Intestinal Barrier DysfunctionPhase 1NCT04061564
Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction in Healthy Volunteers
A Phase 1 study testing Vagal nerve stimulation in people with Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
This is a proof of concept randomised placebo controlled crossover trial to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation on a stress model of increased intestinal permeability in healthy human subjects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction
- What is being tested?
- Vagal nerve stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 16 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- 13 May 2019to 15 Sep 2019
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy males and females between the ages of 18 - 65
- Participants who are able to give informed consent
- Volunteers should be able to attend the Wingate institute on 2 occasions
- Healthy males and females between the ages of 18 - 65
- Participants who are able to give informed consent
- Volunteers should be able to attend the Wingate institute on 2 occasions
Show all 17Show fewer
- Past medical history of diabetes (type 1 or 2)
- Past medical history of inflammatory bowel disease, Coeliac disease, a diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome or significant gastrointestinal symptoms not otherwise medically diagnosed
- Patients actively taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs) or corticosteroids
- Probiotic or antibiotic intake over the past 3 months
- Pregnant or breast feeding participants
- Participants with known or suspected disorders of the hypothalamo-pituatory axis
- Participants with a history of anaphylaxis
- Chronic disease or any regular medication intake not already specified above; in particular:
- Participants with known or suspected severe cardiac disease (e.g., symptomatic coronary artery disease, prior myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure (CHF);
- Participants with clinically significant abnormal screening 3 lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) e.g. second and third degree heart block, prolonged QT interval, atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, history of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, or clinically significant premature ventricular contraction);
- Participants who are implanted with an electrical and/or neurostimulator device (e.g. cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, vagal neurostimulator, deep brain stimulator, spinal stimulator, bone growth stimulator, cochlear implant, sphenopalatine ganglion stimulator or occipital nerve stimulator).
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
The Wigate Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry
London, N1 1HQ
About this study
This is a proof of concept randomised placebo controlled crossover trial to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation on a stress model of increased intestinal permeability in healthy human subjects.
Intestinal permeability perturbation is a phenomenon which is being increasingly recognised as a contributing factor to a multitude of diseases - including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). There are currently limited effective treatment methods known to improve this intestinal permeability perturbation and the use of vagal nerve stimulation would present itself as an inexpensive, non-invasive and non-pharmacological method of reversing this dysfunction. Vagal nerve stimulation efficacy in reversing stress related intestinal barrier dysfunction is available from proof of concept animal models.
This mechanistic project is an important first step in this field of research and will serve as a basis for further research into the role of vagal nerve stimulation in intestinal barrier dysfunction.
Read the detailed description
Stress - a state which evokes a 'fight or flight' or sympathetic response from the human organism - has been implicated in the propagation of inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Indeed, the risk of relapse in both Crohns disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC) increases in the presence of both acute and chronic stress. The mechanism proposed for this phenomenon includes the ability of stress to induce a breakdown in intestinal barrier function via mast cell- and corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH)-dependent pathways. This intestinal barrier perturbation has been demonstrated experimentally in humans using stress paradigms which could be equated to the relatively mild stressful events experienced in every-day life.
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) appears to be playing a crucial role in stress-induced changes in intestinal permeability. Multiple in vitro and in vivo murine model studies have confirmed that both acute and chronic stress (induced in a mouse by various stress paradigms such as restraint and water emersion) can promote increased intestinal permeability. The underlying mechanism seems to be via the disruption of tight junction proteins along the paracellular space of the intestinal epithelium. The disruption of tight junctions in these stress paradigm models are dependent on acetylcholine and CRH. This effect on intestinal permeability appears to recover within 4 days in murine models.
