Cutaneous UlcerMG-1NCT04030832
Reconstruction of Skin Substance Loss With "Micro-grafts" Obtained by Mechanical Disintegration
An observational study of Cutaneous Ulcer and Trauma Injury, run by Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti at 4 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
The etiology of non-healing ulcers depends on both systemic and local factors. The introduction of advanced dressing, negative wound therapy and compression therapy have undoubtedly improved clinical outcomes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cutaneous Ulcer, Trauma Injury
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2017to 30 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who attend the various regional hospitals through the emergency room or surgical clinic
Who may be able to join
- Full-thickness skin loss from a minimum size of 3x3 cm (9cm2) to a maximum size of 5x5 cm (25cm2);
- Loss of substance caused by abrasive-contusive traumas (loss of full-thickness skin substance) or by thermal burn (deep degree II), present for at least 15 days;
- Absence of clinical signs of infection assessed by two culture swabs performed at T0 (pre and post debridement);
- Pre-operative inflammatory index (VES, PCR) and b-hcg negative;
- Absence of exposure of osteo-cartilaginous structures, of noble structures (major arterial vessels, major nerve trunks, tendons without paratenon);
- Specific written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Smoking patients (≥ 10 cigarettes / day);
- Patients with type I or type II diabetes mellitus:
- Patients suffering vascular trophic ulcers;
- Patients with loss of substance at the level of the fingers and toes;
- Patients with loss of substance of the foot and the yarrow region;
- Patients with oncological pathologies in progress or in remission;
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients in therapy with immunosuppressive and corticosteroid drugs, anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents;
- Patients with autoimmune diseases including connectivitis;
- Patients with congenital, acquired and metabolic immunodeficiencies;
- Pregnant patients (ascertained with β-HCG) and breastfeeding.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
Italy4 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti
Ancona, AN, 60126
IRCCS Policlinico San Donato
Milan, MI
Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza"
Roma
Università degli Studi di Udine
Udine, UD
About this study
Official title: Reconstruction of Skin Substance Loss With Method of "Micro-grafts" Obtained by Mechanical Disintegration: Preliminary Study
The etiology of non-healing ulcers depends on both systemic and local factors. The introduction of advanced dressing, negative wound therapy and compression therapy have undoubtedly improved clinical outcomes. The principal aim of study was to demonstrate the efficacy of skin micrografts in the treatment of skin substance loss.
Read the detailed description
The principal aim of study was to evaluate the efficacy of skin micro-grafts obtained with the system of mechanical disintegration in the reconstruction of skin substance loss in the limbs.
The primary endpoint consists in evaluating, through a specific evaluation scale, the Wound Bed Score (WBS) for skin substance loss at Time 0 (T0) and 30 days after the procedure (T30) and to evaluate the increase of this score in this time frame set at 50%. The evaluation will be carried out in double blind.
The secondary endpoints instead consist in the evaluation of the Wound Surface Area Assessment to be carried out at T0 and T30.
In the evaluation of the quality of the resulting scars, through the Vancouver Scale (VS), 90 (T90) and 180 days (T180) after treatment and to evaluate the reduction of this score by 15%; on the other in the evaluation of the progress of the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) administered to the patient at T0, 30, 90, 180.
The purpose of this minimally invasive treatment is to improve the quality of life of those affected by these injuries, avoiding the use of prolonged advanced medications and / or more invasive surgical procedures, thus speeding up healing and favoring the clinical outcome of patients.
No chemical reagents or enzymes are used for the method. There is therefore no tissue manipulation, in full compliance with the European directive 23/2004.
- Conditions
- Cutaneous Ulcer, Trauma Injury
- Medical subject headings
- Skin Ulcer, Accidental Injuries
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Wound Bed Score values
Percentage of patients with change of the Wound Bed Score values higher than 50%, after 30 days,
Measured: change of baseline wound bed score values at day 30
Secondary outcomes (2)
Spontaneous re-epithelialization.
Percentage of patients with spontaneous re-epithelialization of the total wound surface, after 30 days, as assessed by Wound Surface Area Assessment
Measured: Day 0 and Day 30
Vancouver scale
Percentage of patients with change of Vancouver scale values higher than 15%
Measured: Day 30, Day 90 and Day 180
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Jul 2019
- Study start1 Oct 2017
- Primary completion1 Oct 2018
- Study completion30 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cutaneous UlcerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Michele Riccio, Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04030832
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MICROINNESTI-1
- Acronym
- MG-1
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 24 Jul 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Greaves NS, Ashcroft KJ, Baguneid M, Bayat A. Current understanding of molecular and cellular mechanisms in fibroplasia and angiogenesis during acute wound healing. J Dermatol Sci. 2013 Dec;72(3):206-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
PubMed 23958517Trovato L, Monti M, Del Fante C, Cervio M, Lampinen M, Ambrosio L, Redi CA, Perotti C, Kankuri E, Ambrosio G, Rodriguez Y Baena R, Pirozzi G, Graziano A. A New Medical Device Rigeneracons Allows to Obtain Viable Micro-Grafts From Mechanical Disaggregation of Human Tissues. J Cell Physiol. 2015 Oct;230(10):2299-303. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24973.
