AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostate CancerNCT04029714

Prostate Cancer Active Surveillance Trigger Trial (PCASTT-UK): Comparing Current Practice for Men With Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance (AS) to an AS Protocol With Standardised Triggers for Transitioning to Curative Treatment

A study testing Active Surveillance in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust at 5 sites in United Kingdom.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A large proportion of men with prostate cancer are overdiagnosed and overtreated mainly due to PSA testing. Active surveillance (AS) aims to reduce these harms by recommending curative treatment only when and if signs of tumour progression occur. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostate Cancer
What is being tested?
Active Surveillance
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
195 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
19 Sep 2019to Dec 2033
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Recently (within 12 months) diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the prostate
  • Tumour stage ≤ T2a, NX, M0 (former MX)
  • PSA <15ng/ml, PSA density ≤ 0.2 ng/ml/cm3
  • Gleason pattern 3+3=6 (any number of cores, any cancer involvement) or Gleason pattern 3+4=7 (<3 cores (or ≤30 % of cores if more than ten cores), <10 mm cancer in one core)
  • Life expectancy >10 years with no upper age limit*
  • Candidate for curative treatment if progression occurs
  • Signed written informed consent.
  • There is no upper age limit; however the estimated remaining lifetime for the patient should be more than ten years. The potential life expectancy of the participants should be estimated based on age, co-morbidity and risk factors for death, such as frailty and smoking.

Who cannot join

  • Not eligible for AS according to above criteria
  • Not competent in spoken or written English

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United Kingdom5 sites
  • Bedford Hospital

    Bedford

  • Epsom & St. Helier

    London

  • Guy's Hospital

    London

  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital

    London

  • Royal Mardsen Hospital

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Multicentre Randomised Active Surveillance (AS) Trial of Current Practice Versus Standardised Triggers for Curative Treatment of Prostate Cancer

A large proportion of men with prostate cancer are overdiagnosed and overtreated mainly due to PSA testing. Active surveillance (AS) aims to reduce these harms by recommending curative treatment only when and if signs of tumour progression occur. There are however a number of uncertainties in AS, the most important being when to initiate treatment.

Therefore, the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group (SPCG) are running a large multi-centre randomised control trial (RCT) to test the safety of a standardized active surveillance protocol with specific triggers for repeat biopsies and initiation of curative treatment, compared to the current practice for active surveillance. They are recruiting in multiple sites in Sweden, Denmark and Finland. The primary aim is to reduce overtreatment and subsequent side effects, without increasing the risk of disease progression or prostate cancer mortality.

In the UK, there is also no set criteria for when to re-biopsy and/or initiate curative treatment for patients on AS and tends to be at the clinician's discretion. Thus, PCASTT-UK has been established to run as a parallel RCT and add to the findings from SPCG-17.

Read the detailed description

STUDY HYPOTHESIS The aim of this trial is to test the safety of an Active Surveillance protocol comparing current practice to standardized triggers for initiation of curative treatment, based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging or biopsy pathology. The study hypothesis is that standardized triggers will reduce overtreatment without increasing disease progression and prostate cancer mortality.

STUDY DESIGN Randomized multi-centre open-label clinical trial.

INTERVENTIONS Patients within 12 months of a diagnosis of prostate cancer will be approached and consented to the study. Computerised randomisation (1:1) will assign participants to either the control (Arm 1) or intervention arm (Arm 2). In the control arm, patients will be treated according to active surveillance protocol at the trial centre; in the intervention arm patients will follow standardised active surveillance protocol applying specific criteria for repeat biopsies and the initiation of curative treatment. Patients are stratified by centre and Gleason score.

FOLLOW UP In both arms, patients will followed up for 10 years with the following schedule: a PSA test every 6 months, clinical examination (with PSA test) and Quality of Life (QoL) questionnaire annually, and MRI every second year. Re-biopsy and/or initiation of curative treatment depends on the trial arm patients are randomised to.

