of daily living and thus impair the quality of life of older adults. Golf is an activity that challenges the balance, flexibility, and muscular systems of the golfer and could have important implications in addressing… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Exercise Training
- What is being tested?
- golf training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 31 Aug 2015to 5 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Older Military Veterans: 60-80 years old
- The ability to stand independently without external support
- No previous golf experience
- Played ≤1 time in the last month
- Played ≤3 times in the last 6 months
- English Speaking
Who cannot join
- Dementia and Alzheimers Disease assessed via the Telephone Memory Impairment Screen
- Symptomatic cardiovascular disease, active angina, uncontrolled hypertension (SBP>160 or DBP>90, high resting pulse HR>90), symptomatic orthostatic hypotension
- Unstable asthma, exacerbated COPD
- Rheumatoid arthritis, unstable ankle, knee, hip, shoulder or wrist joints
- History of injury or orthopedic operation within the last 6 months
- Movement disorders (Parkinson's disease or other neurological disorders), stroke, hemiparesis or paraparesis
- Peripheral neuropathies, severe vision or hearing problems, or metastatic cancer
- Individuals with vestibular, visual, musculosketelal, orthopedic and/or neurological disorders known to impair balance
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
University Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90089
West Los Angeles Veterans Administration
Los Angeles, California, 90089
About this study
Official title: Golf Intervention for Veterans Exercise Study
Aging is associated with physiological declines that could impair the ability to perform activities of daily living and thus impair the quality of life of older adults. Golf is an activity that challenges the balance, flexibility, and muscular systems of the golfer and could have important implications in addressing the physiological declines associated with aging. Golf also challenges the cognition of golfer and is typically performed in groups of 2-4 people; therefore, it could also have important implications for the cognitive and social health of older adults. This research will investigate the effects of an introductory, therapeutic golf program on the physiological, cognitive, and social well-being of older adults. Older adult military veterans (60-80 years) will participate in a 12-week introductory golf program specifically designed with older adults in mind. The intervention will be led by Professional Golf Association (PGA) professionals with experience in teaching older adults to golf. In order to assess the effectiveness of the intervention, the functional, physiological, and cognitive abilities of the participants will be evaluated as well as the overall well-being before and after the completion of the golf program. These adaptations will be evaluated through the use of biomechanical analysis, standardized older adult functional tests, validated surveys and questionnaires, and validated cognitive assessments.
Read the detailed description
Implementing a 12-week introductory golf intervention designed for older military veterans will allow us to evaluate the usefulness of golf as a means to promote physical activity and well-being across the lifespan. Golf, while studied from a performance perspective, has not been studied as an intervention to promote physical activity and health in older adults. This study will contribute to our knowledge about the feasibility and effectiveness of golf as a means to promote wellness across the lifespan.
1.0 OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE 1: Quantify the changes in the functional, cognitive, and physiological abilities of older military veterans following a 12-week introductory golf intervention.
Hypothesis: Participants will demonstrate improved functional, cognitive and physiological abilities following the intervention.
OBJECTIVE 2: Quantify golf demands and performance including a biomechanical analysis of golf swings, putting and picking up a ball following a 12-week introductory golf intervention.
Hypothesis: The demands of the golf intervention will be similar to or greater than the demands during commonly utilized older adult balance and strengthening exercises.
OBJECTIVE 3: Evaluate the safety and feasibility of a 12-week introductory golf intervention.
Hypothesis 3A: Adverse events associated with the intervention will be minor and not more frequent than AE's associated with other activity programs in seniors.
Hypothesis 3B: Adherence to the program will greater than the adherence associated with other activity-intervention programs in seniors.
3.0 SELECTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF SUBJECTS
Participants will be recruited using physician referrals, flyers, and visits to community centers, military Veteran fitness/wellness classes, military Veteran organizations, and military Veteran housing facilities in the Greater Los Angeles area. Once identified, the participants will go through a two-part screening process that includes a phone interview and clearance from their primary care physician. The phone screen includes the Telephone Memory Impairment Screen and a series of questions pertaining to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants that pass the phone screen will be then required to receive clearance from their primary care physician prior to enrollment in the study. At the baseline testing session, additional details of the study will be explained to the participants, and consent obtained by an experienced researcher.