Similar changes have been described in human models of acute stress. Barclay and Turnberg first showed that intestinal absorption of salt and water was reduced in healthy participants in response to acute stress induced by a short-term stressor paradigm. In this study, they used dichotomous listening as the physiological stressor, whereby the participant is asked to listen to two types of different genres of music in each ear whilst they completed a mentally challenging task. These physiological absorption changes to the intestine's barrier function were found to be mediated by a cholinergic-dependent mechanism. The same authors later showed similar effects with the physical stress paradigm of cold-induced pain in healthy volunteers. Although actual intestinal permeability changes were not measured at the time, one likely mechanism of permeability changes related to these alterations in electrolyte flux is via the claudin-2 paracellular channel, which has since been described. The configuration of this channel is related to ionic flux across the intestinal epithelium and, therefore, would render the epithelium more permeable in times of electrolyte flux. In more recent studies utilising the same cold-pain paradigm, changes in intestinal permeability were paralleled by the release of products of mast cell degranulation, tryptase and histamine. Such changes in intestinal permeability induced by acute stress were mimicked by peripheral administration of CRH and could be reversed by the administration of mast cell stabilisers.
A key role for the parasympathetic nervous system in the perturbation of intestinal permeability by severe physiological stress was derived from the effects of vagal nerve stimulation in animal models. Stimulation of the cervical vagal nerve for 10 minutes prior to giving mice a severe burn protected them from intestinal barrier perturbation and increased intestinal glial fibrillary acidic protein (FGAP) expression, a marker of enteric nervous system glial activation, in vitro and in vivo.This effect was likely, at least in part, due to an α7 acetylcholine receptor dependent mechanism that was demonstrated in both cultured intestinal epithelial cells as well as in enteric glial cells. Further studies have since supported this protective effect of vagal nerve stimulation, suggesting a role for the preservation of the number of dendritic cells in the mesenteric lymph as another potential mechanism.Moreover, the protective effect on the epithelial lining seemed to be via a locally-induced mechanism on the intestine rather than being dependent on a splenic-mediated process as the protective effect held true in splenectomised mice. Stimulation of the parasympathetic nervous system via the vagal nerve therefore seems to play a protective role in modulation of the intestinal barrier function with experimental evidence hinting at its ability to reverse stress induced changes in intestinal permeability.
These results are of significant interest given that the last decade has seen a number of studies supporting the theory of intestinal barrier perturbation in the pathogenesis of IBD.Additionally, the detection of antibodies directed against microbial antigens (such as 'ASCA' - epitopes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Flagellin CBir1) are found in the serum of patients prior to the development of IBD - indicating a disruption of the intestinal barrier function prior to the onset of disease. Furthermore, a genetic predisposition to intestinal barrier perturbation is considered to be a predisposing factor in the development of IBD. Given that it seems that the ANS has a significant role to play in the maintenance of the intestinal barrier function, it would be reasonable to conclude that alterations within the ANS in a susceptible individual may, at least in part, be implicated the development and flares of IBD.
Several serological and urinary markers have been validated as useful tools in measuring intestinal permeability changes in vivo. These include lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), CD-14 and intestinal-type fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) in the serum, as well as an orally-administered dual sugar solution and its by-products in serum and urine. Soluble CD-14 and LBP are part of the LPS inflammatory signalling pathway, thus their levels in serum have been shown to be objective markers for systemic immune activation and damage to gut epithelium. I-FABP is an intracellular protein expressed in the epithelial cells of the mucosal layer of the small and large intestine tissue and is prone to leakage into the blood stream from the enterocytes when intestinal mucosal damage occurs. The oral dual sugar test uses lactulose and rhamnose that are differentially absorbed in the intestine and excreted in the urine. The ratio of lactulose to rhamnose in the urine and serum can be used as a measure of small intestinal permeability when the urine is collected for two hours post ingestion of the test solution.
The therapeutic effect of vagal nerve stimulation in intestinal barrier dysfunction is an important area of study as it could lead to a novel and in-expensive method of treatment of conditions associated with intestinal barrier perturbation. In humans, the auricular branch of the vagus nerve is located directly under the skin, making it a suitable target for transcutaneous stimulation. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device is thus a suitable non-invasive tool for the investigation of transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (tVNS) for reduction of intestinal permeability in humans and has been used in a number of studies utilizing the technique of tVNS in our laboratory.
Corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) is naturally secreted from the healthy human hypothalamus during periods of stress. Intravenously administered CRH possesses the advantage of having a short half-life and is routinely clinically utilised in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Recent evidence has shown that injecting CRH intravenously reliably and significantly increases intestinal permeability in healthy volunteers with no significant adverse effects.This model will be used to induce increased intestinal permeability in healthy human volunteers in order to test the hypothesis that pre-treatment with vagal nerve stimulation can reduce the degree of intestinal permeability induced by CRH.
