Multiple MyelomaLocoMMotionNCT04035226
A Study of Real-life Current Standards of Care in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Received at Least 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Including Proteasome Inhibitor (PI), Immunomodulatory Drug (IMID), and Cluster of Differentiation 38 (CD38) Monoclonal Antibody Treatment
An observational study of Multiple Myeloma, run by Janssen-Cilag Ltd. at 75 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and clinical response including overall response rate (ORR) of real-life standard-of-care (SOC) treatments under routine clinical practice, over a 24-month period, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- How many people
- 254 participants
- Where
- 75 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 2 Aug 2019to 27 Oct 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving antimyeloma treatment as standard of care (SOC) under routine clinical practice will be observed. The main source of data collection will be medical records of each patient.
Who may be able to join
- Have a documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma according to International myeloma working group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria
- Received at least 3 prior lines of therapy or are double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory agent (IMID) (induction with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplant and with or without maintenance therapy is considered a single regimen). Patients will have undergone at least 1 complete cycle of treatment for each regimen (unless progressive disease was the best response)
- Must have documented evidence of progressive disease based on study physician's determination of response by the IMWG response criteria on or after the last regimen. Patients with documented evidence of progressive disease within the previous 6 months and who are refractory or nonresponsive to their most recent line of treatment afterwards are also eligible
- Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status grade of 0 or 1
- Must not be pregnant or must not plan to become pregnant within the study period
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
75 sites in 10 countries.
75 sites in 10 countries
Italy16 sites
U.O. Ematologia con Trapianto- AOU Policlinico di Bari
Bari, 70124
U.O. Ematologia Istituto Tumori Giovanni Paolo II
Bari, 70124
Istituto di Ematologia Seràgnoli azienda ospedaliera univeristaria Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna, 40138
Policlinico di Catania
Catania, 95128
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi
Florence, 50134
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera San Martino - IST
Genova, 16132
Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori
Meldola, 47014
Universita degli Studi di Padova Azienda Ospedaliera di Pa
Padova, 35128
Ospedale Villa Sofia-Cervello
Palermo, 90146
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, 27100
Irccs Crob
Rionero in Vulture, 85028
Università di Roma La Sapienza
Roma, 00161
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS
Roma, 00168
IRCCS Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza
San Giovanni Rotondo, 71013
Ospedale Cardinale G. Panico
Tricase, 73039
A.O.U. Citta della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Presidio Molinette
Turin, 10126
Spain13 sites
Inst. Cat. Doncologia-H Duran I Reynals
Barcelona, 08908
Hosp. Puerta Del Mar
Cadiz, 11009
Hosp. de Jerez de La Frontera
Jerez de la Frontera, 11407
Hosp. de Leon
León, 24008
Hosp. Univ. Ramon Y Cajal
Madrid, 28034
Hosp. Univ. 12 de Octubre
Madrid, 28041
Hosp. Univ. Son Espases
Palma, 7120
Clinica Univ. de Navarra
Pamplona, 31008
Hosp Clinico Univ de Salamanca
Salamanca, 37007
Hosp. Univ. Marques de Valdecilla
Santander, 39008
Hosp. Mutua Terrassa
Terrassa, 08221
Hosp. Univ. Dr. Peset
Valencia, 46017
Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Valladolid
Valladolid, 47003
United States12 sites
Central Care Cancer Center
Bolivar, Missouri, 65613
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
The Cancer Institute at St. Francis Hospital
East Hills, New York, 11548
North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates, P.C.
East Setauket, New York, 11733
Hunterdon Hematology Oncology
Flemington, New Jersey, 08822
Oncology Institute of Hope and Innovation
Glendale, California, 91204
Marin Cancer Center
Greenbrae, California, 94904
Optum Care
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89102
Oncology Hematology Assoc of Central Illinois, P.C. d.b.a. Illinois CancerCare, P.C.
