MSK ConditionsNCT04021004
How do Pilates Trained Physiotherapists Utilise and Value Pilates Exercise for MSK Conditions: A Qualitative Study
An observational study of MSK Conditions, run by University of Salford at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
A self-designed qualitative questionnaire survey was used to investigate opinions and views among thirty Physiotherapists practising in the UK, who had undertaken formal training in Pilates exercise therapy to treat people with MSK conditions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- MSK Conditions
- What is being tested?
- Survey Questionnaire
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2019to 15 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: UK Physiotherapists who have completed formal Pilates instruction training
Who may be able to join
- To participate in the study and complete the survey, it was specified that participants needed to:
- Have undertaken some form of formal Pilates instruction training, such as the Matwork Foundation Pilates courses with the APPI (Australian Physiotherapy and Pilates Institute) or BCP (Body Control Pilates, 2018). Physiotherapists did not have to be a fully certified instructor to participate in the study, however, they must have completed a minimum of one formal Pilates Instruction course. Participants were required to specify this in the demographics section of the survey.
- Be registered with the HCPC (Health and Care Professions council) to currently practice as a Physiotherapist without restriction in the UK. The reasoning for only surveying Physiotherapists is in keeping with the rationale of previous studies (Wells et al., 2014; Allen, 2014; Brennan and French, 2008). Who have advocated that including only Physiotherapists with formal Pilates training guarantees similar standards of practice of participants, as standards and qualification level may vary otherwise. Additionally, extending the survey to other practioners would make further comparisons challenging through data analysis.
- Be computer literate, have e-mail access, time to commit to completion of the survey, and ability to understand written English language.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
A self-designed qualitative questionnaire survey was used to investigate opinions and views among thirty Physiotherapists practising in the UK, who had undertaken formal training in Pilates exercise therapy to treat people with MSK conditions.
Read the detailed description
Pilates is a popular exercise therapy approach that focuses on strength, core stability, flexibility, muscle control, and posture (Wells et al., 2014). This approach has evolved over time, to form a valuable therapeutic tool in the prevention and rehabilitation of a variety of injuries (Di Lorenzo, 2011). More recently, Pilates has become increasingly popular due to its wide-ranging health benefits for individuals with a range of MSK (musculoskeletal) disorders, as well as other conditions (Byrnes, Wu, \& Whillier, 2018). This method has become more commercially recognised and accessible through various professional institutions. The Australian Physiotherapy \& Pilates Institute (APPI), is a globally run organisation licensed in sixteen countries, delivering over 17000 classes per year, as a "graduated system of specific exercise rehabilitation" (Appihealthgroup.com, 2018).
In the UK, Pilates based exercise therapy is used within both the National Health Service (NHS) and private healthcare sectors in the management of low back pain (LBP), general MSK pain, and various degenerative conditions (Yamato et al. 2015). An estimated 17.8 million people live with a musculoskeletal condition in the UK, around 28.9% of the total population (Global Burden of Disease network, 2016). Over 8.75 million people aged 45 and over have sought treatment for osteoarthritis (Arthritis Research UK, 2013), for which the main management strategy is exercise-based therapy. MSK healthcare services are under increasing pressure to provide care to the ageing population, and tackle the healthcare impact associated with inactivity (Hubbard et al., 2004). Group based exercise such as class Pilates, offers an accessible opportunity to increase activity levels in such individuals (Karlsson, Gerdle, Takala, Andersson, \& Larsson, 2018).
There is considerable evidence that Pilates has numerous physical benefits and may improve self-management of MSK conditions. This includes a wealth of quantitative research, several systematic reviews have demonstrated positive improvements on pain, quality of life and functionality (Aladro-Gonzalvo, Araya-Vargas, Machado-Díaz, \& Salazar-Rojas, 2013; Byrnes et al., 2018). However, of the Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) reviewed, high levels of heterogeneity were reported, in terms of sample (sub-types of back pain), exercise selection, delivery and frequency of treatment.
In contrast to this, there is a dearth of qualitative research evaluating Pilates as a treatment approach, mostly focusing on LBP populations (Gaskell \& Williams, 2018). These methods can be valuable to review the definition, scope and rationale of Pilates treatment methods used by Physiotherapists, to provide optimum rehabilitation. Use of a qualitative approach could also gain understanding of how Physiotherapists utilise Pilates for a range of conditions other than LBP (Wells et al., 2014). Therefore, this study aims to investigate the variation in Pilates delivery and why, and in line with previous qualitative studies, further explore the perceived benefits, risks and rationale for this exercise approach. This is the first study to review NHS and private physiotherapists in their use of Pilates group exercise.
- Conditions
- MSK Conditions
- Being tested
- Survey Questionnaire
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Survey QuestionnaireOther
Survey Questionnaire
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Survey Questionnaire
Self-designed electronic survey to capture Physiotherapists opinions and views. The survey was comprised of both multiple choice selections, and open-ended questions in order to allow free text input and generate narrative for thematic analysis.
No scale questions were utilised in this questionnaire.
