AzTrials
AzTrials

DermatomyositisPhase 3RECLAIIMNCT04044690

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of IgPro20 in Adults With Dermatomyositis (DM)

A Phase 3 study testing human immunoglobulin G in people with Dermatomyositis, run by CSL Behring at 76 sites in 14 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of IgPro20 (subcutaneous Ig) treatment in adult subjects with dermatomyositis (DM). The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of IgPro20 subcutaneous (SC) doses in comparison to placebo in adult subjects with DM, as… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Dermatomyositis
What is being tested?
human immunoglobulin G
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
134 participants
Where
76 sitesin 14 countries
Study dates
21 Oct 2019to 2 Dec 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female subjects ≥ 18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of at least probable idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) per European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) Classification Criteria which includes confirmation of dermatomyositis (DM) rash/manifestation, disease activity defined by presence of DM rash / manifestation or an objective disease activity measure
  • Disease severity defined by Physician global activity visual analog scale (VAS) with a minimum value of 2.0 cm on a 10 cm scale and MMT-8 ≤ 142 or CDASI total activity score ≥ 14.
  • Corticosteroid daily dose less than that or equal to 20 mg prednisolone equivalent

Who cannot join

  • Cancer-associated myositis
  • Evidence of active malignant disease or malignancies diagnosed within the previous 5 years
  • Physician Global Damage score ≥ 3, or clinically relevant improvement between Screening Visit and Baseline

Trial locations and contacts

76 sites in 14 countries.

76 sites in 14 countries

United States15 sites
  • 8401473 - RecioMed Clinical Research Network, Inc.

    Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472

  • 8401487 - Ohio State University

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • 8401152 - The University of Kansas Medical Center

    Fairway, Kansas, 66205

  • 8401160 - Center For Rheumatology

    Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334

  • 8401117 - Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research

    Glendale, Arizona, 85306

  • 8401115 - The University of Texas Medical School at Houston

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • 8401474 - West Tennessee Research Institute, LLC

    Jackson, Tennessee, 38305

  • 8401129 - UCLA - Rheumatology Los Angeles

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • 8401476 - DS Research

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40241

  • 8401132 - Omega Research Maitland

    Orlando, Florida, 32810

  • 8401210 - University of Pennsylvania

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • 8401199 - Neuromuscular Research Center

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85028

  • 8401151 - Biomedical Science Tower

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261

  • 8401486 - Oregon Health and Science University

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • 8401107 - Morsani Center for Advanced Health Care (CAHC)

    Tampa, Florida, 33616

Other trials in United States

Germany10 sites
  • 2760203 - Charité

    Berlin, 10117

  • 2760211 - Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 10117

  • 2760199 - University Hospital Köln

    Cologne, 50937

  • 2760271 - Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden

    Dresden, 01307

  • 2760273 - Hautklinik des Uni-Klinikums Erlangen

    Erlangen, 91504

  • 2760036 - University Medicine Göttingen

    Göttingen, 37075

  • 2760201 - Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH)

