AzTrials
AzTrials

Polycystic Ovary SyndromeNCT04021940

Dose Adjusted vs. Fixed Dose Unilateral Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling in PCOS Patients

A study testing ULOD in people with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, run by Hatem AbuHashim.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder and a leading cause of infertility in women of reproductive age affecting up to 20% of them. Laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) is considered a second-line treatment of infertile patients with clomiphene citrate-resistant (CCR) PCOS i.e. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 34 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
What is being tested?
ULOD
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
128 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
5 Aug 2019to 30 Jul 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 34 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of PCOS will be based on the revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to PCOS and its modification (ESHRE, 2018).
  • CCR will be considered if persistent anovulation with 150 mg CC daily for 5 days per cycle, for at least three cycles.
  • Only patients with a phenotype characterized by oligomenorrhoea/anovulation, hyperandrogenaemia and polycystic ovaries on ultrasound examination (PCOM) and a phenotype characterized by oligomenorrhoea/anovulation and PCOM will be enrolled in the study.
  • Age: 20-34 years.
  • Body mass index < 30 kg/m2
  • Patent fallopian tubes by hysterosalpingography.
  • Normal semen analysis of husbands.

Who cannot join

  • Age ≥ 35 years.
  • BMI ≥ 30
  • Previous history of LOD
  • PCOS phenotypes with regular menses or without PCOM ovaries on USS.
  • Other causes of infertility
  • Women with adrenal hyperplasia, thyroid disease, Cushing's syndrome, hyperprolactinemia and a tumor-related excess of androgen.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

Hatem Abu Hashim, MD. FRCOG.PhD contact

+20502300002

hatem_ah@hotmail.com

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Comparison of Dose Adjusted vs. Fixed Dose Unilateral Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Patients

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common endocrine disorder and a leading cause of infertility in women of reproductive age affecting up to 20% of them. Laparoscopic ovarian drilling (LOD) is considered a second-line treatment of infertile patients with clomiphene citrate-resistant (CCR) PCOS i.e. those who did not ovulate in response to CC doses of up to 150 mg for at least three consecutive cycles. The advantage of LOD is the induction of unifollicular ovulation without the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome or high-order multiple pregnancies.

The common practice of LOD was to drill both ovaries i.e. bilateral (BLOD) with a fixed dose of 600 Joules per each ovary (1200 Joules in both) delivered through four punctures, each for 4 s and using 40 W. However, its main adverse effect is diminished ovary reserve due to tissue damage (2). In 1994, Balen and Jacobs reported the effectiveness of fixed-dose unilateral LOD (ULOD) in the management of those women. Subsequently, several randomized trials demonstrated its efficacy with comparable ovulation and pregnancy rates to BLOD.

Recently, a new concept called"dose-adjusted" ULOD was proposed. It means to tailor the energy applied to one ovary, according to its preoperative volume using 60 J/ cm3. When compared with the fixed-dose BLOD among 96 infertile women with CCR- PCOS, a significantly higher ovulation rate during the first postoperative menstrual cycle was in favor of the ULOD group (73 vs. 49%). Meanwhile, a comparable ovulation rate over the 6-month period was found (82 vs. 64%) (6). In addition, both groups experienced a reduction in serum anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) level after LOD which was significantly more in the BLOD group in the first and the 6-month follow-up periods. However, another RCT (n=108 CCR- PCOS patients) reported a comparable ovulation and pregnancy rates at 3-month follow-up period (65.4 vs. 77.3% and 15.4 vs. 26.4%, in ULOD and BLOD respectively) with a reduction in the effectiveness of dose-adjusted ULOD after 6 months. A highly significant difference between ULOD and BLOD groups with regard to the AMH level at 3- and 6-month was also reported. Thereby, the efficacy of dose-adjusted ULOD in improving fertility outcomes in infertile women with CCR- PCOS as well as its effect on ovarian reserve warrants more investigation.

Being tested
ULOD
Medical subject headings
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ULODProcedure or surgery

    ULOD

Study groups in NCT04021940
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dose adjusted ULODExperimentaldose adjusted ULOD using 60J/cm3 applied to the larger ovary. The number of punctures (Np) per ovary will be calculated according to the following formula: Np = 60 J/cm3 divided by 30 W x 4 s.
Receives: Procedure: ULOD
Fixed dose ULODActive comparator600 J for the larger ovary will be delivered through four punctures, each for 4 s and 40 W
Receives: Procedure: ULOD

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. ovulation rate

    serum progesterone level >5 ng/mL on D 21 of the cycle

    Measured: At 6 months postoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jul 2019
  2. Study start5 Aug 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2021 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
128 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04021940
Sponsor's protocol ID
MS.19.05.615
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
13 Jul 2019
Last updated
19 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Abu Hashim H, Foda O, El Rakhawy M. Unilateral or bilateral laparoscopic ovarian drilling in polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Apr;297(4):859-870. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4680-1. Epub 2018 Jan 27.

    PubMed 29374790

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ULOD in people with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, run by Hatem AbuHashim.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hatem Abu Hashim, MD. FRCOG.PhD (+20502300002, hatem_ah@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

ovulation rate (time frame: At 6 months postoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04021940, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in