AzTrials
AzTrials

Child DevelopmentNCT04013087

Safety and Nutritional Adequacy of a New Infant Formula in Healthy Term Infants

A study testing Oral feeding of Feihe Stage 1 infant formula and Breast feeding in people with Child Development, run by Heilongjiang Feihe Dairy Co. Ltd. at 3 sites in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-designed, prospective study and is intended to evaluate the nutritional adequacy and tolerance of a new study formula compared with a concurrent control formula. Approximately 450 infants will be enrolled from approximately 3 China sites. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 14 daysHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Child Development
What is being tested?
Oral feeding of Feihe Stage 1 infant formula and Breast feeding
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
450 participants
Where
3 sitesChina
Study dates
8 Jul 2019to 30 Dec 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 14 days
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • 10-14 days of age at enrolment and randomization, inclusive (day of birth is considered day 0)
  • Plan to exclusively formula feed (formula groups) OR exclusively feed human milk (breastfeeding group)
  • Healthy singleton birth
  • Gestational age of 37-42 completed weeks (37 weeks 0 days through 42 weeks 6 days)
  • Birth weight of 2490g to 4200g
  • Signed informed consent obtained for infant's and mother's participation in the study

Who cannot join

  • History of underlying metabolic or chronic disease; congenital malformation; or any other condition which, in the opinion of the Investigator, is likely to interfere with: the ability of the infant to ingest food, the normal growth and development of the infant, or the evaluation of the infant
  • Evidence of feeding difficulties or formula intolerance, such as vomiting or poor intake, at time of randomization (at investigator discretion)
  • Known allergy to cow's milk protein or a well-documented family history of allergy to cow's milk protein
  • Weight at randomization is <90% of birth weight [(weight at Visit 1÷birth weight) x 100 <90%]
  • Immunocompromised (according to a doctor's diagnosis of immunodeficiency such as Combined Immunodeficiencies, DiGeorge Syndrome, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome, Severe Congenital Neutropenia and Secondary Immunodeficiencies linked to HIV infection, Down Syndrome or others)
  • Known head/brain disease/injury such as microcephaly, macrocephaly or others.
  • Enrollment in another interventional clinical research study while participating in this study

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

China3 sites
  • Jinhua Nanyuan Community Health Center (site 1919)

    Jinhua, Zhejiang

  • Jinhua Qiubin Community Health Center (site 1969)

    Jinhua, Zhejiang

  • Jinhua Xiguan Community Health Center (site 1966)

    Jinhua, Zhejiang

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Nutritional Adequacy of a New Infant Formula in Healthy Term Infants

This study is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-designed, prospective study and is intended to evaluate the nutritional adequacy and tolerance of a new study formula compared with a concurrent control formula. Approximately 450 infants will be enrolled from approximately 3 China sites. Of these infants, approximately 300 will be randomized 1:1 to receive an investigational formula or a control formula for 16weeks of feeding. The remaining approximately 150 infants will be enrolled as a breastfeeding reference group. The primary outcome measure is the rate of weight gain in g/day between baseline and 16 weeks in the test group compared to control formula group. Participants will have the option of providing stool samples at 8 weeks and 16 weeks for analysis of microbiota and metabolomics. The study period will be 16 weeks, and all infants in the 2 formula groups will receive formula free of charge for 6 months.

Read the detailed description

Primary Objective

  1. Compare the rate of weight gain (in g/day) between infants receiving an investigational formula and infants receiving a control formula between at baseline (B), B+2 weeks, B+4 weeks, B+8 weeks, B+12 weeks, and B+16 weeks.

Secondary Objectives

  1. Compare rate of change in length (mm/day) among infants receiving an investigational formula, infants receiving a control formula, and breastfeeding infants at baseline (B), B+2 weeks, B+4 weeks, B+8 weeks, B+12 weeks, and B+16 weeks.
  2. Compare rate of change in head circumference (mm/day) among infants receiving an investigational formula, infants receiving a control formula and breastfeeding infants at baseline (B), B+2 weeks, B+4 weeks, B+8 weeks, B+12 weeks, and B+16 weeks.
  3. Evaluate and compare achieved body weight, length, and head circumference at each visit and after 16 weeks.
  4. Evaluate plotted raw growth data on World Health Organization standard growth charts.1
  5. Compare the types and incidence of adverse events among infants receiving an investigational formula, infants receiving a control formula, and breastfeeding infants.
  6. Compare average daily intake of formula between infants receiving an investigational formula and infants receiving a control formula.
  7. Compare parents' and physician's assessment of formula tolerance among infants receiving an investigational formula, infants receiving a control formula, and breastfeeding infants.
  8. Compare counts of Bifidobacteria and Lactobacillus species in stools of infants receiving an investigational formula, infants receiving a control formula, and breastfeeding infants.
  9. Compare stool short-chain fatty acid metabolites (including total SCFAs, acetic, propionic, n-butyric, iso-butyric and n-valeric acids, L-lactic acid and D-lactic acid, etc) among infants receiving an investigational formula, infants receiving a control formula, and breastfeeding infants.
Being tested
Oral feeding of Feihe Stage 1 infant formula, Oral feeding of control Stage 1 formula, Breast feeding

