AzTrials
AzTrials

Thermogenesis by Different-dosage Ginger Flour FootbathsNCT04051476

Dose-Response Relationship of Ginger Flour Footbaths in Healthy Volunteers

A study testing 3-g footbath, 6-g footbath and 12-g footbath in people with Thermogenesis by Different-dosage Ginger Flour Footbaths, run by ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary and Integrative Medicine at 1 site in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A study to explore whether different dosages of ginger flour in footbaths cause different effects on warmth development as well as on general well-being and the autonomic nervous system. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
3-g footbath, 6-g footbath and 12-g footbath
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
16 participants
Where
1 siteGermany
Study dates
16 Sep 2019to 31 Jan 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Written informed consent
  • Age between 18 and 55 years

Who cannot join

  • Chronic skin lesions at the lower legs or feet
  • Known intolerance or hypersensitivity to ginger preparations
  • Cardiac arrhythmia
  • Cardiac pacemaker
  • Asthma bronchiale
  • Consumption of HRV-modulating medication (especially tricyclic antidepressants, beta blockers)
  • Pregnancy
  • Insufficient knowledge of the german language

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Germany1 site
  • Arcim Institute

    Filderstadt, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70794

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Dose-Response Relationship of Ginger Flour Footbaths in Healthy Volunteers - a Randomized, Controlled, Four-Arm Study With Crossover Design

A study to explore whether different dosages of ginger flour in footbaths cause different effects on warmth development as well as on general well-being and the autonomic nervous system.

Read the detailed description

This is a four-arm randomized controlled trial with crossover design to explore the dose-response relationship of footbaths with different dosages of ginger flour in healthy volunteers, compared to a placebo control (footbath with warm water only). The main focus is on thermogenesis and warmth distribution, as assessed by high-resolution infrared thermography and questionnaire data before, during and after the intervention. In addition, effects on the autonomic nervous system are assessed by measuring various parameters of heart rate variability and pulse wave analysis.

Being tested
3-g footbath, 6-g footbath, 12-g footbath, Warm water footbath
Keywords
Ginger flour footbaths, Dose-response relationship, Thermogenesis, Infrared thermography, Heart rate variability, Healthy volunteers

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 3-g footbathOther

    A ten-minute pre-intervention rest period followed by a 20-minute footbath with 12 l of warm water (40 °C) and 36 g ginger flour (3 g per l), followed by a ten-minute post-intervention rest period.

  • 6-g footbathOther

    A ten-minute pre-intervention rest period followed by a 20-minute footbath with 12 l of warm water (40 °C) and 72 g ginger flour (6 g per l), followed by a ten-minute post-intervention rest period.

  • 12-g footbathOther

    A ten-minute pre-intervention rest period followed by a 20-minute footbath with 12 l of warm water (40 °C) and 144 g ginger flour (12 g per l), followed by a ten-minute post-intervention rest period.

  • Warm water footbathOther

    A ten-minute pre-intervention rest period followed by a 20-minute footbath with 12 l of warm water (40 °C), followed by a ten-minute post-intervention rest period.

Study groups in NCT04051476
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
3-g footbathExperimentalFootbath with 3g ginger flour per liter of water
Receives: Other: 3-g footbath
6-g footbathExperimentalFootbath with 6g ginger flour per liter of water
Receives: Other: 6-g footbath
12-g footbathExperimentalFootbath with 12g ginger flour per liter of water
Receives: Other: 12-g footbath
Warm water footbathPlacebo comparatorFootbath with warm water only
Receives: Other: Warm water footbath

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 2-item warmth perception measure at the feet after the footbath

    Self-reported warmth perception at both feet, assessed with the "Herdecke warmth perception questionnaire" immediately after the footbath (t2). Each item is scored 0-4 (0 = cold; 4 = hot), yielding a mean between 0 and 4.

    Measured: Immediately after the footbath, timepoint 2 (t2)

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. 2-item warmth perception measure at the feet at t1 and t3

    Self-reported warmth perception at both feet, assessed with the "Herdecke warmth perception questionnaire" immediately before (t1) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3). Each item is scored 0-4 (0 = cold; 4 = hot), yielding a mean between 0 and 4.

    Measured: Immediately before (t1) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3)

  2. 2-item warmth perception measure at the hands at t1, t2 and t3

    Self-reported warmth perception at both hands, assessed with the "Herdecke warmth perception questionnaire" immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3). Each item is scored 0-4 (0 = cold; 4 = hot), yielding a mean between 0 and 4.

    Measured: Immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3).

  3. 2-item warmth perception measure at the head at t1, t2 and t3

    Self-reported warmth perception at the head, assessed with the "Herdecke warmth perception questionnaire" immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3). Each item is scored 0-4 (0 = cold; 4 = hot), yielding a mean between 0 and 4.

    Measured: Immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3)

  4. 1-item overall warmth perception measure at t1, t2 and t3

    Self-reported overall warmth perception, assessed with the "Herdecke warmth perception questionnaire" immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3). The item is scored 0-4 (0 = cold; 4 = hot).

    Measured: Immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3)

  5. Warmth perception and skin stimulus at the feet during the footbath

    Self-reported perception of warmth and skin stimulus during the footbath, assessed with a dynamic warmth and skin stimulus visual analog scale (VAS), applied once per minute (0 = cold/no stimulus; 10 = very hot/very strong stimulus).

    Measured: Up to 20 minutes

  6. Well-being at t1, t2 and t3

    Self-reported well-being, assessed with the "Basler Befindlichkeits-Skala" (Basel Mood Questionnaire, BBS) immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3). (BBS: 16 items; 7-point rating scale; higher values represent a better outcome.)

