AzTrials
AzTrials

Guided BoneNCT04051905

Bone Loss in Posterior Mandible Postextraction Sockets

An observational study of Guided Bone, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the bone loss after extraction. The surgery protocol is flapless, and the teeth are mandibular premolars or molars leaving sockets with 4 walls intact or at least 3 walls intact and the buccal wall at 80% . This study will include 40 patients Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Guided Bone
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
30 Sep 2019to 6 Mar 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Population of patients aged between 18 and 80 years with one to two posterior mandibular teeth to extract in absence of bone graft and able to benefit from a flapless technique.

Who may be able to join

  • patients requiring tooth extraction
  • aged 18 to 80
  • Patients showing no indication against-General to surgery

Who cannot join

  • Patient with against-indication for surgical treatment.
  • Patients with an important loss of vestibular cortical
  • Patients requiring and accepting a bone graft
  • Unstabilized periodontal disease or aesthetic indication.
  • Inability to maintain a good level of oral hygiene and good cooperation.
  • Higher tobacco consumption has 10cig / day
  • Acute dental infection

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • UHMontpellier

    Montpellier, 34295

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evolution of Bone Volume in the Mandibular Posterior Area After Natural Healing and Flapless Technique

The aim of this study is to evaluate the bone loss after extraction. The surgery protocol is flapless, and the teeth are mandibular premolars or molars leaving sockets with 4 walls intact or at least 3 walls intact and the buccal wall at 80% . This study will include 40 patients

Read the detailed description

Primary objective :

Estimate the percentage of bone volume loss o and the percentage thickness loss of the buccal and palatal cortical for patients who underwent natural healing in the mandibular molar and premolar areas.

Methods :

Before tooth extraction of a premolar or molar in mandibular area by flapless technique, a CBCT preoperative is performed to verify the integrity of cortical and measure the height and width of the residual cavity. Caliper measurements will also be performed during surgery in order to integrate also the thickness of the bone tables and gingival thickness.

After natural healing , the pre-implant scan performed at six months postoperatively will measure the height and width of the grafted cell, to compare measurements and evaluate the dynamics of alveolar resorption.

Conditions
Guided Bone
Keywords
Regeneration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cone beam diagnostic examination

    Cone beam diagnostic examination: Millimeter measurements will be taken at Day 0.

    This examination is an X-ray technique that uses a cone-shaped radiation beam. The measurements will be made on radiographic examinations

    Mucous measures

    • Vestibular cortical Distance, lingual cortical measured in the middle of the cell
    • Depth of the slot lingual cortical side
    • Depth of the cell vestibular cortical side

    Bone measures

    • Thickness of the lingual cortical measured caliper 2 millimeters under the rim
    • Vestibular cortical thickness measured with calipers 2 millimeters under the rim
    • Depth of the slot lingual cortical side
    • Depth of the cell vestibular cortical side

    Measured: Day diagnostic (Day 0)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Cone beam pre implant examination

    Cone beam pre implant examination : millimeter measurements will be taken at 5 or 6 months.

    This examination is an X-ray technique that uses a cone-shaped radiation beam. The measurements will be made on radiographic examinations

    Mucous measures

    • Vestibular cortical Distance, lingual cortical measured in the middle of the cell
    • Depth of the slot lingual cortical side
    • Depth of the cell vestibular cortical side

    Bone measures

    • Thickness of the lingual cortical measured caliper 2 millimeters under the rim
    • Vestibular cortical thickness measured with calipers 2 millimeters under the rim
    • Depth of the slot lingual cortical side
    • Depth of the cell vestibular cortical side

    Measured: 5 or 6 months

  2. Clinical measures

    Clinical measures on the day of surgery

    Bone measures

    • Thickness of the lingual cortical measured caliper 2 millimeters under the rim
    • Vestibular cortical thickness measured with calipers 2 millimeters under the rim
    • Cortical vestibular cortical lingual distance, measured in the middle of the cell
    • Depth of the slot lingual cortical side
    • Depth of the cell vestibular cortical side

    Mucous measure:

    • Gum buccal keratinized
    • Keratinized gingiva lingual
    • Cortical vestibular cortical lingual distance measured in the middle of the cell

    Measured: Day of surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Aug 2019
  2. Study start30 Sep 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion6 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04051905
Sponsor's protocol ID
RECHMPL19_0395
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
8 Aug 2019
Last updated
10 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: NC

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Guided Bone, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cone beam diagnostic examination (time frame: Day diagnostic (Day 0)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in