Repeat biopsies

Arm 1 (control arm): according to current practice (urologists' judgement)

Arm 2 (intervention arm): standardised triggers

  • A systematic repeat biopsy if PSA density increases to > 0.2 ng/ml/cc, and then at every 0.1 ng/ml/cc increase
  • MRI progression in men with previously only Gleason grade 3+3: 5 mm or more increase in size in any dimension of a measurable lesion, increase in PI-RADS score to 3-5, a new lesion with PI-RADS score 3-5, or high or very high suspicion of extra-capsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion
  • MRI progression in men with Gleason grade 3+4: 5 mm or more increase in size in any dimension of a measurable lesion, or a new lesion with PI-RADS score 3-5

Curative treatment

Arm 1 (control arm): According to current practice (urologists judgement)

Arm 2 (intervention arm): standardised triggers

  • MRI progression in lesions with confirmed Gleason grade 4: increase in PI-RADS score to 4 or 5, or high or very high suspicion of extra-capsular extension or seminal vesicle invasion
  • Pathological progression: Gleason pattern 5, primary Gleason pattern 4 in any core with 5 mm or more cancer, Gleason 3+4 in 3 or more cores or 30% if more than 10 cores are taken, or Gleason 3+4 in 10 mm or more cancer

Patients will remain on trial unless they end Active Surveillance due to initiation of treatment, development of metastases, transition to watchful waiting, or death of any cause. After the initiation of curative treatment, watchful waiting, or palliative treatment for cancer progression, the patient is treated according to the standard protocol of the participating centre.

Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Being tested
Active Surveillance
Keywords
Prostate Cancer, Active Surveillance, MRI, standardised treatment triggers, randomized
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Active SurveillanceProcedure or surgery

    Active monitoring of prostate cancer and curative treatment if there are signs of tumor progression.

Study groups in NCT04029714
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1: Current practice for active surveillanceActive comparatorIn this arm, patients are monitored according to current practice for active surveillance at the trial centre. Repeat biopsies (and/or other examinations) and initiation of curative treatment are performed according to the urologist's judgement.
Receives: Procedure: Active Surveillance
Arm 2: Standardized triggers for treatmentExperimentalIn this arm, patients are monitored according to a standardized active surveillance protocol with specific triggers for treatment. Repeat biopsies and curative treatment are only initiated if/when specific criteria are fulfilled.
Receives: Procedure: Active Surveillance

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-free survival

    Progression-free survival is defined as cumulative incidence of PSA relapse following curative treatment and cumulative incidence of androgen therapy in untreated men. Following radical prostatectomy, biochemical recurrence is defined by two consecutively rising PSA values >0.2 ng/ml. After radiotherapy (RT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy, the definition of PSA failure is any rise by 2 ng/ml or more above the nadir PSA value, regardless of the serum concentration of the nadir.

    Measured: Median 10 years follow-up

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Cumulative incidence of pT3 at radical prostatectomy specimens

    Occurrence of confirmed pT3 in radical prostatectomy specimens according to the pathology report

    Measured: Median 10 years follow-up

  2. Cumulative incidence of metastases

    Occurrence of distant metastasis (suspected or confirmed) during follow-up

    Measured: Median 10 years follow-up

  3. Cumulative number of treatments with curative intent (mainly radical prostatectomies or local radiotherapy)

    Occurrence of radical prostatectomies or local radiotherapy (with or without adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy)

    Measured: Median 10 years follow-up

  4. Cumulative incidence of switch to watchful waiting

    Occurrence of conversions from active surveillance to watchful waiting during follow-up

    Measured: Median 10 years follow-up

  5. Quality of life assessed by EPIC-26 score, incontinence, erectile dysfunction, self-reported quality of life: questionnaires

    Assessed by questionnaires at baseline and every second year.

    Quality-of-life data will be presented as proportions with symptoms and relative risks. Outcome variables will be dichotomized using predetermined cut-off values.

    The following parameters will be included in the analysis:

    • EPIC-26 score
    • Incontinence
    • Erectile dysfunction
    • Self-reported quality of life (rated on a scale of 1-7)

    Measured: Median 10 years follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jul 2019
  2. Study start19 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completionDec 2033 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2033 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
195 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04029714
Sponsor's protocol ID
228445
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
16 Jul 2019
Last updated
23 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Active Surveillance in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust at 5 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-free survival (time frame: Median 10 years follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in