Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Phase 2COURSENCT04039113
Tezepelumab COPD Exacerbation Study
A Phase 2 study testing Tezepelumab in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), run by AstraZeneca at 91 sites in 10 countries.
Trial summary
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 2a Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Adults with Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
- What is being tested?
- Tezepelumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 337 participants
- Where
- 91 sitesin 10 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Jul 2019to 31 Jan 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- History of moderate to very severe physician-diagnosed COPD for at least 12 months prior to enrolment with a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.70 and a post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥20% and ≤80% of predicted normal value.
- History of at least 2 documented moderate to severe COPD exacerbations within 2 to 52 weeks prior to enrollment.
- CAT score of ≥15 at enrollment and on day of randomization.
- Documented treatment with triple therapy for COPD (medium or high dose ICS/LABA/LAMA) throughout the year prior to enrollment. The dose of ICS should be stable for 3 months prior to enrollment.
Who cannot join
- Clinically important pulmonary disease other than COPD, as judged by the Investigator (including current or historic asthma diagnosis).
- Any disorder, including, but not limited to, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, musculoskeletal, infectious (including risk factors for pneumonia), endocrine, metabolic, hematological, psychiatric, or major physical impairment that is not stable.
- Major surgery within 8 weeks before enrollment.
- History of clinically significant infection requiring antibiotics or antiviral medication within 14 days before enrollment.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
- The chest/lungs with pathology that precludes the patient's ability to complete the study
- The patient has active COVID 19 infection during screening period.
Trial locations and contacts
91 sites in 10 countries.
91 sites in 10 countries
United States27 sites
Research Site
Abingdon, Virginia, 24210
Research Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
Research Site
Brandon, Florida, 33511
Research Site
Buckley, Michigan, 49620
Research Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277
Research Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43215
Research Site
Dothan, Alabama, 36305
Research Site
Edmond, Oklahoma, 73034
Research Site
Everett, Washington, 98208
Research Site
Huntington Beach, California, 92647
Research Site
McKinney, Texas, 75069
Research Site
Medford, Oregon, 97504
Research Site
Mooresville, North Carolina, 28117
Research Site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
Research Site
New Bern, North Carolina, 28562
Research Site
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Research Site
Newport Beach, California, 92663
Research Site
Orlando, Florida, 32819
Research Site
Panama City, Florida, 32405
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Research Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Research Site
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
Research Site
Rock Hill, South Carolina, 29732
Research Site
Tampa, Florida, 33607
Research Site
Upland, California, 91786
Research Site
Westminster, California, 92683
Research Site
Winter Park, Florida, 32789-4681
Canada11 sites
Research Site
Burlington, Ontario, L7N 3V2
Research Site
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6
Research Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 3Z5
Research Site
Montreal, Quebec, H1M 1B1
Research Site
Québec, Quebec, G1V 4G5
Research Site
Québec, Quebec, G3K 2P8
Research Site
Saint-Charles-Borromée, Quebec, J6E 2B4
Research Site
Sherwood Park, Alberta, T8L 0N2
Research Site
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8T 7A1
Research Site
Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 1L2
Research Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9
South Korea10 sites
Research Site
Daegu, 42415
Research Site
Incheon, 21431
Research Site
Jeonju, 54907
Research Site
Seoul, 03312
Research Site
Seoul, 03722
Research Site
Seoul, 05030
Research Site
Seoul, 05505
Research Site
Seoul, 06591
Research Site
Seoul, 06973
Research Site
Uijeongbu-si, 11765
Denmark7 sites
Research Site
Aalborg, 9000
Research Site
Aarhus N, 8200
Research Site
Hvidovre, 2650
Research Site
København NV, 2400
Research Site
Odense C, 5000
Research Site
Roskilde, 4000
Research Site
Vejle, 7100
France7 sites
Research Site
Amiens, 80054
Research Site
Brest, 29609
Research Site
Grenoble, 38043
Research Site
Lyon, 69317
Research Site
Marseille, 13015
Research Site
Montpellier, 34090
Research Site
Nantes, 44093
Israel7 sites
Research Site
Ashkelon, 7830604
Research Site
Beersheba, 84101
Research Site
Haifa, 34362
Research Site
Jerusalem, 91031
Research Site
Jerusalem, 91120
Research Site
Kfar Saba, 49281
Research Site
Rehovot, 7661041
United Kingdom7 sites
Research Site
Bradford, BND9 6RJ
Research Site
Chertsey, KT16 0PZ