    Hanover, 30625

  • 2760210 - University of Münster

    Münster, 48149

  • 2760212 - University Hospital Of Tuebingen

    Tübingen, 72076

  • 2760268 - University of Ulm

    Ulm, 89081

Other trials in Germany

Japan10 sites
  • 3920125 - Tokyo Medical And Dental University Medical Hospital

    Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8519

  • 3920091 - Nippon Medical School Hospital

    Bunkyō-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603

  • 3920086 - St. Marianna University Hospital

    Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511

  • 3920088 - Gunma University Hospital

    Maebashi, Gunma, 371-6511

  • 3920096 - Chukyo Hospital

    Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 457-8510

  • 3920089 - Hokkaido University Hospital

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8648

  • 3920097 - Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital

    Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 162-8666

  • 3920087 - Wakayama Medical University Hospital

    Wakayama, 641-8509

  • 3920035 - Yamaguchi University Hospital

    Yamaguchi, 755-8505

  • 3920090 - University Of Fukui Hospital

    Yoshida-Gun, Fukui, 910-1193

Other trials in Japan

Ukraine7 sites
  • 8040053 - Cherkassy Regional Hospital

    Cherkasy, 18009

  • 8040055 - Mechnikov Institute of Microbiology and Immunology

    Kharkiv, 61029

  • 8040057 - Khmelnitskiy Regional Hospital

    Khmelnytskyi, 29000

  • 8040058 - State Institution National Scientific Center Strazhesko

    Kiev, 03151

  • 8040052 - Institute of Rheumatology

    Kyiv, 02081

  • 8040051 - Kyiv Railway Clinical Hospital No.2

    Kyiv, 03049

  • 8040054 - Modern Clinic LLC

    Zaporizhia, 69005

Other trials in Ukraine

France6 sites
  • 2500146 - CHU De Dijon Hopital Du Bocage

    Dijon, 21079

  • 2500188 - Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Lille

    Lille, 59037

  • 2500133 - CHU - Hospital de la Timone

    Marseille, 13385

  • 2500135 - CHU Nice-Hopital Archet I

    Nice, 06202

  • 2500132 - Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere

    Paris, 75013

  • 2500144 - Hopitaux Universitaire de Strasbourg

    Strasbourg, 67098

Other trials in France

Russia5 sites
  • 6430124 - ORIS Firm Limited Liability Company

    Moscow, 117321

  • 6430122 - City Clinical Hospital No. 5

    Nizhny Novgorod, 603005

  • 6430125 - Medical Centre-Healthy Family

    Novosibirsk, 630099

  • 6430120 - St. Petersburg City Rheumatological Hospital 25

    Saint Petersburg, 190068

  • 6430123 - Yaroslavl Oblast Clinical Hospital

    Yaroslavl, 150007

Other trials in Russia

Argentina4 sites
  • 0320084 - DIM Clinica Privada

    Buenos Aires, B1704ETD

  • 0320081 - Fundacion Respirar

    Buenos Aires, C1426ABP

  • 0320083 - Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

    Ciudad Autónoma Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1181ACH

  • 0320077 - Centro Medico Privado de Reumatolgia

    San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000

Other trials in Argentina

Belgium4 sites
  • 0560050 - Ghent Universit Hospital (UZ Gent)

    Ghent, 9000

  • 0560048 - Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Leuven

    Leuven, 3000

  • 0560056 - Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven

    Leuven, 3000

  • 0560049 - CHU de Liège - Sart Tilman

    Liège, 4000

Other trials in Belgium

Italy4 sites
  • 3800133 - Universita degli Studi Di Brescia - Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili di Brescia

    Brescia, 25123

  • 3800132 - Universitaria Vittorio Emanuele

    Catania, 95124

  • 3800139 - Universita degli Studi Firenze

    Florence, 50134

  • 3800134 - Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana

    Pisa, 56124

Other trials in Italy

Mexico3 sites
  • 4840081 - Centro Integral en Reumatologia, SA de CV

    Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44160

  • 4840082 - CINTRE, Centro de Investigacion y Tratamiento Reumatologico S.C.

    Mexico City, Mexico City, 11850

  • 4840084 - Centro de Alta Especialidad en Reumatologia e Investigacion del Potosí, S.C.

    San Luis Potosí City, 78213

Other trials in Mexico

Spain3 sites
  • 7240086 - Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña

    A Coruña, 15006

  • 7240011 - Hospital Universitario Valle de Hebron

    Barcelona, 08035

  • 7240112 - Hospital Clinic Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

Other trials in Spain

Poland2 sites
  • 6160104 - Zespol Poradni Specjalistycznych REUMED, ONYKSOWA Filia nr 2

    Lublin, 20-582

  • 6160117 - MedicalConcierge Centrum Medyczne

    Warsaw, 02-798

Other trials in Poland

Switzerland2 sites
  • 7560033 - University Hospital Bern Inselspital

    Bern, 3010

  • 7560028 - Kantonsspital St. Gallen

    Sankt Gallen, 9007

Other trials in Switzerland

Hungary1 site
  • 3480048 - University of Debrecen

    Debrecen, 4032

Other trials in Hungary

About this study

Official title: A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of IgPro20 (Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin, Hizentra®) in Adults With Dermatomyositis (DM) - The RECLAIIM Study

This is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of IgPro20 (subcutaneous Ig) treatment in adult subjects with dermatomyositis (DM). The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of IgPro20 subcutaneous (SC) doses in comparison to placebo in adult subjects with DM, as measured by responder status based on Total Improvement Score (TIS) assessments.