4.0 RISK ANALYSIS The functional assessments include activities that are regularly conducted throughout the day and have been utilized regularly as part of common clinical practice for assessing functional abilities. In more challenging activities, the participants will be appropriately spotted to ensure safety during the test.
The potential risks are as follows:
Functional Assessment: Fatigue (very minimal risk) - Rest will be provided as needed for the participants.
Muscle soreness (minimal risk) - This is no greater than performing normal activities of daily living.
Joint or muscle injury (minimal risk) - This is no greater than performing normal activities of daily living.
Risk of falling (minimal risk) - On the more challenging tasks, participants will be spotted.
Cognitive Assessment: Questionnaires (minimal risk) - Participants will be given the option to skip or stop answering any questions that make them uncomfortable.
Golf Intervention: Joint or muscle injury (minimal risk) - The participants will be gradually introduced to the activities associated with the sport of golf. Each golf session will include a sport specific warm-up and exercises that prepare the participants for the daily activities. Additionally, the golfers will be supervised by a PGA Professional who specializes in instructing older adults.
Fatigue (very minimal risk) - Participants will also be allowed rest as needed.
Adverse Events: Any unanticipated problem will be recorded via an incident report. Protocols for the USC MBRL have been developed. Any serious adverse event will be reported to the Institutional Review Board at the USC Health Science Campus using the flow chart below.
Continual Safety Monitoring: Researchers will have weekly meetings with the PGA instructors to keep informed about the intervention and participant safety. Additionally, each week, research associates will check in with participants according to the Problem Reports and Tracking Problems Protocol.
5.0 CLINICAL/LABORATORY EVALUATIONS AND STUDY CALENDAR
Duration and Locations: The study from consent enrollment to final data collection will occur over a 16-week period. The study consists of two data collection visits to the Jacquelin Perry Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Laboratory (MBRL) in the Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy located on the University of Southern California Health Science Campus and two data collection visits to a private room located at the West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Hospital (WLAVA). Day 1 (USC) and Day 2 (WLAVA) will occur following the consent enrollment (before training) and Day 3 (USC) and Day 4 (WLAVA) will occur following the completion of the training program.
Biomechanical Analysis at USC (minimal risk): Laboratory kinematics and kinetics will be collecting using an 11-camera digital motion capture system (Qualysis, AB, Gothenberg, Sweden). 14 mm reflective markers will be used to define body segments and track motion during the trials. The trunk will be modeled as 2 rigid segments: pelvic and spine segments. The lower extremity will be modeled as 3 rigid segments: thigh, shank and foot.
Day 1 Tasks (minimal risk): Data collection will last approximately 2 hours and will include previously validated functional assessments.
Height, mass, resting heart rate, resting blood pressure and body fat percentage via Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis 6 minute walk test Hip muscle performance Gait analysis Modified Tandem Quiet Standing Balance confidence: Activities Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale Participants will be given a Golf History Form to complete at home and return on Day 2
Day 2 Tasks (minimal risk): Data collection will last approximately 1.5 hours and will include previously validated cognitive and self-efficacy assessments as well functional measures.
Participants will turn in their Golf History Form Self-reported health-related quality of life as assessed by the RAND 12-item Health Survey Surveys from the Midlife in the United States Survey (MIDUS) study assessing Positive and Negative affect, Social Well-Being, and Sense of Control Cognition as assessed by the NIH Toolbox for cognition Physical activity habits will be assessed via a questionnaire developed by the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestins Intervention (PEPI) Study and a physical activity free recall Episodic verbal learning and memory as assessed by the California Verbal Learning Test Senior Fitness Test: 30-second chair stand and 8-foot-up-and-go test
Day 3 Tasks (minimal risk): Data collection will last approximately 3 hours and will include all tasks performed on Day 1 plus a biomechanical analysis of golf-related demands (see below).
