AzTrials
AzTrials

Osteo Arthritis KneeNCT04016272

Self-Administered Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Pain in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis

A study testing Active tDCS in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee, run by Florida State University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Osteo Arthritis Knee
What is being tested?
Active tDCS
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
123 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 Oct 2019to 5 Nov 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • have symptomatic knee OA based on American College of Rheumatology Clinical criteria
  • have had knee OA pain in the past 3 months with an average of at least 30 on a 0-100 NRS for pain
  • can speak and read English
  • have no plan to change medication regimens for pain throughout the trial

Who cannot join

  • prosthetic knee replacement or nonarthroscopic surgery to the affected knee
  • history of brain surgery, brain tumor, seizure, stroke or intracranial metal implantation
  • systemic rheumatic disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and fibromyalgia
  • alcohol/substance abuse
  • current use of sodium channel blockers, calcium channel blockers and NMDS receptor antagonists
  • diminished cognitive function that would interfere with understanding study procedures(i.e., Mini-Mental Status Exam score ≤ 23)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • hospitalization within the preceding year for psychiatric illness
  • no access to a device with internet access that can be used for secure videoconferencing for real-time remote supervision

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Self-Administered Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Pain in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Phase II Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial

The purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy of self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in older adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA)

Being tested
Active tDCS, Sham tDCS

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Active tDCSDevice

    Also called Soterix 1x1 tDCS mini-CT Stimulator

    tDCS with a constant current intensity of 2 mA will be applied for 20 minutes per session daily for 2 weeks (Monday to Friday) via the Soterix 1x1 tDCS mini-CT Stimulator device (Soterix Medical Inc., NY) with headgear and saline-soaked surface sponge electrodes.

  • Sham tDCSDevice

    Also called Soterix 1x1 tDCS mini-CT Stimulator

    For sham stimulation, the electrodes will be placed in the same positions as for active stimulation, but the stimulator will only deliver 2 mA current for 30 seconds.

Study groups in NCT04016272
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Active tDCSExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Active tDCS
Sham tDCSPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Sham tDCS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Clinical Pain as Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain

    The Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) total score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most intense pain imaginable).

    Measured: baseline, week 3

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in Pain Related Cortical Response Using a Continuous Wave, Multichannel Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) Imaging System

    Pain-related cortical response will be measured using a continuous-wave, multichannel fNIRS imaging system (LIGHTNIRS, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with three semiconductor lasers at 780, 805, and 830 nm. Optical recordings will be collected during thermal and punctate pain stimulation and correlation values will be presented in the form of figures.

    • Specify the full scale: Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between pairs of brain regions (fNIRS channels).
    • A value of r=0 indicates that two brain regions were functionally disconnected.
    • Greater absolute r values denote stronger connections. However, this does not indicate a better or worse result but only a different type of connectivity on a macroscale (when considering several fNIRS channels).
    • We used |r|>0.3 (absolute value of r greater than 0.3) to extract meaningful functional connections.

    Measured: Baseline, week1, week2, and week 3

  2. Acceptability as Measured by the tDCs Experience Questionnaire

    The tDCS experience questionnaire contains 10 questions based on a scale from 0-10, 0 being strongly disagree and 10 being strongly agree.

    Higher scores indicating greater acceptability for 7 questions and lower scores indicating greater acceptability for 3 questions resulting most desirable score of a 70.

    Measured: week 3

  3. Number of Participants With Possible Side Effects of Treatment

    If any side effects are reported, the degree of relatedness to the intervention will be assessed on a 10-point scale, from 0 (not at all) to 10 (to a high degree). The questionnaire ask to what extend did the participant experienced symptoms like, tingling, itching sensation, burning sensation, pain at the stimulation site, fatigue, nervousness, headache, difficulty concentrating, or mood change.

    Measured: week 3

  4. Feasibility as Assessed by the Number of Participants That Complete the Full tDCS Protocol

    We will calculate the percentage of participants who a) meet the inclusion criteria, b) agree to be randomly assigned, c) complete the full tDCS protocol, and d) attend the follow-up assessment.

    Measured: week 3

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2019
  2. Study start18 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion5 Nov 2021
  4. Study completion5 Nov 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
123 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04016272
Sponsor's protocol ID
HSC-SN-19-0469
Other IDs
R15NR018050
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
9 Jul 2019
Last updated
10 May 2023
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Lee C, Kim H, Kim S, Kim Y, Sun X, Chen CX, Park J, Pellegrini C, Garcia DO, Chen NK, Kwoh CK, Ahn H. Predicting Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain and Symptoms: A Machine Learning Approach. Clin J Pain. 2026 Apr 1;42(4):e1364. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001364.

    PubMed 41626992
  • Lee C, Park J, Kwoh CK, Fain M, Park L, Ahn H. Home-Based, Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improves the Overall Pain Experience of Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis. Pain Res Manag. 2025 Feb 24;2025:1783171. doi: 10.1155/prm/1783171. eCollection 2025.

    PubMed 40040747
  • Park J, Tong H, Kang Y, Miao H, Lin L, Fox RS, Telkes I, Martorella G, Ahn H. Comparison of responders and nonresponders with knee osteoarthritis after transcranial direct current stimulation. Pain Manag. 2024 Sep;14(9):507-518. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2024.2429943. Epub 2024 Nov 16.

    PubMed 39548963
  • Martorella G, Mathis K, Miao H, Wang D, Park L, Ahn H. Self-administered transcranial direct current stimulation for pain in older adults with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled study. Brain Stimul. 2022 Jul-Aug;15(4):902-909. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jun 8.

    PubMed 35690388

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Active tDCS in people with Osteo Arthritis Knee, run by Florida State University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 May 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Clinical Pain as Assessed by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain (time frame: baseline, week 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04016272, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in