AzTrials
AzTrials

Urinary Retention PostoperativeOPTIONNCT04010656

Optimization of Spontaneous Postoperative Trial of Void Among Women

A study testing PVR-based self-catheterization in people with Urinary Retention Postoperative and Voiding Disorders, run by Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Trial of void (TOV) is a diagnostic test performed on all women who undergo prolapse repair or incontinence surgery, due to the importance of diagnosing postoperative urinary retention (POUR). Incidence of POUR may be as high as 62% in some studies. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
PVR-based self-catheterization
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
183 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
10 Sep 2018to 30 Dec 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • English-speaking women, age >18yo
  • Scheduled for urogynecology procedure which will need post-operative trial of void (including pelvic organ prolapse and/or stress urinary incontinence repair), with plan for same-day discharge.

Who cannot join

  • Unable or unwilling to perform self-catheterizatoin either by patient or willing family member
  • Pre-existing voiding dysfunction defined as documented PVR > 200 mL
  • Intraoperative urinary tract injury needing indwelling catheter on discharge
  • Need for overnight admission

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Women & Infants Hospital

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02903

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Optimization of Spontaneous Trial of Void: a Prospective Cohort Study

Trial of void (TOV) is a diagnostic test performed on all women who undergo prolapse repair or incontinence surgery, due to the importance of diagnosing postoperative urinary retention (POUR). Incidence of POUR may be as high as 62% in some studies. Timely and accurate diagnosis is important to avoid complications such as urinary tract infection, bladder overdistension, and permanent bladder injury. Despite the frequent use of TOV, there is no gold standard for the test, and it likely has poor specificity, leading to discharge of more patients with catheter than required. This prospective cohort study will seek to establish evidence-based optimal parameters for spontaneous trial of void, a TOV modality that has merit for further evaluation given lower theoretical risk of urinary tract infection.

Read the detailed description

Patients will learn to perform self-catheterization ('clean intermittent catheterization', or CIC) preoperatively; after surgery, the investigators will collect a range of voiding parameters used during different TOV protocols (including minimum voided volume [MVV], post-void residual via bladder scanner [PVR], subjective force of urinary stream [sFOS]). Patients will discharge home to perform CIC until two sequential post-void residuals of less than half the volume voided have been achieved. The rate of voiding dysfunction and resulting PVRs will be used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the perioperative voiding parameters to predict need to perform CIC and post-operative urinary retention.

Being tested
PVR-based self-catheterization
Keywords
Urogynecologic surgery, Urinary retention postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PVR-based self-catheterizationProcedure or surgery

    Home self-catheterization based on standard of care

Study groups in NCT04010656
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PVR-based home self-catheterizationExperimentalPatients will learn to self-catheterize preoperatively prior to urogynecology surgery requiring trial of void. First post-operative void will be used to collect basic information about voiding function. All participants will leave the hospital and self-catheterize until they achieve two sequential voids with post-void residual (PVR) less than half the volume voided. The cases of urinary retention captured with abnormal PVR will be used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of several commonly-used, pre-defined parameters for trial of void.
Receives: Procedure: PVR-based self-catheterization

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of post-operative urinary retention

    Based on defined criteria

    Measured: 24-72 hours postoperative

  2. Diagnostic accuracy of trial of void parameters

    Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value of different trial of void parameters from first postoperative void, based on those used in the literature.

    Measured: First void postoperative (within 4 hours postop)

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Rate of post-operative and post-discharge urinary retention

    Based on post-void residual volume

    Measured: 24-72 hours postoperative

  2. Rate of post-operative urinary tract infection

    UTI in first 6 weeks postoperative

    Measured: 6 weeks postoperative

  3. Patient satisfaction with self-catheterization method via questionnaire

    Novel questionnaire, 5 point Likert scale from "Very dissatisfied to Very satisfied"

    Measured: 2 weeks postoperative

  4. Time to first void postoperative

    To assess time to spontaneous void after surgery

    Measured: 4 hours postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jul 2019
  2. Study start10 Sep 2018
  3. Primary completion10 May 2021
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Subjects will be taught to perform self-catheterization prior to prolapse repair or incontinence surgery; voiding data will be collected on the participant's first void after surgery. Participants will be discharged home to perform self-catheterization until post-void residual is less than half the volume voided on 2 sequential voids to assess actual voiding function, and this data will be used to calculate the diagnostic accuracy of pre-determined combinations of the TOV parameters.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
183 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04010656
Sponsor's protocol ID
WIH IRB 1145237
Acronym
OPTION
Status last verified
Jul 2021
First submitted
19 Feb 2019
Last updated
20 Jul 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Dorflinger A, Monga A. Voiding dysfunction. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Oct;13(5):507-12. doi: 10.1097/00001703-200110000-00010.

