Cognitive PerformancePhase 4NCT04056650
Assessing the Effectiveness of an N-of-1 Platform Using Study of Cognitive Enhancers
A Phase 4 study testing L-theanine, Caffeine supplement and N1 app in people with Cognitive Performance, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The growing consumer-grade molecular and digital wellness market is generating unprecedented volumes of information to support decision-making around individual health. Current trends suggest the demand for personalized health information, tools, and services will continue to rise in the next decade. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Cognitive Performance
- What is being tested?
- L-theanine, Caffeine supplement and N1 app
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 57 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 18 Oct 2019to 22 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- US resident
- 18 years old or over
- Has an iPhone
- Regular caffeine drinker
Who cannot join
- Pregnant/breastfeeding
- Any contraindication/health issue in which risk is added by consumption of caffeine
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
About this study
Official title: Data Driven Health Decisions in the Wild: A Platform for Actionable N-of-1 Studies
The growing consumer-grade molecular and digital wellness market is generating unprecedented volumes of information to support decision-making around individual health. Current trends suggest the demand for personalized health information, tools, and services will continue to rise in the next decade. What is missing is a reliable, individualized way to turn this data into action. Dialogue around consumer health often ignores the disconnect between measurements and goals. For example, monitoring one's weight is not the same as losing weight, and counting steps is not the same as lowering blood pressure. If individuals are to benefit from data, they must be able to relate changes in their personal data to targeted changes in actions and outcomes. There is a great need and opportunity to adapt the tools and capabilities of modern computer science, statistics, and clinical trial design to the needs of individual patients and consumers. The team at the Institute for Next Generation Healthcare (INGH) has created a smartphone-based app ("N1 app") and study platform that together allow individuals to design, implement, and analyze methodologically sound, statistically robust studies of their personal health data. The focus of the platform will be the creation of single-participant randomized crossover studies, known as n-of-1 trials. The platform employs informatics-based intelligence that automates study design and analysis while simultaneously maintaining high standards of statistical rigor and reproducibility.
These novel methods and tools are designed to empower individuals to make rational, data-driven choices about their own health, maximizing the benefit all will receive from new and existing sources of personal health data.
Read the detailed description
The growing burden of chronic disease in the U.S. and the economics of accountable care are driving a shift toward proactive approaches to disease prevention and health maintenance. At the same time, precision medicine studies continue to reveal substantial heterogeneity in the manifestations of even the most common chronic diseases. The bulk of morbidity and mortality in the U.S. arises from conditions with a significant lifestyle component (e.g. type II diabetes), and responsibility for monitoring and maintaining health largely falls on individuals.
Recent advances in molecular biology, sensors, and digital health technology underlie rapidly growing market availability of products and devices for measuring and monitoring individual health. A vast array of wearable devices, smart home monitors, and health tracking apps provide an unprecedented view of individuals "in the wild" and provide customers with health information once accessible only to researchers. The growing digital health market is generating unprecedented volumes of information to support decision making around individual health, and current trends suggest the demand for personalized health information, tools, and services will continue to grow in the next decade.
What is missing from this technological and scientific growth is a reliable, individualized way to translate data into action. If society wants to prevent diabetes, heart disease, and other chronic illnesses that kill millions of Americans each year, individuals must be empowered to address precursor conditions like obesity, hypertension, and depression. Dialogue around consumer health often fails to address the profound disconnect between measurements and outcomes/goals; e.g. monitoring one's weight is not the same as losing weight, and counting steps is not the same as lowering blood pressure. Data are only useful if they can help individuals identify interventions that work for them. The combination of diet, exercise, drugs/supplements, activities, and lifestyle changes that targets an individual's particular set of health problems is unique to him or her, and it is dependent on a complex web of factors including genetics, environment, and personal lifestyle. If individuals are to benefit from data, they must be able to relate changes in their personal data to targeted adjustments in actions and outcomes. This effectively necessitates conducting a robust trial at the level of the individual to determine the most promising recipe of personal lifestyle adjustments to effect change.
To address these challenges, the researchers have developed a unified statistical framework for producing consistent, interpretable study results from diverse n-of-1 study designs. The analysis framework is the backbone of the initial software platform, which includes modules for study design, e-consent, data ingestion, data analysis, and visualization of results.
To test this platform, the researchers plan to deploy a prototype study that allows individuals to test the cognitive effects of two commonly consumed substances: caffeine and caffeine in combination with a safe, prevalent compound, L-theanine. Each enrolled individual will participate in his/her own n-of-1 trial. After a baseline period where neither treatment is taken, participants will alternate between the two treatments ("caffeine alone" and "caffeine + L-theanine") according to a predefined schedule. Participants will complete a daily cognitive assessment composed of 3 validated cognitive tests administered via the N1 app. The platform will analyze the cognitive assessment data and determine whether there is a statistically meaningful treatment effect for either treatment compared to baseline for any of the 3 cognitive tests for each individual that completes the study.