Golf swings, chips and putts that are common to recreational golf players. Participants will perform up to 5-10 trials of each swing type.
Picking up and setting down a golf ball. Subjects will perform up to 5-10 trials of each strategy.
Exit questionnaire about golf training program
Day 4 Tasks (minimal risk): Data collection will last approximately 2 hours and will include all tasks performed on Day 2.
Six months after the completion of the study, participants will receive a telephone call to follow-up on their current golf playing habits following the 12-week program.
Golf Training Visits: Participants will participate in golf training programs at the Heroes Golf Course on the WLAVA campus. Participants will be divided into groups of 2-4 golfers and will meet with a PGA Professional two times per week for 12 weeks. Training sessions will last 1-2 hours. The program is specifically designed for older adults not currently playing golf. The first set of sessions will include introduction to the different forms of the golf swing beginning with partial swings and then gradually progressing to a full swing. Swing modifications will be provided on an individual basis to address needs of the participant. Golf play will begin on holes that are flatter and close to the clubhouse and will begin by only playing 1-2 holes. The golfers will then be appropriately progressed to longer golf play as the PGA Professional feels it is appropriate. All equipment and fees will be included and there will be no cost to the participants.
Tasks (minimal risk):
Warm-up: Each training session will begin with a sport specific warm-up that prepares the participants for the activities of the day.
Supplementary Exercises: Additional strengthening and flexibility exercises will be included in training sessions to prepare the participants for golf-related activities.
Golf swings and putting: These movements will be introduced in a progressive nature beginning with partial swings of the least forceful swing type and eventually progressing to the more forceful swings (drives). Swings with the following equipment will be included: putters, pitching or sand wedges, irons, and woods.
Picking up a ball: The participants will be introduced to techniques to picking up a golf ball which will be individualized to the needs of the participants based off current research in the MBRL (HS-15-00038).
Walking: Participants will gradually increase walking distance. Practice will begin on flat holes and will progress to holes with more challenging terrain.
Golf play: Participants will be gradually introduced to regular golf play beginning with play on a single, low difficulty hole and progressing to multiple holes. Skill difficulty will also be gradually increased.
During the intervention, walking distance will be tracked via fitness trackers. Golf performance will be tracked as well.
6.0 DATA COLLECTION AND MONITORING
Data will be stored securely in the MBRL, CHP, room G9. Electronic data will be stored on a password protected computer. Hard copies of data will be stored in a locking file cabinet. No subject identifiers will be collected.
7.0 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 7.1 PRIMARY DEPENDENT VARIABLES
7.1.1 Segment/joint angular positions, velocities, and accelerations 7.1.2 Joint torques 7.1.3 COP dynamics 7.1.4 Static and dynamic balance 7.1.5 Hip Muscle Performance 7.1.6 Gait speed 7.1.7 Gait spatiotemporal characteristics 7.1.8 Cognitive-Motor Dual Task Performance 7.1.9 Activities Specific Balance Confidence 7.1.10 Senior Fitness Test 7.1.11 Self-Rated Health 7.1.12 Verbal memory recall 7.1.13 Positive and Negative affect 7.1.14 Personal Mastery 7.1.15 Perceived Constraints 7.1.16 Social Contribution 7.1.17 Cognition Fluid Composition Score
7.2 POWER ANALYSIS
To date, this study has not been conducted and thus no preliminary data was available for a power analysis. 12 subjects are requested to ensure for adequate sample size and account for study attrition, based on other exercise intervention studies in older adults.
7.3 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Pre-Post comparisons will be made.
8.0 REGISTRATION GUIDELINE
Following confirmation of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, all potential participants will be consented before enrollment in the study. Study research associates have undergone CITI Training for human subjects' research. In order to participate in the study, participants must be English speaking and have the ability to follow instructions (as assessed by the Telephone Memory Impairment Screen); therefore, there is no need of a legally authorized representative during the consent process. Participants will be consented using a USC Informed Consent form after being explained the details of the study and allowing for adequate time to ask questions and make a decision.