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Oral feeding of Feihe Stage 1 infant formulaDietary supplement

    Oral feeding of Feihe Stage 1 infant formula for 16 weeks

  • Oral feeding of control Stage 1 formulaDietary supplement

    Oral feeding of control Stage 1 formula for 16 weeks (A commercially available product with comparable composition but does not contain sn-2 palmitate enriched vegetable oil as an ingredient (regular vegetable oil is used))

  • Breast feedingDietary supplement

    Breast feeding of human milk for 16 weeks

Study groups in NCT04013087
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Test FormulaExperimentalFeihe Stage 1 infant formula
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Oral feeding of Feihe Stage 1 infant formula
Control formulaActive comparatorA commercially available product with comparable composition but does not contain sn-2 palmitate enriched vegetable oil as an ingredient (regular vegetable oil is used)
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Oral feeding of control Stage 1 formula
Breast feedingOtherBreast fed of human milk
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Breast feeding

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of change in body weight (grams/day) from baseline

    Rate of change in body weight (grams/day) between baseline and B+2 weeks, B+4 weeks, B+8 weeks, B+12 weeks, and B+16 weeks.

    Measured: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Rate of change in body length (mm/day) from baseline

    Rate of change in length (mm/day) measured between baseline (B) and B+2 weeks, B+4 weeks, B+8 weeks, B+12 weeks, and B+16 weeks.

    Measured: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  2. Rate of change in head circumference (mm/day) from baseline

    Rate of change in head circumference (mm/day) measured between baseline (B) and B+2 weeks, B+4 weeks, B+8 weeks, B+12 weeks, and B+16 weeks.

    Measured: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  3. Achieved body weight

    Achieved body weight (grams) at each study visit

    Measured: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  4. Achieved body length

    Achieved body length (cm) at each study visit

    Measured: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  5. Achieved head circumference

    Achieved head circumference (cm) at each study visit

    Measured: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  6. Percentages of infants in each group who are <10th percentile in weight for age.

    Percentages of infants in each group who are <10th percentile in weight for age.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  7. Percentages of infants in each group who are <10th percentile in length for age.

    Percentages of infants in each group who are <10th percentile in length for age.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  8. Percentages of infants in each group who are <10th percentile in head circumference for age.

    Percentages of infants in each group who are <10th percentile in head circumference for age.

    Measured: 16 weeks

  9. Adverse events rate

    Number and percentages of infants in each group experiencing any adverse events and any serious adverse events

    Measured: 16 weeks

  10. Average daily formula intake

    Average daily formula intake volume based on 3-day records kept by parents or care-givers prior to each study visit.

    Measured: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks

  11. Percentage of fussiness

    Percentages of parents in each group reporting fussiness

    Measured: 16 weeks

  12. Percentage of colic

    Percentages of parents in each group reporting colic

    Measured: 16 weeks

  13. Percentage of patterns

    Percentages of parents in each group reporting sleeping patterns

    Measured: 16 weeks

  14. Percentage of cramps

    Percentages of parents in each group reporting cramps

    Measured: 16 weeks

  15. Percentage of regurgitation

    Percentages of parents in each group reporting regurgitation

    Measured: 16 weeks

  16. Stool characteristics

    Score of stool characteristics

    Measured: 16 weeks

  17. Percentage of respiratory manifestations

    Percentages of parents in each group reporting respiratory manifestations

    Measured: 16 weeks

  18. Percentage of dermatologic manifestations

    Percentages of parents in each group reporting dermatologic manifestations

    Measured: 16 weeks

  19. Fecal Bifidobacteria counts

    Total fecal Bifidobacteria counts (mean log10 counts / g wet-weight stool) at 8 weeks and 16 weeks.

    Measured: 8 weeks,16 weeks

  20. Fecal Lactobacillus counts

    Total fecal Lactobacillus counts (mean log10 counts / g wet-weight stool) at 8 weeks and 16 weeks.

    Measured: 8 weeks,16 weeks

  21. Stool short-chain fatty acid

    Total stool short-chain fatty acid metabolites in mg/g dry stool at 8 weeks and 16 weeks.

    Measured: 8 weeks,16 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2019
  2. Study start8 Jul 2019
  3. Primary completion19 Apr 2020
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
450 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04013087
Sponsor's protocol ID
18-SM-12-FEIHE-001
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
5 Jul 2019
Last updated
24 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Oral feeding of Feihe Stage 1 infant formula and Breast feeding in people with Child Development, run by Heilongjiang Feihe Dairy Co. Ltd. at 3 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of change in body weight (grams/day) from baseline (time frame: 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in