DermatomyositisPhase 3RECLAIIMNCT04044690
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of IgPro20 in Adults With Dermatomyositis (DM)
A Phase 3 study testing human immunoglobulin G in people with Dermatomyositis, run by CSL Behring at 76 sites in 14 countries.
Trial summary
This is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of IgPro20 (subcutaneous Ig) treatment in adult subjects with dermatomyositis (DM). The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of IgPro20 subcutaneous (SC) doses in comparison to placebo in adult subjects with DM, as… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dermatomyositis
- What is being tested?
- human immunoglobulin G
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 134 participants
- Where
- 76 sitesin 14 countries
- Study dates
- 21 Oct 2019to 2 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female subjects ≥ 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of at least probable idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) per European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) Classification Criteria which includes confirmation of dermatomyositis (DM) rash/manifestation, disease activity defined by presence of DM rash / manifestation or an objective disease activity measure
- Disease severity defined by Physician global activity visual analog scale (VAS) with a minimum value of 2.0 cm on a 10 cm scale and MMT-8 ≤ 142 or CDASI total activity score ≥ 14.
- Corticosteroid daily dose less than that or equal to 20 mg prednisolone equivalent
Who cannot join
- Cancer-associated myositis
- Evidence of active malignant disease or malignancies diagnosed within the previous 5 years
- Physician Global Damage score ≥ 3, or clinically relevant improvement between Screening Visit and Baseline
Trial locations and contacts
76 sites in 14 countries.
76 sites in 14 countries
United States15 sites
8401473 - RecioMed Clinical Research Network, Inc.
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33472
8401487 - Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
8401152 - The University of Kansas Medical Center
Fairway, Kansas, 66205
8401160 - Center For Rheumatology
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33334
8401117 - Arizona Arthritis & Rheumatology Research
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
8401115 - The University of Texas Medical School at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030
8401474 - West Tennessee Research Institute, LLC
Jackson, Tennessee, 38305
8401129 - UCLA - Rheumatology Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095
8401476 - DS Research
Louisville, Kentucky, 40241
8401132 - Omega Research Maitland
Orlando, Florida, 32810
8401210 - University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
8401199 - Neuromuscular Research Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85028
8401151 - Biomedical Science Tower
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15261
8401486 - Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
8401107 - Morsani Center for Advanced Health Care (CAHC)
Tampa, Florida, 33616
Germany10 sites
2760203 - Charité
Berlin, 10117
2760211 - Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117
2760199 - University Hospital Köln
Cologne, 50937
2760271 - Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus TU Dresden
Dresden, 01307
2760273 - Hautklinik des Uni-Klinikums Erlangen
Erlangen, 91504
2760036 - University Medicine Göttingen
Göttingen, 37075
2760201 - Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH)
Hanover, 30625
2760210 - University of Münster
Münster, 48149
2760212 - University Hospital Of Tuebingen
Tübingen, 72076
2760268 - University of Ulm
Ulm, 89081
Japan10 sites
3920125 - Tokyo Medical And Dental University Medical Hospital
Bunkyo, Tokyo, 113-8519
3920091 - Nippon Medical School Hospital
Bunkyō-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8603
3920086 - St. Marianna University Hospital
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, 216-8511
3920088 - Gunma University Hospital
Maebashi, Gunma, 371-6511
3920096 - Chukyo Hospital
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 457-8510
3920089 - Hokkaido University Hospital
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8648
3920097 - Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital
Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 162-8666
3920087 - Wakayama Medical University Hospital
Wakayama, 641-8509
3920035 - Yamaguchi University Hospital
Yamaguchi, 755-8505
3920090 - University Of Fukui Hospital
Yoshida-Gun, Fukui, 910-1193
Ukraine7 sites
8040053 - Cherkassy Regional Hospital
Cherkasy, 18009
8040055 - Mechnikov Institute of Microbiology and Immunology
Kharkiv, 61029
8040057 - Khmelnitskiy Regional Hospital
Khmelnytskyi, 29000
8040058 - State Institution National Scientific Center Strazhesko
Kiev, 03151
8040052 - Institute of Rheumatology
Kyiv, 02081
