Sports Physical TherapyNCT04017715
Effect of Injury Prevention Program on Cricketers
A study testing Experimental: warm up and Experimental: cool down in people with Sports Physical Therapy, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
The main aim of the study is to prevent the injuries during cricket.Total 60 players were included in the study. 20 players were in warm up group,20 players were in cool down group and 20 players in control group.Base line assessment was by 100m sprint, Illinios agility test, 3 minute burpee test, SEBT and plank. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 24 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sports Physical Therapy
- What is being tested?
- Experimental: warm up and Experimental: cool down
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2019to 30 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 24 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Age: 16-30 years
- Male cricketers registered with PCB
- Players attending minimum three sessions per week
Who cannot join
- Players having any of the following :
- neuromusculoskeletal ,
- cardiovascular, or systematic pathology.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Cricket Injury Prevention Program on National Cricket Players of Rawalpinidi
The main aim of the study is to prevent the injuries during cricket.Total 60 players were included in the study. 20 players were in warm up group,20 players were in cool down group and 20 players in control group.Base line assessment was by 100m sprint, Illinios agility test, 3 minute burpee test, SEBT and plank. After intervention of 6 weeks assessment will be done again by using the same tests.
Read the detailed description
Cricket is referred to as the second most popular game in world after football and in subcontinent along with south east Asian countries its popularity is increasing day by day it's also referred to as gentle's man game and was regarded as relatively injury free, but recently all witnessed that, changes brought to the cricketing world thus making the game more exciting for the viewers and demanding for players , as a result of these changes and high frequency of matches the game of cricket is no longer an injury free and involves risk of moderate to high level of injuries. These changes in game posed their effects on the players and now they are required to have and maintain high level of fitness In addition to technical skill, however this fitness regimen is also causing problems for players i.e. making them prone to overuse injuries a survey conducted by BSC and ACB reported 2.6 injuries and 24.2 injuries per 10,000 players hours respectively and there are studies to prove that most injury cases are reported in specific stages of the season. The major areas of concern are impact injuries to the head, face and fingers and injuries to the back.
Here it's worth defining that what actually is a injury An injury, which could be an acute or an overuse injury, is defined as any physical damage that took place during a game play, practice or training session and which prevented the player from completing that particular game, practice or training session. In similar way a cricket injury is defined as harmful condition or other medical related issue faced by the player that inhibits him/her from being selected for play or makes the player unable to resume his/her normal game for a partial or whole game when required by either the rules or the team captain.The most common injuries reported are hamstring strains, side strains, groin injuries, wrist and hand injuries, and lumbar soft tissue injuries .
While all cricketers are at the a risk of assuming an acute soft tissue injury to lower limb along the Fast bowlers fall under the highest risk category, as well as role-specific injuries. According to statistical data presented by Stretch \& Venter 66% of overall reported injuries fall in serious category, while chronic and acute-on-chronic made up 12% and 22%, respectively. Where reported Soft-tissue injuries were primarily muscle related injuries constituting up to (41%).
According to Stretch The frequency of injury to the head, neck, and face varied from 5.4% to 25%, and the upper limbs accounted for 19.8% to 34.1% of injuries. Back and trunk injuries accounted for 18.0% to 33.3% of the injuries, and lower-limb injuries accounted for 22.8% to 50.0%. Most were first-time injuries; recurrent injuries from the previous season accounted for 23.9% to 29.8%, and injuries sustained during the season recurring again during the same season, 22.7% to 36.8%. Dhillon et al., report that upper limb injuries are more common in cricket players and account for 16.8%
Dhillon et al., in their research also report that 62.5% injuries were severe enough to prevent cricketers from returning to play for more than 4 weeks. Orchard et al gave a further insight to Injury prevalence (the percentage of players missing due to an injury at any given time) was 14% for pace bowlers, 4% for spin bowlers, 4% for batsmen, and 2% for wicket keeper.
