AzTrials
AzTrials

Calcaneus FractureNCT04063657

External Fixation Versus Splinting of Acute Calcaneus Fractures

A study testing External fixator and Splinting in people with Calcaneus Fracture, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aim: Determine if external fixation decreases soft tissue complications compared to splinting. Determine if external fixation decreases time to definitive surgical stabilization and improves final fixation compared to splinting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 69 years
Conditions the study is for
Calcaneus Fracture
What is being tested?
External fixator and Splinting
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
14 Jun 2019to 3 Sep 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 69 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Voluntary consent
  • Age 18 to 69
  • Clinical and/or advanced imaging confirming an acute calcaneal fracture that has occurred within 2 days of which, eventually definitive surgery is recommended/accepted.
  • Unable to consent

Who cannot join

  • Age <18
  • Prior surgery of the affected extremity
  • Prisoners
  • Pregnant women
  • Inflammatory arthritis
  • Non-English-speaking patients

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California, Davis Medical Center

    Sacramento, California, 95817

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: External Fixation Versus Splinting of Acute Calcaneus Fractures Prior to Definitive Surgery

Aim:

  • Determine if external fixation decreases soft tissue complications compared to splinting.
  • Determine if external fixation decreases time to definitive surgical stabilization and improves final fixation compared to splinting.
  • Determine if external fixation improves functional outcomes as evaluated by validated functional scoring systems.

Hypothesis:

  • External fixation improves definitive fixation and functional outcomes of acute calcaneal fractures with decreased complication rates compared to splinting
Being tested
External fixator, Splinting
Keywords
Staged External Fixation, Splinting, Soft tissue complications

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • External fixatorProcedure or surgery

    Patients will be placed in an external fixator followed by open versus closed surgical stabilization of their calcaneus fracture when their soft tissue is appropriate for surgery.

  • SplintingProcedure or surgery

    Patients will be placed in a short leg splint followed by open versus closed surgical stabilization of their calcaneus fracture when their soft tissue is appropriate for surgery.

Study groups in NCT04063657
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
External fixationActive comparatorAdults diagnosed with an acute (<2 days from injury) calcaneal fracture recommended for operative treatment will be placed in external fixator until the patient is deemed clinically appropriate for definitive surgical fixation.
Receives: Procedure: External fixator
SplintingActive comparatorAdults diagnosed with an acute (<2 days from injury) calcaneal fracture recommended for operative treatment will be placed in a short leg splint until the patient is deemed clinically appropriate for definitive surgical fixation.
Receives: Procedure: Splinting

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Definitive Surgery

    Duration of time from injury to definitive surgery

    Measured: Within 2 weeks from injury

  2. Soft Tissue Complications

    Incidence of infection, dehiscence and need for soft tissue coverage

    Measured: Assessed at 2 weeks after surgery

  3. Soft Tissue Complications

    Incidence of infection, dehiscence and need for soft tissue coverage

    Measured: Assessed at 6 weeks after surgery

  4. Soft Tissue Complications

    Incidence of infection, dehiscence and need for soft tissue coverage

    Measured: Assessed at 12 weeks after surgery

  5. Soft Tissue Complications

    Incidence of infection, dehiscence and need for soft tissue coverage

    Measured: Assessed at 6 months after surgery

  6. Soft Tissue Complications

    Incidence of infection, dehiscence and need for soft tissue coverage

    Measured: Assessed at 12 months after surgery

  7. Soft Tissue Complications

    Incidence of infection, dehiscence and need for soft tissue coverage

    Measured: Assessed at 24 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Union Rate

    Assessment of fracture healing

    Measured: Plain xrays at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. CT scan at 1 year.

  2. Radiographic Parameters - Bohler's Angle

    Bohler's angle

    Measured: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery

  3. Radiographic Parameters - Calcaneal Height

    Calcaneal height

    Measured: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery

  4. Radiographic Parameters - Angle of Gissan

    Angle of Gissan

    Measured: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery

  5. Radiographic Parameters - Calcaneal Width

    Calcaneal width

    Measured: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery

  6. Radiographic Parameters - Calcaneal Length

    Calcaneal length

    Measured: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery

  7. Functional Outcomes - VAS

    Assess Visual Analogue pain score(VAS). This will be a patient reported measure from 0-10, minimum score of 0 (no pain), maximum score of 10 (most pain).

    Measured: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery.

  8. Functional Outcomes - FFI-R

    Revised foot function index questionnaire (FFI-R) will assess patient pain, stiffness, activity, difficulties with ambulation, and social issues. The score is tabulated from 34 questions answered 1-5 (1= none of the time, 5= All of the time, scale 34-170). Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.

    Measured: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery

  9. Functional Outcomes - FAAM ADL

    Foot and Ankle Ability measure activities of daily living (FAAM ADL) is a 21-item activities assessing the patient's functionality related to their activities of daily living. The response to each item is scored from 4 to 0, with 4 being ''no difficulty'' and 0 being ''unable to do." Scale 0-84. Higher scores indicate a more favorable functional level.

    Measured: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery

  10. Functional Outcomes - FAAM Sport

    Foot and Ankle Ability measure activities of daily living (FAAM Sport) is a 8-item questionnaire assess the patient's ability to participate in athletic activities. The response to each item is scored from 4 to 0, with 4 being ''no difficulty'' and 0 being ''unable to do." Scale 0-32. Higher scores indicate a more favorable functional level.

    Measured: Assessed at 2, 6, & 12 weeks, and 6, 12, & 24 months after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2019
  2. Study start14 Jun 2019
  3. Primary completion3 Sep 2019
  4. Study completion3 Sep 2019

Why it stopped: Study was slow to recruit. PI decided to close study to focus on other trials.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04063657
Sponsor's protocol ID
1436830
Status last verified
Jan 2022
First submitted
7 Aug 2019
Last updated
9 Feb 2022
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing External fixator and Splinting in people with Calcaneus Fracture, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Feb 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Feb 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Definitive Surgery (time frame: Within 2 weeks from injury). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Feb 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in