Measured: 5 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2019
- Study start1 Apr 2019
- Primary completion15 Jun 2019
- Study completion15 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MSK ConditionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Salford
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Peter Cuddy, University of Salford
- Investigators
- Lynne Gaskell, MSc, Study director, University of Salford
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04021004
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Ref HSR1617-150
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 12 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 10 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cuddy P, Gaskell L. "How do Pilates Trained Physiotherapists utilize and value Pilates Exercise for MSK conditions? A Qualitative Study". Musculoskeletal Care. 2020 Sep;18(3):315-329. doi: 10.1002/msc.1463. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
PubMed 32250561
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- How do Pilates Trained Physiotherapists Utilise and Value Pilates Exercise for MSK Conditions: A Qualitative Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04021004
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Ref HSR1617-150
- Conditions
- MSK Conditions
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of SalfordUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A self-designed qualitative questionnaire survey was used to investigate opinions and views among thirty Physiotherapists practising in the UK, who had undertaken formal training in Pilates exercise therapy to treat people with MSK conditions.
Detailed description
Pilates is a popular exercise therapy approach that focuses on strength, core stability, flexibility, muscle control, and posture (Wells et al., 2014). This approach has evolved over time, to form a valuable therapeutic tool in the prevention and rehabilitation of a variety of injuries (Di Lorenzo, 2011). More recently, Pilates has become increasingly popular due to its wide-ranging health benefits for individuals with a range of MSK (musculoskeletal) disorders, as well as other conditions (Byrnes, Wu, \& Whillier, 2018). This method has become more commercially recognised and accessible through various professional institutions. The Australian Physiotherapy \& Pilates Institute (APPI), is a globally run organisation licensed in sixteen countries, delivering over 17000 classes per year, as a "graduated system of specific exercise rehabilitation" (Appihealthgroup.com, 2018).
In the UK, Pilates based exercise therapy is used within both the National Health Service (NHS) and private healthcare sectors in the management of low back pain (LBP), general MSK pain, and various degenerative conditions (Yamato et al. 2015). An estimated 17.8 million people live with a musculoskeletal condition in the UK, around 28.9% of the total population (Global Burden of Disease network, 2016). Over 8.75 million people aged 45 and over have sought treatment for osteoarthritis (Arthritis Research UK, 2013), for which the main management strategy is exercise-based therapy. MSK healthcare services are under increasing pressure to provide care to the ageing population, and tackle the healthcare impact associated with inactivity (Hubbard et al., 2004). Group based exercise such as class Pilates, offers an accessible opportunity to increase activity levels in such individuals (Karlsson, Gerdle, Takala, Andersson, \& Larsson, 2018).
There is considerable evidence that Pilates has numerous physical benefits and may improve self-management of MSK conditions. This includes a wealth of quantitative research, several systematic reviews have demonstrated positive improvements on pain, quality of life and functionality (Aladro-Gonzalvo, Araya-Vargas, Machado-Díaz, \& Salazar-Rojas, 2013; Byrnes et al., 2018). However, of the Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) reviewed, high levels of heterogeneity were reported, in terms of sample (sub-types of back pain), exercise selection, delivery and frequency of treatment.
In contrast to this, there is a dearth of qualitative research evaluating Pilates as a treatment approach, mostly focusing on LBP populations (Gaskell \& Williams, 2018). These methods can be valuable to review the definition, scope and rationale of Pilates treatment methods used by Physiotherapists, to provide optimum rehabilitation. Use of a qualitative approach could also gain understanding of how Physiotherapists utilise Pilates for a range of conditions other than LBP (Wells et al., 2014). Therefore, this study aims to investigate the variation in Pilates delivery and why, and in line with previous qualitative studies, further explore the perceived benefits, risks and rationale for this exercise approach. This is the first study to review NHS and private physiotherapists in their use of Pilates group exercise.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- UK Physiotherapists who have completed formal Pilates instruction training
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- To participate in the study and complete the survey, it was specified that participants needed to:
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Survey QuestionnaireSurvey Questionnaire | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Survey Questionnaire
Time frame: 5 months
Self-designed electronic survey to capture Physiotherapists opinions and views. The survey was comprised of both multiple choice selections, and open-ended questions in order to allow free text input and generate narrative for thematic analysis. No scale questions were utilised in this questionnaire.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Oct 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32250561Cuddy P, Gaskell L. "How do Pilates Trained Physiotherapists utilize and value Pilates Exercise for MSK conditions? A Qualitative Study". Musculoskeletal Care. 2020 Sep;18(3):315-329. doi: 10.1002/msc.1463. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for MSK Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Test Whether BI 764524 Helps People With an Eye Condition Called Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic Retinopathy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of ADVM-022 in Treatment-Experienced Patients With Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration [LUNA]
Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Efficacy and Safety Study of GAL-101, 2% Ophthalmic Solution in Non-foveal Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Non-neovascular AMD
Geographic Atrophy of the Macula
RecruitingPhase 3
Study to Evaluate Sepofarsen in Subjects With Leber Congenital Amaurosis (LCA) Type 10 (HYPERION)
Leber Congenital Amaurosis 10, Blindness
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Test Whether BI 1815368 Helps People With an Eye Condition Called Diabetic Macular Edema
Macular Edema
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lynne Gaskell, MSc study director
University of Salford
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of MSK Conditions, run by University of Salford at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Survey Questionnaire (time frame: 5 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04021004, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2019.