Colorectal CancerCFC2015NCT04049357
Care for Colon 2015
A study testing Camera Capsule Endoscopy/ PillCam in people with Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The investigatior believe that implementing camera capsule endoscopy as a filter test to colonoscopy will increase screening participation, increase the number of individuals with detected intermediate- high risk adenomas or cancer, reduce the colonoscopy demand and reduce the number of complications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 74 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer, Adenoma
- What is being tested?
- Camera Capsule Endoscopy/ PillCam
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,031 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 3 Aug 2020to 1 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 74 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participation in the Danish colorectal screening program
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Bowel Cancer Screening. A Randomized Controlled Trial
The investigatior believe that implementing camera capsule endoscopy as a filter test to colonoscopy will increase screening participation, increase the number of individuals with detected intermediate- high risk adenomas or cancer, reduce the colonoscopy demand and reduce the number of complications.
Read the detailed description
The Danish national colorectal cancer screening program includes all citizens aged 50-74 years, who are invited biennially to a fecal test for invisible blood in the stool. If the test is positive the citizen is invited for a colonoscopy. 90% of the test-positive undergo colonoscopy. The detected cancers are at a significant earlier stage and survival from screening detected cancer is higher. It is also expected that cancer incidence will drop due to removal of the advanced adenomas before they develop into cancer. Although initial results are positive, there is room for improvement. Additionally there are rare but serious complications to colonoscopy in the form of bleeding or bowel perforation.
Through four years the investigators have tested the colon capsule endoscopy method, and find that the investigation is associated with significantly less discomfort and that the diagnostic ability to find polyps > 1 cm is better than colonoscopy.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Adenoma
- Being tested
- Camera Capsule Endoscopy/ PillCam
- Keywords
- Camera Capsule Endoscopy, Colorectal cancer screening, Optical colonoscopy, Colorectal cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Adenoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Camera Capsule Endoscopy/ PillCamDevice
Camera Capsule Endoscopy in screening
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| The intervention group | Experimental | If the FIT test is returned and positive the individual can choose either Camera Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) or Optical colonoscopy (OC) as the primary bowel investigation. If OC is chosen, it is performed as standard and the participant outcomes remains analyzed in the intervention group as intention to treat.
If CCE is chosen an out-clinic CCE will be done at one of four regional sites. Overall and segmental bowel preparation grade (Leighton-Rex 1-4) and all pathological findings are reported. If the anal verge is identified without video blackout in the colon the transit is considered complete. Any incomplete CCE investigation will be followed by standard optical endoscopy to the extent needed to investigate the proportion of the colon not visualized by the capsule and remove any detected polyps. If the CCE is complete with complete transit and adequate preparation, individuals with more than two polyps or one polyp over 9 mm will be referred for colonoscopy. Receives: Device: Camera Capsule Endoscopy/ PillCam |
| The control group | No intervention | The control group will be invited to screening as usual. The intervention group will be informed that if the fecal test is returned and positive they can either choose to have an initial colon capsule endoscopy, and only colonoscopy if significant findings are made or an initial colonoscopy as usual. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CCE detection rate of polyps compared to OC
The investigators aim to conduct a large scale randomized trial to investigate the implementation of CCE as part of the Danish screening protocol.
Measured: Within 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Aug 2019
- Study start3 Aug 2020
- Primary completion31 Jan 2024
- Study completion1 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- The investigators will include 124.214 consecutive citizens from the Region of Southern Denmark when they are invited for screening. The participants will be randomized into two groups using an automated randomization tool provided by Odense Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN). The randomization will be based on Zelen's pre-randomization principle and will take place prior to citizens receiving the invitation. The individuals are randomized into 62.107 people allocated in the intervention group and 62.107 allocated in the control group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 2,031 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04049357
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0
- Acronym
- CFC2015
- Status last verified
- Apr 2024
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Deding U, Boggild H, Baatrup G, Kaalby L, Hjelmborg J, Thygesen MK, Schelde-Olesen B, Kobaek-Larsen M; CareForColon2015 study group. Socioeconomic differences in expected discomfort from colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy. Prev Med. 2023 Aug;173:107593. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107593. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
PubMed 37364794Deding U, Boggild H, Kaalby L, Hjelmborg J, Kobaek-Larsen M, Thygesen MK, Schelde-Olesen B, Bjorsum-Meyer T, Baatrup G; CareForColon2015 study group. Socioeconomic differences in discrepancies between expected and experienced discomfort from colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy. Heliyon. 2024 Jul 8;10(14):e34274. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34274. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
PubMed 39100485Baatrup G, Bjorsum-Meyer T, Kaalby L, Schelde-Olesen B, Kobaek-Larsen M, Koulaouzidis A, Kroijer R, Al-Najami I, Buch N, Hogh A, Qvist N, Thygesen MK, Deding U; CareForColon2015 study group. Choice of colon capsule or colonoscopy versus default colonoscopy in FIT positive patients in the Danish screening programme: a parallel group randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2025 Sep 8;74(10):1616-1623. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333687.