It is important to state explicitly that the research objectives for this protocol are not related to the efficacy of L-theanine and caffeine. This specific study is designed to allow the researchers to efficiently recruit and enroll subjects so that the underlying statistical methods and software platform for executing n-of-1 trials may be evaluated.
- Conditions
- Cognitive Performance
- Being tested
- L-theanine, Caffeine supplement, N1 app
- Keywords
- N-of-1, Caffeine, L-theanine, Nootropic, Cognition, Individualized
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
L-theanineDrug
up to 250 mg
Caffeine supplementDietary supplement
50-400mg
N1 appDevice
N1 App on mobile device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single caffeinated beverage/supplement | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Dietary Supplement: Caffeine supplement; Device: N1 app |
| Combination caffeine and L-theanine | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: L-theanine; Dietary Supplement: Caffeine supplement; Device: N1 app |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent of individuals who reach study completion
Percent of individuals that complete their n-of-1 trial after study initiation
Measured: Up to 27 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Percent of completed n-of-1 trials that yield statistically meaningful results.
Percent of individual n-of-1 studies that yield statistically conclusive results, for the comparisons (a) caffeine vs. baseline, (b) L-theanine + caffeine vs. baseline.
Measured: Up to 27 days
Study adherence.
Percent of total actions required for the study (e.g. taking assigned treatments and completing daily cognitive assessment) completed by individual and in aggregate.
Measured: Up to 27 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Aug 2019
- Study start18 Oct 2019
- Primary completion22 Dec 2020
- Study completion22 Dec 2020
Why it stopped: Low enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cognitive PerformanceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jason Bobe, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
- Investigators
- Jason Bobe, Principal investigator, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04056650
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GCO 18-0756
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 9 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 12 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Bobe JR, Buros J, Golden E, Johnson M, Jones M, Percha B, Viglizzo R, Zimmerman N. Factors Associated With Trial Completion and Adherence in App-Based N-of-1 Trials: Protocol for a Randomized Trial Evaluating Study Duration, Notification Level, and Meaningful Engagement in the Brain Boost Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jan 8;9(1):e16362. doi: 10.2196/16362.
PubMed 31913135
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Data Driven Health Decisions in the Wild: A Platform for Actionable N-of-1 Studies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04056650
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GCO 18-0756
- Conditions
- Cognitive Performance
- Keywords
- N-of-1, Caffeine, L-theanine, Nootropic, Cognition, Individualized
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Low enrollment
- Enrolment
- 57 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The growing consumer-grade molecular and digital wellness market is generating unprecedented volumes of information to support decision-making around individual health. Current trends suggest the demand for personalized health information, tools, and services will continue to rise in the next decade. What is missing is a reliable, individualized way to turn this data into action. Dialogue around consumer health often ignores the disconnect between measurements and goals. For example, monitoring one's weight is not the same as losing weight, and counting steps is not the same as lowering blood pressure. If individuals are to benefit from data, they must be able to relate changes in their personal data to targeted changes in actions and outcomes. There is a great need and opportunity to adapt the tools and capabilities of modern computer science, statistics, and clinical trial design to the needs of individual patients and consumers. The team at the Institute for Next Generation Healthcare (INGH) has created a smartphone-based app ("N1 app") and study platform that together allow individuals to design, implement, and analyze methodologically sound, statistically robust studies of their personal health data. The focus of the platform will be the creation of single-participant randomized crossover studies, known as n-of-1 trials. The platform employs informatics-based intelligence that automates study design and analysis while simultaneously maintaining high standards of statistical rigor and reproducibility.
These novel methods and tools are designed to empower individuals to make rational, data-driven choices about their own health, maximizing the benefit all will receive from new and existing sources of personal health data.
Detailed description
The growing burden of chronic disease in the U.S. and the economics of accountable care are driving a shift toward proactive approaches to disease prevention and health maintenance. At the same time, precision medicine studies continue to reveal substantial heterogeneity in the manifestations of even the most common chronic diseases. The bulk of morbidity and mortality in the U.S. arises from conditions with a significant lifestyle component (e.g. type II diabetes), and responsibility for monitoring and maintaining health largely falls on individuals.
Recent advances in molecular biology, sensors, and digital health technology underlie rapidly growing market availability of products and devices for measuring and monitoring individual health. A vast array of wearable devices, smart home monitors, and health tracking apps provide an unprecedented view of individuals "in the wild" and provide customers with health information once accessible only to researchers. The growing digital health market is generating unprecedented volumes of information to support decision making around individual health, and current trends suggest the demand for personalized health information, tools, and services will continue to grow in the next decade.