- Conditions
- Exercise Training
- Being tested
- golf training
- Keywords
- aging, exercise, golf, intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
golf trainingBehavioural
12 weeks of training by Professional Golf Association professional
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| golf training | Experimental | 12-week golf training program Receives: Behavioral: golf training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Gait speed
change in walking speed
Measured: baseline and after 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in Strength
change in dynamic and static strength
Measured: baseline and after 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jul 2019
- Study start31 Aug 2015
- Primary completion5 Jun 2018
- Study completion5 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Exercise TrainingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Southern CaliforniaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Phase I, Feasibility and Safety Trial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern California
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, George Salem, University of Southern California
- Investigators
- George J Salem, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Southern CaliforniaSteve Castle, MD, Study director, West Los Angeles Veterans Administration
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04004598
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HS1500352
- Acronym
- GIVE
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 29 Jun 2019
- Last updated
- 9 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gao KL, Hui-Chan CW, Tsang WW. Golfers have better balance control and confidence than healthy controls. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Nov;111(11):2805-12. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-1910-7. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
PubMed 21416145Tsang WW, Hui-Chan CW. Effects of exercise on joint sense and balance in elderly men: Tai Chi versus golf. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Apr;36(4):658-67. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000122077.87090.2e.
PubMed 15064594Tsang WW, Hui-Chan CW. Static and dynamic balance control in older golfers. J Aging Phys Act. 2010 Jan;18(1):1-13. doi: 10.1123/japa.18.1.1.
PubMed 20181990Hoerster KD, Lehavot K, Simpson T, McFall M, Reiber G, Nelson KM. Health and health behavior differences: U.S. Military, veteran, and civilian men. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5):483-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.029.
PubMed 23079170Littman AJ, Forsberg CW, Koepsell TD. Physical activity in a national sample of veterans. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 May;41(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181943826.
PubMed 19346987Bouaziz W, Lang PO, Schmitt E, Kaltenbach G, Geny B, Vogel T. Health benefits of multicomponent training programmes in seniors: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Jul;70(7):520-36. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12822. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
PubMed 27291143Broman G, Johnsson L, Kaijser L. Golf: a high intensity interval activity for elderly men. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004 Oct;16(5):375-81. doi: 10.1007/BF03324567.
PubMed 15636463Parkkari J, Natri A, Kannus P, Manttari A, Laukkanen R, Haapasalo H, Nenonen A, Pasanen M, Oja P, Vuori I. A controlled trial of the health benefits of regular walking on a golf course. Am J Med. 2000 Aug 1;109(2):102-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00455-1.
PubMed 10967150Foxworth JL, Millar AL, Long BL, Way M, Vellucci MW, Vogler JD. Hip joint torques during the golf swing of young and senior healthy males. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Sep;43(9):660-5. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4417.
PubMed 23886577Ball KA, Best RJ. Different centre of pressure patterns within the golf stroke I: Cluster analysis. J Sports Sci. 2007 May;25(7):757-70. doi: 10.1080/02640410600874971.
PubMed 17454544Bezzola L, Merillat S, Jancke L. The effect of leisure activity golf practice on motor imagery: an fMRI study in middle adulthood. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 29;6:67. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00067. eCollection 2012.
PubMed 22479243Bezzola L, Merillat S, Gaser C, Jancke L. Training-induced neural plasticity in golf novices. J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 31;31(35):12444-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1996-11.2011.
