AzTrials
AzTrials

Hepatitis C Virus InfectionNCT04035980

Telemedicine for Linkage to Care People Who Injected Drugs With Hepatitis C

A study testing Telemedicine based healthcare programme in people with Hepatitis C Virus Infection, run by University of La Laguna at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators have designed a community-based intervention study to all subjects attended in drug addiction centers screened for hepatitis C virus (HCV) to evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of a telemedicine based programme versus conventional healthcare assistance Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Hepatitis C Virus Infection
What is being tested?
Telemedicine based healthcare programme
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
166 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
5 Jul 2019to 31 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects 18 years old or older with a valid sanitary card in our public health system
  • Signed Informed consent
  • Tested for HCV: a) no previous documented HCV antibody request or b) with a previous positive HCV antibody test without RNA result or positive result without treatment or confirmed sustained virological response or c) with a negative HCV antibody result tested more than one year ago
  • No current surveillance by any hepatitis specialized care (hepatology or internal medicine)

Who cannot join

  • Previous DBS testing at DAC lost to follow-up

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Manuel N Hernandez-Guerra, MD contact

34922678559

mhernand@ull.edu.es

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital Universitario de Canarias

    San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, 38320

    Manuel Hernandez-Guerra, MD, 34922678559, mhernand@ull.edu.es

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Acceptance of a Telemedicine Based Programme to Treat Hepatitis C Among Patients at Drug Addiction Centers

The investigators have designed a community-based intervention study to all subjects attended in drug addiction centers screened for hepatitis C virus (HCV) to evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of a telemedicine based programme versus conventional healthcare assistance

Read the detailed description

Our current programme of engagement to healthcare and HCV screening based on on-site dried blood spot (DBS) testing has shown to be successful, but with drop-outs in the HCV cascade of care due to economic reasons that difficulties travel costs to appointments, unconsciousness of disease and low awareness of new direct acting antiviral benefits. In this setting, videoconference as a complement to use of serologic scores and dispensing medication outside the hospital could be useful to improve adherence and reduce drop-outs by reducing the visits to hospital from drug addiction centers (DAC), and promoting direct information regarding benefits of been treated with new antivirals free of interferon directly from specialists.

The hypothesis of the study is that the rate of those diagnosed, fully evaluated of liver disease stage, treated and cured will be improved with a lower rate of drop-outs in the cascade of care in the telemedicine arm compared with the conventional arm without affecting satisfaction in the healthcare assistance process.

This is a prospective, randomized, study in which subjects attending DAC will be invited to participate and sign a consent form.

Aims:

  • Evaluation of efficacy (compliance rate with the programme which includes completing screening, liver disease evaluation, and treatment)
  • Evaluation of acceptance (grade of patient satisfaction of the programme)
  • Evaluation of sustained virological response rate and time to achieve eradication
  • The adherence rate to follow-up in participants with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis
  • To assess factors associated with drop-outs
  • Cost-effectiveness analysis of the telemedicine programme

Methodology:

The investigators have designed a community-based intervention study to evaluate a telemedicine based programme versus conventional healthcare to all subjects attending DAC and screened for HCV if : a) there is no previous documented HCV antibody request or b) with a previous positive HCV antibody test without viral load (RNA) result or positive result without treatment or confirmed sustained virological response or c) with a negative HCV antibody result tested more than one year ago.

In the conventional arm participants after the dried blood spot (DBS) testing for viral load (RNA) and genotype will be referred to the tertiary care hospital in case of a RNA positive result for a one-day appointment for disease stage evaluation with elastography and prescription of treatment with DBS after12 weeks of finishing treatment for assessing sustained virological response.

In the interventional arm the hepatologist will real-time videoconference with the patient-staff at DAC to discuss the need of DBS for viral load and genotype, evaluation of fibrotic stage by serologic scores and if it is the case in known RNA positive cases prescription of treatment. If DBS is mandatory the patient will be scheduled for a second videoconference to start treatment according to results. Dispensing and custody of treatment will be performed at DAC. Follow-up to assess side effects and sustained virological response will be also scheduled by videoconference.