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
Providence Cancer Center
Southfield, Michigan, 48075
Washington University School Of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Asclepes Research
Weeki Wachee, Florida, 34607
France9 sites
Centre Hospitalier du Mans
Le Mans, 72000
Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille, Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille, 59000
CHU de Montpellier Hopital Saint Eloi
Montpellier, 34295
C.H.U. Hotel Dieu - France
Nantes, 44093
Hopital Saint Louis
Paris, 75475
Hopital Saint-Antoine
Paris, 75571
Centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
CHU Poitiers - Hopital la Miletrie
Poitiers, 86021
Pôle IUC Oncopole CHU
Toulouse, 31059
United Kingdom7 sites
Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
Birmingham, B9 5SS
Southmead Hospital
Bristol, BS10 5NB
Maidstone Hospital
Kent, ME16 9QQ
Kings College Hospital
London, SE5 9RS
St George's Hospital
London, SW17 OQT
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, NG5 1PB
The Royal Marsden NHS Trust Sutton
Surrey, SM2 5PT
Germany6 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Koelnt
Cologne, 50397
Universitätsklinik Hamburg-Eppendorf - Orthopädische Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik
Hamburg, 20251
Universitaetsklinikum Heidelberg
Heidelberg, 69120
Medizinische Klinik A
Münster, 48149
Klinikum der Eberhard Karls Universitaet Abt fur innere Med II Haematologie Onkologie Germany
Tübingen, 72076
Universitatsklinikum Wurzburg
Würzburg, 97080
Belgium4 sites
Grand Hopital de Charleroi, site Notre Dame
Charleroi, 6000
Universitair Ziekenhuis Antwerpen
Edegem, 2650
UZ Leuven
Leuven, 3000
Ucl de Mont-Godinne
Yvoir, 5530
Netherlands3 sites
VU Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
UMCG
Groningen, 9713 GZ
Erasmus MC - Satellite
Rotterdam, 3075 EA
Russia3 sites
S.P. Botkin Moscow City Clinical Hospital
Moscow, 125284
Clinical Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology
Saint Petersburg, 191024
Samara Region Clinical Hospital
Samara, 443095
Poland2 sites
Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 1 w Lublinie
Lublin, 20-081
Szpital Kliniczny im H Swiecickiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego im K Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
Poznan, 60 569
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Multinational Study of Real-life Current Standards of Care in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Received at Least 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Including PI, IMID, and CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Treatment
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and clinical response including overall response rate (ORR) of real-life standard-of-care (SOC) treatments under routine clinical practice, over a 24-month period, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- No intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
No interventionOther
No intervention will be administered as a part of this study.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Relapsed/refractory Multiple Myeloma | Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including Proteasome Inhibitor (PI), Immunomodulatory Drug (IMID), and Cluster of Differentiation 38 (CD38) Monoclonal Antibody treatment will be observed. Receives: Other: No intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
ORR is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve a partial response (PR) or better according to the international myeloma working group (IMWG) response criteria.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Secondary outcomes (16)
Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) Rate
VGPR rate is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve a VGPR or better according to IMWG response criteria.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Complete Response (CR) Rate
CR rate is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve a complete response (CR) or better according to IMWG response criteria.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Stringent Complete Response (sCR) Rate
sCR rate is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve a stringent complete response (sCR) according to IMWG response criteria.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Rate
Minimal residual disease (MRD) negative rate is defined as the percentage of patients with negative MRD status according to IMWG response criteria.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
CBR is defined as the percentage of patients with clinical benefit. CBR = ORR (sCR + CR + VGPR + PR) + minimal response (MR).
Measured: Up to 24 months
Duration of Response
Duration of response is defined as time from the date of initial documentation of a response (PR or better) to the date of first documented evidence of progressive disease (according to IMWG criteria).