PubMed 25728337Marcarelli M, Trovato L, Novarese E, Riccio M, Graziano A. Rigenera protocol in the treatment of surgical wound dehiscence. Int Wound J. 2017 Feb;14(1):277-281. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12601. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
PubMed 27126653Baglioni E, Trovato L, Marcarelli M, Frenello A, Bocchiotti MA. Treatment of Oncological Post-surgical Wound Dehiscence with Autologous Skin Micrografts. Anticancer Res. 2016 Mar;36(3):975-9.
PubMed 26976986Svolacchia F, De Francesco F, Trovato L, Graziano A, Ferraro GA. An innovative regenerative treatment of scars with dermal micrografts. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016 Sep;15(3):245-53. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12212. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
PubMed 26825041De Francesco F, Graziano A, Trovato L, Ceccarelli G, Romano M, Marcarelli M, Cusella De Angelis GM, Cillo U, Riccio M, Ferraro GA. A Regenerative Approach with Dermal Micrografts in the Treatment of Chronic Ulcers. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2017 Feb;13(1):139-148. doi: 10.1007/s12015-016-9692-2.
PubMed 27738884Falanga V, Saap LJ, Ozonoff A. Wound bed score and its correlation with healing of chronic wounds. Dermatol Ther. 2006 Nov-Dec;19(6):383-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2006.00096.x.
PubMed 17199681Qi X, Ding L, Huang W, Wen B, Guo X, Zhang J. An improved automated type-based method for area assessment of wound surface. Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Jan;25(1):150-158. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12495. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
PubMed 27859908Baryza MJ, Baryza GA. The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995 Sep-Oct;16(5):535-8. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199509000-00013.
PubMed 8537427Jimi S, Kimura M, De Francesco F, Riccio M, Hara S, Ohjimi H. Acceleration Mechanisms of Skin Wound Healing by Autologous Micrograft in Mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Aug 2;18(8):1675. doi: 10.3390/ijms18081675.
PubMed 28767054
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jul 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Reconstruction of Skin Substance Loss With Method of "Micro-grafts" Obtained by Mechanical Disintegration: Preliminary Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04030832
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MG-1 / MICROINNESTI-1
- Conditions
- Cutaneous Ulcer, Trauma Injury
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Ospedali RiunitiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The etiology of non-healing ulcers depends on both systemic and local factors. The introduction of advanced dressing, negative wound therapy and compression therapy have undoubtedly improved clinical outcomes. The principal aim of study was to demonstrate the efficacy of skin micrografts in the treatment of skin substance loss.
Detailed description
The principal aim of study was to evaluate the efficacy of skin micro-grafts obtained with the system of mechanical disintegration in the reconstruction of skin substance loss in the limbs.
The primary endpoint consists in evaluating, through a specific evaluation scale, the Wound Bed Score (WBS) for skin substance loss at Time 0 (T0) and 30 days after the procedure (T30) and to evaluate the increase of this score in this time frame set at 50%. The evaluation will be carried out in double blind.
The secondary endpoints instead consist in the evaluation of the Wound Surface Area Assessment to be carried out at T0 and T30.
In the evaluation of the quality of the resulting scars, through the Vancouver Scale (VS), 90 (T90) and 180 days (T180) after treatment and to evaluate the reduction of this score by 15%; on the other in the evaluation of the progress of the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) administered to the patient at T0, 30, 90, 180.
The purpose of this minimally invasive treatment is to improve the quality of life of those affected by these injuries, avoiding the use of prolonged advanced medications and / or more invasive surgical procedures, thus speeding up healing and favoring the clinical outcome of patients.