    Measured: Immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3)

  7. Skin surface temperature at the feet at t1, t2 and t3

    Skin surface temperature (°C) at both feet, measured with high-resolution infrared thermography immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3).

    Measured: Immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3)

  8. Skin surface temperature at the lower legs at t1, t2 and t3

    Skin surface temperature (°C) at both lower legs, measured with high-resolution infrared thermography immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3).

    Measured: Immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3)

  9. Skin surface temperature at the hands at t1, t2 and t3

    Skin surface temperature (°C) at both hands, measured with high-resolution infrared thermography immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3).

    Measured: Immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3)

  10. Skin surface temperature in the face at t1, t2 and t3

    Skin surface temperature (°C) in the face, measured with high-resolution infrared thermography immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3).

    Measured: Immediately before (t1), immediately after (t2) and 10 minutes following the footbath (t3)

  11. HRV analysis: HF

    High frequency power band (0.15-0.40 Hz) (ms2) from frequency domain analysis, obtained from ECG recordings throughout the intervention and the pre- and post-intervention rest periods (VitaGuard® 3100 monitor, getemed, Germany).

    Measured: Up to 40 minutes (continuous measurement from the beginning of the pre-intervention rest period to the end of the post-intervention rest-period)

  12. HRV analysis: LF

    Low frequency power band (0.04-0.15 Hz) (ms2) from frequency domain analysis (VitaGuard® 3100 monitor, getemed, Germany).

    Measured: Up to 40 minutes (continuous measurement from the beginning of the pre-intervention rest period to the end of the post-intervention rest-period)

  13. HRV analysis: LF/HF ratio

    LF/HF ratio = ratio of two bands from frequency domain analysis: LF band (0.04-0.15 Hz), HF band (0.15-0.40 Hz) (VitaGuard® 3100 monitor, getemed, Germany).

    Measured: Up to 40 minutes (continuous measurement from the beginning of the pre-intervention rest period to the end of the post-intervention rest-period)

  14. HRV analysis: SDNN

    Standard deviation of normal to normal (NN) intervals (ms) (VitaGuard® 3100 monitor, getemed, Germany).

    Measured: Up to 40 minutes (continuous measurement from the beginning of the pre-intervention rest period to the end of the post-intervention rest-period)

  15. HRV analysis: RMSSD

    Root mean square of successive differences (ms) (VitaGuard® 3100 monitor, getemed, Germany).

    Measured: Up to 40 minutes (continuous measurement from the beginning of the pre-intervention rest period to the end of the post-intervention rest-period)

  16. HRV analysis: pNN50

    Percentage of successive NN intervals that differ from each other by more than 50 ms (%) (VitaGuard® 3100 monitor, getemed, Germany).

    Measured: Up to 40 minutes (continuous measurement from the beginning of the pre-intervention rest period to the end of the post-intervention rest-period)

  17. Pulse wave analysis: Pulse Transit Time

    Pulse Transit Time (PTT, ms), obtained from pulse oximetry recordings throughout the intervention and the pre- and post-intervention rest periods (VitaGuard® 3100 monitor, getemed, Germany).

    Measured: Up to 40 minutes (continuous measurement from the beginning of the pre-intervention rest period to the end of the post-intervention rest-period)

  18. Pulse wave analysis: Reflection Index

    Reflection Index (RI, %), obtained from pulse oximetry recordings throughout the intervention and the pre- and post-intervention rest periods (VitaGuard® 3100 monitor, getemed, Germany).

    Measured: Up to 40 minutes (continuous measurement from the beginning of the pre-intervention rest period to the end of the post-intervention rest-period)

  19. Pulse wave analysis: Perfusion Index

    Perfusion Index (PI, %), obtained from pulse oximetry recordings throughout the intervention and the pre- and post-intervention rest periods (VitaGuard® 3100 monitor, getemed, Germany).

    Measured: Up to 40 minutes (continuous measurement from the beginning of the pre-intervention rest period to the end of the post-intervention rest-period)

  20. Evening morning protocol: perception of warmth and stimulus at the feet

    Self-reported lasting effects of the footbaths at the feet, indicated on a seven-point rating scale (higher values represent a better outcome)

    Measured: On the evening of the footbath, before going to sleep; on the following morning, within 15 minutes after waking up

  21. Evening morning protocol: skin condition

    Self-reported lasting effects of the footbaths on skin condition, indicated on a seven-point rating scale (higher values represent a better outcome)

    Measured: On the evening of the footbath, before going to sleep; on the following morning, within 15 minutes after waking up

  22. Evening morning protocol: general well-being

    Self-reported lasting effects of the footbaths on general well-being, indicated on a seven-point rating scale (higher values represent a better outcome)

    Measured: On the evening of the footbath, before going to sleep; on the following morning, within 15 minutes after waking up

  23. Morning protocol: sleep quality

    Self-reported sleep quality during the night following the footbaths, indicated on a seven-point rating scale (higher values represent a better outcome)

    Measured: In the morning after the footbath, within 15 minutes after waking up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Aug 2019
  2. Study start16 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Jan 2020
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
16 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04051476
Sponsor's protocol ID
SWI_08
Status last verified
Apr 2020
First submitted
7 Aug 2019
Last updated
28 Apr 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Deidentified individual participant data will be made available, in addition to study protocol and informed consent form.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing 3-g footbath, 6-g footbath and 12-g footbath in people with Thermogenesis by Different-dosage Ginger Flour Footbaths, run by ARCIM Institute Academic Research in Complementary and Integrative Medicine at 1 site in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

2-item warmth perception measure at the feet after the footbath (time frame: Immediately after the footbath, timepoint 2 (t2)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Apr 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in