Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipNCT04019925
Assessing the Wear Rates of the ADM/MDM Hips Using 3D X-ray Analysis
A study testing ADM/MDM hip in people with Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, run by Unity Health Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
A common complication post hip replacement is hip dislocation or hip instability which can lead to the hip implants being revised. A new generation of Dual Mobility hips was designed to minimize hip dislocation/hip instability and polyethylene wear thus increasing the longevity of the hip prosthesis and reducing the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- What is being tested?
- ADM/MDM hip
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2019to 31 Aug 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or non-pregnant female
- Skeletally mature
- 18 to 75 years old
- Stryker Dual Mobility Hip prosthesis
- BMI between 20 and 35
- Follow-up x-rays between 3 years and 6 years postop
Who cannot join
- Dual Mobility Hip implant that is not the ADM or MDM
- BMI that is 19 or less
- BMI that is greater than 36
- Most recent x-rays less than 3 years postop
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
Unity Health Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8
About this study
Official title: Assessing the Wear Rates of the ADM/MDM Dual Mobility Hips Manufactured by Stryker Orthopaedics Using 3D X-ray Analysis
A common complication post hip replacement is hip dislocation or hip instability which can lead to the hip implants being revised. A new generation of Dual Mobility hips was designed to minimize hip dislocation/hip instability and polyethylene wear thus increasing the longevity of the hip prosthesis and reducing the number of re-operations for a patient. In this study we will be assessing 2 dual mobility hips manufactured by Stryker Orthopaedics Inc. The ADM and the MDM.
Read the detailed description
Hip replacement is a procedure in which the hip joint is replaced by a prosthetic implant or prosthesis. Post op hip dislocation or hip instability is a common complication which can lead to the hip implants being revised. There are many types of hip prostheses manufactured with the aim of prolonging longevity of the prosthesis and minimizing postoperative complications. One of these is a new generation of dual mobility hip manufactured by Stryker Orthopaedics. The Anatomic Dual Mobility (ADM) and the Modular Dual Mobility (MDM) were designed to minimize hip dislocation/hip instability and polyethylene wear thus increasing the longevity of the hip prosthesis and reducing the number of re-operations for a patient. In this study we will be assessing the outcome of the ADM and MDM hip system.
- Conditions
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Being tested
- ADM/MDM hip
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ADM/MDM hipDevice
Also called Dual Mobility Hip
Dual Mobility Hip prosthesis manufactured by Stryker Orthopaedics: ADM/MDM
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ADM/MDM hip prosthesis | Other | Type of prosthesis participant received. Receives: Device: ADM/MDM hip |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To assess the change in polyethylene wear of Dual Mobility hip implants using Stryker Orthopaedics ADM & MDM prostheses
This study will assess the change in linear and volumetric wear using 3D x-ray analysis. Measurements will be taken of x-rays obtained before the patient's discharge home, 6 weeks postop, and the most recent x-ray taken more than 3 years postop.
Measured: before the patient's discharge home, 6 weeks postop, and the most recent x-ray taken up to 5 years postop.
Secondary outcomes (1)
To review the number of postop hip dislocations/hip instabilities
Dislocations and the post op time for each occurrence per patient will be collected in tabular format. This in turn will be used to calculate percent of cases/subject.
Measured: first 5 years post surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2019
- Study start1 Sep 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Mar 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2020 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Unity Health TorontoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Unity Health Toronto
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Stryker Orthopaedics
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Amit Atrey, MD, Principal investigator, Unity Health Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04019925
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 19-061
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 3 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 15 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Huo MH, Parvizi J, Bal BS, Mont MA. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2522-34. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00801. No abstract available.
PubMed 19797590Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;11(2):89-99. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200303000-00003.
PubMed 12670135Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jun;447:19-23. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218752.22613.78.
