Hepatitis C Virus InfectionNCT04035980
Telemedicine for Linkage to Care People Who Injected Drugs With Hepatitis C
A study testing Telemedicine based healthcare programme in people with Hepatitis C Virus Infection, run by University of La Laguna at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The investigators have designed a community-based intervention study to all subjects attended in drug addiction centers screened for hepatitis C virus (HCV) to evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of a telemedicine based programme versus conventional healthcare assistance Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatitis C Virus Infection
- What is being tested?
- Telemedicine based healthcare programme
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 166 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 5 Jul 2019to 31 Dec 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects 18 years old or older with a valid sanitary card in our public health system
- Signed Informed consent
- Tested for HCV: a) no previous documented HCV antibody request or b) with a previous positive HCV antibody test without RNA result or positive result without treatment or confirmed sustained virological response or c) with a negative HCV antibody result tested more than one year ago
- No current surveillance by any hepatitis specialized care (hepatology or internal medicine)
Who cannot join
- Previous DBS testing at DAC lost to follow-up
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, 38320
Manuel Hernandez-Guerra, MD, 34922678559, mhernand@ull.edu.es
About this study
Official title: Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Acceptance of a Telemedicine Based Programme to Treat Hepatitis C Among Patients at Drug Addiction Centers
The investigators have designed a community-based intervention study to all subjects attended in drug addiction centers screened for hepatitis C virus (HCV) to evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of a telemedicine based programme versus conventional healthcare assistance
Read the detailed description
Our current programme of engagement to healthcare and HCV screening based on on-site dried blood spot (DBS) testing has shown to be successful, but with drop-outs in the HCV cascade of care due to economic reasons that difficulties travel costs to appointments, unconsciousness of disease and low awareness of new direct acting antiviral benefits. In this setting, videoconference as a complement to use of serologic scores and dispensing medication outside the hospital could be useful to improve adherence and reduce drop-outs by reducing the visits to hospital from drug addiction centers (DAC), and promoting direct information regarding benefits of been treated with new antivirals free of interferon directly from specialists.
The hypothesis of the study is that the rate of those diagnosed, fully evaluated of liver disease stage, treated and cured will be improved with a lower rate of drop-outs in the cascade of care in the telemedicine arm compared with the conventional arm without affecting satisfaction in the healthcare assistance process.
This is a prospective, randomized, study in which subjects attending DAC will be invited to participate and sign a consent form.
Aims:
- Evaluation of efficacy (compliance rate with the programme which includes completing screening, liver disease evaluation, and treatment)
- Evaluation of acceptance (grade of patient satisfaction of the programme)
- Evaluation of sustained virological response rate and time to achieve eradication
- The adherence rate to follow-up in participants with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis
- To assess factors associated with drop-outs
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of the telemedicine programme
Methodology:
The investigators have designed a community-based intervention study to evaluate a telemedicine based programme versus conventional healthcare to all subjects attending DAC and screened for HCV if : a) there is no previous documented HCV antibody request or b) with a previous positive HCV antibody test without viral load (RNA) result or positive result without treatment or confirmed sustained virological response or c) with a negative HCV antibody result tested more than one year ago.
In the conventional arm participants after the dried blood spot (DBS) testing for viral load (RNA) and genotype will be referred to the tertiary care hospital in case of a RNA positive result for a one-day appointment for disease stage evaluation with elastography and prescription of treatment with DBS after12 weeks of finishing treatment for assessing sustained virological response.
In the interventional arm the hepatologist will real-time videoconference with the patient-staff at DAC to discuss the need of DBS for viral load and genotype, evaluation of fibrotic stage by serologic scores and if it is the case in known RNA positive cases prescription of treatment. If DBS is mandatory the patient will be scheduled for a second videoconference to start treatment according to results. Dispensing and custody of treatment will be performed at DAC. Follow-up to assess side effects and sustained virological response will be also scheduled by videoconference.
In both arms when advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis has been detected an appointment at the tertiary care hospital for hepatocellular carcinoma screening will be scheduled every 6 months.
Cost analysis will be performed by investigators to assess medical and non-medical costs and satisfaction of the healthcare model by a validated questionnaire. In all the planned strategies subjects will be asked to complete a questionnaire that includes demographic variables.
For the present study, a 15% improvement in the efficacy (compliance with the programme) was hypothesized in the group of participants receiving the interventional strategy compared to the conventional strategy. Taking into account a power of 80%, alpha error of 5% and losses of 10% will require 83 participants per group.