PubMed 21880905Murray AD, Daines L, Archibald D, Hawkes RA, Schiphorst C, Kelly P, Grant L, Mutrie N. The relationships between golf and health: a scoping review. Br J Sports Med. 2017 Jan;51(1):12-19. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096625. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
PubMed 27697939
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Golf Intervention for Veterans Exercise Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04004598
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GIVE / HS1500352
- Conditions
- Exercise Training
- Keywords
- aging, exercise, golf, intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Southern CaliforniaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 Aug 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aging is associated with physiological declines that could impair the ability to perform activities of daily living and thus impair the quality of life of older adults. Golf is an activity that challenges the balance, flexibility, and muscular systems of the golfer and could have important implications in addressing the physiological declines associated with aging. Golf also challenges the cognition of golfer and is typically performed in groups of 2-4 people; therefore, it could also have important implications for the cognitive and social health of older adults. This research will investigate the effects of an introductory, therapeutic golf program on the physiological, cognitive, and social well-being of older adults. Older adult military veterans (60-80 years) will participate in a 12-week introductory golf program specifically designed with older adults in mind. The intervention will be led by Professional Golf Association (PGA) professionals with experience in teaching older adults to golf. In order to assess the effectiveness of the intervention, the functional, physiological, and cognitive abilities of the participants will be evaluated as well as the overall well-being before and after the completion of the golf program. These adaptations will be evaluated through the use of biomechanical analysis, standardized older adult functional tests, validated surveys and questionnaires, and validated cognitive assessments.
Detailed description
Implementing a 12-week introductory golf intervention designed for older military veterans will allow us to evaluate the usefulness of golf as a means to promote physical activity and well-being across the lifespan. Golf, while studied from a performance perspective, has not been studied as an intervention to promote physical activity and health in older adults. This study will contribute to our knowledge about the feasibility and effectiveness of golf as a means to promote wellness across the lifespan.
1.0 OBJECTIVES AND PURPOSE
OBJECTIVE 1: Quantify the changes in the functional, cognitive, and physiological abilities of older military veterans following a 12-week introductory golf intervention.
Hypothesis: Participants will demonstrate improved functional, cognitive and physiological abilities following the intervention.
OBJECTIVE 2: Quantify golf demands and performance including a biomechanical analysis of golf swings, putting and picking up a ball following a 12-week introductory golf intervention.
Hypothesis: The demands of the golf intervention will be similar to or greater than the demands during commonly utilized older adult balance and strengthening exercises.
OBJECTIVE 3: Evaluate the safety and feasibility of a 12-week introductory golf intervention.
Hypothesis 3A: Adverse events associated with the intervention will be minor and not more frequent than AE's associated with other activity programs in seniors.
Hypothesis 3B: Adherence to the program will greater than the adherence associated with other activity-intervention programs in seniors.
3.0 SELECTION AND WITHDRAWAL OF SUBJECTS
Participants will be recruited using physician referrals, flyers, and visits to community centers, military Veteran fitness/wellness classes, military Veteran organizations, and military Veteran housing facilities in the Greater Los Angeles area. Once identified, the participants will go through a two-part screening process that includes a phone interview and clearance from their primary care physician. The phone screen includes the Telephone Memory Impairment Screen and a series of questions pertaining to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Participants that pass the phone screen will be then required to receive clearance from their primary care physician prior to enrollment in the study. At the baseline testing session, additional details of the study will be explained to the participants, and consent obtained by an experienced researcher.
4.0 RISK ANALYSIS The functional assessments include activities that are regularly conducted throughout the day and have been utilized regularly as part of common clinical practice for assessing functional abilities. In more challenging activities, the participants will be appropriately spotted to ensure safety during the test.
The potential risks are as follows:
Functional Assessment: Fatigue (very minimal risk) - Rest will be provided as needed for the participants.
Muscle soreness (minimal risk) - This is no greater than performing normal activities of daily living.
Joint or muscle injury (minimal risk) - This is no greater than performing normal activities of daily living.
Risk of falling (minimal risk) - On the more challenging tasks, participants will be spotted.
Cognitive Assessment: Questionnaires (minimal risk) - Participants will be given the option to skip or stop answering any questions that make them uncomfortable.
