AzTrials
AzTrials

Cognitive PerformancePhase 4NCT04056650

Assessing the Effectiveness of an N-of-1 Platform Using Study of Cognitive Enhancers

A Phase 4 study testing L-theanine, Caffeine supplement and N1 app in people with Cognitive Performance, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The growing consumer-grade molecular and digital wellness market is generating unprecedented volumes of information to support decision-making around individual health. Current trends suggest the demand for personalized health information, tools, and services will continue to rise in the next decade. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cognitive Performance
What is being tested?
L-theanine, Caffeine supplement and N1 app
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
57 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 Oct 2019to 22 Dec 2020
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • US resident
  • 18 years old or over
  • Has an iPhone
  • Regular caffeine drinker

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant/breastfeeding
  • Any contraindication/health issue in which risk is added by consumption of caffeine

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

    New York, New York, 10029

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Data Driven Health Decisions in the Wild: A Platform for Actionable N-of-1 Studies

The growing consumer-grade molecular and digital wellness market is generating unprecedented volumes of information to support decision-making around individual health. Current trends suggest the demand for personalized health information, tools, and services will continue to rise in the next decade. What is missing is a reliable, individualized way to turn this data into action. Dialogue around consumer health often ignores the disconnect between measurements and goals. For example, monitoring one's weight is not the same as losing weight, and counting steps is not the same as lowering blood pressure. If individuals are to benefit from data, they must be able to relate changes in their personal data to targeted changes in actions and outcomes. There is a great need and opportunity to adapt the tools and capabilities of modern computer science, statistics, and clinical trial design to the needs of individual patients and consumers. The team at the Institute for Next Generation Healthcare (INGH) has created a smartphone-based app ("N1 app") and study platform that together allow individuals to design, implement, and analyze methodologically sound, statistically robust studies of their personal health data. The focus of the platform will be the creation of single-participant randomized crossover studies, known as n-of-1 trials. The platform employs informatics-based intelligence that automates study design and analysis while simultaneously maintaining high standards of statistical rigor and reproducibility.

These novel methods and tools are designed to empower individuals to make rational, data-driven choices about their own health, maximizing the benefit all will receive from new and existing sources of personal health data.

Read the detailed description

The growing burden of chronic disease in the U.S. and the economics of accountable care are driving a shift toward proactive approaches to disease prevention and health maintenance. At the same time, precision medicine studies continue to reveal substantial heterogeneity in the manifestations of even the most common chronic diseases. The bulk of morbidity and mortality in the U.S. arises from conditions with a significant lifestyle component (e.g. type II diabetes), and responsibility for monitoring and maintaining health largely falls on individuals.

Recent advances in molecular biology, sensors, and digital health technology underlie rapidly growing market availability of products and devices for measuring and monitoring individual health. A vast array of wearable devices, smart home monitors, and health tracking apps provide an unprecedented view of individuals "in the wild" and provide customers with health information once accessible only to researchers. The growing digital health market is generating unprecedented volumes of information to support decision making around individual health, and current trends suggest the demand for personalized health information, tools, and services will continue to grow in the next decade.

What is missing from this technological and scientific growth is a reliable, individualized way to translate data into action. If society wants to prevent diabetes, heart disease, and other chronic illnesses that kill millions of Americans each year, individuals must be empowered to address precursor conditions like obesity, hypertension, and depression. Dialogue around consumer health often fails to address the profound disconnect between measurements and outcomes/goals; e.g. monitoring one's weight is not the same as losing weight, and counting steps is not the same as lowering blood pressure. Data are only useful if they can help individuals identify interventions that work for them. The combination of diet, exercise, drugs/supplements, activities, and lifestyle changes that targets an individual's particular set of health problems is unique to him or her, and it is dependent on a complex web of factors including genetics, environment, and personal lifestyle. If individuals are to benefit from data, they must be able to relate changes in their personal data to targeted adjustments in actions and outcomes. This effectively necessitates conducting a robust trial at the level of the individual to determine the most promising recipe of personal lifestyle adjustments to effect change.

To address these challenges, the researchers have developed a unified statistical framework for producing consistent, interpretable study results from diverse n-of-1 study designs. The analysis framework is the backbone of the initial software platform, which includes modules for study design, e-consent, data ingestion, data analysis, and visualization of results.

To test this platform, the researchers plan to deploy a prototype study that allows individuals to test the cognitive effects of two commonly consumed substances: caffeine and caffeine in combination with a safe, prevalent compound, L-theanine. Each enrolled individual will participate in his/her own n-of-1 trial. After a baseline period where neither treatment is taken, participants will alternate between the two treatments ("caffeine alone" and "caffeine + L-theanine") according to a predefined schedule. Participants will complete a daily cognitive assessment composed of 3 validated cognitive tests administered via the N1 app. The platform will analyze the cognitive assessment data and determine whether there is a statistically meaningful treatment effect for either treatment compared to baseline for any of the 3 cognitive tests for each individual that completes the study.

It is important to state explicitly that the research objectives for this protocol are not related to the efficacy of L-theanine and caffeine. This specific study is designed to allow the researchers to efficiently recruit and enroll subjects so that the underlying statistical methods and software platform for executing n-of-1 trials may be evaluated.

Being tested
L-theanine, Caffeine supplement, N1 app
Keywords
N-of-1, Caffeine, L-theanine, Nootropic, Cognition, Individualized

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • L-theanineDrug

    up to 250 mg

  • Caffeine supplementDietary supplement

    50-400mg

  • N1 appDevice

    N1 App on mobile device

Study groups in NCT04056650
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single caffeinated beverage/supplementActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Caffeine supplement; Device: N1 app
Combination caffeine and L-theanineActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: L-theanine; Dietary Supplement: Caffeine supplement; Device: N1 app

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percent of individuals who reach study completion

    Percent of individuals that complete their n-of-1 trial after study initiation

    Measured: Up to 27 days

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Percent of completed n-of-1 trials that yield statistically meaningful results.

    Percent of individual n-of-1 studies that yield statistically conclusive results, for the comparisons (a) caffeine vs. baseline, (b) L-theanine + caffeine vs. baseline.

    Measured: Up to 27 days

  2. Study adherence.

    Percent of total actions required for the study (e.g. taking assigned treatments and completing daily cognitive assessment) completed by individual and in aggregate.

    Measured: Up to 27 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2019
  2. Study start18 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion22 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion22 Dec 2020

Why it stopped: Low enrollment

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Device feasibility
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
57 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04056650
Sponsor's protocol ID
GCO 18-0756
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
9 Aug 2019
Last updated
12 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Bobe JR, Buros J, Golden E, Johnson M, Jones M, Percha B, Viglizzo R, Zimmerman N. Factors Associated With Trial Completion and Adherence in App-Based N-of-1 Trials: Protocol for a Randomized Trial Evaluating Study Duration, Notification Level, and Meaningful Engagement in the Brain Boost Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jan 8;9(1):e16362. doi: 10.2196/16362.

    PubMed 31913135

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing L-theanine, Caffeine supplement and N1 app in people with Cognitive Performance, run by Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Low enrollment). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percent of individuals who reach study completion (time frame: Up to 27 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04056650, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Mar 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in