StrokeBOLUSNCT04011787
The Relative Effectiveness of BOLUS Versus Continuous Nasogastric Feeding After Stroke: a Proof of Principal Study
A study testing bolus NGT feeding, Continuous NGT feeding and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in people with Stroke and Dysphagia, run by University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Patients with severe strokes are often unable to be take oral diet food and fluids safely because they cannot swallow effectively. Therefore, patients need to be fed via a tube placed through the nose into the stomach (nasogastric tube). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- What is being tested?
- bolus NGT feeding, Continuous NGT feeding and Continuous Glucose Monitoring
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2022to Sep 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age >=18 years
- Within 36 h hospital admission with acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke
- Dysphagia requiring nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding (assessed by failed sip test)
Who cannot join
- Moribund, receiving palliative care
- Clinical diagnosis of pneumonia
- Pre-existing gastric motility problems
- Inability to obtain consent from the patients or their representative
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 6QG
About this study
Patients with severe strokes are often unable to be take oral diet food and fluids safely because they cannot swallow effectively. Therefore, patients need to be fed via a tube placed through the nose into the stomach (nasogastric tube). Tube feeding can be given by the intermittent (bolus) method, whereby the feed is given over a short time (15 to 30 minutes), or by the continuous feeding method, where the feed is given continuously over 10-16 hours. Nasogastric feeding can be complicated by vomiting or reflux of the feed into the oesophagus causing aspiration of gastric contents into the lung and pneumonia. Nasogastric feeds can be given continuously or as bolus feeds. Healthy people eating normally take their diet in discrete meals. The human digestive system is adapted to intermittent food intake and is likely to work best if food is provided in this pattern, but the larger volume of the feed by this method may cause vomiting and aspiration. It is unclear which method is better for allowing normal digestive processes and reducing pneumonia due to aspirated feeds. There are no trials comparing these two feeding methods in patients with acute stroke. The aim of this small study is to determine if a trial comparing the two treatment approaches is feasible in patients with acute stroke, and to collect information on the effects on feed tolerance and digestion.
In this study we will compare the effect of the bolus and intermittent nasogastric tube feeding on digestion and feed tolerance in 20 patients who need nasogastric feeding within 36 hours of a stroke. Patients will be randomly allocated to be given the feeds either by the bolus or by the continuous method for 7 days. During this time they will be examined every day. The study will examine how effectively food is digested by measuring the amount of feed given and the metabolic responses of the body by looking at changes in the level of blood sugar and digestive hormones. The investigators will also monitor complications such as vomiting, diarrhoea, and pneumonia. Patients will be randomly allocated to be given the feeds either by the bolus or by the continuous method for 7 days.
This will provide information which will allow the investigators to design a larger definitive study to conclusively prove which method is more appropriate.
Read the detailed description
Patients admitted to the acute stroke unit at University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust and who require nasogastric (NG) feeding will be eligible for recruitment, patients will be screened and assessed for eligibility on the stroke unit by a member of the local research team, confirmed by a medical practitioner.
Consent- Informed consent will be sought from patients after full oral and written information about the nature and purpose of the study, potential risks and benefits, alternative treatments, and the right to refuse and to withdraw at any time. In cases where the patient lacks the capacity to give fully informed consent, the patient will be informed as much as he/she is able to understand with the option to refuse, and fully informed consent will be sought from a consultee. The oral and written information will be provided to the consultee including the same information as would be given to the patient. If the patient has capacity to consent for themselves, but unable to sign because of impairments; verbal consent, witnessed and signed by an independent observer, will be documented. Where the patient has capacity to consent for themselves, but only able to make a mark on the paper rather than sign as required, the same procedure will be followed. Confirmation of consent will be sought in patients who are recruited with consent from a consultee, but regain capacity prior to the end of the trial.
