ExophthalmosNCT04025034
Deep Lateral Wall Partial Rim-Sparing Orbital Decompression for Treatment of Thyroid-Related Orbitopathy
A study testing Orbital decompression with ultrasonic bone removal in people with Exophthalmos and Orbitopathy, Graves, run by Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre.
Trial summary
The described technique of DLW-PRS decompression for TRO using SONOPET(R) appears to be safe and effective, reducing the complications associated with decompressing the orbital floor and medial wall. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Exophthalmos, Orbitopathy, Graves, Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Orbital decompression with ultrasonic bone removal
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 35 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to 1 Jan 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- -
About this study
Official title: Deep Lateral Wall Partial Rim-Sparing Orbital Decompression With Ultrasonic Bone Removal for Treatment of Thyroid-Related Orbitopathy
The described technique of DLW-PRS decompression for TRO using SONOPET(R) appears to be safe and effective, reducing the complications associated with decompressing the orbital floor and medial wall. The mechanical characteristics of this surgical too provide protection to adjacent dura mater and neurovascular structures when working in narrow spaces.
Read the detailed description
We included in this review patients who had exophthalmos at presentation (using Hertel's exophthalmometer), underwent surgery for rehabilitation of disfiguring exophthalmos and had controlled thyroid function. All patients had a minimum follow up of 6 months. Procedures that potentially might have altered the amount of retroplacement achieved by lateral wall removal, such as fat excision, rim advancement, or decompression into the paranasal sinuses, were not performed. Patients with any history of previous procedures that potentially might have altered exophthalmos measurements were also excluded for the purposes of this study.
SONOPET® Ultrasonic Aspirator. The SONOPET® ultrasonic aspirator, consists of an ultrasonic handpiece that is connected to a base control module. The unit is foot-pedal controlled. The base module houses the controls to regulate the irrigation rate (between 3 and 40 mL/min), aspiration and ultrasound power parameters of the machine. The power setting is expressed as a percentage of that maximum. Aspiration reaches 500 mmHg and the aspiration setting on the machine is also expressed as a percentage of that maximum. The irrigation rate is expressed in milliliters per minute.18 Aspiration occurs through an opening at the distal aspect of the handpiece tip and the irrigation fluid (normal saline at 20°C) flows through a white irrigation sleeve surrounding the handpiece tip. The handpiece oscillates in a nonrotational fashion up to 25,000 times per second with a 0.36 mm width variation. The SONOPET®'s primary mechanism of action is torsional oscillation of a metal bone rasp at 25 kHz. This frequency is ideal for bone removal,22 as the microenvironment created only cuts mineralized tissue, while soft tissues are best cut at frequencies ≥34 kHz.23 The universal handpiece fits multiple interchangeable tips that have varying lengths, sizes, and shapes designed for specific soft tissue or bone removal purposes.22 Different sizes and angles for the cutting surface are also available.
The tip used in this series is a serrated aggressive knife and the superlong payner 360°shape designed for bone fragmentation and removal24 (Figures 1 D, 2 A).
Surgical technique. The procedure was performed with the patient in a supine position under general anesthesia. A single dose of IV dexamethasone (8 mg) and a 1 gr IV cefazoline were given during surgery. After corneal lubrication, the patient was prepped and draped in sterile fashion.
The marked triangle incision was incised (Figure 1, A) and an initial lateral canthotomy was made in a "crow's foot" using a no. 15 Bard-Parker® surgical blade (Becton Dickinson, Hancock, NY, USA) . Dissection was performed in the preseptal plane to provide wide exposure of the rim of the lateral orbital wall(Figure 1, B). The periosteum was incised using a needle-tip monopolar electrocautery and the lateral wall was completely exposed by cutting cautery and periosteal elevators (Figure 1, C). The posterior leaf of the periosteum was mobilized and reflected, along with the temporalis muscle; this minimizes damage to the temporalis muscle during surgery and reduces future temporal hollowing.
- Conditions
- Exophthalmos, Orbitopathy, Graves, Surgery
- Being tested
- Orbital decompression with ultrasonic bone removal
- Keywords
- Decompression, Thyroid-related, Orbitopathy
- Medical subject headings
- Exophthalmos, Graves Ophthalmopathy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Orbital decompression with ultrasonic bone removalProcedure or surgery
Deep lateral wall partial rim-sparing decompression for thyroid-related orbitopathy using SONOPET® appears to be safe and effective, reducing the complications associated and damage to neurovascular structures.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study Group | Experimental | Use of SONOPET(R) to orbital surgery. Receives: Procedure: Orbital decompression with ultrasonic bone removal |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Orbital decompression in exophthalmos in treatment of thyroid-related orbitopahty
Decompression with a bone-cutting ultrasonic aspirator that can be customized for variable decompression of the orbit by tailoring the amount of bone removed from each wall.