In researches carried out by Dhillon et al, the percentage of injuries reported for fast bowlers as compared to rest is quite high this is due to the fact that pace bowling involves repetitive twisting, extension and rotation of trunk and at the same time bowlers are absorbing high reaction forces over a short period of time. These movements, if performed incorrectly or too frequently, can lead to overuse injuries of the back, particularly in elite and high-level cricketers
An increased throwing workload is a risk factor for the development of upper limb injury in elite cricketers.Stretch \& Venter conducted a longitudinal study showing a pattern for the causes of injuries sustained by the cricketers and reported that the young fast bowlers are most likely to sustain an acute soft tissue injury to the lower limb in early part of the cricketing season while playing in games of cricket or practice sessions. Cross-sectional studies have also demonstrated that spinal overuse injuries occur more frequently to cricketers adopting a mixed bowling action than to those who favor a front or a side-on bowling technique
Strategies are placed in order to ensure that cricketers do not adopt the mixed action or bowl too fast for extended periods thus helping to prevent the back injuries. Along with injuries resulting from impacts, injuries from cricket ball impact can also occur and are more common during low level competition or informal participation. Because of the potential severity of these impacts, a range of protective equipment ranging from body padding to gloves and face protectors are now common features of standard cricket equipment. Although a number of measures to prevent cricket injuries have been widely suggested in the literature, there have been very few studies that have formally assessed their effectiveness in preventing injury. Further research is needed to gain a greater understanding of the bio mechanics of cricket actions, the mechanisms of resultant injuries and the role of various risk factors in injury causation. The extent of the sports injury problem must be identified and described. Secondly the factors and mechanisms which play a part in the occurrence of sports injuries have to be identified. The third step is to introduce measures that are likely to reduce the future risk and/or severity of sports injuries.
- Conditions
- Sports Physical Therapy
- Being tested
- Experimental: warm up, Experimental: cool down, No intervention: control
- Keywords
- cricket injury prevention program,sports injuries,
- Medical subject headings
- Athletic Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Experimental: warm upOther
Phase 1 is dynamic stretching and running exercises which includes, A jogging ,B walking lunge and sweeps, C hip in and out running : jog 3 steps stop and do "hip in"/hip out" for Phase 2 is strength and agility which includes A- squat, B- push-ups: wide palmer push-ups. C vertical jumps. D- lateral jump. E- nordic hamstrings,. F (a)- shoulder external rotations, F(b)- modified inverted rows, Phase 3 is balance and core strength which includes A- modified ankle discs, B - planks: standard forward planks 2 repetitions for 30secs. C- side planks: standard side planks on both sides 1 repetition for 20 secs. Da- bird-dog,Db- modified back extensions, Phase 4 is run sprint which includes A- run sprint: 100% speed running between running (20m) with 1 repetition
Experimental: cool downOther
Phase 1 is dynamic stretching and running exercises which includes, A jogging ,B walking lunge and sweeps, C hip in and out running : jog 3 steps stop and do "hip in"/hip out" for Phase 2 is strength and agility which includes A- squat, B- push-ups: wide palmer push-ups. C vertical jumps. D- lateral jump. E- nordic hamstrings,. F (a)- shoulder external rotations, F(b)- modified inverted rows, Phase 3 is balance and core strength which includes A- modified ankle discs, B - planks: standard forward planks 2 repetitions for 30secs. C- side planks: standard side planks on both sides 1 repetition for 20 secs. Da- bird-dog,Db- modified back extensions, Phase 4 is run sprint which includes A- run sprint: 100% speed running between running (20m) with 1 repetition
No intervention: controlOther
sprint exercise and general stretching as conventional protocol as follows in star club
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| warm up | Experimental | warm up exercises Receives: Other: Experimental: warm up |
| cool down | Experimental | cool down exercises Receives: Other: Experimental: cool down |
| control | Active comparator | Following conventional protocol Receives: Other: No intervention: control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
3 minute burpee test
changes from the baseline, The three MBT can be used with authenticity in order to judge endurance \& strength capabilities amid young women. The "training trend" has to be abolished prior to conducting the test that is used for assessment of endurance-strength abilities. A minimum of 5 repeats must be executed for the test to provided results. time will be noted in seconds
Measured: 6th week
Illinois Agility Run Test:
changes from the baseline, Agility is acrucial module of any team sports, however it is not continuously and normally tested, due to the fact its quite challenging to interpret its results. The Illinois Agility Test is a generally used as a test of nimbleness in sportsperson and per se there are several norms available.This is a modest test to govern, requiring little equipment this test also tests out the player's capacity to turn in altered directions and unlike angles. time will be noted in seconds
Measured: 6th week
Plank test:
changes from the baseline, The plank test is a general test carried out to measure core strength also can be utilized as a fitness drill for enhancing core strength. Purpose of this test is to measure the control and endurance of the back/core stabilizing muscles.time will be noted in seconds
Measured: 6th week
SEBT
changes from the baseline, The "Star Excursion Balance Test" or "SEBT"is a vigorous test that involves strength, flexibility, and proprioception.
