AzTrials
AzTrials

Head and Neck NeoplasmsNCT04013178

Exercise After Radiation for Head & Neck Cancer

A study testing Accentuated eccentric loading + electromyostimulation and Conventional resistance training in people with Head and Neck Neoplasms, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

People who receive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) can experience side-effects which include a significant loss in body mass and a loss of muscle mass (cancer cachexia). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Head and Neck Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Accentuated eccentric loading + electromyostimulation and Conventional resistance training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
22 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
31 Mar 2017to 26 Jun 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • a verified clinical diagnosis of head and neck cancer (stage I-IV) with the primary tumor in the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, paranasal sinuses, or salivary glands.
  • received radiation therapy ± concomitant chemotherapy
  • able to walk without assistance
  • received Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology-Certified Exercise Physiologist (CSEP-CEP) approval via The Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire for Everyone (PAR-Q+) and/or physician approval
  • willing/able to travel to the University of Calgary (Calgary, AB).

Who cannot join

  • comorbidities that could confound the ability to participate in laboratory tests (e.g. other malignancies, neuromuscular, musculoskeletal or vascular conditions affecting the lower extremities, such as radiculopathy or myopathy, (where the research team were consulted for individual cases)
  • presence of a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
  • unable to follow verbal instructions in English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Faculty of Kinesiology

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Eccentric Exercise and Electromyostimulation to Improve Muscle Strength and Muscle Mass After Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

People who receive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer (HNC) can experience side-effects which include a significant loss in body mass and a loss of muscle mass (cancer cachexia). Some research has shown success in the use of generic (dynamic) resistance training interventions for patients affected by head and neck cancer. However, this approach could be optimized with the use of novel training methods.The primary aim of this research is to investigate the effect of conventional resistance training vs. an experimental intervention (electromyostimulation combined with accentuated eccentric loading) on muscle strength and muscle mass after radiation for HNC.

Read the detailed description

Background and Rationale

Patients who receive radiation therapy for head and neck cancer treatment are susceptible to side-effects such as a significant loss in body mass and a loss of muscle mass (cancer cachexia) compared to pre-treatment. In addition, radiation therapy treatment may cause cancer-related fatigue and a reduction in overall physical function and health-related quality of life. Some research has shown success in the use of generic (dynamic exercise) resistance training interventions when applied for head and neck cancer survivors. Typically, when the correct training principals are adhered to in healthy populations (i.e. progressive overload, specificity, variation, rest/recovery), muscle strength and muscle mass are effectively enhanced. However, these training variables may be less effective in eliciting positive outcomes in clinical populations in that they are less effective in increasing muscle mass and muscle strength. Exercise is beneficial for people affected by all cancer types, but resistance training may be particularly beneficial for people who have completed radiation therapy treatment for head and neck cancer. Alternative modalities may provide superior improvements in muscle strength and muscle mass. Therefore, further research is warranted to investigate optimized resistance training prescription in head and neck cancer patients.

Research Question \& Objectives

The primary aim of this research is to investigate the effect of conventional resistance training vs. an experimental intervention (electromyostimulation combined with accentuated eccentric loading) on muscle strength and muscle mass after radiation for HNC.

Methods

Head and neck cancer survivors who have completed radiation therapy ≥ 1 month and ≤ 1 year from enrollment will be randomly allocated to one of two treatment arms: conventional (active control) and accentuated eccentric loading + electromyostimulation. Participants will be assessed before and after the intervention for patient-reported outcomes, neuromuscular function and fatigability in response to whole-body exercise.

Being tested
Accentuated eccentric loading + electromyostimulation, Conventional resistance training
Medical subject headings
Head and Neck Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Accentuated eccentric loading + electromyostimulationBehavioural

    An innovative training intervention to optimize muscle strength and muscle mass

  • Conventional resistance trainingBehavioural

    A conventional approach to resistance training

Study groups in NCT04013178
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Accentuated eccentric loading + electromyostimulationExperimentalThis group will undertake a supervised 12-week intervention involving accentuated eccentric loading and electromyostimulation of the knee extensors, dynamic resistance training of lower limb antagonist and synergist muscles and upper limb dynamic resistance training.
Receives: Behavioral: Accentuated eccentric loading + electromyostimulation
Traditional resistance trainingActive comparatorThis group with undertake a supervised 12-week intervention involving volume matched dynamic resistance training of the knee extensors, and dynamic resistance training of lower limb antagonist and synergist muscles and upper limb dynamic resistance training.
Receives: Behavioral: Conventional resistance training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximal Isometric Force in the Knee Extensors

    A change in maximal isometric force in the knee extensors measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.

    Measured: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention

  2. Assessment of change in Muscle Cross-Sectional Area

    ultrasound measurement of the vastus lateralis and rectus femoris

    Measured: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Assessment of change in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue (FACIT-Fatigue) Scale

    Self-report questionnaire for the assessment of cancer-related fatigue. This scale is between a possible raw score of 0 - 52, where the higher the number, the better the outcome.

    Measured: Baseline to after the 12-week intervention, at 6 month and 12 month follow up

  2. Assessment of change in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Therapy - Head and Neck (FACT-H&N) Scale

    Self-report questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life. This scale is between a possible 0 - 144 points, where the higher the number the better the outcome. There are 5 individual sub scales that measure physical-, social-, emotional-, and functional well-being as well as head and neck specific concerns.

    Measured: Baseline to after the 12-week intervention, at 6 month and 12 month follow up

  3. Voluntary Activation

    A reduction voluntary activation (using femoral nerve stimulation) measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test

    Measured: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention

  4. Potentiated Twitch Force

    A reduction in potentiated quadriceps twitch force measured before, before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.

    Measured: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention

  5. Muscle Compound Action Potential (M-Wave) Peak-to Peak Amplitude

    evoked from supra-maximal stimulation of the femoral nerve and measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test

    Measured: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention

  6. Voluntary Electromyography (EMG)

    Root mean square of the EMG signal during an MVC, measured before, during and after an intermittent cycling test.

    Measured: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention

  7. Time to volitional exhaustion

    Time to task failure during an intermittent cycling test

    Measured: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention

  8. Body mass (kg)

    Measured: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention

  9. Estimated body fat %

    Estimated using skin folds

    Measured: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention

  10. Body mass index

    Body mass / (height * height)

    Measured: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2019
  2. Study start31 Mar 2017
  3. Primary completion26 Jun 2019
  4. Study completion26 Jun 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants are assigned to one of two groups in parallel for the duration of the study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
22 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04013178
Sponsor's protocol ID
HREBA.CC-16-0744
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
5 Jul 2019
Last updated
11 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Accentuated eccentric loading + electromyostimulation and Conventional resistance training in people with Head and Neck Neoplasms, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximal Isometric Force in the Knee Extensors (time frame: Baseline and after the 12-week intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in