Due to the nature of the study, patients or their consultee will have to decide within a few hours of admission to hospital. They will be given the opportunity to discuss the study with a relative or friend. Participants or their consultee will be free to withdraw from the trial at any time without giving reasons and without prejudicing further treatment.
An age-matched healthy control group will be recruited from patients' relatives and friends to provide a normal baseline for the metabolic response to normal feeding.
The original signed consent form will be filed in the case report form. One copy will be given to the patient or consultee, another copy will be sent to the trial coordinating centre and another will be filed in the patients' notes.
The participant information sheets, and consent forms, will not be available in other languages. If needed, the usual hospital interpreter and translator services will be available to assist with discussion of the trial.
If a participant is able to consent for the study but later becomes incapacitated, the original consent will endure the loss of capacity as long as the trial has not significantly altered since the original consent was given.
Randomisation- Participants will be randomized into the intervention or control groups using a computerized random number generator. The randomization procedure will be conducted by an independent statistician at Keele University. Sealed and numbered opaque envelopes containing the allocated intervention will be kept in the research office on the acute stroke ward. For each randomisation the envelope with the lowest number will be used. The envelopes will be selected and opened by the research nurse following consent and baseline assessment. An email containing the Participant ID and the number of the envelope will be sent to the Principal Investigator. A copy of the original randomisation codes will be kept independently by the sponsor in the Trial Master File. Assessments-
- A daily log of symptoms and signs of feed intolerance and pneumonia will be taken for 7 days.
- A venous blood sample for a full blood count and C-reactive Protein will be taken on day 1, 3, and 7.
- A Chest x-Ray will be conducted on day 7 to confirm/exclude evidence of pneumonia.
- Glucose level measurements will be taken every 10 minutes for each participant for 5 days following randomisation, using a sensor inserted into the subcutaneous tissue by the trained research nurse.
- Daily for 5 days following randomisation fasting venous plasma glucose, apart from the day that the hormonal profile is collected, samples are to be taken by the research nurse and processed by the pathology department.
- All participants, including healthy controls, will have a hormonal profile in response to feeding will be taken on day 4, post randomisation. The continuous feed, the bolus feed or, in the non-stroke control group, a calorific drink that is equivalent calories to the Naso-Gastric feed (e.g. Ensure plus) will be given as the first meal in the morning after an overnight fast. Venous plasma glucose and insulin levels will be checked both fasting, immediately after the meal, and every 30 minutes in response to NG feed for 4 hours after the meal (total of 10 sets of samples per subject, each set comprising 2ml clotted sample and 1ml fluoride oxalate sample). For patients who are on NG feeding, the sample collection will similarly start at -30 and 0 minute before the NG feed (either bolus or continuous feed) and then every 30 minutes for 4 hours (total of 10 samples). The venous plasma glucose sample collected for the hormonal profile will also be used for the daily fasting venous plasma glucose sample (see above). We will primarily calculate the time averaged mean insulin and glucose responses computed as incremental AUCs (above baseline), divided by the time interval (hours). Values at each individual time point will be compared directly. The investigators will also collect data on total glycaemic exposure (glucose AUC 0-240) and the insulinogenic index (ΔI30/ΔG30) as an index of β-cell response.