Conditions
Dermatomyositis
Being tested
human immunoglobulin G, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Dermatomyositis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • human immunoglobulin GDrug

    Also called IgPro20, Hizentra

    human immunoglobulin G administered subcutaneously

  • PlaceboDrug

    contains 2% human albumin, similar excipients as IgPro20 (Hizentra), same volume, same duration, administered subcutaneously

Study groups in NCT04044690
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IgPro20Experimentalhuman immunoglobulin G administered subcutaneously
Receives: Drug: human immunoglobulin G
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorhuman albumin solution administered subcutaneously
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Responder Rate

    A responder was defined as a participant with a TIS >= 20 points at Week 25 and at least 1 of the previous scheduled visits (Week 17 or 21), who completes 24 weeks of randomized IMP treatment without the use of rescue corticosteroid treatment. The TIS was a sum response criterion which incorporates 6 weighted international myositis assessment and clinical studies (IMACS) core set measures (CSMs) including Physician and Patient Global Disease Activity (PGA), Manual Muscle Testing-8 (MMT-8), Health Assessment Questionnaire, Muscle Enzyme, and Extramuscular Global Activity (EGA). Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 points, respectively on the TIS. Percentage of responders at Week 25 based on TIS are reported here. Multiple imputation (MI) was used to impute missing values for participants who discontinued due to the military activities in Ukraine.

    Measured: At Week 25

Secondary outcomes (33)
  1. Mean TIS

    The TIS was a sum response criterion which incorporates 6 weighted IMACS CSMs including Physician and PGA, MMT-8, Health Assessment Questionnaire, Muscle Enzyme, and EGA. A total improvement score (range 0 to 100; higher the score, better the condition), determined by summing scores for each CSM, was based on improvement in and relative weight of each CSM. Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 points, respectively on the TIS. Least squares (LS) means were estimated using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) including treatment, visit, the interaction between treatment and visit, region, and baseline MMT-8 (<=142 points vs >142 points) as fixed effects, participant as a random effect.

    Measured: At Week 25

  2. Mean Changes From Baseline in MMT-8

    The MMT-8 was a set of 8 designated muscles which were tested bilaterally (potential score ranging from 0 to 150): 7 biaxial muscles with a potential score 0 to 140 and 1 axial (neck flexors) with a potential score of 0 to 10. Improvement is documented with an increase in score. LS means were estimated using a MMRM including treatment, visit, the interaction between treatment and visit, and region as fixed effects, baseline MMT-8 as a continuous covariate and participant as a random effect.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 25

  3. Mean Changes From Baseline in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index Total Activity Score (CDASI-A)

    The CDASI in its modified version 2 (V2) is a validated tool of skin disease activity (3 items) and damage (3 items) assessment. Scores range from 0-100 for activity and from 0-32 for damage. Improvement is documented with a decrease in score. LS means were estimated using a MMRM including treatment, visit, the interaction between treatment and visit, region, and baseline MMT-8 (<=142 points vs >142 points) as fixed effects, baseline CDASI-A as a continuous covariate, and participants as a random effect.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 25

  4. Percentage of Participants Who Are Able to Reduce the Oral Corticosteroid Dose by >= 25%

    Reduction in corticosteroid dose.

    Measured: At Week 25

  5. Period 1: Mean TIS at Each Visit

    The TIS was a sum response criterion which incorporates 6 weighted IMACS CSMs including Physician and PGA, MMT-8, Health Assessment Questionnaire, Muscle Enzyme, and EGA. A total improvement score (range 0 to 100), determined by summing scores for each CSM, was based on improvement in and relative weight of each CSM. Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 points on the TIS.

