AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung Cancer Stage IIINCT04057196

Self-System Therapy for Older Adults With Lung Cancer

A study testing Self-System Therapy for Older Adults with Advanced Lung Cancer (SST-LC) in people with Lung Cancer Stage III and Lung Cancer Stage IV, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study to use Self-system therapy (SST), to treat depression and lung-cancer-related distress in older adults (65 years and older). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer Stage III, Lung Cancer Stage IV
What is being tested?
Self-System Therapy for Older Adults with Advanced Lung Cancer (SST-LC)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
2 Apr 2020to 24 Jun 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 65 years
  • English-speaking
  • The patient has a diagnosis of late-stage (III-IV) lung cancer and is living at her/his home.

Who cannot join

  • Unable to provide informed consent
  • Visual or hearing impairments that preclude participation
  • Serious mental illness

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Duke University

    Durham, North Carolina, 27705

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Self-System Therapy for Older Adults With Advanced Lung Cancer (SST-LC)

The purpose of this study to use Self-system therapy (SST), to treat depression and lung-cancer-related distress in older adults (65 years and older).

Read the detailed description

The investigator will examine whether delivering the SST intervention will be both feasible and acceptable to study participants. The investigator will also examine whether participation in SST can help alleviate symptoms of depression and distress while helping improve overall functioning in older adults with advanced lung cancer.

Being tested
Self-System Therapy for Older Adults with Advanced Lung Cancer (SST-LC)
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Self-System Therapy for Older Adults with Advanced Lung Cancer (SST-LC)Behavioural

    The SST-LC is a brief structured intervention deliverable by video conference. The new SST-LC protocol will incorporate behavioral strategies designed to meet the needs of older adults with lung cancer, including examining individual and shared expectations for lung cancer care, identifying discrepancies between expectations and realistic possibilities, and modifying stress-exacerbating behaviors.

Study groups in NCT04057196
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Adults with Advanced Lung CancerExperimentalOlder adults with stage III or stage IV lung cancer will be enrolled in the Self-System Therapy intervention to treat illness-related distress, depression, and to enhance self-efficacy via delivery of behavioral coping skills across a period of 12 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Self-System Therapy for Older Adults with Advanced Lung Cancer (SST-LC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Patients That Complete SST Treatment Sessions

    Completion of at least 85% of SST treatment sessions across a 12-week period.

    Measured: up to week 12

  2. Patient Satisfaction With Treatment

    The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8), which assesses treatment credibility (pre-treatment) and effectiveness of/satisfaction with services (post-treatment). An overall score is calculated by summing the respondent's rating (item rating) score for each scale item. For the CSQ-8 version, scores therefore range from 8 to 32, with higher values indicating higher satisfaction.

    Measured: End of study, week 12

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. General Distress as Measured by the CORE-10 (Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation 10) at Baseline

    The CORE-10 measure will be used for rating general distress. The measure comprises ten questions about how participants have been feeling over the past week. Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating greater distress.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. General Distress as Measured by the CORE-10 at 12 Weeks

    The CORE-10 measure will be used for rating general distress. The measure comprises ten questions about how participants have been feeling over the past week. Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating greater distress.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. General Distress as Measured by the CORE-10 at 1-month Follow-up

    The CORE-10 measure will be used for rating general distress. The measure comprises ten questions about how participants have been feeling over the past week. Scores range from 0-40, with higher scores indicating greater distress.

    Measured: 1-month follow-up, up to 4 months

  4. Depression as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) at Baseline

    Depression will be measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). The measure has 21 items. The BDI-II is scored by summing the ratings for the 21 items. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 63, where higher scores indicate greater depression.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Depression as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) at 12 Weeks

    Depression will be measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). The measure has 21 items. The BDI-II is scored by summing the ratings for the 21 items. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 63, where higher scores indicate greater depression.

    Measured: 12 weeks

  6. Depression as Measured by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) at 1-month Follow-up

    Depression will be measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II). The measure has 21 items. The BDI-II is scored by summing the ratings for the 21 items. Each item is rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 63, where higher scores indicate greater depression.