PubMed 16741469Goel A, Lau EC, Ong KL, Berry DJ, Malkani AL. Dislocation rates following primary total hip arthroplasty have plateaued in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty. 2015 May;30(5):743-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
PubMed 25573179Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Karrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2012 Oct;83(5):442-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.733919. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
PubMed 23039167Kostensalo I, Junnila M, Virolainen P, Remes V, Matilainen M, Vahlberg T, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Makela KT. Effect of femoral head size on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of 42,379 primary procedures from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2013 Aug;84(4):342-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.810518. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
PubMed 23799348Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Adam P, Farizon F. The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop. 2009 Aug;33(4):927-32. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0589-9. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
PubMed 18521598Darrith B, Courtney PM, Della Valle CJ. Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1):11-19. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0462.R1.
PubMed 29305445De Martino I, D'Apolito R, Soranoglou VG, Poultsides LA, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(ASuppl1):18-24. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0398.R1.
PubMed 28042114Harwin SF, Sultan AA, Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Sodhi N, Piuzzi NS, Mont MA. Mid-Term Outcomes of Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1494-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
PubMed 29307678Loving L, Lee RK, Herrera L, Essner AP, Nevelos JE. Wear performance evaluation of a contemporary dual mobility hip bearing using multiple hip simulator testing conditions. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Jun;28(6):1041-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.011. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
PubMed 23434106D'Apuzzo MR, Koch CN, Esposito CI, Elpers ME, Wright TM, Westrich GH. Assessment of Damage on a Dual Mobility Acetabular System. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Aug;31(8):1828-35. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.039. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
PubMed 26897488
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessing the Wear Rates of the ADM/MDM Dual Mobility Hips Manufactured by Stryker Orthopaedics Using 3D X-ray Analysis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04019925
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 19-061
- Conditions
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Unity Health TorontoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Stryker Orthopaedics
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2019 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2020 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2020 (estimated)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A common complication post hip replacement is hip dislocation or hip instability which can lead to the hip implants being revised. A new generation of Dual Mobility hips was designed to minimize hip dislocation/hip instability and polyethylene wear thus increasing the longevity of the hip prosthesis and reducing the number of re-operations for a patient. In this study we will be assessing 2 dual mobility hips manufactured by Stryker Orthopaedics Inc. The ADM and the MDM.
Detailed description
Hip replacement is a procedure in which the hip joint is replaced by a prosthetic implant or prosthesis. Post op hip dislocation or hip instability is a common complication which can lead to the hip implants being revised. There are many types of hip prostheses manufactured with the aim of prolonging longevity of the prosthesis and minimizing postoperative complications. One of these is a new generation of dual mobility hip manufactured by Stryker Orthopaedics. The Anatomic Dual Mobility (ADM) and the Modular Dual Mobility (MDM) were designed to minimize hip dislocation/hip instability and polyethylene wear thus increasing the longevity of the hip prosthesis and reducing the number of re-operations for a patient. In this study we will be assessing the outcome of the ADM and MDM hip system.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ADM/MDM hip prosthesis | Other | Device: ADM/MDM hipType of prosthesis participant received. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Male or non-pregnant female
- Skeletally mature
- 18 to 75 years old
- Stryker Dual Mobility Hip prosthesis
- BMI between 20 and 35
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Dual Mobility Hip implant that is not the ADM or MDM
- BMI that is 19 or less
- BMI that is greater than 36
- Most recent x-rays less than 3 years postop
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ADM/MDM hipAlso: Dual Mobility HipDual Mobility Hip prosthesis manufactured by Stryker Orthopaedics: ADM/MDM | Device | ADM/MDM hip prosthesis |
Primary outcome
To assess the change in polyethylene wear of Dual Mobility hip implants using Stryker Orthopaedics ADM & MDM prostheses
Time frame: before the patient's discharge home, 6 weeks postop, and the most recent x-ray taken up to 5 years postop.
This study will assess the change in linear and volumetric wear using 3D x-ray analysis. Measurements will be taken of x-rays obtained before the patient's discharge home, 6 weeks postop, and the most recent x-ray taken more than 3 years postop.
1 secondary outcome
To review the number of postop hip dislocations/hip instabilities
Time frame: first 5 years post surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jul 2019.
- Background: PubMed 19797590Huo MH, Parvizi J, Bal BS, Mont MA. What's new in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Oct;91(10):2522-34. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.00801. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12670135Barrack RL. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;11(2):89-99. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200303000-00003.