No chemical reagents or enzymes are used for the method. There is therefore no tissue manipulation, in full compliance with the European directive 23/2004.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who attend the various regional hospitals through the emergency room or surgical clinic
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Full-thickness skin loss from a minimum size of 3x3 cm (9cm2) to a maximum size of 5x5 cm (25cm2);
- Loss of substance caused by abrasive-contusive traumas (loss of full-thickness skin substance) or by thermal burn (deep degree II), present for at least 15 days;
- Absence of clinical signs of infection assessed by two culture swabs performed at T0 (pre and post debridement);
- Pre-operative inflammatory index (VES, PCR) and b-hcg negative;
- Absence of exposure of osteo-cartilaginous structures, of noble structures (major arterial vessels, major nerve trunks, tendons without paratenon);
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Smoking patients (≥ 10 cigarettes / day);
- Patients with type I or type II diabetes mellitus:
- Patients suffering vascular trophic ulcers;
- Patients with loss of substance at the level of the fingers and toes;
- Patients with loss of substance of the foot and the yarrow region;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Wound Bed Score values
Time frame: change of baseline wound bed score values at day 30
Percentage of patients with change of the Wound Bed Score values higher than 50%, after 30 days,
2 secondary outcomes
Spontaneous re-epithelialization.
Time frame: Day 0 and Day 30
Vancouver scale
Time frame: Day 30, Day 90 and Day 180
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jul 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 23958517Greaves NS, Ashcroft KJ, Baguneid M, Bayat A. Current understanding of molecular and cellular mechanisms in fibroplasia and angiogenesis during acute wound healing. J Dermatol Sci. 2013 Dec;72(3):206-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.07.008. Epub 2013 Jul 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 25728337Trovato L, Monti M, Del Fante C, Cervio M, Lampinen M, Ambrosio L, Redi CA, Perotti C, Kankuri E, Ambrosio G, Rodriguez Y Baena R, Pirozzi G, Graziano A. A New Medical Device Rigeneracons Allows to Obtain Viable Micro-Grafts From Mechanical Disaggregation of Human Tissues. J Cell Physiol. 2015 Oct;230(10):2299-303. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24973.
- Results publication: PubMed 27126653Marcarelli M, Trovato L, Novarese E, Riccio M, Graziano A. Rigenera protocol in the treatment of surgical wound dehiscence. Int Wound J. 2017 Feb;14(1):277-281. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12601. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 26976986Baglioni E, Trovato L, Marcarelli M, Frenello A, Bocchiotti MA. Treatment of Oncological Post-surgical Wound Dehiscence with Autologous Skin Micrografts. Anticancer Res. 2016 Mar;36(3):975-9.
- Results publication: PubMed 26825041Svolacchia F, De Francesco F, Trovato L, Graziano A, Ferraro GA. An innovative regenerative treatment of scars with dermal micrografts. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016 Sep;15(3):245-53. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12212. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 27738884De Francesco F, Graziano A, Trovato L, Ceccarelli G, Romano M, Marcarelli M, Cusella De Angelis GM, Cillo U, Riccio M, Ferraro GA. A Regenerative Approach with Dermal Micrografts in the Treatment of Chronic Ulcers. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2017 Feb;13(1):139-148. doi: 10.1007/s12015-016-9692-2.
- Results publication: PubMed 17199681Falanga V, Saap LJ, Ozonoff A. Wound bed score and its correlation with healing of chronic wounds. Dermatol Ther. 2006 Nov-Dec;19(6):383-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2006.00096.x.
- Results publication: PubMed 27859908Qi X, Ding L, Huang W, Wen B, Guo X, Zhang J. An improved automated type-based method for area assessment of wound surface. Wound Repair Regen. 2017 Jan;25(1):150-158. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12495. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
- Results publication: PubMed 8537427Baryza MJ, Baryza GA. The Vancouver Scar Scale: an administration tool and its interrater reliability. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1995 Sep-Oct;16(5):535-8. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199509000-00013.
- Results publication: PubMed 28767054Jimi S, Kimura M, De Francesco F, Riccio M, Hara S, Ohjimi H. Acceleration Mechanisms of Skin Wound Healing by Autologous Micrograft in Mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 Aug 2;18(8):1675. doi: 10.3390/ijms18081675.
Related trials for Cutaneous Ulcer
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Active, not recruiting
Wearable Insoles for Recurrent Diabetic Ulcer Prevention
Diabetes, Peripheral Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Personalized Nutritional Intervention on Wound Healing of Cutaneous Ulcers in Diabetics
Foot, Diabetic
Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of ZKARE® Gel and Its Accessory ZKAPI® in the Treatment of Chronic Ulcers.
Chronic Ulcers
Active, not recruiting
EDX110 Randomized Control Trial for Treatment of DFUs
Wound Heal, Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cutaneous Ulcer and Trauma Injury, run by Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti at 4 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Wound Bed Score values (time frame: change of baseline wound bed score values at day 30). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04030832, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2019.