    Measured: 1-month follow-up, up to 4 months

  7. Functioning as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Lung (FACT-L)

    Functioning will be measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy- Lung (FACT-L). The FACT-L is a 36-item measure, each item with a five-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much), measuring overall quality of life (QOL) across five dimensions that are summed together to derive a total score. The total score range is from 0-136. The higher the score, the better the QOL.

    Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up (up to 4 months)

  8. Number of Participants With Participant-reported Mobility Indices Available

    Mobility indices will include participant report of difficulty walking across a room without help from another person or equipment (none, a little vs some, a lot, unable), difficulty walking two to three blocks without help from another person or equipment (none, a little vs some, a lot, unable), and use of assistive device (yes vs no).

    Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up (up to 4 months)

  9. Number of Participants With Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) Scores Available

    Physical Activity will be measured using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE)The instrument is comprised of self-reported occupational, household and leisure activities items over a one-week period. PASE scores are calculated from weights and frequency values for each of 12 types of activity.

    Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 1 month follow-up (up to 4 months)

  10. Number of Participants With Computerized Selves Questionnaire (CSQ) Responses Available at Baseline

    Self-Discrepancy will be measured using the Computerized Selves Questionnaire (CSQ). The CSQ is a computer-based version of the original self-discrepancy questionnaire used by Higgins and colleagues (1986) in which a person is asked to produce a list of eight personal attributes that s/he would ideally like to possess and eight attributes s/he feels s/he ought to possess. To score, qualities in the actual self column are compared with those in the ought self column.

    Measured: Baseline

  11. Number of Participants With Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ) Responses Available at Baseline

    Self-Regulatory Orientation will be measured using the Regulatory Focus Questionnaire (RFQ).The measure has 11 items using 5-point scales, along two sub scales measuring the extent to which an individual believes s/he has been successful in attaining promotion or prevention goals. Six questions quantify Promotion and five questions quantify Prevention the promotion sums must be divided by 6, and the prevention sums must be divided by 5 in order to place scores for both orientations on the same 1-5 scale.

    Measured: Baseline

  12. Treatment Session Fidelity as Measured by Number of Participants Who Were Taught All Skills.

    Trained raters will listen to audio recordings of treatment sessions and use a pre-defined checklist of session content and strategies of the treatment to indicate if session coping skills were taught (yes/no) coded as 1 for yes and 0 for no. Higher scores indicate greater session fidelity.

    Measured: End of study, week 12

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Aug 2019
  2. Study start2 Apr 2020
  3. Primary completion20 May 2021
  4. Study completion24 Jun 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04057196
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00102705
Status last verified
Jul 2022
First submitted
13 Aug 2019
Last updated
3 Aug 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Strauman TJ, Eddington KM. Treatment of Depression From a Self-Regulation Perspective: Basic Concepts and Applied Strategies in Self-System Therapy. Cognit Ther Res. 2017 Feb;41(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10608-016-9801-1. Epub 2016 Aug 29.

    PubMed 28216800
  • Waters SJ, Strauman TJ, McKee DC, Campbell LC, Shelby RA, Dixon KE, Fras AM, Keefe FJ. Self-system therapy for distress associated with persistent low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. Psychother Res. 2016 Jul;26(4):472-83. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2015.1040485. Epub 2015 Jun 16.

    PubMed 26079438
  • Ramos K, Ayaz A, Riley J, Faircloth K, Porter LS, Strauman TJ. Adaptation and Implementation of Self-System Therapy for Older Adults with Advanced Lung Cancer: Pilot Trial Results. Cancers (Basel). 2025 Aug 28;17(17):2809. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172809.

    PubMed 40940906

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Self-System Therapy for Older Adults with Advanced Lung Cancer (SST-LC) in people with Lung Cancer Stage III and Lung Cancer Stage IV, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Aug 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Patients That Complete SST Treatment Sessions (time frame: up to week 12). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04057196, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in