8040051 - Kyiv Railway Clinical Hospital No.2
Kyiv, 03049
8040054 - Modern Clinic LLC
Zaporizhia, 69005
France6 sites
2500146 - CHU De Dijon Hopital Du Bocage
Dijon, 21079
2500188 - Centre Hospitalier Regional Universitaire de Lille
Lille, 59037
2500133 - CHU - Hospital de la Timone
Marseille, 13385
2500135 - CHU Nice-Hopital Archet I
Nice, 06202
2500132 - Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere
Paris, 75013
2500144 - Hopitaux Universitaire de Strasbourg
Strasbourg, 67098
Russia5 sites
6430124 - ORIS Firm Limited Liability Company
Moscow, 117321
6430122 - City Clinical Hospital No. 5
Nizhny Novgorod, 603005
6430125 - Medical Centre-Healthy Family
Novosibirsk, 630099
6430120 - St. Petersburg City Rheumatological Hospital 25
Saint Petersburg, 190068
6430123 - Yaroslavl Oblast Clinical Hospital
Yaroslavl, 150007
Argentina4 sites
0320084 - DIM Clinica Privada
Buenos Aires, B1704ETD
0320081 - Fundacion Respirar
Buenos Aires, C1426ABP
0320083 - Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Ciudad Autónoma Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1181ACH
0320077 - Centro Medico Privado de Reumatolgia
San Miguel de Tucumán, T4000
Belgium4 sites
0560050 - Ghent Universit Hospital (UZ Gent)
Ghent, 9000
0560048 - Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Leuven
Leuven, 3000
0560056 - Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
Leuven, 3000
0560049 - CHU de Liège - Sart Tilman
Liège, 4000
Italy4 sites
3800133 - Universita degli Studi Di Brescia - Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili di Brescia
Brescia, 25123
3800132 - Universitaria Vittorio Emanuele
Catania, 95124
3800139 - Universita degli Studi Firenze
Florence, 50134
3800134 - Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
Pisa, 56124
Mexico3 sites
4840081 - Centro Integral en Reumatologia, SA de CV
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44160
4840082 - CINTRE, Centro de Investigacion y Tratamiento Reumatologico S.C.
Mexico City, Mexico City, 11850
4840084 - Centro de Alta Especialidad en Reumatologia e Investigacion del Potosí, S.C.
San Luis Potosí City, 78213
Spain3 sites
7240086 - Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña
A Coruña, 15006
7240011 - Hospital Universitario Valle de Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
7240112 - Hospital Clinic Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
Poland2 sites
6160104 - Zespol Poradni Specjalistycznych REUMED, ONYKSOWA Filia nr 2
Lublin, 20-582
6160117 - MedicalConcierge Centrum Medyczne
Warsaw, 02-798
Switzerland2 sites
7560033 - University Hospital Bern Inselspital
Bern, 3010
7560028 - Kantonsspital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, 9007
About this study
Official title: A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of IgPro20 (Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin, Hizentra®) in Adults With Dermatomyositis (DM) - The RECLAIIM Study
This is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of IgPro20 (subcutaneous Ig) treatment in adult subjects with dermatomyositis (DM). The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of IgPro20 subcutaneous (SC) doses in comparison to placebo in adult subjects with DM, as measured by responder status based on Total Improvement Score (TIS) assessments.
- Conditions
- Dermatomyositis
- Being tested
- human immunoglobulin G, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatomyositis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
human immunoglobulin GDrug
Also called IgPro20, Hizentra
human immunoglobulin G administered subcutaneously
PlaceboDrug
contains 2% human albumin, similar excipients as IgPro20 (Hizentra), same volume, same duration, administered subcutaneously
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IgPro20 | Experimental | human immunoglobulin G administered subcutaneously Receives: Drug: human immunoglobulin G |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | human albumin solution administered subcutaneously Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Responder Rate
A responder was defined as a participant with a TIS >= 20 points at Week 25 and at least 1 of the previous scheduled visits (Week 17 or 21), who completes 24 weeks of randomized IMP treatment without the use of rescue corticosteroid treatment. The TIS was a sum response criterion which incorporates 6 weighted international myositis assessment and clinical studies (IMACS) core set measures (CSMs) including Physician and Patient Global Disease Activity (PGA), Manual Muscle Testing-8 (MMT-8), Health Assessment Questionnaire, Muscle Enzyme, and Extramuscular Global Activity (EGA). Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 points, respectively on the TIS. Percentage of responders at Week 25 based on TIS are reported here. Multiple imputation (MI) was used to impute missing values for participants who discontinued due to the military activities in Ukraine.
