Achilles Tendon RuptureNCT04050748
Achilles Tendon Lengthening With Traditional vs. Accelerated Rehab
A study testing Achilles tendon repair in people with Achilles Tendon Rupture, run by Henry Ford Health System at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the surgically repaired tendon of a ruptured achilles tendon. We will investigate fixation slippage and tendon creep and correlate how these post-repair findings can contribute to outcomes of tendon repairs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Achilles Tendon Rupture
- What is being tested?
- Achilles tendon repair
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2017to 5 Jun 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with an acute tendon rupture less than 6 weeks were included in this study.
Who cannot join
- Underwent any additional concomitant procedures or tendon transfers, sustained prior ruptures, or had a chronic rupture.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Tendon Lengthening With Traditional vs. Accelerated Rehab Following Achilles Tendon Repair: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the surgically repaired tendon of a ruptured achilles tendon. We will investigate fixation slippage and tendon creep and correlate how these post-repair findings can contribute to outcomes of tendon repairs.
Read the detailed description
pture of the Achilles tendon is a relatively common injury among athletes involved in sports which require rapid direction changes and accelerations, such as soccer, sprinting, and basketball. Approximately 80% of ruptures occur during recreational sports, but it can also occur in sedentary individuals. An increase in recreational sport involvement has coincided with an increase in Achilles tendon ruptures. The most common age group for this injury is between 30 and 40 years old, and it is more likely to occur in males. It is thought that rupture in this age group is highest due to the co-occurrence of competitive sports and age- related degenerative changes.
Tendons changes occur as we age. There is decreased collagen density and fewer cross links, which alters the integrity of the tendon and its sheath. These changes, in addition to repetitive microtrauma, can cause the Achilles tendon to become calcified and thickened. Alteration in the elasticity of the tendon can set the stage for a rupture during abrupt increases in training intensity or during competitions.
The Achilles tendon is the largest tendon in the body, and it receives its blood supply from the gastroc- soleus complex. The blood supply is weakest between 2cm and 6cm from the tendon's insertion on the calcaneus, which is also the region where it is most likely to rupture.
The current recommendation for acute Achilles rupture is surgical repair, but there is no consensus regarding surgical versus nonsurgical treatment (immobilization, rehab, etc.). Surgical repair is thought to reduce the rates of re-rupture but also cause an increased risk of complications. There does not appear to be a difference in pre-injury activity levels between the two methods.
Tendons have excellent healing potential when the torn ends are reasonably approximated. Optimal tendon healing depends on surgical apposition and mechanical stabilization of the tendon ends. Once a tendon has been repaired, the suture material holds the tendon ends together, allowing fibroblasts to produce sufficient amounts of collagen to form a tendon callus.
In contrast with approximated tears, neglected ruptures with retraction of the proximal portion of the tendon heal with scar tissue, resulting in a lengthened, weakened musculotendinous unit. Poor muscle function will result without restoration of normal tendon length. Studies of tendon healing have indicated that early controlled motion and tensile stress applied to a repaired tendon promote earlier organization and remodeling of collagen fibers, decreased scar tissue, and increased strength compared with tendon immobilization.
Previous studies involving Rotator cuff repairs and ACL ligament reconstructions have employed the use of Tantalum Beads and roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis to evaluate the creep or stretch of repaired soft tissue. These studies show that there appears to be soft tissue stretch/creep that occurs as tendon and ligament repairs/reconstructions heal. A surgeon's knowledge of how a repaired soft tissue will deform or stretch will be an undoubted asset to patient care and management. This knowledge will be invaluable for the surgeon in regards to appropriately preparing a tendon for repair, directly repairing the tendon and appropriately tensioning of the repair. It will also give valuable information for rehabilitation protocols and activity limitations post-operatively.
The safety of tantalum material has well been described in the orthopaedic literature. It is currently used in implants ranging from cervical spinal fusions to femoral rods without side effects.
Recently a prospective study looking at creep in rupture biceps tendons has been completed our institution. This study will use stereophotogrammetric analysis to expand our investigations to include Achilles tendon.
- Conditions
- Achilles Tendon Rupture
- Being tested
- Achilles tendon repair
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Achilles tendon repairProcedure or surgery
Patients will be undergoing achilles tendon repair
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early Rehabiliation | Placebo comparator | 6 weeks of non-weight bearing in addition to basic stretching exercises. Receives: Procedure: Achilles tendon repair |
| Accelerated Rehabilitation | Active comparator | Patients will be non-weight bearing for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks patients were transitioned to a boot with two heel wedges and were weight bearing as tolerated. At 4 weeks, patients were transitioned to one wedge, and at 6 weeks patients were weight bearing as tolerated in a flat shoe. Each heel wedge was ¾ inch tall. After 6 weeks, patient's in both groups underwent identical rehab regimens per protocol Receives: Procedure: Achilles tendon repair |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Repair site lengthening
Intratendinous and repair site lengthening were determined
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score
measure symptoms and physical activity levels after being treated for a complete Achilles tendon rupture
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Aug 2019
- Study start1 Jun 2017
- Primary completion5 Jun 2019
- Study completion5 Jun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Achilles Tendon RuptureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Henry Ford Health SystemThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Henry Ford Health System
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Toufic R. Jildeh, Henry Ford Health System
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04050748
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 37283847
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 8 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Okoroha KR, Ussef N, Jildeh TR, Khalil LS, Hasan L, Bench C, Zeni F, Eller E, Moutzouros V. Comparison of Tendon Lengthening With Traditional Versus Accelerated Rehabilitation After Achilles Tendon Repair: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;48(7):1720-1726. doi: 10.1177/0363546520909389. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
PubMed 32203675
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Tendon Lengthening With Traditional vs. Accelerated Rehab Following Achilles Tendon Repair: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04050748
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 37283847
- Conditions
- Achilles Tendon Rupture
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Henry Ford Health SystemUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Jun 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the surgically repaired tendon of a ruptured achilles tendon. We will investigate fixation slippage and tendon creep and correlate how these post-repair findings can contribute to outcomes of tendon repairs.