PubMed 40210462Deding U, Bjorsum-Meyer T, Kaalby L, Kobaek-Larsen M, Thygesen MK, Madsen JB, Kroijer R, Baatrup G. Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: Interim analyses of randomized controlled trial CareForColon2015. Endosc Int Open. 2021 Nov 12;9(11):E1712-E1719. doi: 10.1055/a-1546-8727. eCollection 2021 Nov.
PubMed 34790535Kaalby L, Deding U, Kobaek-Larsen M, Havshoi AV, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Thygesen MK, Kroeijer R, Bjorsum-Meyer T, Baatrup G. Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun;7(1):e000411. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000411.
PubMed 32601101Nadimi ES, Braun JM, Schelde-Olesen B, Khare S, Gogineni VC, Blanes-Vidal V, Baatrup G. Towards full integration of explainable artificial intelligence in colon capsule endoscopy's pathway. Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 18;15(1):5960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89648-z.
PubMed 39966538Schelde-Olesen B, Koulaouzidis A, Deding U, Toth E, Dabos KJ, Eliakim A, Carretero C, Gonzalez-Suarez B, Dray X, de Lange T, Beaumont H, Rondonotti E, Kopylov U, Ellul P, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Robertson A, Stenfors I, Bojorquez A, Piccirelli S, Raabe GG, Margalit-Yehuda R, Barba I, Scardino G, Ouazana S, Bjorsum-Meyer T. Bowel cleansing quality evaluation in colon capsule endoscopy: what is the reference standard? Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 23;17:17562848241290256. doi: 10.1177/17562848241290256. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39449979
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Bowel Cancer Screening. A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04049357
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CFC2015 / 0
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Adenoma
- Keywords
- Camera Capsule Endoscopy, Colorectal cancer screening, Optical colonoscopy, Colorectal cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,031 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Odense University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigatior believe that implementing camera capsule endoscopy as a filter test to colonoscopy will increase screening participation, increase the number of individuals with detected intermediate- high risk adenomas or cancer, reduce the colonoscopy demand and reduce the number of complications.
Detailed description
The Danish national colorectal cancer screening program includes all citizens aged 50-74 years, who are invited biennially to a fecal test for invisible blood in the stool. If the test is positive the citizen is invited for a colonoscopy. 90% of the test-positive undergo colonoscopy. The detected cancers are at a significant earlier stage and survival from screening detected cancer is higher. It is also expected that cancer incidence will drop due to removal of the advanced adenomas before they develop into cancer. Although initial results are positive, there is room for improvement. Additionally there are rare but serious complications to colonoscopy in the form of bleeding or bowel perforation.