Measured: At Week 25
Secondary outcomes (33)
Mean TIS
The TIS was a sum response criterion which incorporates 6 weighted IMACS CSMs including Physician and PGA, MMT-8, Health Assessment Questionnaire, Muscle Enzyme, and EGA. A total improvement score (range 0 to 100; higher the score, better the condition), determined by summing scores for each CSM, was based on improvement in and relative weight of each CSM. Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 points, respectively on the TIS. Least squares (LS) means were estimated using a mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) including treatment, visit, the interaction between treatment and visit, region, and baseline MMT-8 (<=142 points vs >142 points) as fixed effects, participant as a random effect.
Measured: At Week 25
Mean Changes From Baseline in MMT-8
The MMT-8 was a set of 8 designated muscles which were tested bilaterally (potential score ranging from 0 to 150): 7 biaxial muscles with a potential score 0 to 140 and 1 axial (neck flexors) with a potential score of 0 to 10. Improvement is documented with an increase in score. LS means were estimated using a MMRM including treatment, visit, the interaction between treatment and visit, and region as fixed effects, baseline MMT-8 as a continuous covariate and participant as a random effect.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 25
Mean Changes From Baseline in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index Total Activity Score (CDASI-A)
The CDASI in its modified version 2 (V2) is a validated tool of skin disease activity (3 items) and damage (3 items) assessment. Scores range from 0-100 for activity and from 0-32 for damage. Improvement is documented with a decrease in score. LS means were estimated using a MMRM including treatment, visit, the interaction between treatment and visit, region, and baseline MMT-8 (<=142 points vs >142 points) as fixed effects, baseline CDASI-A as a continuous covariate, and participants as a random effect.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 25
Percentage of Participants Who Are Able to Reduce the Oral Corticosteroid Dose by >= 25%
Reduction in corticosteroid dose.
Measured: At Week 25
Period 1: Mean TIS at Each Visit
The TIS was a sum response criterion which incorporates 6 weighted IMACS CSMs including Physician and PGA, MMT-8, Health Assessment Questionnaire, Muscle Enzyme, and EGA. A total improvement score (range 0 to 100), determined by summing scores for each CSM, was based on improvement in and relative weight of each CSM. Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 points on the TIS.
Measured: At Week 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, and 25
Period 2: Mean TIS at Each Visit
The TIS was a sum response criterion which incorporates 6 weighted IMACS CSMs including Physician and PGA, MMT-8, Health Assessment Questionnaire, Muscle Enzyme, and EGA. A total improvement score (range 0 to 100), determined by summing scores for each CSM, was based on improvement in and relative weight of each CSM. Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 points on the TIS.
Measured: Week 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Period 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving TIS ≥ 20, ≥ 40 and ≥ 60 Points
Participants were considered and reported in more than one category (TIS >= 20, >= 40 and >= 60 Points).
Measured: At Week 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, and 25
Period 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving TIS ≥ 20, ≥ 40 and ≥ 60 Points
Participants were considered and reported in more than one category (TIS >= 20, >= 40 and >= 60 Points).
Measured: Week 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Period 1: Time to First Achieving TIS >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 Points on the TIS
The observation was censored if no improvement was observed before the intake of rescue/increased doses of oral corticosteroids in SP1 or before the end of the period.
Measured: Up to Week 25
Period 1 and 2: Time to First Achieving TIS >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 Points Improvement on the TIS
The observation was censored if no improvement was observed before the intake of rescue/increased doses of oral corticosteroids in SP1 or before the end of the period.
Measured: Up to Week 53
Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual CSMs (Except Muscle Enzymes) and CDASI
Individual CSMs included following: Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Physician global disease activity (PGDA), PGA assessment, MMT-8, health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI), and MDAAT-EGA. Higher values were associated with a better state of health for the MMT-8 (range 0 -150) assessment, while lower values were associated with a better state of health for: MDAAT-PGDA (range 0 -100), PGA (range 0-100), HAQ-DI (range 0-3), MDAAT-EGA (range 0 -100), and CDASI-A (range 0-100).
Measured: From Baseline to Week 25
Mean Changes From Week 25 in Individual CSMs (Except Muscle Enzymes) and CDASI
Individual CSMs included following: MDAAT-PGDA, PGA assessment, MMT-8, HAQ-DI, and MDAAT extramacular global assessment. Higher values were associated with a better state of health for the MMT-8 (range 0 -150) assessment, while lower values were associated with a better state of health for: MDAAT-PGDA (range 0 -100), PGA (range 0-100), HAQ-DI (range 0-3), MDAAT-EGA (range 0 -100), and CDASI-A (range 0-100).