In both arms when advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis has been detected an appointment at the tertiary care hospital for hepatocellular carcinoma screening will be scheduled every 6 months.

Cost analysis will be performed by investigators to assess medical and non-medical costs and satisfaction of the healthcare model by a validated questionnaire. In all the planned strategies subjects will be asked to complete a questionnaire that includes demographic variables.

For the present study, a 15% improvement in the efficacy (compliance with the programme) was hypothesized in the group of participants receiving the interventional strategy compared to the conventional strategy. Taking into account a power of 80%, alpha error of 5% and losses of 10% will require 83 participants per group.

Being tested
Telemedicine based healthcare programme
Keywords
Screening, Telemedicine, Diagnosis
Medical subject headings
Hepatitis C, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Telemedicine based healthcare programmeBehavioural

    Two-way videoconference to evaluate the need of screening with DBS, disease stage evaluation and treatment of HCV RNA positive patients at drug addiction centers

Study groups in NCT04035980
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional careNo interventionScreening HCV with dried blod spot (DBS) testing and referral to tertiary care hospital to evaluate disease stage and treatment of HCV RNA positive patients
Telemedicine careActive comparatorTwo-way videoconference to evaluate the need of screening with DBS, disease stage evaluation and treatment of HCV RNA positive patients at drug addiction centers
Receives: Behavioral: Telemedicine based healthcare programme

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Efficacy of the intervention

    Compliance rate (number of patients of the overall participants) with the programme which includes completing screening, liver disease evaluation, treatment and follow-up visit at 12 week

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Acceptance of the intervention with validated satisfaction questionnaire

    Grade of patient satisfaction of the telemedicine programme by a validated questionnaire

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Sustained virological response rate

    Achievement of viral eradication rate (number of patients from the total with active infection that received treatment and achieved eradication)

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Time to sustained virological response rate

    Time (months) from DBS testing to achievement of viral eradication

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Adherence rate to follow-up

    Adherence rate (confirmed assistance) to follow-up appointments in patients with advance fibrosis and cirrhosis

    Measured: 12 months

  5. Demographic factors associated with drop-outs

    Evaluation of demographic characteristics associated with drop-outs in the cascade of care

    Measured: 12 months

  6. Cost-effectiveness of telemedicine strategy

    Cost-effectiveness analysis taking in consideration utilities and disease management annual costs of the intervention

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jul 2019
  2. Study start5 Jul 2019
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
166 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04035980
Sponsor's protocol ID
Telemedicine_HCV
Status last verified
May 2023
First submitted
23 Jul 2019
Last updated
18 May 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Garcia-Fulgueiras A, Garcia-Pina R, Morant C, de Larrea-Baz NF, Alvarez E. Burden of disease related to hepatitis C and hepatitis B in Spain: a methodological challenge of an unfolding health problem. J Viral Hepat. 2011 Oct;18(10):e453-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01467.x. Epub 2011 Jun 1.

    PubMed 21914063
  • Vallejo F, Barrio G, Brugal MT, Pulido J, Toro C, Sordo L, Espelt A, Bravo MJ; Itinere Project Group. High hepatitis C virus prevalence and incidence in a community cohort of young heroin injectors in a context of extensive harm reduction programmes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Jun;69(6):599-603. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-205070. Epub 2015 Apr 13.

    PubMed 25870164
  • Coats JT, Dillon JF. The effect of introducing point-of-care or dried blood spot analysis on the uptake of hepatitis C virus testing in high-risk populations: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Nov;26(11):1050-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 4.

    PubMed 26118799

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Telemedicine based healthcare programme in people with Hepatitis C Virus Infection, run by University of La Laguna at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Manuel N Hernandez-Guerra, MD (34922678559, mhernand@ull.edu.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Efficacy of the intervention (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04035980, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 9 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in