Through four years the investigators have tested the colon capsule endoscopy method, and find that the investigation is associated with significantly less discomfort and that the diagnostic ability to find polyps > 1 cm is better than colonoscopy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- The investigators will include 124.214 consecutive citizens from the Region of Southern Denmark when they are invited for screening. The participants will be randomized into two groups using an automated randomization tool provided by Odense Patient data Explorative Network (OPEN). The randomization will be based on Zelen's pre-randomization principle and will take place prior to citizens receiving the invitation. The individuals are randomized into 62.107 people allocated in the intervention group and 62.107 allocated in the control group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| The intervention group | Experimental | Device: Camera Capsule Endoscopy/ PillCamIf the FIT test is returned and positive the individual can choose either Camera Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) or Optical colonoscopy (OC) as the primary bowel investigation. If OC is chosen, it is performed as standard and the participant outcomes remains analyzed in the intervention group as intention to treat. If CCE is chosen an out-clinic CCE will be done at one of four regional sites. Overall and segmental bowel preparation grade (Leighton-Rex 1-4) and all pathological findings are reported. If the anal verge is identified without video blackout in the colon the transit is considered complete. Any incomplete CCE investigation will be followed by standard optical endoscopy to the extent needed to investigate the proportion of the colon not visualized by the capsule and remove any detected polyps. If the CCE is complete with complete transit and adequate preparation, individuals with more than two polyps or one polyp over 9 mm will be referred for colonoscopy. |
| The control group | No intervention | –The control group will be invited to screening as usual. The intervention group will be informed that if the fecal test is returned and positive they can either choose to have an initial colon capsule endoscopy, and only colonoscopy if significant findings are made or an initial colonoscopy as usual. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 74 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participation in the Danish colorectal screening program
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Camera Capsule Endoscopy/ PillCamCamera Capsule Endoscopy in screening | Device | The intervention group |
Primary outcome
CCE detection rate of polyps compared to OC
Time frame: Within 30 days
The investigators aim to conduct a large scale randomized trial to investigate the implementation of CCE as part of the Danish screening protocol.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 37364794Deding U, Boggild H, Baatrup G, Kaalby L, Hjelmborg J, Thygesen MK, Schelde-Olesen B, Kobaek-Larsen M; CareForColon2015 study group. Socioeconomic differences in expected discomfort from colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy. Prev Med. 2023 Aug;173:107593. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107593. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 39100485Deding U, Boggild H, Kaalby L, Hjelmborg J, Kobaek-Larsen M, Thygesen MK, Schelde-Olesen B, Bjorsum-Meyer T, Baatrup G; CareForColon2015 study group. Socioeconomic differences in discrepancies between expected and experienced discomfort from colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy. Heliyon. 2024 Jul 8;10(14):e34274. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34274. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
- Results publication: PubMed 40210462Baatrup G, Bjorsum-Meyer T, Kaalby L, Schelde-Olesen B, Kobaek-Larsen M, Koulaouzidis A, Kroijer R, Al-Najami I, Buch N, Hogh A, Qvist N, Thygesen MK, Deding U; CareForColon2015 study group. Choice of colon capsule or colonoscopy versus default colonoscopy in FIT positive patients in the Danish screening programme: a parallel group randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2025 Sep 8;74(10):1616-1623. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-333687.
- Results publication: PubMed 34790535Deding U, Bjorsum-Meyer T, Kaalby L, Kobaek-Larsen M, Thygesen MK, Madsen JB, Kroijer R, Baatrup G. Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: Interim analyses of randomized controlled trial CareForColon2015. Endosc Int Open. 2021 Nov 12;9(11):E1712-E1719. doi: 10.1055/a-1546-8727. eCollection 2021 Nov.
- Results publication: PubMed 32601101Kaalby L, Deding U, Kobaek-Larsen M, Havshoi AV, Zimmermann-Nielsen E, Thygesen MK, Kroeijer R, Bjorsum-Meyer T, Baatrup G. Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun;7(1):e000411. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2020-000411.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39966538Nadimi ES, Braun JM, Schelde-Olesen B, Khare S, Gogineni VC, Blanes-Vidal V, Baatrup G. Towards full integration of explainable artificial intelligence in colon capsule endoscopy's pathway. Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 18;15(1):5960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89648-z.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39449979Schelde-Olesen B, Koulaouzidis A, Deding U, Toth E, Dabos KJ, Eliakim A, Carretero C, Gonzalez-Suarez B, Dray X, de Lange T, Beaumont H, Rondonotti E, Kopylov U, Ellul P, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Robertson A, Stenfors I, Bojorquez A, Piccirelli S, Raabe GG, Margalit-Yehuda R, Barba I, Scardino G, Ouazana S, Bjorsum-Meyer T. Bowel cleansing quality evaluation in colon capsule endoscopy: what is the reference standard? Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 23;17:17562848241290256. doi: 10.1177/17562848241290256. eCollection 2024.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Toripalimab Plus Cetuximab and Irinotecan for Second-Line Right-Sided RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Advanced Colon Cancer Phase II Study
Colorectal Cancer (CRC)
Not yet recruiting
FLuorescent Angiography in REduction of Anastomotic Leak in Rectal Cancer Surgery
Rectal Cancer Patients, Rectal Cancer Surgery
Not yet recruiting
A Multicenter Randomized Open-Label Trial Evaluating ctDNA-Guided Interruption Versus Standard of Care Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) Therapy In Patients With Advanced / Metastatic Solid Tumors.
NSCLC (Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), NSCLC (Non-small Cell Lung Cancer)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08165784 in People With PIK3CA-Mutated Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Advanced Breast Cancer, Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Camera Capsule Endoscopy/ PillCam in people with Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma, run by Odense University Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CCE detection rate of polyps compared to OC (time frame: Within 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04049357, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2025.