- Conditions
- Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction
- Being tested
- Vagal nerve stimulation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vagal nerve stimulationDevice
The participant will be administered electrical stimulation at a level specifically set to their comfort. This will be performed using a TENS machine device.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation | Active comparator | The participant will be administered vagal nerve stimulation to each ear (20 minutes in total) Receives: Device: Vagal nerve stimulation |
| Sham transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation | Sham comparator | The participant will be administered sham stimulation to each ear (20 minutes in total) Receives: Device: Vagal nerve stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The effect of vagal nerve stimulation on corticotropin releasing hormone induced intestinal barrier dysfunction
Blood (Intestinal fatty acid binding protein, CD14, Lipopolysaccaride binding protein, dual sugar test result) and urine analyses (the dual sugar test) will be used to determine the intestinal barrier function before and after vagal nerve stimulation. Stress induced intestinal barrier dysfunction will be reproduced with the administration of corticotropin releasing hormone. Intestinal fatty acid binding protein, CD14, Lipopolysaccaride binding protein will be measured quantitatively using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and results will be presented in microgram/litre
. Serum and urine sugar concentrations will be measured using high performance liquid chromatography. Results will be presented as a ratio between the monosaccharide and di-saccharide sugar concentrations (i.e. lactulose to rhamnose and lactulose to mannitol ratios).
Measured: 2 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
The effect of vagal nerve stimulation on autonomic parameter - mean root square difference of RR intervals
Participants' autonomic parameters will be monitored during, before and after vagal nerve stimulation. The mean root square difference of RR intervals will be calculated using a mathematical equation which utilises the time difference between the R-R interval (in seconds) on electrocardiographic monitoring. The mean root square difference will be reported in milliseconds.
Comparisons of these parameters will then be made between the active and sham interventions.
Measured: 2 months
The effect of vagal nerve stimulation on autonomic parameter - low frequency to high frequency ratio of RR intervals
Participants' autonomic parameters will be monitored during, before and after vagal nerve stimulation. Low frequency to high frequency ratio of the RR intervals will be calculated using a mathematical equation which utilises the time difference between the R-R interval (in seconds) on electrocardiographic monitoring. Low frequency to high frequency ratio will be reported as a 'ratio' (no units).
Comparisons of these parameters will then be made between the active and sham interventions.
Measured: 2 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2019
- Study start13 May 2019
- Primary completion15 Aug 2019
- Study completion15 Sep 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Intestinal Barrier DysfunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Queen Mary University of LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Proof of concept randomised, placebo controlled, single blinded, cross over study
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04061564
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QMERC2018/83
- Status last verified
- Jul 2019
- First submitted
- 18 Jul 2019
- Last updated
- 8 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Vagal Nerve Stimulation for Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction in Healthy Volunteers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04061564
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- QMERC2018/83
- Conditions
- Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 16 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Queen Mary University of LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 May 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Sep 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a proof of concept randomised placebo controlled crossover trial to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation on a stress model of increased intestinal permeability in healthy human subjects.
Intestinal permeability perturbation is a phenomenon which is being increasingly recognised as a contributing factor to a multitude of diseases - including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). There are currently limited effective treatment methods known to improve this intestinal permeability perturbation and the use of vagal nerve stimulation would present itself as an inexpensive, non-invasive and non-pharmacological method of reversing this dysfunction. Vagal nerve stimulation efficacy in reversing stress related intestinal barrier dysfunction is available from proof of concept animal models.
This mechanistic project is an important first step in this field of research and will serve as a basis for further research into the role of vagal nerve stimulation in intestinal barrier dysfunction.
Detailed description
Stress - a state which evokes a 'fight or flight' or sympathetic response from the human organism - has been implicated in the propagation of inflammation in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Indeed, the risk of relapse in both Crohns disease (CD) and Ulcerative colitis (UC) increases in the presence of both acute and chronic stress. The mechanism proposed for this phenomenon includes the ability of stress to induce a breakdown in intestinal barrier function via mast cell- and corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH)-dependent pathways. This intestinal barrier perturbation has been demonstrated experimentally in humans using stress paradigms which could be equated to the relatively mild stressful events experienced in every-day life.