    PubMed 11547032
  • Partoll LM. Efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape with other pelvic reconstructive surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;186(6):1292-5; discussion 1295-8. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.123736.

    PubMed 12066111
  • Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Vasavada S, Ellerkmann M. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Mar;111(3):611-21. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318162f22e.

    PubMed 18310363
  • Geller EJ. Prevention and management of postoperative urinary retention after urogynecologic surgery. Int J Womens Health. 2014 Aug 28;6:829-38. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S55383. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 25210477
  • Geller EJ, Hankins KJ, Parnell BA, Robinson BL, Dunivan GC. Diagnostic accuracy of retrograde and spontaneous voiding trials for postoperative voiding dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Sep;118(3):637-642. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318229e8dd.

    PubMed 21860294
  • de Souza GM, Costa WS, Bruschini H, Sampaio FJ. Morphological analysis of the acute effects of overdistension on the extracellular matrix of the rat urinary bladder wall. Ann Anat. 2004 Feb;186(1):55-9. doi: 10.1016/S0940-9602(04)80122-5.

    PubMed 14994912
  • Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A, Breivik H. Detecting postoperative urinary retention with an ultrasound scanner. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2002 Mar;46(3):279-82. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2002.t01-1-460309.x.

    PubMed 11939918
  • Asimakopoulos AD, De Nunzio C, Kocjancic E, Tubaro A, Rosier PF, Finazzi-Agro E. Measurement of post-void residual urine. Neurourol Urodyn. 2016 Jan;35(1):55-7. doi: 10.1002/nau.22671. Epub 2014 Sep 22.

    PubMed 25251215
  • Wheeler TL 2nd, Richter HE, Greer WJ, Bowling CB, Redden DT, Varner RE. Predictors of success with postoperative voiding trials after a mid urethral sling procedure. J Urol. 2008 Feb;179(2):600-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.080. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

    PubMed 18082219
  • Hakvoort RA, Dijkgraaf MG, Burger MP, Emanuel MH, Roovers JP. Predicting short-term urinary retention after vaginal prolapse surgery. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28(3):225-8. doi: 10.1002/nau.20636.

    PubMed 19130599
  • Ripperda CM, Kowalski JT, Chaudhry ZQ, Mahal AS, Lanzer J, Noor N, Good MM, Hynan LS, Jeppson PC, Rahn DD. Predictors of early postoperative voiding dysfunction and other complications following a midurethral sling. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;215(5):656.e1-656.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.010. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

    PubMed 27319367
  • Kleeman S, Goldwasser S, Vassallo B, Karram M. Predicting postoperative voiding efficiency after operation for incontinence and prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jul;187(1):49-52. doi: 10.1067/mob.2002.124841.

    PubMed 12114887
  • Foster RT Sr, Borawski KM, South MM, Weidner AC, Webster GD, Amundsen CL. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating 2 techniques of postoperative bladder testing after transvaginal surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;197(6):627.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.017.

    PubMed 18060956
  • Saint S. Clinical and economic consequences of nosocomial catheter-related bacteriuria. Am J Infect Control. 2000 Feb;28(1):68-75. doi: 10.1016/s0196-6553(00)90015-4.

    PubMed 10679141
  • Dieter AA, Amundsen CL, Visco AG, Siddiqui NY. Treatment for urinary tract infection after midurethral sling: a retrospective study comparing patients who receive short-term postoperative catheterization and patients who pass a void trial on the day of surgery. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012 May-Jun;18(3):175-8. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0b013e3182544e03.

    PubMed 22543772

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PVR-based self-catheterization in people with Urinary Retention Postoperative and Voiding Disorders, run by Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of post-operative urinary retention (time frame: 24-72 hours postoperative). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04010656, which also lists 30 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in