Measured: Up to 24 months
Time to Response
Time to response is defined as the time between the date of Day 1 of Cycle 1 and the first clinical response evaluation that the patient has met all criteria for PR or better response.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Time to Next Treatment [TTNT]
Time to next treatment is defined as the time from diagnosis to the start of the next-line treatment.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the time from the date of Day 1 of Cycle 1 to the date of first documented disease progression (according to IMWG response criteria) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Time to Progression on the Next Line of Subsequent Antimyeloma Therapy or Death (PFS2)
PFS2 is defined as the time from the date of Day 1 of Cycle 1 to progression on the next line of subsequent antimyeloma therapy or death, whichever occurs first.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is the duration from the date of Day 1 of Cycle 1 to the date of the patient's death or study completion, whichever occurs first.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Change from Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3 includes 30 items in 5 functional scales, 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales, and 6 single symptom items. The responses are reported using a verbal rating scale. The item and scale scores are transformed to a 0 to 100 scale. A higher score represents greater health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), better functioning, and more (worse) symptoms.
Measured: Baseline up to 24 months
Change from Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-MY20 Scale Score
The EORTC QLQ-MY20 was designed to use alongside the EORTC QLQ-C30 to address issues of more relevance to myeloma patients. Four single items from the EORTC QLQ-MY20 will be performed to assess emotional health status (feel restless or agitated, thinking about your illness, worried about dying, worried about health in the future) on scale of 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much).
Measured: Baseline up to 24 months
Change from Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) using EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire Score
EuroQol Five Dimension (EQ-5D-5L) is a 5-item questionnaire that assesses 5 domains including mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression plus a visual analog scale rating "health today" with anchors ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state).
Measured: Baseline up to 24 months
Number of Patients with Adverse Events (AEs)
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Severity of Adverse Events as Assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
Severity of AEs has 5 grades based on CTCAE criteria: Grade 1: Mild; Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe; Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; Grade 5: Death related to adverse event.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jul 2019
- Study start2 Aug 2019
- Primary completion27 Oct 2022
- Study completion27 Oct 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 254 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen-Cilag Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Legend Biotech
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Janssen-Cilag Ltd. Clinical Trial, Study director, Janssen-Cilag Ltd.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04035226
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR108651
- Other IDs
- 68284528MMY4001
- Acronym
- LocoMMotion
- Status last verified
- Mar 2025
- First submitted
- 25 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 30 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Einsele H, Moreau P, Bahlis N, Bhutani M, Vincent L, Karlin L, Perrot A, Goldschmidt H, van de Donk NWCJ, Ocio EM, Martinez Lopez J, Rodriguez-Otero P, Dytfeld D, Jakubowiak A, Schinke C, Besemer B, Anguille S, Manier S, Rasche L, Teipel R, Scheid C, Pawlyn C, Cavo M, Diels J, Ghilotti F, Lau BW, Renaud T, Orel O, Ong F, Ramos DF, Ammann E, Parekh T, Albrecht C, Weisel K, Mateos MV. Comparative Efficacy of Talquetamab vs. Real-World Physician's Choice of Treatment in Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Analyses of MonumenTAL-1 vs. LocoMMotion/MoMMent. Adv Ther. 2026 Jan;43(1):333-355. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03409-y. Epub 2025 Nov 28.