The autonomic nervous system (ANS) appears to be playing a crucial role in stress-induced changes in intestinal permeability. Multiple in vitro and in vivo murine model studies have confirmed that both acute and chronic stress (induced in a mouse by various stress paradigms such as restraint and water emersion) can promote increased intestinal permeability. The underlying mechanism seems to be via the disruption of tight junction proteins along the paracellular space of the intestinal epithelium. The disruption of tight junctions in these stress paradigm models are dependent on acetylcholine and CRH. This effect on intestinal permeability appears to recover within 4 days in murine models.
Similar changes have been described in human models of acute stress. Barclay and Turnberg first showed that intestinal absorption of salt and water was reduced in healthy participants in response to acute stress induced by a short-term stressor paradigm. In this study, they used dichotomous listening as the physiological stressor, whereby the participant is asked to listen to two types of different genres of music in each ear whilst they completed a mentally challenging task. These physiological absorption changes to the intestine's barrier function were found to be mediated by a cholinergic-dependent mechanism. The same authors later showed similar effects with the physical stress paradigm of cold-induced pain in healthy volunteers. Although actual intestinal permeability changes were not measured at the time, one likely mechanism of permeability changes related to these alterations in electrolyte flux is via the claudin-2 paracellular channel, which has since been described. The configuration of this channel is related to ionic flux across the intestinal epithelium and, therefore, would render the epithelium more permeable in times of electrolyte flux. In more recent studies utilising the same cold-pain paradigm, changes in intestinal permeability were paralleled by the release of products of mast cell degranulation, tryptase and histamine. Such changes in intestinal permeability induced by acute stress were mimicked by peripheral administration of CRH and could be reversed by the administration of mast cell stabilisers.
A key role for the parasympathetic nervous system in the perturbation of intestinal permeability by severe physiological stress was derived from the effects of vagal nerve stimulation in animal models. Stimulation of the cervical vagal nerve for 10 minutes prior to giving mice a severe burn protected them from intestinal barrier perturbation and increased intestinal glial fibrillary acidic protein (FGAP) expression, a marker of enteric nervous system glial activation, in vitro and in vivo.This effect was likely, at least in part, due to an α7 acetylcholine receptor dependent mechanism that was demonstrated in both cultured intestinal epithelial cells as well as in enteric glial cells. Further studies have since supported this protective effect of vagal nerve stimulation, suggesting a role for the preservation of the number of dendritic cells in the mesenteric lymph as another potential mechanism.Moreover, the protective effect on the epithelial lining seemed to be via a locally-induced mechanism on the intestine rather than being dependent on a splenic-mediated process as the protective effect held true in splenectomised mice. Stimulation of the parasympathetic nervous system via the vagal nerve therefore seems to play a protective role in modulation of the intestinal barrier function with experimental evidence hinting at its ability to reverse stress induced changes in intestinal permeability.
These results are of significant interest given that the last decade has seen a number of studies supporting the theory of intestinal barrier perturbation in the pathogenesis of IBD.Additionally, the detection of antibodies directed against microbial antigens (such as 'ASCA' - epitopes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Flagellin CBir1) are found in the serum of patients prior to the development of IBD - indicating a disruption of the intestinal barrier function prior to the onset of disease. Furthermore, a genetic predisposition to intestinal barrier perturbation is considered to be a predisposing factor in the development of IBD. Given that it seems that the ANS has a significant role to play in the maintenance of the intestinal barrier function, it would be reasonable to conclude that alterations within the ANS in a susceptible individual may, at least in part, be implicated the development and flares of IBD.