Measured: From Week 25 to Week 53
Period 1: Number of Participants Meeting Definition of Worsening (DOW) at Least Once, Twice, or > Twice
The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment Visual Analog Scale (VAS) worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.)
Measured: Up to Week 25
Period 1: Percentage of Participants Meeting DOW at Least Once, Twice, or > Twice
The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment VAS worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.)
Measured: Up to Week 25
Period 2: Number of Participants Meeting DOW at Least Once, Twice, or > Twice
The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment VAS worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.)
Measured: From Week 25 up to Week 53
Period 2: Percentage of Participants Meeting DOW at Least Once, Twice, or > Twice
The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment VAS worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.)
Measured: From Week 25 up to Week 53
Time to Meeting DOW for the First Time
The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment VAS worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.) The observation was censored if no DOW was observed before the intake of rescue treatment or before the end of the period.
Measured: Up to Week 53
Number of Participants Meeting DOW and Receiving Rescue Steroid Treatment
The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment VAS worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.) The Number of participants meeting DOW and who received rescue steroid treatment are reported here.
Measured: Up to Week 25
Percentage of Participants Meeting DOW and Receiving Rescue Steroid Treatment
The DOW consists of meeting 1 of the following criteria on 2 consecutive visits at least 2 weeks apart: PGA Assessment VAS worsening >= 2 cm* and MMT-8 worsening >= absolute 10%, or EGA worsening >= 2 cm on the MDAAT VAS, or Any 3 of 6 CSM worsening by >= absolute 20%. (*If baseline PGA VAS is 8 to 10, then any worsening on Physician Global VAS was acceptable as long as MMT-8 criterion was met.) The percentage of participants meeting DOW and who received rescue steroid treatment are reported here.
Measured: Up to Week 25
Number of Participants Who Start Oral Corticosteroid Dose Taper
Measured: Up to Week 25
Percentage of Participants Who Start Oral Corticosteroid Dose Taper
Measured: Up to Week 25
Number of Participants Who Are Able to Reduce the Oral Corticosteroid Dose by >= 25%, >= 50%, >= 75%
Measured: Up to Week 25 and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Are Able to Reduce the Oral Corticosteroid Dose by >= 25%, >= 50%, >= 75%
Measured: Up to Week 25 and 52
Percentage of Participants Receiving Rescue Corticosteroid Treatment
Measured: Up to Week 25
Percentage of Participants Whose Rescue Corticosteroid Treatment is Tapered
Measured: Up to Week 25
Time to First Intake of Rescue Corticosteroid Treatment
The observation was censored if no Rescue was observed before the last day of the last week with IMP intake or before the end of the period.
Measured: Up to Week 25
Number of Participants Having at Least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and More Than 2 Levels of Improvement From Baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EuroQoL 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
EQ-5D-5L was assessed across 5 levels, with participants selecting the option that best described their health on that day, ranging from "no problems" to "unable to" walk, wash/dress, or perform usual activities. Out of total participants of each arm, only participants having at least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and more than 2 Levels of improvement from baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L are reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 13 and 25
Percentage of Participants Having at Least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and More Than 2 Levels of Improvement From Baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L was assessed across 5 levels, with participants selecting the option that best described their health on that day, ranging from "no problems" to "unable to" walk, wash/dress, or perform usual activities. Out of total participants of each arm, only participants having at least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and more than 2 Levels of improvement from baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L are reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: From Baseline to Week 13 and 25
Number of Participants Having no Reduction in Levels, at Least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and More Than 2 Levels of Improvement From Week 25 in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L was assessed across 5 levels, with participants selecting the option that best described their health on that day, ranging from "no problems" to "unable to" walk, wash/dress, or perform usual activities. Out of total participants of each arm, only participants having no reduction, at least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and more than 2 Levels of improvement from baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L are reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: From Week 25 to 41 and 53