PubMed 41313549Mateos MV, Weisel K, De Stefano V, Goldschmidt H, Delforge M, Mohty M, Dytfeld D, Angelucci E, Vincent L, Perrot A, Benjamin R, van de Donk NWCJ, Ocio EM, Roccia T, Schecter JM, Koskinen S, Haddad I, Strulev V, Mitchell L, Buyze J, Filho OC, Einsele H, Moreau P. LocoMMotion: a study of real-life current standards of care in triple-class exposed patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma - 2-year follow-up (final analysis). Leukemia. 2024 Dec;38(12):2554-2560. doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02404-6. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
PubMed 39322709Einsele H, Moreau P, Bahlis N, Bhutani M, Vincent L, Karlin L, Perrot A, Goldschmidt H, van de Donk NWCJ, Ocio EM, Martinez-Lopez J, Rodriguez-Otero P, Dytfeld D, Diels J, Strulev V, Haddad I, Renaud T, Ammann E, Cabrieto J, Perualila N, Gan R, Zhang Y, Parekh T, Albrecht C, Weisel K, Mateos MV. Comparative Efficacy of Talquetamab vs. Current Treatments in the LocoMMotion and MoMMent Studies in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Adv Ther. 2024 Apr;41(4):1576-1593. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02797-x. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
PubMed 38402374Mateos MV, Weisel K, Diels J, Arribas A, Tamayo M, Schecter JM, Roccia T, Haddad I, Pacaud L, Moreau P. Characterization and Outcomes of Spanish Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Included in the LocoMMotion Study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024 Apr;24(4):224-231.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.12.001. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
PubMed 38212206Moreau P, Mateos MV, Gonzalez Garcia ME, Einsele H, De Stefano V, Karlin L, Lindsey-Hill J, Besemer B, Vincent L, Kirkpatrick S, Delforge M, Perrot A, van de Donk NWCJ, Pawlyn C, Manier S, Leleu X, Martinez-Lopez J, Ghilotti F, Diels J, Morano R, Albrecht C, Strulev V, Haddad I, Pei L, Kobos R, Smit J, Slavcev M, Marshall A, Weisel K. Comparative Effectiveness of Teclistamab Versus Real-World Physician's Choice of Therapy in LocoMMotion and MoMMent in Triple-Class Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Adv Ther. 2024 Feb;41(2):696-715. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02738-0. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
PubMed 38110653Moreau P, van de Donk NWCJ, Delforge M, Einsele H, De Stefano V, Perrot A, Besemer B, Pawlyn C, Karlin L, Manier S, Leleu X, Weisel K, Ghilotti F, Diels J, Elsada A, Morano R, Strulev V, Pei L, Kobos R, Smit J, Slavcev M, Mateos MV. Comparative Efficacy of Teclistamab Versus Current Treatments in Real-World Clinical Practice in the Prospective LocoMMotion Study in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Adv Ther. 2023 May;40(5):2412-2425. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02480-7. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
PubMed 36961654Mateos MV, Weisel K, Martin T, Berdeja JG, Jakubowiak A, Stewart AK, Jagannath S, Lin Y, Diels J, Ghilotti F, Thilakarathne P, Perualila NJ, Cabrieto J, Haefliger B, Erler-Yates N, Hague C, Jackson CC, Schecter JM, Strulev V, Nesheiwat T, Pacaud L, Einsele H, Moreau P. Adjusted comparison of outcomes between patients from CARTITUDE-1 versus multiple myeloma patients with prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs and anti-CD38 antibody from the prospective, multinational LocoMMotion study of real-world clinical practice. Haematologica. 2023 Aug 1;108(8):2192-2204. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.280482.
