AzTrials
AzTrials

Molar Incisor HypomineralizationNCT04061096

Local Anesthesia in Molar Teeth With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization

A study testing Evaluation of cold test, Evaluation of electrical pulp test and Evaluation of pain during the treatment in people with Molar Incisor Hypomineralization, run by Didem Sakaryali.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare responses to electrical pulp test (EPT) and cold test among molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH)-effected and not MIH-effected carious teeth before and after administration of local anesthesia for caries removal. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Molar Incisor Hypomineralization
What is being tested?
Evaluation of cold test, Evaluation of electrical pulp test and Evaluation of pain during the treatment
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
38 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Sep 2014to 1 May 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy participants

Who cannot join

  • Not being cooperative during treatment procedure

About this study

Official title: Effectiveness Of Local Anesthesia In Molar Teeth With Molar Incisor Hypomineralization-A Prospective Study

To compare responses to electrical pulp test (EPT) and cold test among molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH)-effected and not MIH-effected carious teeth before and after administration of local anesthesia for caries removal.

Read the detailed description

Fifty carious permanent first molar teeth (25 MIH-effected, 25 not MIH-effected) were included. Firstly, radiographic caries depth, International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) codes and MIH levels of teeth were recorded. Then, during the treatment, EPT and cold test were performed before and after the administration of local anesthesia. Visual Analog Scale for Pain was used to evaluate cold test and pain during treatment. When interpreting results, significancy level was stated for the values of p<0.05.

Being tested
Evaluation of cold test, Evaluation of electrical pulp test, Evaluation of pain during the treatment
Keywords
Anesthesia, Cold test, Electrical pulp test
Medical subject headings
Molar Hypomineralization

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Evaluation of cold testDiagnostic test

    Cold test evaluation to describe the sensitivity level of teeth due to induce the hydrodynamic forces in dentine tubules.

  • Evaluation of electrical pulp testDiagnostic test

    Electrical pulp test evaluation to describe the sensitivity level of teeth due to induce the nerve fibers in pulp tissue.

  • Evaluation of pain during the treatmentDiagnostic test

    Describe the sensitivity level due to induce the hydrodynamic forces during treatment procedure.

Study groups in NCT04061096
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MIH-effected carious first permanent molar teethActive comparatorMIH-effected carious permanent first molar teeth were well-demarcated white/yellow or brown/yellow enamel opacities which is a sign for hypomineralization and asymptomatic which meant to be without any spontaneous pain or pain during eating or drinking, percussion or palpation tenderness, formation of abcess or fistula.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Evaluation of cold test; Diagnostic Test: Evaluation of electrical pulp test; Diagnostic Test: Evaluation of pain during the treatment
not MIH-effected carious first permanent molar teethActive comparatorThe carious not MIH-effected teeth were only carious without any hypomineralize areas and asymptomatic which meant to be without any spontaneous pain or pain during eating or drinking, percussion or palpation tenderness, formation of abcess or fistula.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Evaluation of cold test; Diagnostic Test: Evaluation of electrical pulp test; Diagnostic Test: Evaluation of pain during the treatment
MIH-effected non-carious first permanent molar teethPlacebo comparatorMIH-effected teeth were carious permanent first molar teeth with well-demarcated white/yellow or brown/yellow enamel opacities which is a sign for hypomineralization and did not have any sign of caries.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Evaluation of cold test; Diagnostic Test: Evaluation of electrical pulp test; Diagnostic Test: Evaluation of pain during the treatment
not MIH-effected non-carious first permanent molar teethPlacebo comparatornot any signs of being caries or hypomineralization.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Evaluation of cold test; Diagnostic Test: Evaluation of electrical pulp test; Diagnostic Test: Evaluation of pain during the treatment

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cold test results

    Visual Analog Scale for Pain was used to evaluate the cold tests for before and after the local anesthesia. Visual analog scale was used to rate the sensitivity level of patients with 6 different faces representing different levels of pain from "0=no pain" to "10=unbearable pain".

    Measured: Time frame of cold test evaluation was aproximately 1 hour for each participant.

  2. Electrical pulp test results

    Electrical pulp test values at which patients felt sensitive were recorded.

    Measured: Time frame of electrical pulp test evaluation was aproximately 1 hour for each participant.

  3. Pain during the treatment

    Visual Analog Scale for Pain was used to evaluate the pain during the treatment. Visual analog scale was used to rate the sensitivity level of patients with 6 different faces representing different levels of pain from "0=no pain" to "10=unbearable pain".

    Measured: Pain during the treatment was evaluated for aproximately 1 hour for each participant.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Aug 2019
  2. Study start1 Sep 2014
  3. Primary completion1 May 2018
  4. Study completion1 May 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
38 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04061096
Sponsor's protocol ID
Didem Sakaryali
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
10 Aug 2019
Last updated
19 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The authors decided to share the information of this study after the study will be published in a scientific journal.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Evaluation of cold test, Evaluation of electrical pulp test and Evaluation of pain during the treatment in people with Molar Incisor Hypomineralization, run by Didem Sakaryali.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cold test results (time frame: Time frame of cold test evaluation was aproximately 1 hour for each participant.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in