Detailed description
pture of the Achilles tendon is a relatively common injury among athletes involved in sports which require rapid direction changes and accelerations, such as soccer, sprinting, and basketball. Approximately 80% of ruptures occur during recreational sports, but it can also occur in sedentary individuals. An increase in recreational sport involvement has coincided with an increase in Achilles tendon ruptures. The most common age group for this injury is between 30 and 40 years old, and it is more likely to occur in males. It is thought that rupture in this age group is highest due to the co-occurrence of competitive sports and age- related degenerative changes.
Tendons changes occur as we age. There is decreased collagen density and fewer cross links, which alters the integrity of the tendon and its sheath. These changes, in addition to repetitive microtrauma, can cause the Achilles tendon to become calcified and thickened. Alteration in the elasticity of the tendon can set the stage for a rupture during abrupt increases in training intensity or during competitions.
The Achilles tendon is the largest tendon in the body, and it receives its blood supply from the gastroc- soleus complex. The blood supply is weakest between 2cm and 6cm from the tendon's insertion on the calcaneus, which is also the region where it is most likely to rupture.
The current recommendation for acute Achilles rupture is surgical repair, but there is no consensus regarding surgical versus nonsurgical treatment (immobilization, rehab, etc.). Surgical repair is thought to reduce the rates of re-rupture but also cause an increased risk of complications. There does not appear to be a difference in pre-injury activity levels between the two methods.
Tendons have excellent healing potential when the torn ends are reasonably approximated. Optimal tendon healing depends on surgical apposition and mechanical stabilization of the tendon ends. Once a tendon has been repaired, the suture material holds the tendon ends together, allowing fibroblasts to produce sufficient amounts of collagen to form a tendon callus.
In contrast with approximated tears, neglected ruptures with retraction of the proximal portion of the tendon heal with scar tissue, resulting in a lengthened, weakened musculotendinous unit. Poor muscle function will result without restoration of normal tendon length. Studies of tendon healing have indicated that early controlled motion and tensile stress applied to a repaired tendon promote earlier organization and remodeling of collagen fibers, decreased scar tissue, and increased strength compared with tendon immobilization.
Previous studies involving Rotator cuff repairs and ACL ligament reconstructions have employed the use of Tantalum Beads and roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis to evaluate the creep or stretch of repaired soft tissue. These studies show that there appears to be soft tissue stretch/creep that occurs as tendon and ligament repairs/reconstructions heal. A surgeon's knowledge of how a repaired soft tissue will deform or stretch will be an undoubted asset to patient care and management. This knowledge will be invaluable for the surgeon in regards to appropriately preparing a tendon for repair, directly repairing the tendon and appropriately tensioning of the repair. It will also give valuable information for rehabilitation protocols and activity limitations post-operatively.
The safety of tantalum material has well been described in the orthopaedic literature. It is currently used in implants ranging from cervical spinal fusions to femoral rods without side effects.
Recently a prospective study looking at creep in rupture biceps tendons has been completed our institution. This study will use stereophotogrammetric analysis to expand our investigations to include Achilles tendon.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early Rehabiliation | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Achilles tendon repair6 weeks of non-weight bearing in addition to basic stretching exercises. |
| Accelerated Rehabilitation | Active comparator | Procedure: Achilles tendon repairPatients will be non-weight bearing for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks patients were transitioned to a boot with two heel wedges and were weight bearing as tolerated. At 4 weeks, patients were transitioned to one wedge, and at 6 weeks patients were weight bearing as tolerated in a flat shoe. Each heel wedge was ¾ inch tall. After 6 weeks, patient's in both groups underwent identical rehab regimens per protocol |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with an acute tendon rupture less than 6 weeks were included in this study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Underwent any additional concomitant procedures or tendon transfers, sustained prior ruptures, or had a chronic rupture.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Achilles tendon repairPatients will be undergoing achilles tendon repair | Procedure or surgery | Accelerated Rehabilitation, Early Rehabiliation |
Primary outcome
Repair site lengthening
Time frame: 2 years
Intratendinous and repair site lengthening were determined
1 secondary outcome
Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Aug 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32203675Okoroha KR, Ussef N, Jildeh TR, Khalil LS, Hasan L, Bench C, Zeni F, Eller E, Moutzouros V. Comparison of Tendon Lengthening With Traditional Versus Accelerated Rehabilitation After Achilles Tendon Repair: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;48(7):1720-1726. doi: 10.1177/0363546520909389. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Achilles Tendon Rupture
Not yet recruiting
Early Functional Outcomes After Open Versus Percutaneous Repair of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures
Patients With an Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture, Time From Achilles Tendon Rupture to Surgery of Less Than 2 Weeks
Recruiting
Blood Flow Restriction Exercise in Patients With an Achilles Tendon Rupture
Achilles Tendon Rupture
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Achilles Non-SNIS REGENETEN
Complete Mid-portion Achilles Rupture
RecruitingObservational study
Achilles Tendon Rupture Patient Outcomes at 12 Months
Achilles Tendon Rupture
Recruiting
Effect of BFR Rehab After Achilles Tendon Rupture
Achilles Tendon Rupture
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Achilles tendon repair in people with Achilles Tendon Rupture, run by Henry Ford Health System at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Repair site lengthening (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04050748, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Aug 2019.