Percentage of Participants Having no Reduction in Levels, at Least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and More Than 2 Levels of Improvement From Week 25 in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L was assessed across 5 levels, with participants selecting the option that best described their health on that day, ranging from "no problems" to "unable to" walk, wash/dress, or perform usual activities. Out of total participants of each arm, only participants having no reduction, at least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and more than 2 Levels of improvement from baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L are reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: From Week 25 to 41 and 53
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Related TEAEs and Serious TEAEs
Measured: Up to 5 years
Annualized Rate of TEAEs, Related TEAEs and Serious TEAEs Per Time at Risk
Measured: Up to 5 years
Annualized Rate of Mild, Moderate, and Severe TEAEs Per Time at Risk
Measured: Up to 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Aug 2019
- Study start21 Oct 2019
- Primary completion2 Dec 2024
- Study completion2 Dec 2024
Why it stopped: Primary endpoint not attained
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for DermatomyositisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by CSL BehringThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- CSL Behring
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Study Director, Study director, CSL Behring
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04044690
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IgPro20_3007
- Other IDs
- 2018-003171-35, 2023-508293-28-00, 2023, 2018
- Acronym
- RECLAIIM
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: CSL will consider requests to share Individual Patient Data (IPD) from systematic review groups or bona-fide researchers. For information on the process and requirements for submitting a voluntary data sharing request for IPD, please contact CSL at clinicaltrials@cslbehring.com. Applicable country specific privacy and other laws and regulations will be considered and may prevent sharing of IPD. If the request is approved and the researcher has executed an appropriate data sharing agreement, IPD that has been appropriately anonymized will be available.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of IgPro20 (Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin, Hizentra®) in Adults With Dermatomyositis (DM) - The RECLAIIM Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04044690
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RECLAIIM / IgPro20_3007
- Conditions
- Dermatomyositis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Primary endpoint not attained
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CSL BehringIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 9 Dec 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of IgPro20 (subcutaneous Ig) treatment in adult subjects with dermatomyositis (DM). The primary objective of this study is to assess the efficacy of IgPro20 subcutaneous (SC) doses in comparison to placebo in adult subjects with DM, as measured by responder status based on Total Improvement Score (TIS) assessments.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IgPro20 | Experimental | Drug: human immunoglobulin Ghuman immunoglobulin G administered subcutaneously |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebohuman albumin solution administered subcutaneously |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or female subjects ≥ 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of at least probable idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) per European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology (EULAR/ACR) Classification Criteria which includes confirmation of dermatomyositis (DM) rash/manifestation, disease activity defined by presence of DM rash / manifestation or an objective disease activity measure
- Disease severity defined by Physician global activity visual analog scale (VAS) with a minimum value of 2.0 cm on a 10 cm scale and MMT-8 ≤ 142 or CDASI total activity score ≥ 14.
- Corticosteroid daily dose less than that or equal to 20 mg prednisolone equivalent
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Cancer-associated myositis
- Evidence of active malignant disease or malignancies diagnosed within the previous 5 years
- Physician Global Damage score ≥ 3, or clinically relevant improvement between Screening Visit and Baseline
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| human immunoglobulin GAlso: IgPro20, Hizentrahuman immunoglobulin G administered subcutaneously | Drug | IgPro20 |
| Placebocontains 2% human albumin, similar excipients as IgPro20 (Hizentra), same volume, same duration, administered subcutaneously | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Responder Rate
Time frame: At Week 25
A responder was defined as a participant with a TIS >= 20 points at Week 25 and at least 1 of the previous scheduled visits (Week 17 or 21), who completes 24 weeks of randomized IMP treatment without the use of rescue corticosteroid treatment. The TIS was a sum response criterion which incorporates 6 weighted international myositis assessment and clinical studies (IMACS) core set measures (CSMs) including Physician and Patient Global Disease Activity (PGA), Manual Muscle Testing-8 (MMT-8), Health Assessment Questionnaire, Muscle Enzyme, and Extramuscular Global Activity (EGA). Thresholds for minimal, moderate, and major improvement were >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 points, respectively on the TIS. Percentage of responders at Week 25 based on TIS are reported here. Multiple imputation (MI) was used to impute missing values for participants who discontinued due to the military activities in Ukraine.