Several serological and urinary markers have been validated as useful tools in measuring intestinal permeability changes in vivo. These include lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), CD-14 and intestinal-type fatty acid-binding protein (I-FABP) in the serum, as well as an orally-administered dual sugar solution and its by-products in serum and urine. Soluble CD-14 and LBP are part of the LPS inflammatory signalling pathway, thus their levels in serum have been shown to be objective markers for systemic immune activation and damage to gut epithelium. I-FABP is an intracellular protein expressed in the epithelial cells of the mucosal layer of the small and large intestine tissue and is prone to leakage into the blood stream from the enterocytes when intestinal mucosal damage occurs. The oral dual sugar test uses lactulose and rhamnose that are differentially absorbed in the intestine and excreted in the urine. The ratio of lactulose to rhamnose in the urine and serum can be used as a measure of small intestinal permeability when the urine is collected for two hours post ingestion of the test solution.
The therapeutic effect of vagal nerve stimulation in intestinal barrier dysfunction is an important area of study as it could lead to a novel and in-expensive method of treatment of conditions associated with intestinal barrier perturbation. In humans, the auricular branch of the vagus nerve is located directly under the skin, making it a suitable target for transcutaneous stimulation. A transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) device is thus a suitable non-invasive tool for the investigation of transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation (tVNS) for reduction of intestinal permeability in humans and has been used in a number of studies utilizing the technique of tVNS in our laboratory.
Corticotropin releasing hormone (CRH) is naturally secreted from the healthy human hypothalamus during periods of stress. Intravenously administered CRH possesses the advantage of having a short half-life and is routinely clinically utilised in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Recent evidence has shown that injecting CRH intravenously reliably and significantly increases intestinal permeability in healthy volunteers with no significant adverse effects.This model will be used to induce increased intestinal permeability in healthy human volunteers in order to test the hypothesis that pre-treatment with vagal nerve stimulation can reduce the degree of intestinal permeability induced by CRH.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Proof of concept randomised, placebo controlled, single blinded, cross over study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation | Active comparator | Device: Vagal nerve stimulationThe participant will be administered vagal nerve stimulation to each ear (20 minutes in total) |
| Sham transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation | Sham comparator | Device: Vagal nerve stimulationThe participant will be administered sham stimulation to each ear (20 minutes in total) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Healthy males and females between the ages of 18 - 65
- Participants who are able to give informed consent
- Volunteers should be able to attend the Wingate institute on 2 occasions
- Healthy males and females between the ages of 18 - 65
- Participants who are able to give informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vagal nerve stimulationThe participant will be administered electrical stimulation at a level specifically set to their comfort. This will be performed using a TENS machine device. | Device | Active transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation, Sham transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation |
Primary outcome
The effect of vagal nerve stimulation on corticotropin releasing hormone induced intestinal barrier dysfunction
Time frame: 2 months
Blood (Intestinal fatty acid binding protein, CD14, Lipopolysaccaride binding protein, dual sugar test result) and urine analyses (the dual sugar test) will be used to determine the intestinal barrier function before and after vagal nerve stimulation. Stress induced intestinal barrier dysfunction will be reproduced with the administration of corticotropin releasing hormone. Intestinal fatty acid binding protein, CD14, Lipopolysaccaride binding protein will be measured quantitatively using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and results will be presented in microgram/litre . Serum and urine sugar concentrations will be measured using high performance liquid chromatography. Results will be presented as a ratio between the monosaccharide and di-saccharide sugar concentrations (i.e. lactulose to rhamnose and lactulose to mannitol ratios).
2 secondary outcomes
The effect of vagal nerve stimulation on autonomic parameter - mean root square difference of RR intervals
Time frame: 2 months
The effect of vagal nerve stimulation on autonomic parameter - low frequency to high frequency ratio of RR intervals
Time frame: 2 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Mar 2022.
Related trials for Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
A Pilot Study: Micro and NanoPlastics in Association With Crohn's Disease
Crohn's Disease (CD)
Recruiting
The Enteric Nervous System in Spinal Cord Injury: Study of the Enteric Nervous System and the Intestinal Epithelial Barrier Via Colonic Biopsies in Spinal Cord Injury Patients
Spinal Cord Injuries
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Vagal nerve stimulation in people with Intestinal Barrier Dysfunction, run by Queen Mary University of London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 17 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The effect of vagal nerve stimulation on corticotropin releasing hormone induced intestinal barrier dysfunction (time frame: 2 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2022.