- Being tested
- bolus NGT feeding, Continuous NGT feeding, Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Metabolic Profile, Chest X-ray
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Deglutition Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bolus NGT feedingDietary supplement
Participants randomised to bolus NGT feeding will receive this for 7 days at mealtimes
Continuous NGT feedingDietary supplement
Participants randomised to bolus NGT feeding will receive this continuously for 7 days as per hospital protocol
Continuous Glucose MonitoringDiagnostic test
Both participant groups will have continuous glucose monitoring performed for 5 days while in the study
Metabolic ProfileDiagnostic test
Bloods will be taken to assess all patients metabolic profile
Chest X-rayRadiation
A chest X-ray will be performed on patients receiving study interventions on day 7 to confirm/exclude pneumonia
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Active comparator | bolus NGT feeding Receives: Dietary Supplement: bolus NGT feeding; Diagnostic Test: Continuous Glucose Monitoring; Diagnostic Test: Metabolic Profile; Radiation: Chest X-ray |
| Control | Other | Continuous NGT feeding (standard care) Receives: Dietary Supplement: Continuous NGT feeding; Diagnostic Test: Metabolic Profile; Radiation: Chest X-ray |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feed tolerance
Total of 7 points. 7/7 full tolerance, 0/7 severe intolerance. This is based on Nutrition, Vomiting, Diarrhoea, Bloating, Abdominal pain, Pneumonia and raised inflammatory markers
Measured: 7 days
Secondary outcomes (15)
Number of glucose excursions above 7mmol/L
Number of glucose excursions above 7mmol/L
Measured: 7 days
mean glucose levels
mean glucose levels
Measured: 7 days
glucose centiles
10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th
Measured: 7 days
total area under curve (AUC)
total area under the curve (AUC) measured in mmol
Measured: 7 days
diurnal AUC
diurnal AUC
Measured: 7 days
nocturnal AUC
nocturnal AUC
Measured: 7 days
average duration of specific glucose readings
e.g. <4-7.9mmol/l, 7-11mmol/l and >11mmol/l
Measured: 7 days
average hourly change
change in glucose levels from one hour to the next
Measured: 7 days
inter-day variability
change in glucose levels between days
Measured: 7 days
largest amplitude of glycaemic excursions
largest rise in glucose levels
Measured: 7 days
mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions
average of glucose levels
Measured: 7 days
postprandial amplitude of glycaemic excursions
glucose changes after meal
Measured: 7 days
the time-averaged mean insulin and glucose responses
computed as incremental AUCs (above baseline), divided by the time interval (hours)
Measured: 5 hours
total glycaemic exposure
glucose AUC 0-240
Measured: 5 hours
the insulinogenic index
relationship between insulin and glucose levels at 30 minutes
Measured: 5 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2019
- Study start1 Jul 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completionAug 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2023 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Funding withdrawn for the study
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- 20 patients will be randomised to two arms with a control group of a further 10 patients
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Fahmy Hanna, Principal investigator, Consultant
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04011787
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1437
- Acronym
- BOLUS
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2019
- Last updated
- 26 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The participants' clinicians clinical team and members of the research team on the delegation log will access the data. Representatives of the sponsor (UHNM) and representatives the regulatory authorities will have access to personal data for monitoring and audit purposes only.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Relative Effectiveness of BOLUS Versus Continuous Nasogastric Feeding After Stroke: a Proof of Principal Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04011787
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BOLUS / 1437
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Funding withdrawn for the study
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2022 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with severe strokes are often unable to be take oral diet food and fluids safely because they cannot swallow effectively. Therefore, patients need to be fed via a tube placed through the nose into the stomach (nasogastric tube). Tube feeding can be given by the intermittent (bolus) method, whereby the feed is given over a short time (15 to 30 minutes), or by the continuous feeding method, where the feed is given continuously over 10-16 hours. Nasogastric feeding can be complicated by vomiting or reflux of the feed into the oesophagus causing aspiration of gastric contents into the lung and pneumonia. Nasogastric feeds can be given continuously or as bolus feeds. Healthy people eating normally take their diet in discrete meals. The human digestive system is adapted to intermittent food intake and is likely to work best if food is provided in this pattern, but the larger volume of the feed by this method may cause vomiting and aspiration. It is unclear which method is better for allowing normal digestive processes and reducing pneumonia due to aspirated feeds. There are no trials comparing these two feeding methods in patients with acute stroke. The aim of this small study is to determine if a trial comparing the two treatment approaches is feasible in patients with acute stroke, and to collect information on the effects on feed tolerance and digestion.