Research Site
Cottingham, HU16 5JQ
Research Site
Glasgow, G12 0YN
Research Site
London, SW10 9NH
Research Site
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP
Research Site
Wakefield, WF1 4DG
Germany5 sites
Research Site
Berlin, 12203
Research Site
Frankfurt, 60596
Research Site
Großhansdorf, 20927
Research Site
Lübeck, 23552
Research Site
Mainz, 55131
Netherlands5 sites
Research Site
Eindhoven, 5623 EJ
Research Site
Heerlen, 6419 PC
Research Site
Rotterdam, 3045 PM
Research Site
Rotterdam, 3083 AN
Research Site
Zutphen, 7207 AE
Spain5 sites
Research Site
Alzira, 46410
Research Site
Barcelona, 08025
Research Site
Granada, 18014
Research Site
Málaga, 29010
Research Site
Mérida (Badajoz), 06800
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Phase 2a Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Patients With Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (COURSE)
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 2a Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Adults with Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Read the detailed description
This is a Phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tezepelumab in adults with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving triple inhaled maintenance therapy, and having had 2 or more documented COPD exacerbations in the 12 months prior to Visit 1. Approximately, 338 subjects will be randomized globally. Subjects will be stratified by region and prior number of exacerbations (2 vs. 3 or more). Subjects will receive tezepelumab, or placebo, administered via subcutaneous injection at the study site, over a 52 week treatment period. The study also includes a post-treatment follow-up period of 12 weeks.
- Being tested
- Tezepelumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- COPD, Moderate COPD, Severe COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TezepelumabBiological
Tezepelumab subcutaneous injection
PlaceboOther
Placebo subcutaneous injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tezepelumab | Active comparator | Tezepelumab, SC, Q4W Receives: Biological: Tezepelumab |
| Matching Placebo | Placebo comparator | Matching placebo, SC, Q4W Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations in Participants With Moderate to Very Severe COPD.
A COPD exacerbation was defined as a change in the participant's usual COPD symptoms that is beyond normal day-to-day variation, is acute in onset, lasts 2 or more days, and may warrant a change in regular medication and leads to any of the following: Use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days, use of antibiotics for at least 3 days, an inpatient hospitalisation due to COPD, or results in death.
Analysis was done using a negative binomial model with the response variable as the number of COPD exacerbations experienced during the follow-up for exacerbations. The model included covariates of treatment group, region, and number of exacerbations reported at randomisation as recorded in IWRS (2, >=3). The logarithm of the time at risk (in years) for exacerbation in the study is used as an offset variable.
Measured: From randomisation up to Week 52
Secondary outcomes (11)
Time to First Moderate/Severe COPD Exacerbation
Time to first moderate/severe COPD exacerbation post-randomisation, presented as number of subjects with at least one moderate/severe COPD exacerbation.
Measured: From randomisation up to Week 52
Proportion of Participants COPD Exacerbation Free at Week 52
An exacerbation event was defined as described in primary analysis. A participant was exacerbation free if they did not experience any moderate or severe exacerbations from randomisation to Week 52 (EOT).
Measured: From randomisation up to Week 52
Comparison of Annual Severe COPD Exacerbation Rates Over 52 Weeks
An exacerbation was considered severe if it results in at least 1 of the following: Hospitalisation due to the COPD exacerbation (defined as a participant being admitted for ≥ 24 hours to an observation area, the emergency department, or other equivalent healthcare facility), or death related to COPD or COPD exacerbation.
Measured: From randomisation up to Week 52
Proportion of Participants With >=1 Severe COPD Exacerbations Over 52 Weeks
An exacerbation was considered severe if it results in at least 1 of the following: Hospitalisation due to the COPD exacerbation (defined as a participant being admitted for ≥ 24 hours to an observation area, the emergency department, or other equivalent healthcare facility), or death related to COPD or COPD exacerbation.
Measured: From randomisation up to Week 52
Time to First Severe COPD Exacerbation
Time to first severe COPD exacerbation post-randomisation, presented as number of subjects with at least one severe COPD exacerbation.
Measured: From randomisation up to Week 52
Least Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 (FEV1) at Week 52
Pre-Bronchodilator FEV1 (L) was determined by spirometry at the clinic visit. FEV1 is defined as the volume of air exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced expiration.
Change from baseline was obtained as an absolute difference between Week 52 measure and the baseline value.