Measured: 33 months
Change in proptosis
Measured by the difference in Hertel exophthalmometry
Measured: 33 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Visual acuity
Using Snellen scale, decimal fraction
Measured: 33 months
Lagophthalmos
Presence of lagophthalmos
Measured: 33 months
Eyelid retraction
Measured by upper eyelid margin distance to the corneal reflex and lower eyelid margin distance to the corneal reflex
Measured: 33 months
Keratopathy
Presence of exposure keratopathy
Measured: 33 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jul 2019
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionDec 2017
- Study completion1 Jan 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ExophthalmosStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Retrsopective, non-comparative case series
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital del Rio Hortega, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Enrique Mencia-Gutierrez, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
- Investigators
- Maria Ugalde-Diez, M.D., Ph.D., Study director, 12 de Octubre Hospital, Madrid
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04025034
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DLWP-R2019
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 22 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: To describe the results of thyroid-related orbitopathy (TRO) treated by ultrasound lateral deep lateral wall bony decompression with partial rim sparing (DLW-PRS)
Publications
Baldeschi L, MacAndie K, Hintschich C, Wakelkamp IM, Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM. The removal of the deep lateral wall in orbital decompression: its contribution to exophthalmos reduction and influence on consecutive diplopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct;140(4):642-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.04.023. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
PubMed 16140250Paridaens DA, Verhoeff K, Bouwens D, van Den Bosch WA. Transconjunctival orbital decompression in Graves' ophthalmopathy: lateral wall approach ab interno. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jul;84(7):775-81. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.7.775.
PubMed 10873993Sivak-Callcott JA, Linberg JV, Patel S. Ultrasonic bone removal with the Sonopet Omni: a new instrument for orbital and lacrimal surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov;123(11):1595-7. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.11.1595.
PubMed 16286624Cho RI, Choe CH, Elner VM. Ultrasonic bone removal versus high-speed burring for lateral orbital decompression: comparison of surgical outcomes for the treatment of thyroid eye disease. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Mar-Apr;26(2):83-7. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b8e614.
PubMed 20305505Bengoa-Gonzalez A, Galindo-Ferreiro A, Mencia-Gutierrez E, Sanchez-Tocino H, Martin-Clavijo A, Lago-Llinas MD. Deep Lateral Wall Partial Rim-Sparing Orbital Decompression with Ultrasonic Bone Removal for Treatment of Thyroid-Related Orbitopathy. J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 2;2019:9478512. doi: 10.1155/2019/9478512. eCollection 2019.
PubMed 31885895
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Deep Lateral Wall Partial Rim-Sparing Orbital Decompression With Ultrasonic Bone Removal for Treatment of Thyroid-Related Orbitopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04025034
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DLWP-R2019
- Conditions
- Exophthalmos, Orbitopathy, Graves, Surgery
- Keywords
- Decompression, Thyroid-related, Orbitopathy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 35 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Universitario 12 de OctubreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital del Rio Hortega, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
- Study start
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The described technique of DLW-PRS decompression for TRO using SONOPET(R) appears to be safe and effective, reducing the complications associated with decompressing the orbital floor and medial wall. The mechanical characteristics of this surgical too provide protection to adjacent dura mater and neurovascular structures when working in narrow spaces.
Detailed description
We included in this review patients who had exophthalmos at presentation (using Hertel's exophthalmometer), underwent surgery for rehabilitation of disfiguring exophthalmos and had controlled thyroid function. All patients had a minimum follow up of 6 months. Procedures that potentially might have altered the amount of retroplacement achieved by lateral wall removal, such as fat excision, rim advancement, or decompression into the paranasal sinuses, were not performed. Patients with any history of previous procedures that potentially might have altered exophthalmos measurements were also excluded for the purposes of this study.
SONOPET® Ultrasonic Aspirator. The SONOPET® ultrasonic aspirator, consists of an ultrasonic handpiece that is connected to a base control module. The unit is foot-pedal controlled. The base module houses the controls to regulate the irrigation rate (between 3 and 40 mL/min), aspiration and ultrasound power parameters of the machine. The power setting is expressed as a percentage of that maximum. Aspiration reaches 500 mmHg and the aspiration setting on the machine is also expressed as a percentage of that maximum. The irrigation rate is expressed in milliliters per minute.18 Aspiration occurs through an opening at the distal aspect of the handpiece tip and the irrigation fluid (normal saline at 20°C) flows through a white irrigation sleeve surrounding the handpiece tip. The handpiece oscillates in a nonrotational fashion up to 25,000 times per second with a 0.36 mm width variation. The SONOPET®'s primary mechanism of action is torsional oscillation of a metal bone rasp at 25 kHz. This frequency is ideal for bone removal,22 as the microenvironment created only cuts mineralized tissue, while soft tissues are best cut at frequencies ≥34 kHz.23 The universal handpiece fits multiple interchangeable tips that have varying lengths, sizes, and shapes designed for specific soft tissue or bone removal purposes.22 Different sizes and angles for the cutting surface are also available.