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C Virus Infection
- Being tested
- Telemedicine based healthcare programme
- Keywords
- Screening, Telemedicine, Diagnosis
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis C, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Telemedicine based healthcare programmeBehavioural
Two-way videoconference to evaluate the need of screening with DBS, disease stage evaluation and treatment of HCV RNA positive patients at drug addiction centers
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional care | No intervention | Screening HCV with dried blod spot (DBS) testing and referral to tertiary care hospital to evaluate disease stage and treatment of HCV RNA positive patients |
| Telemedicine care | Active comparator | Two-way videoconference to evaluate the need of screening with DBS, disease stage evaluation and treatment of HCV RNA positive patients at drug addiction centers Receives: Behavioral: Telemedicine based healthcare programme |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy of the intervention
Compliance rate (number of patients of the overall participants) with the programme which includes completing screening, liver disease evaluation, treatment and follow-up visit at 12 week
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Acceptance of the intervention with validated satisfaction questionnaire
Grade of patient satisfaction of the telemedicine programme by a validated questionnaire
Measured: 12 months
Sustained virological response rate
Achievement of viral eradication rate (number of patients from the total with active infection that received treatment and achieved eradication)
Measured: 12 months
Time to sustained virological response rate
Time (months) from DBS testing to achievement of viral eradication
Measured: 12 months
Adherence rate to follow-up
Adherence rate (confirmed assistance) to follow-up appointments in patients with advance fibrosis and cirrhosis
Measured: 12 months
Demographic factors associated with drop-outs
Evaluation of demographic characteristics associated with drop-outs in the cascade of care
Measured: 12 months
Cost-effectiveness of telemedicine strategy
Cost-effectiveness analysis taking in consideration utilities and disease management annual costs of the intervention
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jul 2019
- Study start5 Jul 2019
- Primary completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatitis C Virus InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 166 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of La Laguna
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Manuel Hernandez-Guerra, MD, University of La Laguna
- Investigators
- Manuel Hernandez-Guerra, MD, Principal investigator, MD
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04035980
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Telemedicine_HCV
- Status last verified
- May 2023
- First submitted
- 23 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 18 May 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Garcia-Fulgueiras A, Garcia-Pina R, Morant C, de Larrea-Baz NF, Alvarez E. Burden of disease related to hepatitis C and hepatitis B in Spain: a methodological challenge of an unfolding health problem. J Viral Hepat. 2011 Oct;18(10):e453-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01467.x. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
PubMed 21914063Vallejo F, Barrio G, Brugal MT, Pulido J, Toro C, Sordo L, Espelt A, Bravo MJ; Itinere Project Group. High hepatitis C virus prevalence and incidence in a community cohort of young heroin injectors in a context of extensive harm reduction programmes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Jun;69(6):599-603. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-205070. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
PubMed 25870164Coats JT, Dillon JF. The effect of introducing point-of-care or dried blood spot analysis on the uptake of hepatitis C virus testing in high-risk populations: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Nov;26(11):1050-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
PubMed 26118799
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 May 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Acceptance of a Telemedicine Based Programme to Treat Hepatitis C Among Patients at Drug Addiction Centers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04035980
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Telemedicine_HCV
- Conditions
- Hepatitis C Virus Infection
- Keywords
- Screening, Telemedicine, Diagnosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 166 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of La LagunaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators have designed a community-based intervention study to all subjects attended in drug addiction centers screened for hepatitis C virus (HCV) to evaluate the efficacy and acceptance of a telemedicine based programme versus conventional healthcare assistance
Detailed description
Our current programme of engagement to healthcare and HCV screening based on on-site dried blood spot (DBS) testing has shown to be successful, but with drop-outs in the HCV cascade of care due to economic reasons that difficulties travel costs to appointments, unconsciousness of disease and low awareness of new direct acting antiviral benefits. In this setting, videoconference as a complement to use of serologic scores and dispensing medication outside the hospital could be useful to improve adherence and reduce drop-outs by reducing the visits to hospital from drug addiction centers (DAC), and promoting direct information regarding benefits of been treated with new antivirals free of interferon directly from specialists.
The hypothesis of the study is that the rate of those diagnosed, fully evaluated of liver disease stage, treated and cured will be improved with a lower rate of drop-outs in the cascade of care in the telemedicine arm compared with the conventional arm without affecting satisfaction in the healthcare assistance process.
This is a prospective, randomized, study in which subjects attending DAC will be invited to participate and sign a consent form.
Aims:
- Evaluation of efficacy (compliance rate with the programme which includes completing screening, liver disease evaluation, and treatment)
- Evaluation of acceptance (grade of patient satisfaction of the programme)
- Evaluation of sustained virological response rate and time to achieve eradication
- The adherence rate to follow-up in participants with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis
- To assess factors associated with drop-outs
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of the telemedicine programme
Methodology:
The investigators have designed a community-based intervention study to evaluate a telemedicine based programme versus conventional healthcare to all subjects attending DAC and screened for HCV if : a) there is no previous documented HCV antibody request or b) with a previous positive HCV antibody test without viral load (RNA) result or positive result without treatment or confirmed sustained virological response or c) with a negative HCV antibody result tested more than one year ago.