Baseline was defined as the last assessment recorded prior to the first dose of study treatment.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Lease Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52
The SGRQ is a 50-item PRO instrument to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases. The total score indicates the impact of disease on overall health status. This total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents the worst possible health status and 0 indicates the best possible health status.
Baseline is the measurement recorded at Week 0 (Visit 3).
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Proportion of Participants Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference of 4 Units or More in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52
The SGRQ is a 50-item PRO instrument to measure the health status of participants with airway obstruction diseases. The total score indicates the impact of disease on overall health status. This total score is expressed as a percentage of overall impairment, in which 100 represents the worst possible health status and 0 indicates the best possible health status.
A responder was defined as an individual who had "improvement" at Week 52 (>=4 point decrease in SGRQ total score).
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Least Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in COPD Assessment Tool (CAT) Total Score at Week 52
The CAT is an 8-item PRO developed to measure the impact of COPD on health status. A CAT total score is the sum of item responses. Scores range from 0-40 with higher scores indicative of greater COPD impact on health status.
Baseline was defined as the value at the randomisation visit (Visit 3). If the Visit 3 measurement was missing, the screening value was used as baseline instead.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Serum Concentration of Tezepelumab
Blood samples were collected to determine the serum concentration of Tezepelumab.
With the exception of Week 0 and Week 64, only pre-dose data from samples collected between 21 and 35 days after previous dose of investigational product were included.
Measured: Pre-dose at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36 and also at weeks 52 and 64 where no dosing was scheduled
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Tezepelumab
Blood samples were measured for the presence of ADAs for tezepelumab using validated assays. Treatment-induced ADA positive was defined as ADA negative at baseline and post-baseline ADA positive. Treatment-boosted ADA positive was defined as baseline positive ADA titre that was boosted to a 4 fold or higher level following IP administration. TE-ADA positive was defined as the sum of treatment-induced ADA positive and treatment-boosted ADA positive. ADA incidence is the proportion of TE-ADA positive subjects in a population. ADA persistently positive was defined as ADA positive at >= 2 post-baseline assessments or ADA positive at last post-baseline assessment. ADA transiently positive was defined as having at least one post-baseline ADA positive assessment and not fulfilling the conditions of ADA persistently positive. Treatment-induced nAb positive was defined as nAb negative or ADA negative at baseline and nAb positive at any post-baseline visit.
Measured: Pre-dose at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36 and also at weeks 52 and 64 where no dosing was scheduled
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jul 2019
- Study start30 Jul 2019
- Primary completion10 Nov 2023
- Study completion31 Jan 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AstraZenecaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either tezepelumab or matching placebo both administered subcutaneously.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 337 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Amgen
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dave Singh, MD, Principal investigator, Division of Infection, Immunity & Resp Medicine, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04039113
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D5241C00001
- Other IDs
- 2019-001363-67, 2019
- Acronym
- COURSE
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 18 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Singh D, Brightling CE, Rabe KF, Han MK, Christenson SA, Drummond MB, Papi A, Pavord ID, Molfino NA, Almqvist G, Kotalik A, Hellqvist A, Golabek M, Sindhwani NS, Ponnarambil SS; COURSE study investigators. Efficacy and safety of tezepelumab versus placebo in adults with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COURSE): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2025 Jan;13(1):47-58. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00324-2. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
PubMed 39653044
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Multicenter Phase 2a Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Patients With Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (COURSE)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04039113
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COURSE / D5241C00001
- Keywords
- COPD, Moderate COPD, Severe COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 337 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZenecaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Amgen
- Study start
- 30 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 18 Feb 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 2a Study to Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Tezepelumab in Adults with Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Detailed description
This is a Phase 2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of tezepelumab in adults with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) receiving triple inhaled maintenance therapy, and having had 2 or more documented COPD exacerbations in the 12 months prior to Visit 1. Approximately, 338 subjects will be randomized globally. Subjects will be stratified by region and prior number of exacerbations (2 vs. 3 or more). Subjects will receive tezepelumab, or placebo, administered via subcutaneous injection at the study site, over a 52 week treatment period. The study also includes a post-treatment follow-up period of 12 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either tezepelumab or matching placebo both administered subcutaneously.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tezepelumab | Active comparator | Biological: TezepelumabTezepelumab, SC, Q4W |
| Matching Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: PlaceboMatching placebo, SC, Q4W |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- History of moderate to very severe physician-diagnosed COPD for at least 12 months prior to enrolment with a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC<0.70 and a post-bronchodilator FEV1 ≥20% and ≤80% of predicted normal value.