PubMed 36546453Mateos MV, Weisel K, De Stefano V, Goldschmidt H, Delforge M, Mohty M, Cavo M, Vij R, Lindsey-Hill J, Dytfeld D, Angelucci E, Perrot A, Benjamin R, van de Donk NWCJ, Ocio EM, Scheid C, Gay F, Roeloffzen W, Rodriguez-Otero P, Broijl A, Potamianou A, Sakabedoyan C, Semerjian M, Keim S, Strulev V, Schecter JM, Vogel M, Wapenaar R, Nesheiwat T, San-Miguel J, Sonneveld P, Einsele H, Moreau P. LocoMMotion: a prospective, non-interventional, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2022 May;36(5):1371-1376. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01531-2. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
PubMed 35332278
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Multinational Study of Real-life Current Standards of Care in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Received at Least 3 Prior Lines of Therapy Including PI, IMID, and CD38 Monoclonal Antibody Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04035226
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LocoMMotion / CR108651
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 254 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Janssen-Cilag Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Legend Biotech
- Study start
- 2 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Oct 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Oct 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and clinical response including overall response rate (ORR) of real-life standard-of-care (SOC) treatments under routine clinical practice, over a 24-month period, in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Relapsed/refractory Multiple Myeloma | – | Other: No interventionPatients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who received at least 3 prior lines of therapy including Proteasome Inhibitor (PI), Immunomodulatory Drug (IMID), and Cluster of Differentiation 38 (CD38) Monoclonal Antibody treatment will be observed. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) receiving antimyeloma treatment as standard of care (SOC) under routine clinical practice will be observed. The main source of data collection will be medical records of each patient.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Have a documented diagnosis of multiple myeloma according to International myeloma working group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria
- Received at least 3 prior lines of therapy or are double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immunomodulatory agent (IMID) (induction with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplant and with or without maintenance therapy is considered a single regimen). Patients will have undergone at least 1 complete cycle of treatment for each regimen (unless progressive disease was the best response)
- Must have documented evidence of progressive disease based on study physician's determination of response by the IMWG response criteria on or after the last regimen. Patients with documented evidence of progressive disease within the previous 6 months and who are refractory or nonresponsive to their most recent line of treatment afterwards are also eligible
- Have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status grade of 0 or 1
- Must not be pregnant or must not plan to become pregnant within the study period
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| No interventionNo intervention will be administered as a part of this study. | Other | Relapsed/refractory Multiple Myeloma |
Primary outcome
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: Up to 24 months
ORR is defined as the percentage of patients who achieve a partial response (PR) or better according to the international myeloma working group (IMWG) response criteria.
16 secondary outcomes
Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) Rate
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Complete Response (CR) Rate
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Stringent Complete Response (sCR) Rate
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Negative Rate
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Duration of Response
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Time to Response
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Time to Next Treatment [TTNT]
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Time to Progression on the Next Line of Subsequent Antimyeloma Therapy or Death (PFS2)
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Change from Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Scale Score
Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months
Change from Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-MY20 Scale Score
Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months
Change from Baseline in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) using EQ-5D-5L Questionnaire Score
Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months
Number of Patients with Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Severity of Adverse Events as Assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE)