What is missing from this technological and scientific growth is a reliable, individualized way to translate data into action. If society wants to prevent diabetes, heart disease, and other chronic illnesses that kill millions of Americans each year, individuals must be empowered to address precursor conditions like obesity, hypertension, and depression. Dialogue around consumer health often fails to address the profound disconnect between measurements and outcomes/goals; e.g. monitoring one's weight is not the same as losing weight, and counting steps is not the same as lowering blood pressure. Data are only useful if they can help individuals identify interventions that work for them. The combination of diet, exercise, drugs/supplements, activities, and lifestyle changes that targets an individual's particular set of health problems is unique to him or her, and it is dependent on a complex web of factors including genetics, environment, and personal lifestyle. If individuals are to benefit from data, they must be able to relate changes in their personal data to targeted adjustments in actions and outcomes. This effectively necessitates conducting a robust trial at the level of the individual to determine the most promising recipe of personal lifestyle adjustments to effect change.
To address these challenges, the researchers have developed a unified statistical framework for producing consistent, interpretable study results from diverse n-of-1 study designs. The analysis framework is the backbone of the initial software platform, which includes modules for study design, e-consent, data ingestion, data analysis, and visualization of results.
To test this platform, the researchers plan to deploy a prototype study that allows individuals to test the cognitive effects of two commonly consumed substances: caffeine and caffeine in combination with a safe, prevalent compound, L-theanine. Each enrolled individual will participate in his/her own n-of-1 trial. After a baseline period where neither treatment is taken, participants will alternate between the two treatments ("caffeine alone" and "caffeine + L-theanine") according to a predefined schedule. Participants will complete a daily cognitive assessment composed of 3 validated cognitive tests administered via the N1 app. The platform will analyze the cognitive assessment data and determine whether there is a statistically meaningful treatment effect for either treatment compared to baseline for any of the 3 cognitive tests for each individual that completes the study.
It is important to state explicitly that the research objectives for this protocol are not related to the efficacy of L-theanine and caffeine. This specific study is designed to allow the researchers to efficiently recruit and enroll subjects so that the underlying statistical methods and software platform for executing n-of-1 trials may be evaluated.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Device feasibility
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single caffeinated beverage/supplement | Active comparator | Dietary Supplement: Caffeine supplement, Device: N1 app |
| Combination caffeine and L-theanine | Active comparator | Drug: L-theanine, Dietary Supplement: Caffeine supplement, Device: N1 app |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- US resident
- 18 years old or over
- Has an iPhone
- Regular caffeine drinker
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnant/breastfeeding
- Any contraindication/health issue in which risk is added by consumption of caffeine
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| L-theanineup to 250 mg | Drug | Combination caffeine and L-theanine |
| Caffeine supplement50-400mg | Dietary supplement | Combination caffeine and L-theanine, Single caffeinated beverage/supplement |
| N1 appN1 App on mobile device | Device | Combination caffeine and L-theanine, Single caffeinated beverage/supplement |
Primary outcome
Percent of individuals who reach study completion
Time frame: Up to 27 days
Percent of individuals that complete their n-of-1 trial after study initiation
2 secondary outcomes
Percent of completed n-of-1 trials that yield statistically meaningful results.
Time frame: Up to 27 days
Study adherence.
Time frame: Up to 27 days
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Low enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Mar 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31913135Bobe JR, Buros J, Golden E, Johnson M, Jones M, Percha B, Viglizzo R, Zimmerman N. Factors Associated With Trial Completion and Adherence in App-Based N-of-1 Trials: Protocol for a Randomized Trial Evaluating Study Duration, Notification Level, and Meaningful Engagement in the Brain Boost Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jan 8;9(1):e16362. doi: 10.2196/16362.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Cognitive Performance
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Recruiting
Effects of Red Panax Ginseng Supplementation on Cognitive Performance and Emotional Well-Being in Young Healthy Adults
Mental Acuity
RecruitingPhase 4
Improving Morning Strength and Cognitive Performance Using Caffeine or Whole-body Vibration.
Vibration Therapy, Caffeine
Not yet recruiting
The Effects of Ischemic Conditioning in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease
Recruiting
The Effect of Water Temperature on Heart Rate Variability and Cognition
Mental Acuity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jason Bobe principal investigator
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing L-theanine, Caffeine supplement and N1 app in people with Cognitive Performance, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Low enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent of individuals who reach study completion (time frame: Up to 27 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04056650, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2021.