Golf Intervention: Joint or muscle injury (minimal risk) - The participants will be gradually introduced to the activities associated with the sport of golf. Each golf session will include a sport specific warm-up and exercises that prepare the participants for the daily activities. Additionally, the golfers will be supervised by a PGA Professional who specializes in instructing older adults.
Fatigue (very minimal risk) - Participants will also be allowed rest as needed.
Adverse Events: Any unanticipated problem will be recorded via an incident report. Protocols for the USC MBRL have been developed. Any serious adverse event will be reported to the Institutional Review Board at the USC Health Science Campus using the flow chart below.
Continual Safety Monitoring: Researchers will have weekly meetings with the PGA instructors to keep informed about the intervention and participant safety. Additionally, each week, research associates will check in with participants according to the Problem Reports and Tracking Problems Protocol.
5.0 CLINICAL/LABORATORY EVALUATIONS AND STUDY CALENDAR
Duration and Locations: The study from consent enrollment to final data collection will occur over a 16-week period. The study consists of two data collection visits to the Jacquelin Perry Musculoskeletal Biomechanics Research Laboratory (MBRL) in the Division of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy located on the University of Southern California Health Science Campus and two data collection visits to a private room located at the West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Hospital (WLAVA). Day 1 (USC) and Day 2 (WLAVA) will occur following the consent enrollment (before training) and Day 3 (USC) and Day 4 (WLAVA) will occur following the completion of the training program.
Biomechanical Analysis at USC (minimal risk): Laboratory kinematics and kinetics will be collecting using an 11-camera digital motion capture system (Qualysis, AB, Gothenberg, Sweden). 14 mm reflective markers will be used to define body segments and track motion during the trials. The trunk will be modeled as 2 rigid segments: pelvic and spine segments. The lower extremity will be modeled as 3 rigid segments: thigh, shank and foot.
Day 1 Tasks (minimal risk): Data collection will last approximately 2 hours and will include previously validated functional assessments.
Height, mass, resting heart rate, resting blood pressure and body fat percentage via Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis 6 minute walk test Hip muscle performance Gait analysis Modified Tandem Quiet Standing Balance confidence: Activities Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale Participants will be given a Golf History Form to complete at home and return on Day 2
Day 2 Tasks (minimal risk): Data collection will last approximately 1.5 hours and will include previously validated cognitive and self-efficacy assessments as well functional measures.
Participants will turn in their Golf History Form Self-reported health-related quality of life as assessed by the RAND 12-item Health Survey Surveys from the Midlife in the United States Survey (MIDUS) study assessing Positive and Negative affect, Social Well-Being, and Sense of Control Cognition as assessed by the NIH Toolbox for cognition Physical activity habits will be assessed via a questionnaire developed by the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestins Intervention (PEPI) Study and a physical activity free recall Episodic verbal learning and memory as assessed by the California Verbal Learning Test Senior Fitness Test: 30-second chair stand and 8-foot-up-and-go test
Day 3 Tasks (minimal risk): Data collection will last approximately 3 hours and will include all tasks performed on Day 1 plus a biomechanical analysis of golf-related demands (see below).
Golf swings, chips and putts that are common to recreational golf players. Participants will perform up to 5-10 trials of each swing type.
Picking up and setting down a golf ball. Subjects will perform up to 5-10 trials of each strategy.
Exit questionnaire about golf training program
Day 4 Tasks (minimal risk): Data collection will last approximately 2 hours and will include all tasks performed on Day 2.
Six months after the completion of the study, participants will receive a telephone call to follow-up on their current golf playing habits following the 12-week program.
Golf Training Visits: Participants will participate in golf training programs at the Heroes Golf Course on the WLAVA campus. Participants will be divided into groups of 2-4 golfers and will meet with a PGA Professional two times per week for 12 weeks. Training sessions will last 1-2 hours. The program is specifically designed for older adults not currently playing golf. The first set of sessions will include introduction to the different forms of the golf swing beginning with partial swings and then gradually progressing to a full swing. Swing modifications will be provided on an individual basis to address needs of the participant. Golf play will begin on holes that are flatter and close to the clubhouse and will begin by only playing 1-2 holes. The golfers will then be appropriately progressed to longer golf play as the PGA Professional feels it is appropriate. All equipment and fees will be included and there will be no cost to the participants.