The SEBT can also be used to compare balance ability among different sports and to assess physical performance. Research suggests to use this test as a screening tool for sport participation as well as a post-rehabilitation test to ensure dynamic functional symmetry. It has also been shown that the performance of SEBT improves after training. time will be noted in seconds
Measured: 6th week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jul 2019
- Study start2 Mar 2019
- Primary completion30 Jun 2019
- Study completion30 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sports Physical TherapyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Riphah International UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Muhammad Faheem Afzal, MSSPT, Principal investigator, Riphah International University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04017715
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REC/00510 Amna Imran
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 10 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 21 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Maquirriain J, Ghisi JP. Uncommon abdominal muscle injury in a tennis player: internal oblique strain. Br J Sports Med. 2006 May;40(5):462-3. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.023457.
PubMed 16632581Heiser TM, Weber J, Sullivan G, Clare P, Jacobs RR. Prophylaxis and management of hamstring muscle injuries in intercollegiate football players. Am J Sports Med. 1984 Sep-Oct;12(5):368-70. doi: 10.1177/036354658401200506.
PubMed 6496833Drezner JA. Practical management: hamstring muscle injuries. Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Jan;13(1):48-52. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200301000-00009. No abstract available.
PubMed 12544164Worrell TW. Factors associated with hamstring injuries. An approach to treatment and preventative measures. Sports Med. 1994 May;17(5):338-45. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199417050-00006.
PubMed 8052770Morton S, Barton CJ, Rice S, Morrissey D. Risk factors and successful interventions for cricket-related low back pain: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;48(8):685-91. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091782. Epub 2013 May 10.
PubMed 23666021Merlino J, Perisa J. Low back pain in a competitive cricket athlete. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;7(1):101-8.
PubMed 22319683Nealon AR, Kountouris A, Cook JL. Side strain in sport: a narrative review of pathomechanics, diagnosis, imaging and management for the clinician. J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Mar;20(3):261-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
PubMed 27616432
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Cricket Injury Prevention Program on National Cricket Players of Rawalpinidi
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04017715
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REC/00510 Amna Imran
- Conditions
- Sports Physical Therapy
- Keywords
- cricket injury prevention program,sports injuries,
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Riphah International UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main aim of the study is to prevent the injuries during cricket.Total 60 players were included in the study. 20 players were in warm up group,20 players were in cool down group and 20 players in control group.Base line assessment was by 100m sprint, Illinios agility test, 3 minute burpee test, SEBT and plank. After intervention of 6 weeks assessment will be done again by using the same tests.
Detailed description
Cricket is referred to as the second most popular game in world after football and in subcontinent along with south east Asian countries its popularity is increasing day by day it's also referred to as gentle's man game and was regarded as relatively injury free, but recently all witnessed that, changes brought to the cricketing world thus making the game more exciting for the viewers and demanding for players , as a result of these changes and high frequency of matches the game of cricket is no longer an injury free and involves risk of moderate to high level of injuries. These changes in game posed their effects on the players and now they are required to have and maintain high level of fitness In addition to technical skill, however this fitness regimen is also causing problems for players i.e. making them prone to overuse injuries a survey conducted by BSC and ACB reported 2.6 injuries and 24.2 injuries per 10,000 players hours respectively and there are studies to prove that most injury cases are reported in specific stages of the season. The major areas of concern are impact injuries to the head, face and fingers and injuries to the back.
Here it's worth defining that what actually is a injury An injury, which could be an acute or an overuse injury, is defined as any physical damage that took place during a game play, practice or training session and which prevented the player from completing that particular game, practice or training session. In similar way a cricket injury is defined as harmful condition or other medical related issue faced by the player that inhibits him/her from being selected for play or makes the player unable to resume his/her normal game for a partial or whole game when required by either the rules or the team captain.The most common injuries reported are hamstring strains, side strains, groin injuries, wrist and hand injuries, and lumbar soft tissue injuries .
While all cricketers are at the a risk of assuming an acute soft tissue injury to lower limb along the Fast bowlers fall under the highest risk category, as well as role-specific injuries. According to statistical data presented by Stretch \& Venter 66% of overall reported injuries fall in serious category, while chronic and acute-on-chronic made up 12% and 22%, respectively. Where reported Soft-tissue injuries were primarily muscle related injuries constituting up to (41%).