    Measured: At Week 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, and 25

  6. Period 2: Mean TIS at Each Visit

    The TIS was a sum response criterion which incorporates 6 weighted IMACS CSMs including Physician and PGA, MMT-8, Health Assessment Questionnaire, Muscle Enzyme, and EGA. A total improvement score (range 0 to 100), determined by summing scores for each CSM, was based on improvement in and relative weight of each CSM. Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 points on the TIS.

    Measured: Week 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

  7. Period 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving TIS ≥ 20, ≥ 40 and ≥ 60 Points

    Participants were considered and reported in more than one category (TIS >= 20, >= 40 and >= 60 Points).

    Measured: At Week 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, and 25

  8. Period 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving TIS ≥ 20, ≥ 40 and ≥ 60 Points

    Participants were considered and reported in more than one category (TIS >= 20, >= 40 and >= 60 Points).

    Measured: Week 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53

  9. Period 1: Time to First Achieving TIS >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 Points on the TIS

    The observation was censored if no improvement was observed before the intake of rescue/increased doses of oral corticosteroids in SP1 or before the end of the period.

    Measured: Up to Week 25

  10. Period 1 and 2: Time to First Achieving TIS >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 Points Improvement on the TIS

    The observation was censored if no improvement was observed before the intake of rescue/increased doses of oral corticosteroids in SP1 or before the end of the period.

    Measured: Up to Week 53

  11. Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual CSMs (Except Muscle Enzymes) and CDASI

    Individual CSMs included following: Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Physician global disease activity (PGDA), PGA assessment, MMT-8, health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), and MDAAT-EGA. Higher values were associated with a better state of health for the MMT-8 (range 0 -150) assessment, while lower values were associated with a better state of health for: MDAAT-PGDA (range 0 -100), PGA (range 0-100), HAQ-DI (range 0-3), MDAAT-EGA (range 0 -100), and CDASI-A (range 0-100).

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 25

  12. Mean Changes From Week 25 in Individual CSMs (Except Muscle Enzymes) and CDASI

    Individual CSMs included following: MDAAT-PGDA, PGA assessment, MMT-8, HAQ-DI, and MDAAT extramacular global assessment. Higher values were associated with a better state of health for the MMT-8 (range 0 -150) assessment, while lower values were associated with a better state of health for: MDAAT-PGDA (range 0 -100), PGA (range 0-100), HAQ-DI (range 0-3), MDAAT-EGA (range 0 -100), and CDASI-A (range 0-100).

    Measured: From Week 25 to Week 53

  13. Period 1: Number of Participants Meeting Definition of Worsening (DOW) at Least Once, Twice, or > Twice

    The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment Visual Analog Scale (VAS) worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.)

    Measured: Up to Week 25

  14. Period 1: Percentage of Participants Meeting DOW at Least Once, Twice, or > Twice

    The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment VAS worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.)

    Measured: Up to Week 25

  15. Period 2: Number of Participants Meeting DOW at Least Once, Twice, or > Twice

    The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment VAS worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.)

    Measured: From Week 25 up to Week 53

  16. Period 2: Percentage of Participants Meeting DOW at Least Once, Twice, or > Twice

    The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment VAS worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.)

    Measured: From Week 25 up to Week 53

  17. Time to Meeting DOW for the First Time

    The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment VAS worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.) The observation was censored if no DOW was observed before the intake of rescue treatment or before the end of the period.

    Measured: Up to Week 53

  18. Number of Participants Meeting DOW and Receiving Rescue Steroid Treatment

    The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment VAS worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.) The Number of participants meeting DOW and who received rescue steroid treatment are reported here.

    Measured: Up to Week 25

  19. Percentage of Participants Meeting DOW and Receiving Rescue Steroid Treatment

    The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment VAS worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.) The percentage of participants meeting DOW and who received rescue steroid treatment are reported here.