In this study we will compare the effect of the bolus and intermittent nasogastric tube feeding on digestion and feed tolerance in 20 patients who need nasogastric feeding within 36 hours of a stroke. Patients will be randomly allocated to be given the feeds either by the bolus or by the continuous method for 7 days. During this time they will be examined every day. The study will examine how effectively food is digested by measuring the amount of feed given and the metabolic responses of the body by looking at changes in the level of blood sugar and digestive hormones. The investigators will also monitor complications such as vomiting, diarrhoea, and pneumonia. Patients will be randomly allocated to be given the feeds either by the bolus or by the continuous method for 7 days.
This will provide information which will allow the investigators to design a larger definitive study to conclusively prove which method is more appropriate.
Detailed description
Patients admitted to the acute stroke unit at University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust and who require nasogastric (NG) feeding will be eligible for recruitment, patients will be screened and assessed for eligibility on the stroke unit by a member of the local research team, confirmed by a medical practitioner.
Consent- Informed consent will be sought from patients after full oral and written information about the nature and purpose of the study, potential risks and benefits, alternative treatments, and the right to refuse and to withdraw at any time. In cases where the patient lacks the capacity to give fully informed consent, the patient will be informed as much as he/she is able to understand with the option to refuse, and fully informed consent will be sought from a consultee. The oral and written information will be provided to the consultee including the same information as would be given to the patient. If the patient has capacity to consent for themselves, but unable to sign because of impairments; verbal consent, witnessed and signed by an independent observer, will be documented. Where the patient has capacity to consent for themselves, but only able to make a mark on the paper rather than sign as required, the same procedure will be followed. Confirmation of consent will be sought in patients who are recruited with consent from a consultee, but regain capacity prior to the end of the trial.
Due to the nature of the study, patients or their consultee will have to decide within a few hours of admission to hospital. They will be given the opportunity to discuss the study with a relative or friend. Participants or their consultee will be free to withdraw from the trial at any time without giving reasons and without prejudicing further treatment.
An age-matched healthy control group will be recruited from patients' relatives and friends to provide a normal baseline for the metabolic response to normal feeding.
The original signed consent form will be filed in the case report form. One copy will be given to the patient or consultee, another copy will be sent to the trial coordinating centre and another will be filed in the patients' notes.
The participant information sheets, and consent forms, will not be available in other languages. If needed, the usual hospital interpreter and translator services will be available to assist with discussion of the trial.
If a participant is able to consent for the study but later becomes incapacitated, the original consent will endure the loss of capacity as long as the trial has not significantly altered since the original consent was given.
Randomisation- Participants will be randomized into the intervention or control groups using a computerized random number generator. The randomization procedure will be conducted by an independent statistician at Keele University. Sealed and numbered opaque envelopes containing the allocated intervention will be kept in the research office on the acute stroke ward. For each randomisation the envelope with the lowest number will be used. The envelopes will be selected and opened by the research nurse following consent and baseline assessment. An email containing the Participant ID and the number of the envelope will be sent to the Principal Investigator. A copy of the original randomisation codes will be kept independently by the sponsor in the Trial Master File. Assessments-
- A daily log of symptoms and signs of feed intolerance and pneumonia will be taken for 7 days.
- A venous blood sample for a full blood count and C-reactive Protein will be taken on day 1, 3, and 7.
- A Chest x-Ray will be conducted on day 7 to confirm/exclude evidence of pneumonia.
- Glucose level measurements will be taken every 10 minutes for each participant for 5 days following randomisation, using a sensor inserted into the subcutaneous tissue by the trained research nurse.
- Daily for 5 days following randomisation fasting venous plasma glucose, apart from the day that the hormonal profile is collected, samples are to be taken by the research nurse and processed by the pathology department.