Tasks (minimal risk):
Warm-up: Each training session will begin with a sport specific warm-up that prepares the participants for the activities of the day.
Supplementary Exercises: Additional strengthening and flexibility exercises will be included in training sessions to prepare the participants for golf-related activities.
Golf swings and putting: These movements will be introduced in a progressive nature beginning with partial swings of the least forceful swing type and eventually progressing to the more forceful swings (drives). Swings with the following equipment will be included: putters, pitching or sand wedges, irons, and woods.
Picking up a ball: The participants will be introduced to techniques to picking up a golf ball which will be individualized to the needs of the participants based off current research in the MBRL (HS-15-00038).
Walking: Participants will gradually increase walking distance. Practice will begin on flat holes and will progress to holes with more challenging terrain.
Golf play: Participants will be gradually introduced to regular golf play beginning with play on a single, low difficulty hole and progressing to multiple holes. Skill difficulty will also be gradually increased.
During the intervention, walking distance will be tracked via fitness trackers. Golf performance will be tracked as well.
6.0 DATA COLLECTION AND MONITORING
Data will be stored securely in the MBRL, CHP, room G9. Electronic data will be stored on a password protected computer. Hard copies of data will be stored in a locking file cabinet. No subject identifiers will be collected.
7.0 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS 7.1 PRIMARY DEPENDENT VARIABLES
7.1.1 Segment/joint angular positions, velocities, and accelerations 7.1.2 Joint torques 7.1.3 COP dynamics 7.1.4 Static and dynamic balance 7.1.5 Hip Muscle Performance 7.1.6 Gait speed 7.1.7 Gait spatiotemporal characteristics 7.1.8 Cognitive-Motor Dual Task Performance 7.1.9 Activities Specific Balance Confidence 7.1.10 Senior Fitness Test 7.1.11 Self-Rated Health 7.1.12 Verbal memory recall 7.1.13 Positive and Negative affect 7.1.14 Personal Mastery 7.1.15 Perceived Constraints 7.1.16 Social Contribution 7.1.17 Cognition Fluid Composition Score
7.2 POWER ANALYSIS
To date, this study has not been conducted and thus no preliminary data was available for a power analysis. 12 subjects are requested to ensure for adequate sample size and account for study attrition, based on other exercise intervention studies in older adults.
7.3 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Pre-Post comparisons will be made.
8.0 REGISTRATION GUIDELINE
Following confirmation of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, all potential participants will be consented before enrollment in the study. Study research associates have undergone CITI Training for human subjects' research. In order to participate in the study, participants must be English speaking and have the ability to follow instructions (as assessed by the Telephone Memory Impairment Screen); therefore, there is no need of a legally authorized representative during the consent process. Participants will be consented using a USC Informed Consent form after being explained the details of the study and allowing for adequate time to ask questions and make a decision.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Phase I, Feasibility and Safety Trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| golf training | Experimental | Behavioral: golf training12-week golf training program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Older Military Veterans: 60-80 years old
- The ability to stand independently without external support
- No previous golf experience
- Played ≤1 time in the last month
- Played ≤3 times in the last 6 months
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Dementia and Alzheimers Disease assessed via the Telephone Memory Impairment Screen
- Symptomatic cardiovascular disease, active angina, uncontrolled hypertension (SBP>160 or DBP>90, high resting pulse HR>90), symptomatic orthostatic hypotension
- Unstable asthma, exacerbated COPD
- Rheumatoid arthritis, unstable ankle, knee, hip, shoulder or wrist joints
- History of injury or orthopedic operation within the last 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| golf training12 weeks of training by Professional Golf Association professional | Behavioural | golf training |
Primary outcome
Change in Gait speed
Time frame: baseline and after 12 weeks
change in walking speed
1 secondary outcome
Change in Strength
Time frame: baseline and after 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Aug 2019.
