AzTrials
AzTrials

AgingHEXNCT04034888

Home Exercise Program for Homebound Older Adults

A study testing HEX in people with Aging, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Exercise can be beneficial for older adults by promoting health, delaying or reversing functional decline, reducing chronic disease risk, decreasing falls, increasing strength and stamina, improving ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL), and improving overall quality of life (QOL). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aging
What is being tested?
HEX
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
19 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2020to 30 May 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Veteran enrolled in the Veterans Administration Medical Health Care System's Home- Based Primary Care Program
  • Aged 65 years or older

Who cannot join

  • Paraplegia
  • Life expectancy of less than 12 months
  • Currently engaged in a physical therapy program
  • Any medical condition(s) or contraindications precluding patient participation in the study as per medical judgement of study team

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Maryland

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21201

Other trials in United States

About this study

Exercise can be beneficial for older adults by promoting health, delaying or reversing functional decline, reducing chronic disease risk, decreasing falls, increasing strength and stamina, improving ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL), and improving overall quality of life (QOL). Developing and implementing exercise programs for homebound older adults for whom traveling to routine clinic-based appointments may not be feasible or safe becomes critical. Homebound, older adults are at increased risk for recurrent hospitalization, use of emergency care, nursing home placement, and death. Indeed, one study shows patients had significantly higher risk of being admitted into a hospital or nursing home, higher mortality, and higher health care expenditures compared to those in a comparison group. The purpose of this pilot is to develop and implement a pragmatic and feasible intervention to improve physical functioning in older homebound adults with chronic mobility disability. Unfortunately, little is known about the feasibility and utility of pragmatic home-based exercise rehabilitation in older adults with severe mobility limitations.

The investigators propose to develop and implement an intervention targeting functional limitations in this population with mobility disability. Our overall goals are to maintain and restore physical functioning and QOL for older, homebound adults. This research carries direct benefits for these patients as even modest improvements in disabled older adults may translate into significantly better QOL, reduce disability, minimize or reverse gradual declines related to serious chronic disease, resort functional independence, and increase community living capacity. Thus, the specified objectives of finalizing and implementing a sustainable home-based exercise program have practical implications for disabled older adults. Were homebound patients even slightly higher in terms of functional capacity, it could provide a partial degree of functional independence, impacting QOL for both patients and caregivers.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to develop and implement a pragmatic and feasible intervention to improve physical functioning in older homebound adults with chronic mobility disability. Unfortunately, little is known about the feasibility and utility of pragmatic home-based exercise rehabilitation in older adults with severe mobility limitations.

The Specific Aims and Hypotheses of this proposal are:

Specific Aim #1: Using human-centered design methodologies, work with providers and patients to develop a feasible multi-component home exercise program targeting mobility, strength, and performance of task-oriented ADLs. Feasibility will be determined by assessing adherence and retention to the developed exercise program.

Hypothesis 1: The investigators hypothesize that a task-based exercise intervention can be feasibly delivered in the homes of homebound, older adults.

Specific Aim #2: Perform a feasibility study to better assess feasibility and determine the effect(s) of the home-based intervention created in Aim 1 on functional outcomes (primary outcome SPPB), mobility, and QOL changes in homebound older adults with mobility disability.

Hypothesis 2: The investigators hypothesize that the developed 12-week multi-component exercise intervention will improve performance of basic ADLs, functional mobility, and QOL; as well as outcomes related to patient satisfaction, emergency department visits, and hospitalization.

Conditions
Aging
Being tested
HEX

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HEXBehavioural

    HEX is a customized exercise program with components including: 1) controlled flexibility movements; 2) progressive ADL training focusing on bed mobility, bed to chair transfers, and indoor walking; 3) task-specific seated resistance training to improve ability to get out of bed and; 4) and balance exercises. Participants will be expected to perform their HEX program at least 2 times/week in their home and all individualized exercise sessions will be supervised by an Exercise Physiologist. Each exercise has four levels of difficulty, which will be progressed as tolerated throughout the 12-weeks. Seated resistance exercises were designed to target all the major muscle groups and will include the following: arm curls, shoulder raises (lateral/front), overhead arm raise, wrist curls, leg extensions, hip flexion, hip ab/adduction, sit-to-stands, torso rotation, and marching.

Study groups in NCT04034888
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Home Exercise Program (HEX)ExperimentalCustomized home exercise program
Receives: Behavioral: HEX

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Short Physical Performance Battery

    captures domains of strength, endurance, and balance and is highly predictive of disability. The SPPB score is based on timed measures of standing balance, walking speed, and ability to rise from a chair.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in 30-second sit-to-stand test

    determines lower extremity strength and endurance in older adults. The number of sit-to-stands is recorded.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12-weeks

  2. Change in 30-second arm curl test

    determines upper extremity strength and endurance in older adults. The number of arm curls is recorded.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12-weeks

  3. Change in Grip Strength

    This is a surrogate marker for sarcopenia and will be measured with a hand dynamometer. The arm to be tested held by the participant's side and elbow at a 90° angle. The participant squeezes the hand as hard as possible for few seconds. The best out of two trials separated by 60 seconds will be used.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

  4. Change in Lower Extremity Strength

    will be measured with a wireless digital handheld manual muscle dynamometer during leg extension. To evaluate the knee extensor muscles, the dynamometer will be placed on the anterior part of the lower leg. Participants will perform 3 isometric maximal voluntary contractions of 5 seconds with a 60-second recovery period between contractions.

    Measured: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jul 2019
  2. Study start1 Feb 2020
  3. Primary completion30 May 2024
  4. Study completion30 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
19 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04034888
Sponsor's protocol ID
UMaryland
Acronym
HEX
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
16 Jul 2019
Last updated
4 Dec 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No individual participant data will be shared with other researchers outside of our study team.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing HEX in people with Aging, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Short Physical Performance Battery (time frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in