- History of at least 2 documented moderate to severe COPD exacerbations within 2 to 52 weeks prior to enrollment.
- CAT score of ≥15 at enrollment and on day of randomization.
- Documented treatment with triple therapy for COPD (medium or high dose ICS/LABA/LAMA) throughout the year prior to enrollment. The dose of ICS should be stable for 3 months prior to enrollment.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Clinically important pulmonary disease other than COPD, as judged by the Investigator (including current or historic asthma diagnosis).
- Any disorder, including, but not limited to, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, hepatic, renal, neurological, musculoskeletal, infectious (including risk factors for pneumonia), endocrine, metabolic, hematological, psychiatric, or major physical impairment that is not stable.
- Major surgery within 8 weeks before enrollment.
- History of clinically significant infection requiring antibiotics or antiviral medication within 14 days before enrollment.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TezepelumabTezepelumab subcutaneous injection | Biological | Tezepelumab |
| PlaceboPlacebo subcutaneous injection | Other | Matching Placebo |
Primary outcome
Rate of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations in Participants With Moderate to Very Severe COPD.
Time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52
A COPD exacerbation was defined as a change in the participant's usual COPD symptoms that is beyond normal day-to-day variation, is acute in onset, lasts 2 or more days, and may warrant a change in regular medication and leads to any of the following: Use of systemic corticosteroids for at least 3 days, use of antibiotics for at least 3 days, an inpatient hospitalisation due to COPD, or results in death. Analysis was done using a negative binomial model with the response variable as the number of COPD exacerbations experienced during the follow-up for exacerbations. The model included covariates of treatment group, region, and number of exacerbations reported at randomisation as recorded in IWRS (2, >=3). The logarithm of the time at risk (in years) for exacerbation in the study is used as an offset variable.
11 secondary outcomes
Time to First Moderate/Severe COPD Exacerbation
Time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52
Proportion of Participants COPD Exacerbation Free at Week 52
Time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52
Comparison of Annual Severe COPD Exacerbation Rates Over 52 Weeks
Time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52
Proportion of Participants With >=1 Severe COPD Exacerbations Over 52 Weeks
Time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52
Time to First Severe COPD Exacerbation
Time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52
Least Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in Pre-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 (FEV1) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Lease Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Proportion of Participants Achieving a Minimum Clinically Important Difference of 4 Units or More in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Least Square (LS) Mean Difference in Change From Baseline in COPD Assessment Tool (CAT) Total Score at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Serum Concentration of Tezepelumab
Time frame: Pre-dose at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36 and also at weeks 52 and 64 where no dosing was scheduled
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Response to Tezepelumab
Time frame: Pre-dose at weeks 0, 4, 12, 24, 36 and also at weeks 52 and 64 where no dosing was scheduled
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Feb 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39653044Singh D, Brightling CE, Rabe KF, Han MK, Christenson SA, Drummond MB, Papi A, Pavord ID, Molfino NA, Almqvist G, Kotalik A, Hellqvist A, Golabek M, Sindhwani NS, Ponnarambil SS; COURSE study investigators. Efficacy and safety of tezepelumab versus placebo in adults with moderate to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COURSE): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2025 Jan;13(1):47-58. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(24)00324-2. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
- CSR SynopsisLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Recruiting
Lungs on Fire: Wildfire Smoke, Incident Diseases, Susceptible Populations, and Community Values in Canada
Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Phase 2b Efficacy and Safety Study of AERO-007, an Inhaled LABA+LAMA Combination for Nebulization Delivery in COPD Patients
COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
RecruitingObservational study
Collection of Airway, Blood and/or Urine Specimens From Subjects for Research Studies
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Smoking
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Investigate the Effect of AZD6793 in Participants With Moderate to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of WIN378 in Participants With Moderate to Severe COPD (Sirius)
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dave Singh, MD principal investigator
Division of Infection, Immunity & Resp Medicine, The University of Manchester, United Kingdom
91 sites in 10 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Tezepelumab in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), run by AstraZeneca at 91 sites in 10 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 91 sites in United States, Canada, South Korea, Denmark, France and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of Moderate or Severe COPD Exacerbations in Participants With Moderate to Very Severe COPD. (time frame: From randomisation up to Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04039113, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Feb 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.