- Background: PubMed 16741469Khatod M, Barber T, Paxton E, Namba R, Fithian D. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Jun;447:19-23. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000218752.22613.78.
- Background: PubMed 25573179Goel A, Lau EC, Ong KL, Berry DJ, Malkani AL. Dislocation rates following primary total hip arthroplasty have plateaued in the Medicare population. J Arthroplasty. 2015 May;30(5):743-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
- Background: PubMed 23039167Hailer NP, Weiss RJ, Stark A, Karrholm J. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2012 Oct;83(5):442-8. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2012.733919. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
- Background: PubMed 23799348Kostensalo I, Junnila M, Virolainen P, Remes V, Matilainen M, Vahlberg T, Pulkkinen P, Eskelinen A, Makela KT. Effect of femoral head size on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of 42,379 primary procedures from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop. 2013 Aug;84(4):342-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2013.810518. Epub 2013 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 18521598Philippot R, Camilleri JP, Boyer B, Adam P, Farizon F. The use of a dual-articulation acetabular cup system to prevent dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 384 cases at a mean follow-up of 15 years. Int Orthop. 2009 Aug;33(4):927-32. doi: 10.1007/s00264-008-0589-9. Epub 2008 Jun 3.
- Background: PubMed 29305445Darrith B, Courtney PM, Della Valle CJ. Outcomes of dual mobility components in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Bone Joint J. 2018 Jan;100-B(1):11-19. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B1.BJJ-2017-0462.R1.
- Background: PubMed 28042114De Martino I, D'Apolito R, Soranoglou VG, Poultsides LA, Sculco PK, Sculco TP. Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty using dual mobility acetabular components: a systematic review. Bone Joint J. 2017 Jan;99-B(ASuppl1):18-24. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B1.BJJ-2016-0398.R1.
- Background: PubMed 29307678Harwin SF, Sultan AA, Khlopas A, Chughtai M, Sodhi N, Piuzzi NS, Mont MA. Mid-Term Outcomes of Dual Mobility Acetabular Cups for Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018 May;33(5):1494-1500. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.12.008. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
- Background: PubMed 23434106Loving L, Lee RK, Herrera L, Essner AP, Nevelos JE. Wear performance evaluation of a contemporary dual mobility hip bearing using multiple hip simulator testing conditions. J Arthroplasty. 2013 Jun;28(6):1041-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.09.011. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
- Background: PubMed 26897488D'Apuzzo MR, Koch CN, Esposito CI, Elpers ME, Wright TM, Westrich GH. Assessment of Damage on a Dual Mobility Acetabular System. J Arthroplasty. 2016 Aug;31(8):1828-35. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.01.039. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Enrolling by invitation
Comparison of Functional Results of ADM X3-MoP Cup (Stryker) and a CoC Cup (Zimmer) in Young Patients
Arthroplasties, Hip Replacement
Not yet recruiting
Total Hip Replacement: an Investigation of Robotic-assisted Versus conVentional Surgery and Patient-centred outcomEs
Osteo Arthritis Knee and Hip
RecruitingObservational study
The restor3d Outcomes Registry
Joint Replacement, Arthropathy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Muscle Stiffness, Functional Reserve, and Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Lower Extremity Arthroplasty
Osteoarthritis (Knee / Hip), Sarcopenia
RecruitingPhase 4
Low-Volume Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block With Dexamethasone vs Standard-Volume PENG Block After Total Hip Arthroplasty
Pain, Postoperative, Muscle Weakness
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amit Atrey, MD principal investigator
Unity Health Toronto, St. Michael's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ADM/MDM hip in people with Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, run by Unity Health Toronto at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kerry Ann K. Griffith-Cunningham (416 864-6060 ext. 2273, griffithk@smh.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To assess the change in polyethylene wear of Dual Mobility hip implants using Stryker Orthopaedics ADM & MDM prostheses (time frame: before the patient's discharge home, 6 weeks postop, and the most recent x-ray taken up to 5 years postop.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04019925, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2019.