    Measured: Up to Week 25

  20. Number of Participants Who Start Oral Corticosteroid Dose Taper

    Measured: Up to Week 25

  21. Percentage of Participants Who Start Oral Corticosteroid Dose Taper

    Measured: Up to Week 25

  22. Number of Participants Who Are Able to Reduce the Oral Corticosteroid Dose by >= 25%, >= 50%, >= 75%

    Measured: Up to Week 25 and 52

  23. Percentage of Participants Who Are Able to Reduce the Oral Corticosteroid Dose by >= 25%, >= 50%, >= 75%

    Measured: Up to Week 25 and 52

  24. Percentage of Participants Receiving Rescue Corticosteroid Treatment

    Measured: Up to Week 25

  25. Percentage of Participants Whose Rescue Corticosteroid Treatment is Tapered

    Measured: Up to Week 25

  26. Time to First Intake of Rescue Corticosteroid Treatment

    The observation was censored if no Rescue was observed before the last day of the last week with IMP intake or before the end of the period.

    Measured: Up to Week 25

  27. Number of Participants Having at Least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and More Than 2 Levels of Improvement From Baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EuroQoL 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)

    EQ-5D-5L was assessed across 5 levels, with participants selecting the option that best described their health on that day, ranging from "no problems" to "unable to" walk, wash/dress, or perform usual activities. Out of total participants of each arm, only participants having at least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and more than 2 Levels of improvement from baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 13 and 25

  28. Percentage of Participants Having at Least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and More Than 2 Levels of Improvement From Baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L

    EQ-5D-5L was assessed across 5 levels, with participants selecting the option that best described their health on that day, ranging from "no problems" to "unable to" walk, wash/dress, or perform usual activities. Out of total participants of each arm, only participants having at least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and more than 2 Levels of improvement from baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: From Baseline to Week 13 and 25

  29. Number of Participants Having no Reduction in Levels, at Least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and More Than 2 Levels of Improvement From Week 25 in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L

    EQ-5D-5L was assessed across 5 levels, with participants selecting the option that best described their health on that day, ranging from "no problems" to "unable to" walk, wash/dress, or perform usual activities. Out of total participants of each arm, only participants having no reduction, at least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and more than 2 Levels of improvement from baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: From Week 25 to 41 and 53

  30. Percentage of Participants Having no Reduction in Levels, at Least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and More Than 2 Levels of Improvement From Week 25 in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L

    EQ-5D-5L was assessed across 5 levels, with participants selecting the option that best described their health on that day, ranging from "no problems" to "unable to" walk, wash/dress, or perform usual activities. Out of total participants of each arm, only participants having no reduction, at least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and more than 2 Levels of improvement from baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L are reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: From Week 25 to 41 and 53

  31. Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Related TEAEs and Serious TEAEs

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  32. Annualized Rate of TEAEs, Related TEAEs and Serious TEAEs Per Time at Risk

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  33. Annualized Rate of Mild, Moderate, and Severe TEAEs Per Time at Risk

    Measured: Up to 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Aug 2019
  2. Study start21 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion2 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion2 Dec 2024

Why it stopped: Primary endpoint not attained

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
134 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04044690
Sponsor's protocol ID
IgPro20_3007
Other IDs
2018-003171-35, 2023-508293-28-00, 2023, 2018
Acronym
RECLAIIM
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
1 Aug 2019
Last updated
9 Dec 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: CSL will consider requests to share Individual Patient Data (IPD) from systematic review groups or bona-fide researchers. For information on the process and requirements for submitting a voluntary data sharing request for IPD, please contact CSL at clinicaltrials@cslbehring.com. Applicable country specific privacy and other laws and regulations will be considered and may prevent sharing of IPD. If the request is approved and the researcher has executed an appropriate data sharing agreement, IPD that has been appropriately anonymized will be available.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing human immunoglobulin G in people with Dermatomyositis, run by CSL Behring at 76 sites in 14 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 76 sites in United States, Germany, Japan, Ukraine, France and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Responder Rate (time frame: At Week 25). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in