The tip used in this series is a serrated aggressive knife and the superlong payner 360°shape designed for bone fragmentation and removal24 (Figures 1 D, 2 A).
Surgical technique. The procedure was performed with the patient in a supine position under general anesthesia. A single dose of IV dexamethasone (8 mg) and a 1 gr IV cefazoline were given during surgery. After corneal lubrication, the patient was prepped and draped in sterile fashion.
The marked triangle incision was incised (Figure 1, A) and an initial lateral canthotomy was made in a "crow's foot" using a no. 15 Bard-Parker® surgical blade (Becton Dickinson, Hancock, NY, USA) . Dissection was performed in the preseptal plane to provide wide exposure of the rim of the lateral orbital wall(Figure 1, B). The periosteum was incised using a needle-tip monopolar electrocautery and the lateral wall was completely exposed by cutting cautery and periosteal elevators (Figure 1, C). The posterior leaf of the periosteum was mobilized and reflected, along with the temporalis muscle; this minimizes damage to the temporalis muscle during surgery and reduces future temporal hollowing.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Retrsopective, non-comparative case series
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study Group | Experimental | Procedure: Orbital decompression with ultrasonic bone removalUse of SONOPET(R) to orbital surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Orbital decompression with ultrasonic bone removalDeep lateral wall partial rim-sparing decompression for thyroid-related orbitopathy using SONOPET® appears to be safe and effective, reducing the complications associated and damage to neurovascular structures. | Procedure or surgery | Study Group |
Primary outcome
Orbital decompression in exophthalmos in treatment of thyroid-related orbitopahty
Time frame: 33 months
Decompression with a bone-cutting ultrasonic aspirator that can be customized for variable decompression of the orbit by tailoring the amount of bone removed from each wall.
Change in proptosis
Time frame: 33 months
Measured by the difference in Hertel exophthalmometry
4 secondary outcomes
Visual acuity
Time frame: 33 months
Lagophthalmos
Time frame: 33 months
Eyelid retraction
Time frame: 33 months
Keratopathy
Time frame: 33 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jul 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 16140250Baldeschi L, MacAndie K, Hintschich C, Wakelkamp IM, Prummel MF, Wiersinga WM. The removal of the deep lateral wall in orbital decompression: its contribution to exophthalmos reduction and influence on consecutive diplopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Oct;140(4):642-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.04.023. Epub 2005 Sep 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 10873993Paridaens DA, Verhoeff K, Bouwens D, van Den Bosch WA. Transconjunctival orbital decompression in Graves' ophthalmopathy: lateral wall approach ab interno. Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jul;84(7):775-81. doi: 10.1136/bjo.84.7.775.
- Results publication: PubMed 16286624Sivak-Callcott JA, Linberg JV, Patel S. Ultrasonic bone removal with the Sonopet Omni: a new instrument for orbital and lacrimal surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Nov;123(11):1595-7. doi: 10.1001/archopht.123.11.1595.
- Results publication: PubMed 20305505Cho RI, Choe CH, Elner VM. Ultrasonic bone removal versus high-speed burring for lateral orbital decompression: comparison of surgical outcomes for the treatment of thyroid eye disease. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Mar-Apr;26(2):83-7. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b8e614.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31885895Bengoa-Gonzalez A, Galindo-Ferreiro A, Mencia-Gutierrez E, Sanchez-Tocino H, Martin-Clavijo A, Lago-Llinas MD. Deep Lateral Wall Partial Rim-Sparing Orbital Decompression with Ultrasonic Bone Removal for Treatment of Thyroid-Related Orbitopathy. J Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 2;2019:9478512. doi: 10.1155/2019/9478512. eCollection 2019.
- NavigatorLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. To describe the results of thyroid-related orbitopathy (TRO) treated by ultrasound lateral deep lateral wall bony decompression with partial rim sparing (DLW-PRS)
Related trials for Exophthalmos
RecruitingPhase 1
NEXUS Study: A Study to Test Single and Multiple Doses of MER511 Given to Adults With Graves' Disease
Graves Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Rilzabrutinib in Adult Participants With Graves' Disease
Graves' Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About The Effects of Felzartamab on Thyroid Function and Its Safety in Adults With Graves' Disease Ages 18 to 75 Years Old
Graves' Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Study to Determine if BHV-1300 is Safe in Adults With Graves' Disease
Graves' Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of Efgartigimod PH20 SC PFS in Adult Participants With Graves' Disease.
Graves Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maria Ugalde-Diez, M.D., Ph.D. study director
12 de Octubre Hospital, Madrid
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Orbital decompression with ultrasonic bone removal in people with Exophthalmos and Orbitopathy, Graves, run by Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Orbital decompression in exophthalmos in treatment of thyroid-related orbitopahty (time frame: 33 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04025034, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2019.