- All participants, including healthy controls, will have a hormonal profile in response to feeding will be taken on day 4, post randomisation. The continuous feed, the bolus feed or, in the non-stroke control group, a calorific drink that is equivalent calories to the Naso-Gastric feed (e.g. Ensure plus) will be given as the first meal in the morning after an overnight fast. Venous plasma glucose and insulin levels will be checked both fasting, immediately after the meal, and every 30 minutes in response to NG feed for 4 hours after the meal (total of 10 sets of samples per subject, each set comprising 2ml clotted sample and 1ml fluoride oxalate sample). For patients who are on NG feeding, the sample collection will similarly start at -30 and 0 minute before the NG feed (either bolus or continuous feed) and then every 30 minutes for 4 hours (total of 10 samples). The venous plasma glucose sample collected for the hormonal profile will also be used for the daily fasting venous plasma glucose sample (see above). We will primarily calculate the time averaged mean insulin and glucose responses computed as incremental AUCs (above baseline), divided by the time interval (hours). Values at each individual time point will be compared directly. The investigators will also collect data on total glycaemic exposure (glucose AUC 0-240) and the insulinogenic index (ΔI30/ΔG30) as an index of β-cell response.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- 20 patients will be randomised to two arms with a control group of a further 10 patients
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: bolus NGT feeding, Diagnostic Test: Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Diagnostic Test: Metabolic Profile, Radiation: Chest X-raybolus NGT feeding |
| Control | Other | Dietary Supplement: Continuous NGT feeding, Diagnostic Test: Metabolic Profile, Radiation: Chest X-rayContinuous NGT feeding (standard care) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age >=18 years
- Within 36 h hospital admission with acute ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke
- Dysphagia requiring nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding (assessed by failed sip test)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Moribund, receiving palliative care
- Clinical diagnosis of pneumonia
- Pre-existing gastric motility problems
- Inability to obtain consent from the patients or their representative
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bolus NGT feedingParticipants randomised to bolus NGT feeding will receive this for 7 days at mealtimes | Dietary supplement | Intervention |
| Continuous NGT feedingParticipants randomised to bolus NGT feeding will receive this continuously for 7 days as per hospital protocol | Dietary supplement | Control |
| Continuous Glucose MonitoringBoth participant groups will have continuous glucose monitoring performed for 5 days while in the study | Diagnostic test | Intervention |
| Metabolic ProfileBloods will be taken to assess all patients metabolic profile | Diagnostic test | Control, Intervention |
| Chest X-rayA chest X-ray will be performed on patients receiving study interventions on day 7 to confirm/exclude pneumonia | Radiation | Control, Intervention |
Primary outcome
Feed tolerance
Time frame: 7 days
Total of 7 points. 7/7 full tolerance, 0/7 severe intolerance. This is based on Nutrition, Vomiting, Diarrhoea, Bloating, Abdominal pain, Pneumonia and raised inflammatory markers
15 secondary outcomes
Number of glucose excursions above 7mmol/L
Time frame: 7 days
mean glucose levels
Time frame: 7 days
glucose centiles
Time frame: 7 days
total area under curve (AUC)
Time frame: 7 days
diurnal AUC
Time frame: 7 days
nocturnal AUC
Time frame: 7 days
average duration of specific glucose readings
Time frame: 7 days
average hourly change
Time frame: 7 days
inter-day variability
Time frame: 7 days
largest amplitude of glycaemic excursions
Time frame: 7 days
mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions
Time frame: 7 days
postprandial amplitude of glycaemic excursions
Time frame: 7 days
the time-averaged mean insulin and glucose responses
Time frame: 5 hours
total glycaemic exposure
Time frame: 5 hours
the insulinogenic index
Time frame: 5 hours
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 May 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The participants' clinicians clinical team and members of the research team on the delegation log will access the data. Representatives of the sponsor (UHNM) and representatives the regulatory authorities will have access to personal data for monitoring and audit purposes only.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fahmy Hanna principal investigator
Consultant
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing bolus NGT feeding, Continuous NGT feeding and Continuous Glucose Monitoring in people with Stroke and Dysphagia, run by University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feed tolerance (time frame: 7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 May 2022.