AzTrials
AzTrials

Outpatient SurgeryANESTHADOMNCT04028622

Validation of Telemedicine Pre-anesthesia Consultation in Low-risk Anesthetic Patients Undergoing Ambulatory Surgery

A study testing TCAD (telemedicine anesthesia consultation) in people with Outpatient Surgery and Telemedicine, run by University Hospital, Grenoble.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to validate the teleconsultation of anesthesia in anesthetic low risk patients and undergoing outpatient surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Outpatient Surgery, Telemedicine
What is being tested?
TCAD (telemedicine anesthesia consultation)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Mar 2020to May 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients scheduled for ambulatory surgery with anesthesia procedures
  • Patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists score 1 or 2.
  • Patients with visual and auditory acuity, language proficiency.
  • Non-urgent surgery
  • Affiliation to the French Social Security

Who cannot join

  • patient with American Society of Anesthesiologists score 2 and complex treatments
  • Complex surgical procedure
  • Patient taking anticoagulant and / or antiplatelet treatments
  • Patient having a serious problem during a previous surgery
  • Pregnant woman
  • Patient under guardianship or deprivation of liberty by judicial decision.

About this study

The purpose of this study is to validate the teleconsultation of anesthesia in anesthetic low risk patients and undergoing outpatient surgery.

Read the detailed description

Anesthesia consultation is a necessary and obligatory step in the process of anesthesia. Telemedicine anesthesia consultation (TCAD) experiments have been successfully conducted in the United States, demonstrating the technical feasibility and medical relevance of the approach. In partnership with the Rhône-Alpes Regional Health Agency, an Telemedicine anesthesia consultation will be set up at the University Hospital Grenoble for low-risk anesthetic and surgical patients via a telemedicine platform accessible to patients' homes. Avoiding transport, unclog consultations in hospitals, and avoiding absences from work for traditional consultations are some of the advantages of this new method of consultation. This project involves assessing the feasibility, safety, and costs associated with home anesthesia teleconsultation for patients requiring outpatient surgery.

Being tested
TCAD (telemedicine anesthesia consultation)
Keywords
ambulatory, anesthesia, consultation, telemedicine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TCAD (telemedicine anesthesia consultation)Other

    Patients in the TCAD (telemedicine anesthesia consultation) group, arrange their bookings on a website and realise their anesthesia consultation from a platform from home

Study groups in NCT04028622
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TCAD (telemedicine anesthesia consultation)ExperimentalPatients having a telemedicine anesthesia consultation
Receives: Other: TCAD (telemedicine anesthesia consultation)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Validation of anesthesia teleconsultation in low-risk anesthetic patients undergoing outpatient surgery

    Patients rate with performed surgery following a successful telemedicine anesthesia consultation without cancellation or postponement of surgery

    Measured: 24 hours post surgery

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Anesthesia teleconsultation failure rate for technical reasons

    Rate of patients who did not benefit from anesthesia teleconsultation for technical reasons

    Measured: up to 1 hour post anesthesia teleconsultation outset

  2. Cancellation or postponement surgery rate

    Patients rate

    Measured: 24 hours post surgery

  3. Patient rate, seen in teleconsultation, secondarily oriented towards a conventional consultation

    Patients rate

    Measured: 24 hours post surgery

  4. Extension of the ambulatory stay rate

    Patients rate

    Measured: 24 hours post surgery

  5. Readmitted patients rate

    Rate of readmitted patients related with surgery and assigned to the teleconsultation

    Measured: 24 hours post surgery

  6. Patient satisfaction with anesthesia teleconsultation

    Global satisfaction level (regarding the sound and picture quality, respect of confidentiality and privacy, recommend or choose teleconsultation for the next anesthesia consultation) using Numerical Rating Scale from 0 to 10, 0 : extremely unsatisfied, 10= extremely satisfied.

    Measured: at 7 days post hospital discharge

  7. Physician satisfaction with anesthesia teleconsultation

    Global satisfaction level (regarding the sound and picture quality, respect of confidentiality and privacy, clinical observations collection quality, recommend teleconsultation for the next anesthesia consultation) using Numerical Rating Scale from 0 to 10, 0 : extremely unsatisfied, 10= extremely satisfied.

    Measured: up to 1 hour post anesthesia teleconsultation outset

  8. Cost of transportation from home to hospital

    Cost ( euros)

    Measured: at 7 days post hospital discharge

  9. Rate of transportation carbon footprint saved using anesthesia teleconsultation

    co2 equivalent

    Measured: at 7 days post hospital discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jul 2019
  2. Study startMar 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMay 2021 (estimated)

Why it stopped: The insufficient development of connection networks limit the teleconsultation deployment in the Grenoble metropolitan area

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04028622
Sponsor's protocol ID
38RC17.217
Acronym
ANESTHADOM
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
18 Mar 2019
Last updated
31 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Applegate RL 2nd, Gildea B, Patchin R, Rook JL, Wolford B, Nyirady J, Dawes TA, Faltys J, Ramsingh DS, Stier G. Telemedicine pre-anesthesia evaluation: a randomized pilot trial. Telemed J E Health. 2013 Mar;19(3):211-6. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0132. Epub 2013 Feb 5.

    PubMed 23384334
  • Charles BL. Telemedicine can lower costs and improve access. Healthc Financ Manage. 2000 Apr;54(4):66-9.

    PubMed 10915354
  • Dilisio RP, Dilisio AJ, Weiner MM. Preoperative virtual screening examination of the airway. J Clin Anesth. 2014 Jun;26(4):315-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.12.010. Epub 2014 Jun 8.

    PubMed 24916897
  • Galvez JA, Rehman MA. Telemedicine in anesthesia: an update. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Aug;24(4):459-62. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328348717b.

    PubMed 21659874
  • Huston JL, Burton DC. Patient satisfaction with multispecialty interactive teleconsultations. J Telemed Telecare. 1997;3(4):205-8. doi: 10.1258/1357633971931174.

    PubMed 9614735
  • Wade VA, Karnon J, Elshaug AG, Hiller JE. A systematic review of economic analyses of telehealth services using real time video communication. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 10;10:233. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-233.

    PubMed 20696073
  • Wong DT, Kamming D, Salenieks ME, Go K, Kohm C, Chung F. Preadmission anesthesia consultation using telemedicine technology: a pilot study. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jun;100(6):1605-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00038. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15166585

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing TCAD (telemedicine anesthesia consultation) in people with Outpatient Surgery and Telemedicine, run by University Hospital, Grenoble.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Validation of anesthesia teleconsultation in low-risk anesthetic patients undergoing outpatient surgery (time frame: 24 hours post surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04028622, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in