In the conventional arm participants after the dried blood spot (DBS) testing for viral load (RNA) and genotype will be referred to the tertiary care hospital in case of a RNA positive result for a one-day appointment for disease stage evaluation with elastography and prescription of treatment with DBS after12 weeks of finishing treatment for assessing sustained virological response.
In the interventional arm the hepatologist will real-time videoconference with the patient-staff at DAC to discuss the need of DBS for viral load and genotype, evaluation of fibrotic stage by serologic scores and if it is the case in known RNA positive cases prescription of treatment. If DBS is mandatory the patient will be scheduled for a second videoconference to start treatment according to results. Dispensing and custody of treatment will be performed at DAC. Follow-up to assess side effects and sustained virological response will be also scheduled by videoconference.
In both arms when advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis has been detected an appointment at the tertiary care hospital for hepatocellular carcinoma screening will be scheduled every 6 months.
Cost analysis will be performed by investigators to assess medical and non-medical costs and satisfaction of the healthcare model by a validated questionnaire. In all the planned strategies subjects will be asked to complete a questionnaire that includes demographic variables.
For the present study, a 15% improvement in the efficacy (compliance with the programme) was hypothesized in the group of participants receiving the interventional strategy compared to the conventional strategy. Taking into account a power of 80%, alpha error of 5% and losses of 10% will require 83 participants per group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Parallel Assignment
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Conventional care | No intervention | –Screening HCV with dried blod spot (DBS) testing and referral to tertiary care hospital to evaluate disease stage and treatment of HCV RNA positive patients |
| Telemedicine care | Active comparator | Behavioral: Telemedicine based healthcare programmeTwo-way videoconference to evaluate the need of screening with DBS, disease stage evaluation and treatment of HCV RNA positive patients at drug addiction centers |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subjects 18 years old or older with a valid sanitary card in our public health system
- Signed Informed consent
- Tested for HCV: a) no previous documented HCV antibody request or b) with a previous positive HCV antibody test without RNA result or positive result without treatment or confirmed sustained virological response or c) with a negative HCV antibody result tested more than one year ago
- No current surveillance by any hepatitis specialized care (hepatology or internal medicine)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Previous DBS testing at DAC lost to follow-up
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Telemedicine based healthcare programmeTwo-way videoconference to evaluate the need of screening with DBS, disease stage evaluation and treatment of HCV RNA positive patients at drug addiction centers | Behavioural | Telemedicine care |
Primary outcome
Efficacy of the intervention
Time frame: 12 months
Compliance rate (number of patients of the overall participants) with the programme which includes completing screening, liver disease evaluation, treatment and follow-up visit at 12 week
6 secondary outcomes
Acceptance of the intervention with validated satisfaction questionnaire
Time frame: 12 months
Sustained virological response rate
Time frame: 12 months
Time to sustained virological response rate
Time frame: 12 months
Adherence rate to follow-up
Time frame: 12 months
Demographic factors associated with drop-outs
Time frame: 12 months
Cost-effectiveness of telemedicine strategy
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 May 2023.
- Background: PubMed 21914063Garcia-Fulgueiras A, Garcia-Pina R, Morant C, de Larrea-Baz NF, Alvarez E. Burden of disease related to hepatitis C and hepatitis B in Spain: a methodological challenge of an unfolding health problem. J Viral Hepat. 2011 Oct;18(10):e453-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2011.01467.x. Epub 2011 Jun 1.
- Background: PubMed 25870164Vallejo F, Barrio G, Brugal MT, Pulido J, Toro C, Sordo L, Espelt A, Bravo MJ; Itinere Project Group. High hepatitis C virus prevalence and incidence in a community cohort of young heroin injectors in a context of extensive harm reduction programmes. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Jun;69(6):599-603. doi: 10.1136/jech-2014-205070. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
- Background: PubMed 26118799Coats JT, Dillon JF. The effect of introducing point-of-care or dried blood spot analysis on the uptake of hepatitis C virus testing in high-risk populations: A systematic review of the literature. Int J Drug Policy. 2015 Nov;26(11):1050-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hepatitis C Virus Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Patients With Liver Disease
Hepatitis D, Hepatitis C
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Elimination of Hepatitis C Virus Among Users of Substances
Hepatitis C in Substance Users
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Performance of the INSTI® HCV Antibody Test for CLIA-Waived Use
HCV Infection
Not yet recruiting
Study to Evaluate the Performance of the INSTI® HCV Antibody Test for Point-of-Care Use in Individuals at Risk for HCV Infection or Presenting With Signs or Symptoms of HCV Infection
HCV Infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
People With CHC Who Achieved a Sustained Virological Response Following Therapy With Direct Acting Antiviral Agents
Diabetes Mellitus, Hepatitis C, Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Manuel Hernandez-Guerra, MD principal investigator
MD
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Telemedicine based healthcare programme in people with Hepatitis C Virus Infection, run by University of La Laguna at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 May 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Manuel N Hernandez-Guerra, MD (34922678559, mhernand@ull.edu.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy of the intervention (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04035980, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 May 2023.