33 secondary outcomes
Mean TIS
Time frame: At Week 25
Mean Changes From Baseline in MMT-8
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 25
Mean Changes From Baseline in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index Total Activity Score (CDASI-A)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 25
Percentage of Participants Who Are Able to Reduce the Oral Corticosteroid Dose by >= 25%
Time frame: At Week 25
Period 1: Mean TIS at Each Visit
Time frame: At Week 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, and 25
Period 2: Mean TIS at Each Visit
Time frame: Week 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Period 1: Percentage of Participants Achieving TIS ≥ 20, ≥ 40 and ≥ 60 Points
Time frame: At Week 5, 9, 13, 17, 21, and 25
Period 2: Percentage of Participants Achieving TIS ≥ 20, ≥ 40 and ≥ 60 Points
Time frame: Week 25, 29, 33, 37, 41, 45, 49, and 53
Period 1: Time to First Achieving TIS >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 Points on the TIS
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Period 1 and 2: Time to First Achieving TIS >= 20, >= 40, and >= 60 Points Improvement on the TIS
Time frame: Up to Week 53
Mean Changes From Baseline in Individual CSMs (Except Muscle Enzymes) and CDASI
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 25
Mean Changes From Week 25 in Individual CSMs (Except Muscle Enzymes) and CDASI
Time frame: From Week 25 to Week 53
Period 1: Number of Participants Meeting Definition of Worsening (DOW) at Least Once, Twice, or > Twice
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Period 1: Percentage of Participants Meeting DOW at Least Once, Twice, or > Twice
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Period 2: Number of Participants Meeting DOW at Least Once, Twice, or > Twice
Time frame: From Week 25 up to Week 53
Period 2: Percentage of Participants Meeting DOW at Least Once, Twice, or > Twice
Time frame: From Week 25 up to Week 53
Time to Meeting DOW for the First Time
Time frame: Up to Week 53
Number of Participants Meeting DOW and Receiving Rescue Steroid Treatment
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Percentage of Participants Meeting DOW and Receiving Rescue Steroid Treatment
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Number of Participants Who Start Oral Corticosteroid Dose Taper
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Percentage of Participants Who Start Oral Corticosteroid Dose Taper
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Number of Participants Who Are Able to Reduce the Oral Corticosteroid Dose by >= 25%, >= 50%, >= 75%
Time frame: Up to Week 25 and 52
Percentage of Participants Who Are Able to Reduce the Oral Corticosteroid Dose by >= 25%, >= 50%, >= 75%
Time frame: Up to Week 25 and 52
Percentage of Participants Receiving Rescue Corticosteroid Treatment
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Percentage of Participants Whose Rescue Corticosteroid Treatment is Tapered
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Time to First Intake of Rescue Corticosteroid Treatment
Time frame: Up to Week 25
Number of Participants Having at Least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and More Than 2 Levels of Improvement From Baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EuroQoL 5-Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 13 and 25
Percentage of Participants Having at Least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and More Than 2 Levels of Improvement From Baseline in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: From Baseline to Week 13 and 25
Number of Participants Having no Reduction in Levels, at Least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and More Than 2 Levels of Improvement From Week 25 in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: From Week 25 to 41 and 53
Percentage of Participants Having no Reduction in Levels, at Least 1 Level, 2 Levels, and More Than 2 Levels of Improvement From Week 25 in Mobility, Self-care, and Usual Activities Domains of EQ-5D-5L
Time frame: From Week 25 to 41 and 53
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Related TEAEs and Serious TEAEs
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Annualized Rate of TEAEs, Related TEAEs and Serious TEAEs Per Time at Risk
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Annualized Rate of Mild, Moderate, and Severe TEAEs Per Time at Risk
Time frame: Up to 5 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. CSL will consider requests to share Individual Patient Data (IPD) from systematic review groups or bona-fide researchers. For information on the process and requirements for submitting a voluntary data sharing request for IPD, please contact CSL at clinicaltrials@cslbehring.com. Applicable country specific privacy and other laws and regulations will be considered and may prevent sharing of IPD. If the request is approved and the researcher has executed an appropriate data sharing agreement, IPD that has been appropriately anonymized will be available.
Related trials for Dermatomyositis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Empasiprubart in Adults With Dermatomyositis
Dermatomyositis, Myositis
RecruitingPhase 2
FAST for DM - Fatty Acid Supplementation Trial (FAST) for Dermatomyositis (DM)
Dermatomyositis (DM), Juvenile Dermatomyositis (JDM)
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History of Inflammatory Muscle Diseases
Inflammation In Skeletal Muscle
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Investigate the Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of ALLO-329, an Allogeneic CAR T-cell Therapy, in Adults With Autoimmune Disease
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (With and Without Nephritis), Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy
RecruitingPhase 2
Topical Ruxolitinib Cream for Refractory Cutaneous Dermatomyositis
Dermatomyositis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Study Director study director
CSL Behring
76 sites in 14 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing human immunoglobulin G in people with Dermatomyositis, run by CSL Behring at 76 sites in 14 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 76 sites in United States, Germany, Japan, Ukraine, France and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Responder Rate (time frame: At Week 25). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2025.