AzTrials
AzTrials

Dry EyeNCT04063735

Alleviating Effects Against Dry Eye by Oral Intake of Cordyceps Cicadae Mycelia

A study testing Cordyceps Cicadae Mycelia in people with Dry Eye and Supplement, run by David Pei-Cheng Lin.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cordyceps cicadae mycelia was tested for amelioration of dry eye symptoms through dietary supplementation. Its efficacy in relief of human dry eye status was assessed by randomized, double-blinded tests, including multiple assessments. The results were compared between the placebo group and the experimental group. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Dry Eye, Supplement
What is being tested?
Cordyceps Cicadae Mycelia
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
97 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Dec 2016to 30 Nov 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged from 20 to 60 with dry eye symptoms confirmed by ophthalmologists, and without chronic diseases.

Who cannot join

  • Those vulnerable to damages or loss of self-conscious, or behavior capacity, or with major illness or with critical diseases.

About this study

Cordyceps cicadae mycelia was tested for amelioration of dry eye symptoms through dietary supplementation. Its efficacy in relief of human dry eye status was assessed by randomized, double-blinded tests, including multiple assessments. The results were compared between the placebo group and the experimental group.

Read the detailed description

Former animal studies had shown that Cordyceps cicadae mycelia can effectively ameliorate UVB-induced dry eye symptoms. This study further investigated its efficacy in human dry eye status by randomized, double-blinded tests, including dry eye questionnaires, blood tests, salivary tests, tear volume test, intra-ocular pressure assessments, ocular surface photography, corneal fluorescein stain, tear film breakup time test, fundus photography, and cornea impression cytology. All tests were performed again after 3 months of dietary supplement of either samples or placebo. A total of 97 participants completed the trial. The data were analyzed by paired-t test and compared between the placebo and the experimental groups.

Conditions
Dry Eye, Supplement
Being tested
Cordyceps Cicadae Mycelia, Placebo
Keywords
Dry Eye, Cordyceps cicadae mycelia
Medical subject headings
Dry Eye Syndromes

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cordyceps Cicadae MyceliaDietary supplement

    Cordyceps Cicadae Mycelia supplement for 3 months

  • PlaceboDietary supplement

    Placebo was given to participants.

Study groups in NCT04063735
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental groupExperimentalsupplement was given for 3 months.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Cordyceps Cicadae Mycelia
Placebo groupPlacebo comparatorPlacebo was given for 3 months.
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. tear film breakup time

    Tear film breakup time was used for tear quality assessments.

    Measured: day 1 to day 90.

  2. Cornea surface scores based on Efron grading system

    Cornea surface scores based on Efron grading system was used for assessment of cornea surface damages.

    Measured: day 1 to day 90.

  3. Intra-ocular pressure

    Intra-ocular pressure was taken to assess eye pressure.

    Measured: day 1 to day 90.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2019
  2. Study start1 Dec 2016
  3. Primary completion7 Feb 2017
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized double-blinded placebo study
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
97 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04063735
Sponsor's protocol ID
16-019-A2
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
15 Aug 2019
Last updated
21 Aug 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cordyceps Cicadae Mycelia in people with Dry Eye and Supplement, run by David Pei-Cheng Lin.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

tear film breakup time (time frame: day 1 to day 90.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in