According to Stretch The frequency of injury to the head, neck, and face varied from 5.4% to 25%, and the upper limbs accounted for 19.8% to 34.1% of injuries. Back and trunk injuries accounted for 18.0% to 33.3% of the injuries, and lower-limb injuries accounted for 22.8% to 50.0%. Most were first-time injuries; recurrent injuries from the previous season accounted for 23.9% to 29.8%, and injuries sustained during the season recurring again during the same season, 22.7% to 36.8%. Dhillon et al., report that upper limb injuries are more common in cricket players and account for 16.8%
Dhillon et al., in their research also report that 62.5% injuries were severe enough to prevent cricketers from returning to play for more than 4 weeks. Orchard et al gave a further insight to Injury prevalence (the percentage of players missing due to an injury at any given time) was 14% for pace bowlers, 4% for spin bowlers, 4% for batsmen, and 2% for wicket keeper.
In researches carried out by Dhillon et al, the percentage of injuries reported for fast bowlers as compared to rest is quite high this is due to the fact that pace bowling involves repetitive twisting, extension and rotation of trunk and at the same time bowlers are absorbing high reaction forces over a short period of time. These movements, if performed incorrectly or too frequently, can lead to overuse injuries of the back, particularly in elite and high-level cricketers
An increased throwing workload is a risk factor for the development of upper limb injury in elite cricketers.Stretch \& Venter conducted a longitudinal study showing a pattern for the causes of injuries sustained by the cricketers and reported that the young fast bowlers are most likely to sustain an acute soft tissue injury to the lower limb in early part of the cricketing season while playing in games of cricket or practice sessions. Cross-sectional studies have also demonstrated that spinal overuse injuries occur more frequently to cricketers adopting a mixed bowling action than to those who favor a front or a side-on bowling technique
Strategies are placed in order to ensure that cricketers do not adopt the mixed action or bowl too fast for extended periods thus helping to prevent the back injuries. Along with injuries resulting from impacts, injuries from cricket ball impact can also occur and are more common during low level competition or informal participation. Because of the potential severity of these impacts, a range of protective equipment ranging from body padding to gloves and face protectors are now common features of standard cricket equipment. Although a number of measures to prevent cricket injuries have been widely suggested in the literature, there have been very few studies that have formally assessed their effectiveness in preventing injury. Further research is needed to gain a greater understanding of the bio mechanics of cricket actions, the mechanisms of resultant injuries and the role of various risk factors in injury causation. The extent of the sports injury problem must be identified and described. Secondly the factors and mechanisms which play a part in the occurrence of sports injuries have to be identified. The third step is to introduce measures that are likely to reduce the future risk and/or severity of sports injuries.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| warm up | Experimental | Other: Experimental: warm upwarm up exercises |
| cool down | Experimental | Other: Experimental: cool downcool down exercises |
| control | Active comparator | Other: No intervention: controlFollowing conventional protocol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 24 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age: 16-30 years
- Male cricketers registered with PCB
- Players attending minimum three sessions per week
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Players having any of the following :
- neuromusculoskeletal ,
- cardiovascular, or systematic pathology.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental: warm upPhase 1 is dynamic stretching and running exercises which includes, A jogging ,B walking lunge and sweeps, C hip in and out running : jog 3 steps stop and do "hip in"/hip out" for Phase 2 is strength and agility which includes A- squat, B- push-ups: wide palmer push-ups. C vertical jumps. D- lateral jump. E- nordic hamstrings,. F (a)- shoulder external rotations, F(b)- modified inverted rows, Phase 3 is balance and core strength which includes A- modified ankle discs, B - planks: standard forward planks 2 repetitions for 30secs. C- side planks: standard side planks on both sides 1 repetition for 20 secs. Da- bird-dog,Db- modified back extensions, Phase 4 is run sprint which includes A- run sprint: 100% speed running between running (20m) with 1 repetition | Other | warm up |
| Experimental: cool downPhase 1 is dynamic stretching and running exercises which includes, A jogging ,B walking lunge and sweeps, C hip in and out running : jog 3 steps stop and do "hip in"/hip out" for Phase 2 is strength and agility which includes A- squat, B- push-ups: wide palmer push-ups. C vertical jumps. D- lateral jump. E- nordic hamstrings,. F (a)- shoulder external rotations, F(b)- modified inverted rows, Phase 3 is balance and core strength which includes A- modified ankle discs, B - planks: standard forward planks 2 repetitions for 30secs. C- side planks: standard side planks on both sides 1 repetition for 20 secs. Da- bird-dog,Db- modified back extensions, Phase 4 is run sprint which includes A- run sprint: 100% speed running between running (20m) with 1 repetition | Other | cool down |