- Background: PubMed 21416145Gao KL, Hui-Chan CW, Tsang WW. Golfers have better balance control and confidence than healthy controls. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Nov;111(11):2805-12. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-1910-7. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
- Background: PubMed 15064594Tsang WW, Hui-Chan CW. Effects of exercise on joint sense and balance in elderly men: Tai Chi versus golf. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004 Apr;36(4):658-67. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000122077.87090.2e.
- Background: PubMed 20181990Tsang WW, Hui-Chan CW. Static and dynamic balance control in older golfers. J Aging Phys Act. 2010 Jan;18(1):1-13. doi: 10.1123/japa.18.1.1.
- Background: PubMed 23079170Hoerster KD, Lehavot K, Simpson T, McFall M, Reiber G, Nelson KM. Health and health behavior differences: U.S. Military, veteran, and civilian men. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Nov;43(5):483-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.029.
- Background: PubMed 19346987Littman AJ, Forsberg CW, Koepsell TD. Physical activity in a national sample of veterans. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009 May;41(5):1006-13. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181943826.
- Background: PubMed 27291143Bouaziz W, Lang PO, Schmitt E, Kaltenbach G, Geny B, Vogel T. Health benefits of multicomponent training programmes in seniors: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2016 Jul;70(7):520-36. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12822. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
- Background: PubMed 15636463Broman G, Johnsson L, Kaijser L. Golf: a high intensity interval activity for elderly men. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2004 Oct;16(5):375-81. doi: 10.1007/BF03324567.
- Background: PubMed 10967150Parkkari J, Natri A, Kannus P, Manttari A, Laukkanen R, Haapasalo H, Nenonen A, Pasanen M, Oja P, Vuori I. A controlled trial of the health benefits of regular walking on a golf course. Am J Med. 2000 Aug 1;109(2):102-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(00)00455-1.
- Background: PubMed 23886577Foxworth JL, Millar AL, Long BL, Way M, Vellucci MW, Vogler JD. Hip joint torques during the golf swing of young and senior healthy males. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Sep;43(9):660-5. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4417.
- Background: PubMed 17454544Ball KA, Best RJ. Different centre of pressure patterns within the golf stroke I: Cluster analysis. J Sports Sci. 2007 May;25(7):757-70. doi: 10.1080/02640410600874971.
- Background: PubMed 22479243Bezzola L, Merillat S, Jancke L. The effect of leisure activity golf practice on motor imagery: an fMRI study in middle adulthood. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012 Mar 29;6:67. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00067. eCollection 2012.
- Background: PubMed 21880905Bezzola L, Merillat S, Gaser C, Jancke L. Training-induced neural plasticity in golf novices. J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 31;31(35):12444-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1996-11.2011.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Exercise Training
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Concurrent Training on Serum PCSK9 Levels in Adults With Overweight
Overweight, Lipid Metabolism
Not yet recruiting
Threshold-Based Versus Range-Based Exercise Intensity Prescription in Cardiac Rehabilitation
Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiac Rehabilitation
Recruiting
Evaluating the Feasibility of Prehabilitation Delivery Models for Patients Preparing for Gynecologic Cancer Surgery
Prehabilitation, Preoperative Aerobic Training
Not yet recruiting
Radiofrequency and Pelvic Floor-Core Exercise for Chronic Low Back Pain in Women With Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
Chronic Low Back Pain, Urinary Incontinence
RecruitingPhase 2
Neurovascular Regulation During Exercise in Humans With Chronic Kidney Disease: Sympatholysis in CKD
Chronic Kidney Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
George J Salem, PhD principal investigator
University of Southern California
Steve Castle, MD study director
West Los Angeles Veterans Administration
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing golf training in people with Exercise Training, run by University of Southern California at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Gait speed (time frame: baseline and after 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04004598, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Aug 2019.