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Mar 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41313549Einsele H, Moreau P, Bahlis N, Bhutani M, Vincent L, Karlin L, Perrot A, Goldschmidt H, van de Donk NWCJ, Ocio EM, Martinez Lopez J, Rodriguez-Otero P, Dytfeld D, Jakubowiak A, Schinke C, Besemer B, Anguille S, Manier S, Rasche L, Teipel R, Scheid C, Pawlyn C, Cavo M, Diels J, Ghilotti F, Lau BW, Renaud T, Orel O, Ong F, Ramos DF, Ammann E, Parekh T, Albrecht C, Weisel K, Mateos MV. Comparative Efficacy of Talquetamab vs. Real-World Physician's Choice of Treatment in Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Analyses of MonumenTAL-1 vs. LocoMMotion/MoMMent. Adv Ther. 2026 Jan;43(1):333-355. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03409-y. Epub 2025 Nov 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39322709Mateos MV, Weisel K, De Stefano V, Goldschmidt H, Delforge M, Mohty M, Dytfeld D, Angelucci E, Vincent L, Perrot A, Benjamin R, van de Donk NWCJ, Ocio EM, Roccia T, Schecter JM, Koskinen S, Haddad I, Strulev V, Mitchell L, Buyze J, Filho OC, Einsele H, Moreau P. LocoMMotion: a study of real-life current standards of care in triple-class exposed patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma - 2-year follow-up (final analysis). Leukemia. 2024 Dec;38(12):2554-2560. doi: 10.1038/s41375-024-02404-6. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38402374Einsele H, Moreau P, Bahlis N, Bhutani M, Vincent L, Karlin L, Perrot A, Goldschmidt H, van de Donk NWCJ, Ocio EM, Martinez-Lopez J, Rodriguez-Otero P, Dytfeld D, Diels J, Strulev V, Haddad I, Renaud T, Ammann E, Cabrieto J, Perualila N, Gan R, Zhang Y, Parekh T, Albrecht C, Weisel K, Mateos MV. Comparative Efficacy of Talquetamab vs. Current Treatments in the LocoMMotion and MoMMent Studies in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Adv Ther. 2024 Apr;41(4):1576-1593. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02797-x. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38212206Mateos MV, Weisel K, Diels J, Arribas A, Tamayo M, Schecter JM, Roccia T, Haddad I, Pacaud L, Moreau P. Characterization and Outcomes of Spanish Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Included in the LocoMMotion Study. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2024 Apr;24(4):224-231.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.12.001. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38110653Moreau P, Mateos MV, Gonzalez Garcia ME, Einsele H, De Stefano V, Karlin L, Lindsey-Hill J, Besemer B, Vincent L, Kirkpatrick S, Delforge M, Perrot A, van de Donk NWCJ, Pawlyn C, Manier S, Leleu X, Martinez-Lopez J, Ghilotti F, Diels J, Morano R, Albrecht C, Strulev V, Haddad I, Pei L, Kobos R, Smit J, Slavcev M, Marshall A, Weisel K. Comparative Effectiveness of Teclistamab Versus Real-World Physician's Choice of Therapy in LocoMMotion and MoMMent in Triple-Class Exposed Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Adv Ther. 2024 Feb;41(2):696-715. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02738-0. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36961654Moreau P, van de Donk NWCJ, Delforge M, Einsele H, De Stefano V, Perrot A, Besemer B, Pawlyn C, Karlin L, Manier S, Leleu X, Weisel K, Ghilotti F, Diels J, Elsada A, Morano R, Strulev V, Pei L, Kobos R, Smit J, Slavcev M, Mateos MV. Comparative Efficacy of Teclistamab Versus Current Treatments in Real-World Clinical Practice in the Prospective LocoMMotion Study in Patients with Triple-Class-Exposed Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Adv Ther. 2023 May;40(5):2412-2425. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02480-7. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36546453Mateos MV, Weisel K, Martin T, Berdeja JG, Jakubowiak A, Stewart AK, Jagannath S, Lin Y, Diels J, Ghilotti F, Thilakarathne P, Perualila NJ, Cabrieto J, Haefliger B, Erler-Yates N, Hague C, Jackson CC, Schecter JM, Strulev V, Nesheiwat T, Pacaud L, Einsele H, Moreau P. Adjusted comparison of outcomes between patients from CARTITUDE-1 versus multiple myeloma patients with prior exposure to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs and anti-CD38 antibody from the prospective, multinational LocoMMotion study of real-world clinical practice. Haematologica. 2023 Aug 1;108(8):2192-2204. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2022.280482.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35332278Mateos MV, Weisel K, De Stefano V, Goldschmidt H, Delforge M, Mohty M, Cavo M, Vij R, Lindsey-Hill J, Dytfeld D, Angelucci E, Perrot A, Benjamin R, van de Donk NWCJ, Ocio EM, Scheid C, Gay F, Roeloffzen W, Rodriguez-Otero P, Broijl A, Potamianou A, Sakabedoyan C, Semerjian M, Keim S, Strulev V, Schecter JM, Vogel M, Wapenaar R, Nesheiwat T, San-Miguel J, Sonneveld P, Einsele H, Moreau P. LocoMMotion: a prospective, non-interventional, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2022 May;36(5):1371-1376. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01531-2. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Janssen-Cilag Ltd. Clinical Trial study director
Janssen-Cilag Ltd.
75 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Multiple Myeloma, run by Janssen-Cilag Ltd. at 75 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 75 sites in Italy, Spain, United States, France, United Kingdom and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Response Rate (ORR) (time frame: Up to 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04035226, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Mar 2025.