| No intervention: controlsprint exercise and general stretching as conventional protocol as follows in star club | Other | control |
Primary outcome
3 minute burpee test
Time frame: 6th week
changes from the baseline, The three MBT can be used with authenticity in order to judge endurance \& strength capabilities amid young women. The "training trend" has to be abolished prior to conducting the test that is used for assessment of endurance-strength abilities. A minimum of 5 repeats must be executed for the test to provided results. time will be noted in seconds
Illinois Agility Run Test:
Time frame: 6th week
changes from the baseline, Agility is acrucial module of any team sports, however it is not continuously and normally tested, due to the fact its quite challenging to interpret its results. The Illinois Agility Test is a generally used as a test of nimbleness in sportsperson and per se there are several norms available.This is a modest test to govern, requiring little equipment this test also tests out the player's capacity to turn in altered directions and unlike angles. time will be noted in seconds
Plank test:
Time frame: 6th week
changes from the baseline, The plank test is a general test carried out to measure core strength also can be utilized as a fitness drill for enhancing core strength. Purpose of this test is to measure the control and endurance of the back/core stabilizing muscles.time will be noted in seconds
SEBT
Time frame: 6th week
changes from the baseline, The "Star Excursion Balance Test" or "SEBT"is a vigorous test that involves strength, flexibility, and proprioception. The SEBT can also be used to compare balance ability among different sports and to assess physical performance. Research suggests to use this test as a screening tool for sport participation as well as a post-rehabilitation test to ensure dynamic functional symmetry. It has also been shown that the performance of SEBT improves after training. time will be noted in seconds
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Apr 2020.
- Background: PubMed 16632581Maquirriain J, Ghisi JP. Uncommon abdominal muscle injury in a tennis player: internal oblique strain. Br J Sports Med. 2006 May;40(5):462-3. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2005.023457.
- Background: PubMed 6496833Heiser TM, Weber J, Sullivan G, Clare P, Jacobs RR. Prophylaxis and management of hamstring muscle injuries in intercollegiate football players. Am J Sports Med. 1984 Sep-Oct;12(5):368-70. doi: 10.1177/036354658401200506.
- Background: PubMed 12544164Drezner JA. Practical management: hamstring muscle injuries. Clin J Sport Med. 2003 Jan;13(1):48-52. doi: 10.1097/00042752-200301000-00009. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 8052770Worrell TW. Factors associated with hamstring injuries. An approach to treatment and preventative measures. Sports Med. 1994 May;17(5):338-45. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199417050-00006.
- Background: PubMed 23666021Morton S, Barton CJ, Rice S, Morrissey D. Risk factors and successful interventions for cricket-related low back pain: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;48(8):685-91. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091782. Epub 2013 May 10.
- Background: PubMed 22319683Merlino J, Perisa J. Low back pain in a competitive cricket athlete. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Feb;7(1):101-8.
- Background: PubMed 27616432Nealon AR, Kountouris A, Cook JL. Side strain in sport: a narrative review of pathomechanics, diagnosis, imaging and management for the clinician. J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Mar;20(3):261-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.08.016. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sports Physical Therapy
Recruiting
Effects of Scapular Training on Adolescent Boxers
Sports Physical Therapy
Recruiting
Individualized Rehabilitation for Osgood-Schlatter or Sever Pain in Youth Athletes
Osgood-Schlatter Disease, Sever's Disease
Recruiting
French Contrast Versus Oregon Circuit Training in Competitive Football Players
No Disease or Condition is Being Studied
Recruiting
Diaphragmatic Facilitation and Upper Extremity Performance in Volleyball Players
Volleyball Players
Recruiting
Comparative Effects of Dolphin Kick Streamline Training Versus Flutter Kick Training in Competitive Swimmers
Sports Physical Therapy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Muhammad Faheem Afzal, MSSPT principal investigator
Riphah International University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Experimental: warm up and Experimental: cool down in people with Sports Physical Therapy, run by Riphah International University at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
3 minute burpee test (time frame: 6th week). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04017715, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Apr 2020.